Hi Phil,
It's a bug.
Fuseki uses the CORS filter from Eclipse Jetty by code-copy so as not to
depend on Jetty. But at the last update, some Jetty code usage didn't
get replaced and there are class references.
Issue created:
https://github.com/apache/jena/issues/2443
Andy
On 02/05/2024
- finding the RDF terms that are currently
in use in the database and recovering space indexes. RocksDB compaction
is about the second case.
Martynas
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 10:30 PM Andy Seaborne wrote:
Hi Balduin,
Thanks for the detailed report. It's useful to hear of the use case
On 25/04/2024 07:58, Thomas Francart wrote:
Hello Andy
Le lun. 22 avr. 2024 à 21:03, Andy Seaborne a écrit :
On 22/04/2024 08:02, Thomas Francart wrote:
Hello
This is 3.17.0. Pretty old, due to other dependency with TopQuadrant
SHACL
API.
It's not perfect in 5.0.0 either
The wording has been changed to
"Jena5 requires Java 17, or a later version of Java."
Thanks
Andy
On 24/04/2024 09:45, Balduin Landolt wrote:
Hi list,
me again... Does Jena Fuseki 5.0.0 support Java 21?
On https://jena.apache.org/download/ all I can see is "Jena5 requires Java
17".
Hi Balduin,
Thanks for the detailed report. It's useful to hear of the use case that
occur and also the behaviour of specific deployments.
On 22/04/2024 16:22, Balduin Landolt wrote:
Hello,
we're running Fuseki 5.0.0 (but previously the last 4.x versions behaved
essentially the same) with
On 24/04/2024 10:41, Rob @ DNR wrote:
Java versions are generally forwards compatible, so Fuseki should run fine on
Java 21, unless any of our dependencies have some previously unreported issues
with Java 21
If you do find any bugs then please file bugs as appropriate
Thanks,
Rob
The
. I'd like to
understand the usage to see which change is best).
Andy
BTW It's rdf:parseType="Literal" -- Jena 5.0.0 is not tolerant of lower
case "literal"
Thomas
Le sam. 20 avr. 2024 à 18:06, Andy Seaborne a écrit :
Hi Thomas,
Which version of Jena is this?
And
Hi Thomas,
Which version of Jena is this?
Andy
On 19/04/2024 17:18, Thomas Francart wrote:
Hello
The RDF/XML parsing of the following succeeds:
https://xx.xx.xx/PC"/>
while the RDF/XML parsing of this gives an error : in that case the XML has
simply be encoded with , and and the
Hi Arne, hi Simon,
It got removed because there wasn't evidence of use. 5.x.x was a chance
It is opinionated and it doesn't feel like a good fit being in the
central code for graph. It's more like a utility library feature.
It can come back, maybe in a better form or better location.
So to
Hi John,
Yes, the join of two large subqueries is the issue.
Optimization involves making pragmatic determination. Sometimes it isn't
optimal for some data.
Something to consider is detecting these independency of the (?X_i,
?X_j) and (?Y_i, ?Y_j) blocks because ia hash join is likely a
and techniques for operation
Fuseki/TDB. There is so much variety "out there" that all reports are
helpful.
Andy
Best regards,
Gaspar
On Sun, Mar 24, 2024 at 5:00 PM Andy Seaborne wrote:
On 21/03/2024 09:52, Rob @ DNR wrote:
Gaspar
This probably relates to https://access.
Andy,
On Mar 19, 2024, at 5:02 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
Hi Jim,
What happens if you use GRAPH rather than FROM?
WHERE {
GRAPH <http://example.org/ubergraph> {
?cell rdfs:subClassOf cell: .
?cell part_of: ?organ .
?organ rdfs:subClassOf organ: .
?organ part_of: a
users@jena.apache.org
Subject: Re: Requesting advice on Fuseki memory settings
Hi Andy
On Sat, Mar 16, 2024 at 8:58 PM Andy Seaborne wrote:
On 12/03/2024 13:17, Gaspar Bartalus wrote:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 6:28 PM Andy Seaborne wrote:
On 11/03/2024 14:35, Gaspar Bartalus wrote:
Hi Andy,
o write a
value. "1"^^xsd:int is canonical; "+1"^^xsd:int is not canonical.
Most published data uses canonical forms.
