Hi :)
[sighs deeply] So some people on this mailing-list demand that we all
change which email-client we use to the one that they use and then set
it to a non-default way.
Many of us disagree with that sort of philosophy, especially for a
User Support mailing-list. In my opinion we should be
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014 11:46:00 +
Tom Davies tomc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi :)
[sighs deeply] So some people on this mailing-list demand that we all
change which email-client we use to the one that they use and then set
it to a non-default way.
[snip]
I only recall seeing one suggestion that
On 3/4/2014 3:01 PM, Carl Paulsen carlpaul...@comcast.net wrote:
OK, thanks, this helps. I hadn't understood that the only way to ADD
the button was to right-click. Sometimes it's helpful to be explicit.
Not everyone knows all the details of every software.
From my original email:
On
On 3/4/2014 3:01 PM, Carl Paulsen carlpaul...@comcast.net wrote:
So I had the Reply Lists (or Smart Reply?) button on individual email
windows all along (whether showing all headers or not).
NO.
There is a separate 'Reply List' button.
There is a 'Smart Reply' button.
Two different buttons.
On 3/4/2014 7:37 PM, Doug dmcgarr...@optonline.net wrote:
I'm using Thunderbird latest rev (24.3.0) in PCLOS, and customize only
shows the usual reply stuff --reply, reply all, reply list.
Are you customizing the MAIN Menu Toolbar (at the very top), or the MAIL
HEADER Toolbar (that contains
On 3/5/2014 11:02 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Again, the 'Smart Reply' button is ONLY available in the HEADER toolbar.
And more importantly, can only be ADDED TO the EMail Header Toolbar, NOT
the main Menu toolbar up top. If you are trying to drag it to the top
one, it
On Mon, 03 Mar 2014 21:14:04 +0100
yahoo-pier_andreit pier_andr...@yahoo.it wrote:
[snip]
dear jim, I'm using thunderbird, and I have the same problem, if I
press
ctrlR the reply is to the sender non to the list, and I would like
ctrlto
reply to the list not to the sender, so I have to
On 3/3/2014 9:12 PM, Carl Paulsen carlpaul...@comcast.net wrote:
Tanstaafl, where is the smart reply button? I'm running T-Bird 24.3.0
(latest update for me) and see no such button. I have either Reply or
Reply to List, but no smart button and no preference or option for such
a button that I
On 3/4/2014 10:37 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 3/3/2014 9:12 PM, Carl Paulsen carlpaul...@comcast.net wrote:
Tanstaafl, where is the smart reply button? I'm running T-Bird 24.3.0
(latest update for me) and see no such button. I have either Reply or
Reply to List, but no
I still see no Smart Reply but in the email window itself there is the
Reply Lists button, which I will be trying to use. I see no option for
any toolbar, menu item or anything else resembling what you are talking
about (I also see no images in the bug post you link to). Makes me
wonder if
On 3/4/14, 1:51 PM, Carl Paulsen wrote:
I still see no Smart Reply but in the email window itself there is the
Reply Lists button, which I will be trying to use. I see no option
for any toolbar, menu item or anything else resembling what you are
talking about (I also see no images in the bug
On 3/4/2014 1:51 PM, Carl Paulsen carlpaul...@comcast.net wrote:
I still see no Smart Reply but in the email window itself
Like I said...
YOU HAVE TO ADD IT.
Right-click (CMD-Click on a Mac) in the email Header pane, and click
'Customize'.
Then you should be able to drag-remove the plain
OK, thanks, this helps. I hadn't understood that the only way to ADD
the button was to right-click. Sometimes it's helpful to be explicit.
Not everyone knows all the details of every software.
So I had the Reply Lists (or Smart Reply?) button on individual email
windows all along (whether
On 03/04/2014 02:31 PM, John Mary Linge wrote:
On 3/4/14, 1:51 PM, Carl Paulsen wrote:
I still see no Smart Reply but in the email window itself there is
the Reply Lists button, which I will be trying to use. I see no
option for any toolbar, menu item or anything else resembling what
you
On 03/04/2014 02:40 PM, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 3/4/2014 1:51 PM, Carl Paulsen carlpaul...@comcast.net wrote:
I still see no Smart Reply but in the email window itself
Like I said...
YOU HAVE TO ADD IT.
Right-click (CMD-Click on a Mac) in the email Header pane, and click
'Customize'.
Then
On 3/2/2014 1:53 PM, Jim Seymour jseym...@linxnet.com wrote:
In fact: Because some people, for some reason, feel the need to set
Reply-to to their own email address: I've a procmail rule that
resets those to the mailing list.
