Delayed reply - wait for bearerbox
Dear All, I have a problem sometimes happened, that message added to SMSbox logs as below 2015-09-02 11:01:28 [23452] [3] INFO: sendsms sender: (127.0.0.1) to:<9> msg: but in the kannel access log *(the SMS sent after 11 min)* 2015-09-02 11:11:41 Sent SMS [SMSC:ASIACELLTS_TX2] [SVC:tester] [ACT:] [BINF:] [FID:] [from:1234] [to:9] [flags:-1:2:-1:-1:-1] [msg:172:X62AX645XX2XX627X634X62AX631X627X643X643XX2XX628X646X62CX627X62DXX2XX628X62EX62FX645X629XX2XX623X62FX639X64AX647XX2XX627X633X645X627X621XX2XX627X644X644X647XX2XX627X644X62DX633X646X649XX2XX645X639XX2XX633X639X62FXX2XX627X644X628X63AX62FX627X62FX64AX6XCX644X644X627X644X63AX627X621XX2XX627X631X633X644XX2XXX3XXX2XX627X644X649XX2XXX34XX31XX38XX34] [udh:0:] Can you please advice why this delay may happened and how can I avoid it, I am using 1.4.3. Thank you. Best regards, Ahmad
DLR Problem
Hi All, I have problem with the DLR that DLR row not found, I use msg-id-type=0X02 , but I still have the problem, please note also that this problem not always happened, sometimes the kannel finds the DLR row in the database. Also I have note the following the TS field in the DLR table mean reference to the Manual field-timestamp = ts field-timestamp (m) stringThe table field that is used for the timestamp data but as we see in the below log: 2010-09-30 16:12:01 [23945] [15] DEBUG: sql: SELECT mask, service, url, source, destination, boxc FROM dlr WHERE smsc='MYSMPP' AND *ts='1657099323'* ; but the ts here is the message id not the Timestamp , do you have any ideas about that ? 2010-09-30 16:12:01 [23945] [15] DEBUG: len: 120 2010-09-30 16:12:01 [23945] [15] DEBUG: size: 121 2010-09-30 16:12:01 [23945] [15] DEBUG: immutable: 0 2010-09-30 16:12:01 [23945] [15] DEBUG: data: 69 64 3a 36 32 43 35 35 34 33 42 20 73 75 62 3a id:62C5543B sub: 2010-09-30 16:12:01 [23945] [15] DEBUG: data: 30 30 31 20 64 6c 76 72 64 3a 30 30 31 20 73 75 001 dlvrd:001 su 2010-09-30 16:12:01 [23945] [15] DEBUG: data: 62 6d 69 74 20 64 61 74 65 3a 31 30 30 39 33 30 bmit date:100930 2010-09-30 16:12:01 [23945] [15] DEBUG: data: 31 36 31 32 20 64 6f 6e 65 20 64 61 74 65 3a 31 1612 done date:1 2010-09-30 16:12:01 [23945] [15] DEBUG: data: 30 30 39 33 30 31 36 31 32 20 73 74 61 74 3a 52 009301612 stat:R 2010-09-30 16:12:01 [23945] [15] DEBUG: data: 45 4a 45 43 54 44 20 65 72 72 3a 30 30 30 20 74 EJECTD err:000 t 2010-09-30 16:12:01 [23945] [15] DEBUG: data: 65 78 74 3a 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 ext: 2010-09-30 16:12:01 [23945] [15] DEBUG: data: 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 2010-09-30 16:12:01 [23945] [15] DEBUG:Octet string dump ends. 2010-09-30 16:12:01 [23945] [15] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends. 2010-09-30 16:12:01 [23945] [15] DEBUG: SMPP[MYSMPP] handle_pdu, got DLR 2010-09-30 16:12:01 [23945] [15] DEBUG: DLR[mysql]: Looking for DLR smsc=MYSMPP, ts=1657099323, dst=9XX, type=2 2010-09-30 16:12:01 [23945] [15] DEBUG: sql: SELECT mask, service, url, source, destination, boxc FROM dlr WHERE smsc='MYSMPP' AND ts='1657099323'; 2010-09-30 16:12:01 [23945] [15] DEBUG: no rows found 2010-09-30 16:12:01 [23945] [15] WARNING: DLR[mysql]: DLR from SMSCMYSMPP for DST9XX not found. Regards and very thanks Hafez
Too long password
Dears, I get the following error when I try to connect my SMPP connection, my password is 9 chars 2010-06-20 10:52:19 [4228] [38] WARNING: SMPP: PDU element password too long (length is 9, should be 8) and I know that the SMPP allows 8 chars + the null char as terminator, I called my provider and they need 3 working days to change the password :/ is there any patch or anything I can do from my side to fix the problem. Regards, -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile: 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com
how set up the esm_class to 0
hi all, How can I set up esm_class=0 in Kannel 1.43 Thanks, Hafez
how kannel matched the received DLR