Andy
Shaw, Ryan schrieb am Mi., 20. März 2024, 13:32:
On Mar 20, 2024, at 5:05 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
** Term graphs
Graphs are now term graphs in t
The Apache Jena development community is pleased to
announce the release of Apache Jena 5.0.0.
In Jena5:
* Minimum Java requirement: Java 17
* Language tags are case-insensitive unique.
* Term graphs for in-memory models
* RRX - New RDF/XML parser
* Remove support for JSON-LD 1.0
*
to those expressions may
themselves be dynamically computed values that don’t exist in the underlying
dataset directly.
Rob
From: Chirag Ratra
Date: Tuesday, 19 March 2024 at 10:39
To: users@jena.apache.org , Andy Seaborne ,
dcchabg...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Query Performance
On 18/03/2024 17:46, Jim Balhoff wrote:
Hi,
I’m running a particular query in a Fuseki server which performs very
differently if the data is in a named graph vs. the default graph. I’m
wondering if it’s expected to have a large performance hit if a named graph is
specified. The dataset
On 12/03/2024 13:17, Gaspar Bartalus wrote:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 6:28 PM Andy Seaborne wrote:
On 11/03/2024 14:35, Gaspar Bartalus wrote:
Hi Andy,
On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 4:41 PM Andy Seaborne wrote:
On 08/03/2024 10:40, Gaspar Bartalus wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the responses.
We
On 12/03/2024 13:02, Anna P wrote:
Hi Lorenz,
Thank you for your reply. Yes, I used maven to build the project. Here are
dependencies details:
Hi Lorenz,
Yes, I used maven to build the project. Here are the dependencies details:
UTF-8
1.8
1.8
junit
junit
4.11
test
org.apache.jena
On 11/03/2024 14:35, Gaspar Bartalus wrote:
Hi Andy,
On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 4:41 PM Andy Seaborne wrote:
On 08/03/2024 10:40, Gaspar Bartalus wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the responses.
We were actually curious if you'd have some explanation for the
linear increase in the storage, and why
dataset and the size it uses on disk. (Changes
between `df -h` and `du -lh`)?
The heap memory has some very minimal peaks, saw-tooth, but otherwise it's
flat.
Regards,
Gaspar
On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 11:55 PM Andy Seaborne wrote:
On 07/03/2024 13:24, Gaspar Bartalus wrote:
Dear Jena support
heap memory has some very minimal peaks, saw-tooth, but otherwise it's
flat.
At what amount of memory?
Regards,
Gaspar
On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 11:55 PM Andy Seaborne wrote:
On 07/03/2024 13:24, Gaspar Bartalus wrote:
Dear Jena support team,
We would like to ask you to help us in co
On 07/03/2024 13:24, Gaspar Bartalus wrote:
Dear Jena support team,
We would like to ask you to help us in configuring the memory for our
jena-fuseki instance running in kubernetes.
*We have the following setup:*
* Jena-fuseki deployed as StatefulSet to a k8s cluster with the
resource
m the web UI without issues
>
> Met Vriendelijke Groet / With Kind Regards
> Bart van Leeuwen
>
> On 2024/02/16 10:49:38 Andy Seaborne wrote:
> > Hi Bart,
> >
> > Do you have a complete, ideally runnable, example of how you are
using
> > RDFConnection and also th
Hi Bart,
Do you have a complete, ideally runnable, example of how you are using
RDFConnection and also the client side auth setup.
Andy
On 15/02/2024 19:27, Bart van Leeuwen wrote:
Hi,
I'm running Fuseki 4.9.0. on linux with OpenJDK 17
I've protected it with the shiro configuration and
The Apache Jena development community is pleased to
announce the release of Apache Jena 5.0.0-rc1
In Jena5:
* Minimum: Java 17
* Language tags are case-insensitive unique.
* Term graphs for in-memory models
* RRX - New RDF/XML parser
* Remove support for JSON-LD 1.0
* Turtle/Trig Output :
Hi Balduin,
On 07/02/2024 11:05, Balduin Landolt wrote:
Hi everyone,
we're storing data in Fuseki as a persistence for our application backend,
the data is structured according to the application logic. Whenever
something changes in our application logic, we have to do a database
migration, so
Hi Jaana,
Glad you got it sorted out.
The Fuseki UI does not do anything special about browser caches. There
was a major UI update with implementing it in Vue and all the HTML
assets that go with that.