That is rude and arrogant and you should *never* do that.
Some
On Mon, 03 Mar 2014 07:25:36 -0500
Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 3/2/2014 1:53 PM, Jim Seymour jseym...@linxnet.com wrote:
In fact: Because some people, for some reason, feel the need to set
Reply-to to their own email address: I've a procmail rule that
resets those to the
On 3/3/2014 7:56 AM, Jim Seymour jseym...@linxnet.com wrote:
On Mon, 03 Mar 2014 07:25:36 -0500
Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 3/2/2014 1:53 PM, Jim Seymour jseym...@linxnet.com wrote:
In fact: Because some people, for some reason, feel the need to set
Reply-to to their own
Yes, I so agree with you.
From: Jim Seymour jseym...@linxnet.com
Date: Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 6:56 AM
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Reply-To?
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
On Mon, 03 Mar 2014 07:25:36 -0500
Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 3/2/2014 1:53 PM, Jim
On 3/3/2014 9:58 AM, Jim Seymour jseym...@linxnet.com wrote:
On Mon, 03 Mar 2014 09:46:06 -0500
Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
[snip]
If you cannot see the difference then I guess we have nothing more to
discuss, because I don't (try to) discuss things with stupid people.
[snip]
Hi :)
+1
to the point that conversations begun on the mailing list should stay on-list.
I really liked that i could just reply to this post and it went
straight to the list without also going to a selection of other
people. That is the way this mailing list used to work all the time
and it
On 03/03/2014 01:56 PM, Jim Seymour wrote:
On Mon, 03 Mar 2014 07:25:36 -0500
Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
tagliuzzo
egards,
Jim
dear jim, I'm using thunderbird, and I have the same problem, if I press
ctrlR the reply is to the sender non to the list, and I would like to
reply
I'm not Jim, but probably know far more than he does about Thunderbird.
On 3/3/2014 3:14 PM, yahoo-pier_andreit pier_andr...@yahoo.it wrote:
dear jim, I'm using thunderbird, and I have the same problem, if I press
ctrlR the reply is to the sender non to the list, and I would like to
reply to
Tanstaafl, where is the smart reply button? I'm running T-Bird 24.3.0
(latest update for me) and see no such button. I have either Reply or
Reply to List, but no smart button and no preference or option for such
a button that I can find. I'm on a Mac. Sure would be helpful.
Carl
On
On 16/08/2012 at 16:28, anne-ology lagin...@gmail.com wrote:
BTW - what is PM ?
Personal (Private) Message.
Wikipedia article showed up as fourth entry when I asked Google about
PM forum.
But since Google personalizes search results (according to past queries of
user), it's much harder to
Hi Anne and Jay,
Le 2012-08-16 00:53, Jay Lozier a écrit :
(3) Thank you for standing up against these list-members who respond
at the bottom !
Actually there are two different philosophies. Top posting works best
when only a few people are actively involved in the conversation and all
are
På Thu, 16 Aug 2012 02:29:24 +0200, skrev Andrew Brager
apb3...@bak.rr.com:
Thunderbird has the option. I don't know what other clients have it, if
any.
Opera have that option too.
But it still doesn't make the idea of making the From: the default To:
address for replies any better.
It
: Marc Paré m...@marcpare.com
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: Reply settings on this list have changed
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Thursday, 16 August, 2012, 7:03
Hi Anne and Jay,
Le 2012-08-16 00:53, Jay Lozier a écrit :
(3) Thank you for standing up against these list-members who
On 08/16/2012 03:11 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
Bottom posting is a good way to alienate most of the target
I strongly dislike bottom posting Just saying... If it were
obviously the correct and logical choice, then I expect more people
would tend towards it naturally.
I usually follow
to reach the list.
Regards from
Tom :)
--- On Thu, 16/8/12, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak and...@pitonyak.org wrote:
From: Andrew Douglas Pitonyak and...@pitonyak.org
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Reply settings on this list have changed
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Thursday, 16 August
Thanks for clearing up that acronym.
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Jay Lozier jsloz...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/15/2012 08:48 PM, anne-ology wrote:
(2) Just what - or who - is RFC ???
Request for comments
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to:
yes, I agree with you; and thanks for your kind words.
For the listers who promote Thunderbird Opera, the problems, some
of which are noted here, persist ;-(
BTW - what is PM ? ... Prime Minister doesn't fit into the context
;-)
difficult to keep things on-list and more
difficult for new arrivals to the list. Perfect!!
