gt;
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Tom Davies >>> >wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi :)
> >>> > Ahh, so is it a sort of Content Management System that can be used to
> >>> hold
> >
it a sort of Content Management System that can be used to
>>> hold
>>> > documents centrally, like putting them on a shared folder on a Lan so
>>> that
>>> > everyone can work on the same file instead of each generating different
>>> >
On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 19:06 +, Kieran Peckett wrote:
> I have been following this post as I also wanted to know about how to add
> SharePoint, not about which Cloud storage service is the best
Yes, you're thread got hi-jacked by the Microsoft-hate squad. Sadly it
happens not infrequently.
Pl
t;Manage
>repositories./
> * If only students are to be prevented from accessing private files
>(but teachers etc, allowed) then a new
> * role should be made and assigned system wide. See FAQ 6 in
>Repositories FAQ
> <http://docs.moodle.org/22/en/**Repositori
ositories_FAQ> for
more information."
http://docs.moodle.org/22/en/Private_files
Steve
From: Felmon Davis
To: users@global.libreoffice.org Sent: Friday, 15 February 2013, 6:55
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Share-point?
On Fri, 15 Feb 2013, Fabian Ro
;s denied by a government minister". I guess
some of you need to swap out gov minister and replace with senator or whatever.
Regards from
Tom :)
>
> From: Adam Tauno Williams
>To: users@global.libreoffice.org
>Sent: Friday, 15 February 20
On Fri, 2013-02-15 at 13:31 +, Tom Davies wrote:
> Hi :)
> Hmmm, what worries me is "MS" and "Standards" in the same sentence.
> Haven't we already learned, many times over, that MS's idea of
> open = closed
This is true for corporations, nothing specific to Microsoft. That is
why you need O
>
> From: Adam Tauno Williams
>To: users@global.libreoffice.org
>Sent: Friday, 15 February 2013, 12:56
>Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Share-point?
>
>On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 11:28 -0600, anne-ology wrote:
>> Content Management System
On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 17:37 +, IBBoard wrote:
> Microsoft might not have control over it, but Dropbox will. For a business,
> that is unacceptable - and rightly so, since it means important documents
> go outside your perimeter. Instead they use a document management system
> (like Sharepoint o
On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 11:28 -0600, anne-ology wrote:
> Content Management System ;-) ... LAN ;-) ... a wiki ;-) ???
> as to these - I haven't a clue; I'll continue to stick with the
> KISs method ;-)
What is simple about Content Management? Nothing.
> But if we each sign up to use DropBox
not now at least and now would be a great time to have the upload
utility.
oh, well. pardon the off-off-topic; we should get back to the main
off-topic or even on topic!
F.
From: Felmon Davis
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Friday, 15 February 2013,
. I'm not sure how interactive it
can be.
Regards from
Tom :)
>
> From: Felmon Davis
>To: users@global.libreoffice.org
>Sent: Friday, 15 February 2013, 6:55
>Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Share-point?
>
>On Fri, 15 Feb 2013, Fa
On Fri, 15 Feb 2013, Fabian Rodriguez wrote:
On 13-02-14 02:05 PM, Felmon Davis wrote:
this thread is off-topic but I'll take advantage of it before it's
cut: I would like a solution where
a) individuals could upload documents to me
b) they wouldn't be able to see each other's documents (unles
On 13-02-14 02:05 PM, Felmon Davis wrote:
> this thread is off-topic but I'll take advantage of it before it's
> cut: I would like a solution where
>
> a) individuals could upload documents to me
> b) they wouldn't be able to see each other's documents (unless I
> allowed it)
> c) should be either
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013, Mirosław Zalewski wrote:
On 14/02/2013 at 19:41, Felmon Davis wrote:
I wholly agree this is far better than BusyBox for many purposes.
You meant Dropbox ;) .
slip of the pen or rather key.
Busybox is set of minimalistic Linux command-line tools. It has completely
d
Erm... Dropbox _claims_ to encrypt your files. Yes, the DB staff may be
able to read it, it depends on the encryption method (not entirely sure, I
think they said something like AES-256 or something, maybe I'm getting
confused).
Someone correct me if I've got my info wrong!
On 14 Feb 2013 20:32,
IBBoard wrote:
Dropbox is an unencrypted cloud solution. Once it is on the Dropbox severs
then any of the Dropbox staff/could/ read it. Or it could be copied or
otherwise lost by people who aren't your employees. Or it could be leaked
as party of a wider Dropbox hack/leak. Or it could be retriev
Hi :)
So is Alfresco an OpenSource alternative? If not what is?