Dears, Please can anyone help me to know how kannel matched the received DLR with the stored DLR, I get sometimes the error got DLR but could not find message or was not interested in it id1983706424 dst955342324564, type1 , I checked the msg-id-type and it is set correct but as you note that I add the DLR with MSISDN start with + SMSC[MT_BILLING]: DLR = http://HOST/PATH/dlr_script.php?delivery_val=%dact_val=%Amsisdn_val=+955342324564 but wen I receive the DLR I get the msisdn without + like this 955342324564 is the ton /npi setting important for the DLR matching ? Any Idea please? Please find my setting and log below: group = smsc smsc = smpp smsc-id = MT_BILLING host = XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX port = X transceiver-mode = 1 smsc-username = smsc-password = xxx system-type = x allowed-smsc-id = MT_BILLING interface-version = 34 reconnect-delay = 30 source-addr-ton = 5 source-addr-npi = 0 dest-addr-ton = 1 dest-addr-npi = 1 bind-addr-ton = 1 bind-addr-npi = 1 wait-ack = 1 wait-ack-expire = 0x02 msg-id-type = 0x00 log-file = /var/log/my.log log-level = 0 2010-01-23 22:20:43 [31246] [8] DEBUG: SMPP[MT_BILLING]: Sending enquire link: 2010-01-23 22:20:43 [31246] [8] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0x7f178c16cbf0 dump: 2010-01-23 22:20:43 [31246] [8] DEBUG: type_name: enquire_link 2010-01-23 22:20:43 [31246] [8] DEBUG: command_id: 21 = 0x0015 2010-01-23 22:20:43 [31246] [8] DEBUG: command_status: 0 = 0x 2010-01-23 22:20:43 [31246] [8] DEBUG: sequence_number: 13348 = 0x3424 2010-01-23 22:20:43 [31246] [8] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends. 2010-01-23 22:20:55 [31246] [8] WARNING: SMPP: PDU NULL terminated string (message_id) has no NULL. 2010-01-23 22:20:55 [31246] [8] DEBUG: SMPP[MT_BILLING]: Got PDU: 2010-01-23 22:20:55 [31246] [8] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0x7f178c16cbf0 dump: 2010-01-23 22:20:55 [31246] [8] DEBUG: type_name: submit_sm_resp 2010-01-23 22:20:55 [31246] [8] DEBUG: command_id: 2147483652 = 0x8004 2010-01-23 22:20:55 [31246] [8] DEBUG: command_status: 69 = 0x0045 2010-01-23 22:20:55 [31246] [8] DEBUG: sequence_number: 13346 = 0x3422 2010-01-23 22:20:55 [31246] [8] DEBUG: message_id: NULL 2010-01-23 22:20:55 [31246] [8] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends. 2010-01-23 22:20:55 [31246] [8] ERROR: SMPP[MT_BILLING]: SMSC returned error code 0x0045 (Submit failed) in response to submit_sm. 2010-01-23 22:20:55 [31246] [8] DEBUG: SMSC[MT_BILLING]: creating DLR message 2010-01-23 22:20:55 [31246] [8] DEBUG: SMSC[MT_BILLING]: DLR = http://HOST/PATH/dlr_script.php?delivery_val=%dact_val=%Amsisdn_val=+955342324564 2010-01-23 22:20:55 [31246] [8] DEBUG: SMPP[MT_BILLING]: Got PDU: 2010-01-23 22:20:55 [31246] [8] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0x7f178c16cbf0 dump: 2010-01-23 22:20:55 [31246] [8] DEBUG: type_name: enquire_link_resp 2010-01-23 22:20:55 [31246] [8] DEBUG: command_id: 2147483669 = 0x8015 2010-01-23 22:20:55 [31246] [8] DEBUG: command_status: 0 = 0x 2010-01-23 22:20:55 [31246] [8] DEBUG: sequence_number: 13347 = 0x3423 2010-01-23 22:20:55 [31246] [8] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends. 2010-01-23 22:20:55 [31246] [8] DEBUG: SMPP[MT_BILLING]: Got PDU: 2010-01-23 22:20:55 [31246] [8] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0x7f178c16cbf0 dump: 2010-01-23 22:20:55 [31246] [8] DEBUG: type_name: enquire_link_resp 2010-01-23 22:20:55 [31246] [8] DEBUG: command_id: 2147483669 = 0x8015 2010-01-23 22:20:55 [31246] [8] DEBUG: command_status: 0 = 0x 2010-01-23 22:20:55 [31246] [8] DEBUG: sequence_number: 13348 = 0x3424 2010-01-23 22:20:55 [31246] [8] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends. 2010-01-23 22:20:55 [31246] [8] DEBUG: Optional parameter tag (0x000e) 2010-01-23 22:20:55 [31246] [8] DEBUG: Optional parameter length read as 1 2010-01-23 22:20:55 [31246] [8] WARNING: SMPP: Unknown TLV(0x000e,0x0001,01) for PDU type (deliver_sm) received! 2010-01-23 22:20:55 [31246] [8] DEBUG: Optional parameter tag (0x0006) 2010-01-23 22:20:55 [31246] [8] DEBUG: Optional parameter length read as 1 2010-01-23 22:20:55 [31246] [8] WARNING: SMPP: Unknown TLV(0x0006,0x0001,01) for PDU type (deliver_sm) received! 