Regards from
Tom :)
From: Marc Paré m...@marcpare.com
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: Reply settings on this list have changed
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Thursday, 16 August, 2012, 7:03
is
brilliant! It makes it more difficult to keep things on-list and more
difficult for new arrivals to the list. Perfect!!
Regards from
Tom :)
From: Marc Paré m...@marcpare.com
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: Reply settings on this list have changed
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Date
How old do you think engineering is?
granted this term existed, yet the definition has changed
post-industrialization.
Here are a couple sites which seem to be fairly accurate
historically -
http://www.creatingtechnology.org/history.htm
On 08/16/2012 07:14 AM, anne-ology wrote:
Thanks for clearing up that acronym.
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=RFC
You can repeat the same on Google, Yahoo!, Bing, Wikipedia et al.
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Jay Lozier jsloz...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/15/2012 08:48 PM,
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012, Tom Davies wrote:
The question is not about wrong or right imo, it's about whether we
want new people to start using LO and to feel welcome or do we want
to discourage all newcomers?
don't assume most new-comers are not familiar with mailing lists. some
aren't but many
I think the safe response when using the changed list settings is use
Reply-all. For simplicity, the only instruction to users of the lists
that works consistently is Reply-all.
steve
On 2012-08-16 05:22, Jay Lozier wrote:
On 08/15/2012 12:09 PM, Dan Hall wrote:
In Outlook 2003 SP3 - Reply
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Reply settings on this list have
changed
On 08/14/2012 07:24 PM, anne-ology wrote:
no, this 'reply to list' option does not exist for many of us.
Do you have a reply all option?
You may want to check what email address is used
@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Reply settings on this list have
changed
On 08/14/2012 07:24 PM, anne-ology wrote:
no, this 'reply to list' option does not exist for many of us.
Do you have a reply all option?
You may want to check what email address is used
exactly;
this requires having to delete the extraneous e-addresses ;-)
Therefore, I'd like to know what is the time savings in this vs.
having the reply go to the list ???
This change isn't anymore logical than some of these responders who
must think we should
On 8/15/2012 5:11 PM, anne-ology wrote:
I find deleting to be slightly easier than copy paste in order to
include the original sender. Further, what difference does it make to
you how many copies the original sender receives? If I happen to
receive two copies of a response to me,
Thunderbird has the option. I don't know what other clients have it, if
any.
On 8/15/2012 5:00 PM, anne-ology wrote:
exactly - well, there is a third option [to forward ;-) ]
And those are the only options available in the web-based e-mails as
well.
BTW - I've never
(1) I'm not referring to the sender vs. the list ... Im referring
to all the others' which are placed in the cc;
by clicking on 'reply all', all the e-addresses are picked up -
therefore, I have to be sure that the 'to' has the sender's e-address and
the 'cc' has the list
On 08/15/2012 08:48 PM, anne-ology wrote:
(1) I'm not referring to the sender vs. the list ... Im referring
to all the others' which are placed in the cc;
by clicking on 'reply all', all the e-addresses are picked up -
therefore, I have to be sure that the 'to' has the
On 08/13/2012 12:50 PM, Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
2012/8/13 Anthony Easthope antiso...@myopera.com:
Opera Webmail. I move around to much on computers to use a dedicated
mail client. http://mail.opera.com
I actually have an Opera Mail address, but I didn't use it for years
now; maybe it's
On 08/14/2012 02:33 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 08/13/2012 12:50 PM, Johnny Rosenberg wrote:
2012/8/13 Anthony Easthope antiso...@myopera.com:
Opera Webmail. I move around to much on computers to use a dedicated
mail client. http://mail.opera.com
I actually have an Opera Mail address, but I didn't use
no, this 'reply to list' option does not exist for many of us.
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 4:07 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P
webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote:
I have a couple of Web-based email accounts, but I have to look them up
[and their passwords] since I have not used them for more
Not in my gmail
steve
On 2012-08-15 11:24, anne-ology wrote:
no, this 'reply to list' option does not exist for many of us.
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 4:07 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P
webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote:
I have a couple of Web-based email accounts, but I have to look them
On 08/14/2012 07:24 PM, anne-ology wrote:
no, this 'reply to list' option does not exist for many of us.
Do you have a reply all option?
You may want to check what email address is used in the To field with
reply or reply all.
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 4:07 PM, webmaster-Kracked_P_P
50 matches
Mail list logo