Andy
On 09/02/2024 05:37, jaa...@kolumbus.fi wrote:
Hi, I just noticed that it's
Recorded as https://github.com/apache/jena/issues/2254
On 06/02/2024 23:06, Andy Seaborne wrote:
Hi Samuel,
This is when the server exists for some reason?
(If it's an internal exception, there should be a stack trace in the log
file.)
What operating system are you running on?
What's
Hi Samuel,
This is when the server exists for some reason?
(If it's an internal exception, there should be a stack trace in the log
file.)
What operating system are you running on?
What's in the new Data-0002 directory?
It does look like some defensive measures are needed to not choose to
This is a combination of things happening.
In the one case of no data (grph or dataset) provided, Jena does read
the URL. If there is supplied data, FROM refers the dataset.
The URL is coming back from www.learningsparql.com
as explicitly "Content-Type: text/plain", not "text/turtle".
Jena
https://github.com/apache/jena/discussions/2150
The query shows is not the one generated by the update builder.
On 03/01/2024 20:58, Dhamotharan, Kishan wrote:
Hi all,
We are attempting to upgrade from Jena 3.5 to Jena 4.10.0.
We are using “RDFConnection.connect(TDBFactory.createDataset());” for unit
tests.
The below query works totally fine in Jena 3.5 but fails with the following
exception in
Jena5 is the next planned release for Apache Jena.
** All issues for Jena5:
https://github.com/apache/jena/issues?q=is%3Aissue+label%3AJena5
** Java Requirement
Java 17 or later is required.
Java 17 language constructs now are used in the codebase.
** Language tags
Language tags become are
Jorge,
Have you looked at
https://jena.apache.org/documentation/query/service_enhancer.html
It might have features of use to you.
Andy
On 14/12/2023 08:25, George News wrote:
Hi,
I have deployed several Fuseki instances. This email scenario is just
for 2.
I was testing the SERVICE
On 13/12/2023 15:49, Arne Bernhardt wrote:
Hello Martynas,
I have no experience with implementing a validation layer for Fuseki.
But I might have an idea for your suggested approach:
Instead of loading a copy of the graph and modifying it, you could create
an
On 08/12/2023 02:08, Dhamotharan, Kishan wrote:
Hello Lorenz,
Thanks for your response.
...
Since query builder 3.5 does not have addWhereValueVar is there any other way
to build the query ?
It’s a very painful process to pull in three party / open source libraries,
requires multiple
[2023-12-06 22:19:53] INFO Server :: Path = /'/ds'
Not good. Shell quoting didn't happen. That's a URL path component
called '/ds' in the server root.
Andy
On 06/12/2023 23:55, Steve Vestal wrote:
I was using bash. When I run it in command prompt, it works. Thanks!
There isn't much information to go.
On 29/11/2023 09:50, Mikael Pesonen wrote:
No idea?
On 16/11/2023 13.11, Mikael Pesonen wrote:
What could be the reason why new data is suddenly not added to text
index and not found with Jena text queries?
The newest files in Jena text index folder are
at 1:34 PM Andy Seaborne wrote:
On 24/11/2023 10:05, Marco Neumann wrote:
(side note) preferably the local name of a URI should not start with a
number but a letter or underscore.
It's a hangover from XML QNames.
Turtle doesn't care.
Style-wise, yes, avoid an initial number.
What d
On 24/11/2023 10:05, Marco Neumann wrote:
(side note) preferably the local name of a URI should not start with a
number but a letter or underscore.
It's a hangover from XML QNames.
Turtle doesn't care.
Style-wise, yes, avoid an initial number.
What do you mean by human-readable here?
On 24/11/2023 08:55, Marco Neumann wrote:
Laura, see jena issue #2102
https://github.com/apache/jena/issues/2102
It's specific to [].
Because data formats accept these bad URIs (with a warning), the fact
SPARQL generates errors is a bug to be fixed.
Andy
Marco
On Fri, Nov 24,
On 24/11/2023 10:40, Marco Neumann wrote:
The URI syntax is defined by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) in
RFC 3986.
W3C RDF is just a rule-taker here ;)
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc3986
We've drafted a non-normative section:
Another option is the HTTP query string - think of it as asking a
question of resource "http://example.org/book;
Andy
On 24/11/2023 11:03, Martynas Jusevičius wrote:
On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 11:46 AM Laura Morales wrote:
in the case that I want to use these URLs with a web browser.