Regards from
Tom :)
>
> From: Felmon Davis
>To: users@global.libreoffice.org
>Sent: Thursday, 14 February 2013, 18:20
>Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Share-point?
>
&g
On 14/02/2013 at 19:41, Felmon Davis wrote:
> I wholly agree this is far better than BusyBox for many purposes.
You meant Dropbox ;) .
Busybox is set of minimalistic Linux command-line tools. It has completely
different purpose.
--
Best regards
Mirosław Zalewski
--
For unsubscribe instruct
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013, IBBoard wrote:
Yes, you can encrypt it first, but a) that is an extra step and b) it only
gives you a semi-useful backup, not a fully versioned document store.
If you want encrypted backups then I'd suggest SpiderOak instead - they
encrypt it with a key they don't know, so
gt;>>>>But if we each sign up to use DropBox, we can each end up with
>>>>> 6Gb
>>>>> of free space to use as we wish in sharing documents -
>>>>> and MsFt does not have any control over this :-)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On T
ke a wiki?
Regards from
Tom :)
--
*From:* anne-ology
*To:* Tom
*Cc:* users@global.libreoffice.org
*Sent:* Thursday, 14 February 2013, 16:53
*Subject:* Re: [libreoffice-users] Share-point?
Just 'searched' and found this -
http://www.youtube.co
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013, Mirosław Zalewski wrote:
On 14/02/2013 at 19:20, Felmon Davis wrote:
is the point that it is better for a business that Microsoft hold
their documents than that Busybox does?
SharePoint is internal network solution. It does not exchange any
information it holds with Mi
ent Management System that can be used to
>>> hold
>>> > documents centrally, like putting them on a shared folder on a Lan so
>>> that
>>> > everyone can work on the same file instead of each generating different
>>> > copies and then trying to compare all the dif
On 14/02/2013 at 19:20, Felmon Davis wrote:
> is the point that it is better for a business that Microsoft hold
> their documents than that Busybox does?
SharePoint is internal network solution. It does not exchange any information
it holds with Microsoft servers. Your confidential data stays
guez
>To: users@global.libreoffice.org
>Sent: Thursday, 14 February 2013, 17:38
>Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Share-point?
>
>On 13-02-13 03:24 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
>> Has anyone managed to get MS Sharepoint working with 4.0.0? Apparently it's
>> one of the features
users@global.libreoffice.org
> *Sent:* Thursday, 14 February 2013, 16:53
> *Subject:* Re: [libreoffice-users] Share-point?
>
> Just 'searched' and found this -
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s12Jb5Z2xaE
>
> Seems somewhat silly since we could all ben
ly because it's MS.
Thanks and regards from
Tom :)
>
> From: Sigrid Carrera
>To: Tom Davies
>Cc: anne-ology ; "users@global.libreoffice.org"
>
>Sent: Thursday, 14 February 2013, 17:32
>Subject: Re: [libreoffice-u
On 13-02-13 03:24 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
> Has anyone managed to get MS Sharepoint working with 4.0.0? Apparently it's
> one of the features that are supposed to be in the 4.0.0 although i have no
> idea what SharePoint is nor why anyone would use it.
Sharepoint needs to be configured with CMI
Sort of like a wiki?
> > Regards from
> > Tom :)
> >
> >
> > --
> > *From:* anne-ology
> > *To:* Tom
> > *Cc:* users@global.libreoffice.org
> > *Sent:* Thursday, 14 February 2013, 16:53
> > *Subject:* Re: [
om:* anne-ology
> *To:* Tom
> *Cc:* users@global.libreoffice.org
> *Sent:* Thursday, 14 February 2013, 16:53
> *Subject:* Re: [libreoffice-users] Share-point?
>
> Just 'searched' and found this -
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s12Jb5Z2xaE
>
>
incorporate all the
different changes? Sort of like a wiki?
Regards from
Tom :)
>
> From: anne-ology
>To: Tom
>Cc: users@global.libreoffice.org
>Sent: Thursday, 14 February 2013, 16:53
>Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Share-point?
>
>
Just 'searched' and found this -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s12Jb5Z2xaE
Seems somewhat silly since we could all benefit if we were to use
DropBox -
http://db.tt/v1nUSr8M
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 2:24 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
> Has anyone managed to get
Hi :)
Has anyone managed to get MS Sharepoint working with 4.0.0? Apparently it's
one of the features that are supposed to be in the 4.0.0 although i have no
idea what SharePoint is nor why anyone would use it.
According to the comments under this article
http://www.webupd8.org/2013/02/libre
34 matches
Mail list logo