I
On 18/11/2023 08:21, Laura Morales wrote:
I've tried this option too using the following configuration
fuseki:dataset [
a ja:RDFDataset;
ja:defaultGraph [
a ja:UnionModel ;
ja:subModel [
a tdb2:GraphTDB2 ;
tdb2:dataset [
On 16/11/2023 11:35, Laura Morales wrote:
I would like to configure Fuseki such that I can use 2 datasets from 2
different locations, as if they were a single dataset.
This is my config.ttl:
<#> a fuseki:Service ;
fuseki:endpoint [
fuseki:operation fuseki:query
] ;
On 15/11/2023 09:19, Steven Blanchard wrote:
Dear Jena Users,
When i delete a dataset with fuseki, only the configuration file are
removing and not the tdb2 folder
According to the documentation this is expected behaviour :
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/77490993/importing-jena-to-eclipse-compile-problems
On 15/11/2023 21:35, Paul Jarski wrote:
I believe I've followed the instructions from
https://jena.apache.org/tutorials/using_jena_with_eclipse.html: I ran
mvn clean install with apparently no issues, but
On 10/11/2023 20:35, Marco Neumann wrote:
On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 5:51 PM Andy Seaborne wrote:
On 10/11/2023 12:33, Marco Neumann wrote:
Should DELETE {URI URI * } not update all matching graph patterns?
No.
(and that's bad syntax)
I had a case where only DELETE {URI URI NODE } did
On 10/11/2023 18:19, Marco Neumann wrote:
On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 5:51 PM Andy Seaborne wrote:
On 10/11/2023 12:33, Marco Neumann wrote:
Should DELETE {URI URI * } not update all matching graph patterns?
No.
(and that's bad syntax)
DELETE { ?x } is bad syntax?
"*" is
On 10/11/2023 12:33, Marco Neumann wrote:
Should DELETE {URI URI * } not update all matching graph patterns?
No.
(and that's bad syntax)
I had a case where only DELETE {URI URI NODE } did execute the update in
the dataset/graph/query fuseki UI.
To be precise it is a DELETE INSERT
Hi Hugo,
On 01/11/2023 19:43, Hugo Mills wrote:
Hi,
We’ve got an application we’ve inherited recently which uses a Fuseki
database. It was originally Fuseki 3.4.0, and has been upgraded to 4.9.0
recently. The 3.4.0 server needed regular restarts (once a day) in order
to keep working; the
The Apache Jena development community is pleased to
announce the release of Apache Jena 4.10.0
In this release:
* Prepare for Jena5
Check use of deprecated API calls
These are largely being removed in Jena5.
Jena5 will require Java17
jena5 Fuseki will switch from javax.servlet to
It's not clear from the information so far.
Complete, minimal, verifiable example please.
Also - what's the stacktrace you are seeing and which Jena version are
you running?
Andy
On 27/10/2023 22:18, Martynas Jusevičius wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to understand in which circumstances can
On 27/10/2023 17:58, Justin wrote:
Hello,
Is it possible to allow qparse to preserve comments?
No - the parser skips them.
e.g. it currently does not:
```
justin@parens:/tmp$ cat a.rq
select * where {
?s ?p ?o
# comment here
}
justin@parens:/tmp$ ~/Downloads/apache-jena-4.7.0/bin/qparse
On 26/10/2023 10:17, Steve Vestal wrote:
What is the best way to reconstruct a typed Literal from a SPARQL SELECT
result?
I have a SPARQL SELECT query issued against an OntModel in this way:
QueryExecution structureRowsExec =
QueryExecutionFactory.create(structureRowsQuery,
On 19/10/2023 14:46, Taras Petrenko wrote:
Hi,
I would like to know which Pellet implementation is the most consistent with
Jena? or which one is currently used in Protege ?
Now I am using the openllet-jena, version 2.6.3:
To finf the version of jena to go with a release of openllet-jena,
.
Andy
On 10/12/2023 1:42 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
Thanks. It parses OK.
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023, 19:36 Jim Balhoff, wrote:
On Oct 6, 2023, at 3:46 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
On 28/06/2023 09:26, Damion Dooley wrote:
I’m using RIOT to parse a large food ontology in owl rdf/xml format.
Thanks. It parses OK.
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023, 19:36 Jim Balhoff, wrote:
> > On Oct 6, 2023, at 3:46 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 28/06/2023 09:26, Damion Dooley wrote:
> >> I’m using RIOT to parse a large food ontology in owl rdf/xml format.
>
On 28/06/2023 09:26, Damion Dooley wrote:
I’m using RIOT to parse a large food ontology in owl rdf/xml format.
Damion,
Is that data publicly available?
There's a new RDF/XML parser for Jena in the pipeline and I'd like to
try it out on real data.
Andy
s happening.
On Tue, 19 Sept 2023 at 23:05, Andy Seaborne wrote:
Hi Jan,
Thanks for the update.
On 18/09/2023 19:49, Jan Eerdekens wrote:
Hi Andy,
Sorry for the late answer, but I was quite busy.
The database was as far as I can tell generated in version 4.7.0 and then
upgrades to 4.8.0
An active issue in the RDF 1.2 Working Group is whether to mandate the
syntactic form of language tags.
Currently, in RDF, it says that language tags are compared case
insensitively and also that "Lexical representations of language tags
MAY be converted to lower case." Its actually in RDF
On 25/09/2023 15:35, Arne Bernhardt wrote:
Hello,
in order to use the GraphMem2 graphs in Jena 4.9, we are planning to switch
to "literal term equality" in our projects.
Currently we are discussing the following two approaches:
1. simple RDF standard compatibility.
We treat object literal
, but I'll check with our OPS people to see if
they can identify something on the OS level that might access the files or
if they have setup a backup process. Currently we're only running 1 Jena
instance per environment.
regards,
Jan
On Wed, 30 Aug 2023 at 23:08, Andy Seaborne wrote:
Hi Jan
.
tdb2.tdbquery --loc DATABASE 'ASK{}'
TDB1 is different; read-transactions can do some completion actions. The
journal is more heavily used.
Andy
On 18/09/2023 16:35, Jim Balhoff wrote:
On Sep 18, 2023, at 11:09 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
On 18/09/2023 15:35, Jim Balhoff wrote:
Thanks
On 18/09/2023 15:35, Jim Balhoff wrote:
Thanks, I think that’s basically what I’ve got. The only operation I have
enabled is 'fuseki:query’. But Fuseki still complains if the filesystem is
read-only.
The database is opened before the configuration is processed.
Also, there is only one
The TDB2 database is open for general use (i.e. write).
You can get read-only by restricting the operations on the dataset to
only query and the read functions of the Graph Store Protocol.
Being SPARQL, query operations and write (update) operations are
separate by syntax and there are
:
Just on a command line (dev system)
/usr/bin/java -Xmx8G -jar fuseki-server.jar --update --port 3030
--config=../jena_config/fuseki_config.ttl
On 08/09/2023 11.47, Andy Seaborne wrote:
In a container? As a VM?
On 08/09/2023 07:36, Mikael Pesonen wrote:
We are using Ubuntu.
On Thu, 7 Sept
In a container? As a VM?
On 08/09/2023 07:36, Mikael Pesonen wrote:
We are using Ubuntu.
On Thu, 7 Sept 2023 at 16:33, Andy Seaborne wrote:
Are the database files on a MS Windows filesystem?
There is a long-standing Java issue that memory mapped files on MS
Windows do not get freed until
On 07/09/2023 15:54, mbk wrote:
Hi!
We generate a RDF/XML file which has all its resources with the
'rdf:about' attribute. We would like to replace this attribute with 'rdf:id'
Using apache-jena 3.17.0 We create ressource with
model.createResource(uri,res) where uri is an UUID with prefix
Are the database files on a MS Windows filesystem?
There is a long-standing Java issue that memory mapped files on MS
Windows do not get freed until the JVM exists.
Various bugs in the OpenJDK bug database such as:
https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-4715154
Andy
On 07/09/2023 13:06,
On 31/08/2023 08:58, Simon Bin wrote:
On Wed, 2023-08-30 at 21:36 +0100, Andy Seaborne wrote:
The query editor in the UI is a 3rd party compoent (from
@zazuco/yasqe -
it has security bug fixes from the original). It is has a SPARQL 1.1
grammar engine which determines the synatx checking
Hi Jan,
On 30/08/2023 14:58, Jan Eerdekens wrote:
Hi,
We've been evaluating an using Jena for about 1,5 years now, but are
recently running into a perplexing issue. In a lot of different scenarios,
ways of using Jena, we are getting the exceptions like the one below:
Caused by:
On 29/08/2023 12:26, Andy Seaborne wrote:
Which result format is this? JSON? XML?
Thanks - the fact the impact on JSON and XML results writers is
suggestive that the difference is in that area.
Andy
No suggestion that our case is representative of any broader pattern.
Dave
determines the synatx checking. It would benefit
from a contribution to update the parser. LATERAL is not implemented by
several engines.
Andy
Orange Restricted
-Message d'origine-
De : Andy Seaborne
Envoyé : mardi 29 août 2023 22:10
À : users@jena.apache.org
Objet : Re: Problem
There is also the service enhancer
https://jena.apache.org/documentation/query/service_enhancer.html
which provides various ways to control federated query.
Andy
On 29/08/2023 19:22, Simon Bin wrote:
You could use the "LATERAL" extension of Jena (not standard Sparql
1.1):
PREFIX wd:
On 29/08/2023 08:46, Dave Reynolds wrote:
Hi Andy,
On 27/08/2023 10:36, Andy Seaborne wrote:
On 25/08/2023 15:18, Dave Reynolds wrote: [1]
> We've being testing some of our troublesome queries on 4.9.0 on java
> 11 vs java 17 and see a 10-15% performance hit on java 17 (even after
On 25/08/2023 15:18, Dave Reynolds wrote: [1]
> We've being testing some of our troublesome queries on 4.9.0 on java
> 11 vs java 17 and see a 10-15% performance hit on java 17 (even after
> we take control of the GC by forcing both to use the old parallel GC
> instead of G1). No idea why,
On 25/08/2023 09:04, Enrico.Daga wrote:
Hi,
I am having a strange error while attempting to initialise a TDB2 dataset:
TDB2Factory.connectDataset(tdb2location);
tdb2location existing. However, I am getting the error below, which I don't
understand. It seems related to some file system
On 18/08/2023 07:38, Gaspar Bartalus wrote:
Hi,
We would like to execute queries (construct) and updates (insert/delete
data) in one transaction.
Very similar I think to what Andy described here:
https://github.com/w3c/sparql-dev/issues/83
Something that has not quite ever managed to
ps://github.com/spdx/tools/blob/bc35e25dacb728bf8332b82b509bb3efacd6c64e/src/org/spdx/rdfparser/SPDXDocument.java#L1225-L1235
On 16 Aug 2023, at 18:18, Andrii Berezovskyi wrote:
Thanks Andy,
On 15 Aug 2023, at 10:12, Andy Seaborne wrote:
That's quite a long method!
Yes, not proudest part of
On 03/07/2023 14:20, Dave Reynolds wrote:
We have a very strange problem with recent fuseki versions when running
(in docker containers) on small machines. Suspect a jetty issue but it's
not clear.
From the threads here, it does seem to be Jetty related.
I haven't managed to reproduce the
If you turn on the NCSA logging, there is a standard format logging line
output.
In the provided log4j2.properties, it is switched off by default:
logger.fuseki-request.level = OFF
so comment out that line and a NCSA log line is generated which include
X-Forwarded-For.
You
On 14/08/2023 19:46, Andrii Berezovskyi wrote:
Hello,
I just noticed that .listReifiedStatements()
ReifiedStatement, and RSIterator, which we use [1],
That's quite a long method!
What is reification used for in Lyo?
Do quoted triples provide the same capability?
have been deprecated in
Jena uses jsonld-java for JSON-LD 1.0 and titanium-json-ld for JSON-LD 1.1
Rob describes the framing support for passing information to jsonld-java
for JSON-LD 1.0.
At Jena5, support for JSON-LD 1.0 is planned for removal. The
jsonld-java project does not appear to be active.
The project
Hi Robert,
On 26/07/2023 12:44, Robert Alexander wrote:
Dear friends,
I am using Apache Jena Fuseki from a Docker image
https://hub.docker.com/r/secoresearch/fuseki and all works so well. Love
Jena/Fuseki!
The problem I’m grappling with though is that after an initial mass loading
from RDF
A reminder that Jena will move from requiring Java11 to requiring Java17.
The project aims to support for 2 LTS versions of Java.
Java21 is scheduled for September 19 this year and is LTS.
Some time after that date that Jena will switch, with a major version
bump to Jena 5.x.y
For Fuseki,
On 20/07/2023 17:18, Brandon Sara wrote:
I just came across CVE-2023-32200 and was wondering, is it different than
CVE-2023-22665 and, if so, how is it different?
Jena 4.8.0 addresses CVE-2023-22665 by requiring the Java system
property "jena:scripting" to enable scripting.
Jena 4.9.0
Conal,
Thanks for the information.
Can you see if metaspace is growing as well?
All,
Could someone please try running Fuseki main, with no datasets (--empty)
with some healthcheck ping traffic.
Andy
On 19/07/2023 14:42, Conal McLaughlin wrote:
Hey Dave,
Thank you for providing an in
ttp://jmvanel.free.fr/jmv.rdf%23me>
+33
(0)6 89 16 29 52
Le dim. 16 juil. 2023 à 21:53, Andy Seaborne a écrit :
https://github.com/apache/jena/issues/1499
Are you are using 4.6.0?
Andy
On 16/07/2023 14:54, Jean-Marc Vanel wrote:
Every few weeks, I get this stack, and the database is un
https://github.com/apache/jena/issues/1499
Are you are using 4.6.0?
Andy
On 16/07/2023 14:54, Jean-Marc Vanel wrote:
Every few weeks, I get this stack, and the database is unusable afterwards.
Is there some "purge" to call now and then ?
java.lang.Error: Maximum lock count exceeded
to just do a complete rebuild?
Yes, that is safer.
Andy
Many thanks,
jw
On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 3:55 PM Andy Seaborne wrote:
Hi Jeff,
There were fixes to compaction in 4.6.0.
On 12/07/2023 23:53, Jeffrey C. Witt wrote:
Dear List,
I ran into an unusual error today when I tried
Hi Laura,
It hadn't occurred to me that the GC choice might be involved.
Also, I though G1 was the default GC but it seems at java11 it isn't
that simple. It's build dependent.
I use the Ubuntu build of OpenJDK.
Java11 has Shenandoah
Java17 has G1 -- and I think java21 will be G1.
Could you
clashes.
Andy
Martynas
On Sun, 2 Jul 2023 at 19.03, Andy Seaborne wrote:
On 02/07/2023 13:23, Martynas Jusevičius wrote:
Hi,
Can I see an example of the data that needs to be POSTed to /$/datasets
in
order to create a new dataset+service?
The API is documented here but the data
RAM when
running a lot of simple queries in series (not in parallel).
One thing that I want to try, but so far haven't, is to restart Fuseki halfway
through the job.
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2023 at 1:18 PM
From: "Andy Seaborne"
To: users@jena.apache.org
Subject: Re: OO
Hi Jeff,
There were fixes to compaction in 4.6.0.
On 12/07/2023 23:53, Jeffrey C. Witt wrote:
Dear List,
I ran into an unusual error today when I tried to backup (and also compact)
my TDB instance.
I first encountered the error when trying to compact and backup up using
fuseki 4.3.2
I ran
Severity: important
Affected versions:
- Apache Jena 3.7.0 through 4.8.0
Description:
There is insufficient restrictions of called script functions in Apache Jena
versions 4.8.0 and earlier. It allows a
remote user to execute javascript via a SPARQL query.
This issue affects Apache Jena:
On 10/07/2023 12:18, Andy Seaborne wrote:
Laura, Dave,
This doesn't sound like the same issue but let's see.
Sorry for the confusion - these questions are for Laura.
- Is it in a container? If so:
Is it the container being killed OOM or
Java throwing an OOM exception?
Much
Laura, Dave,
This doesn't sound like the same issue but let's see.
Dave - your situation isn't under high load is it?
- Is it in a container? If so:
Is it the container being killed OOM or
Java throwing an OOM exception?
Much RAM does the container get? How many threads?
- If not a
The Apache Jena development community is pleased to
announce the release of Apache Jena 4.9.0.
In this release:
* New in-memory graph implementations
* Important update to Fuseki UI.
Switch from TriplyDB/(yasr,yasqe) to zazuko/(yasr,yasqe)
This changes picks up some security fixes in yasr
1 - 100 of 4195 matches
Mail list logo