2010-01-23 22:20:55 [31246] [8] DEBUG: Optional parameter tag (0x001e) 2010-01-23 22:20:55 [31246] [8] DEBUG: Optional parameter length read as 9 2010-01-23 22:20:55 [31246] [8] DEBUG: Optional parameter tag (0x0427) 2010-01-23 22:20:55 [31246] [8] DEBUG: Optional parameter length read as 1 2010-01-23 22:20:55 [31246] [8] DEBUG: SMPP[MT_BILLING]: Got PDU: 2010-01-23 22:20:55 [31246] [8] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0x7f178c16cbf0 dump: 2010-01-23 22:20:55 [31246] [8] DEBUG: type_name: deliver_sm 2010-01-23 22:20:55 [31246] [8] DEBUG: command_id: 5 = 0x0005 2010-01-23 22:20:55 [31246] [8] DEBUG: command_status: 0 = 0x 2010-01-23 22:20:55 [31246] [8] DEBUG: sequence_number: 26 = 0x001a 2010-01-23 22:20:55 [31246] [8] DEBUG: service_type: NULL 2010-01-23 22:20:55 [31246] [8] DEBUG: source_addr_ton: 1 = 0x0001 2010-01-23 22:20:55 [31246] [8] DEBUG: source_addr_npi: 1 = 0x0001
Re: Kannel ignoring sms-resend-retry
Hi, Thanks guys for help, Konstantin your right I note that this problem happend with concatenated SMS only, I tried to send 1 sms to the same users and I did not get the connection stuck. I will provide the logs today for the bug report. but is there temporary solution for this issue? Regards, Hafez 2010/1/18 Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.com Hi, Actually 2 SMS keep looping. The one to xxx6855 is standalone, the other to xxx4220 has 3 parts. The log size is not sufficient to show if it exceeds the sms-resend-retry = 5 limit (5x for xxx6855, 4.3 for xxx4220), but certainly the sms-resend-freq = 1200 is violated. Since it is a reported bug, it needs to be looked after in the code. @Hafez: Could you please supplement the bug report by Konstantin, making sure your logs are longer than sms-resend-retry = 5 if you want to demonstrate infinite looping (or reduce your retry limit). BR, Nikos - Original Message - *From:* Konstantin Vayner konstan...@appcell.net *To:* Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.com ; hafez ahmadhafezad...@gmail.com *Cc:* users users@kannel.org *Sent:* Monday, January 18, 2010 2:59 AM *Subject:* Re: Kannel ignoring sms-resend-retry Hi guys, Actually, this thing looks a lot like the problem i had recently. The brief is like the following: 1) a *concatenated* message is being sent (am i right here, Hafez? i think yours are concatenated because i see pdu size 140 in all the samples i've seen in your log...) 2) one or more parts of the message fail with *temporary* error 3) the link is still alive (e.g. remote smsc throws temporary error - in your case Message Queue Full, in mine it was System Error) these 3 together lead to *infinite* retry without delay at all, disobeying both sms-resend-freq and sms-resend-retry (tested on 1.4.1 , 1.4.3 and cvs) see this bugreport: http://redmine.kannel.org/issues/show/529 Regards, Β Konstantin 2010/1/18 Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.com Hi, Β Actually, kannel obeys strictly the sms-resend-retry = 5 you specified. It will retry 5 times to resend the SMS before aborting. You seem to confuse throttling with max-pending-submits. Please read user guide on that. Β I imagineΒ that your problem is with sms-resend-freq = 1200, and why it resends the SMS every 1 instead of waiting 1200. I would have to check the code for that. Β Meanwhile, comment out the wait-ack = 1, it doesn't make sense in your setup and the default value is better. Β BR, NikosΒ - Original Message - *From:* hafez ahmad hafezad...@gmail.com *To:* Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.com *Cc:* users@kannel.org *Sent:* Sunday, January 17, 2010 4:22 PM *Subject:* Re: Kannel ignoring sms-resend-retry Dear Nikos, Thanks for your kind feedback. please find the attached log and the config below: group = core admin-port = 14000 smsbox-port = 14005 admin-password = status-password = admin-allow-ip = localhost log-file = /logs/kannel.log log-level = 0 box-deny-ip = *.*.*.* box-allow-ip = 127.0.0.1 dlr-storage = internal sms-resend-freq = 1200 sms-resend-retry = 5 group = smsc smsc = smpp smsc-id = MYSMPP host = XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX port = x transceiver-mode = 1 smsc-username = *** smsc-password = system-type = *** allowed-smsc-id = MYSMPP interface-version = 34 address-range = 808080 max-pending-submits = 1 reconnect-delay = 30 source-addr-ton = 5 source-addr-npi = 1 dest-addr-ton = 1 dest-addr-npi = 1 bind-addr-ton = 1 bind-addr-npi = 1 wait-ack = 1 wait-ack-expire = 0x02 msg-id-type = 0x00 log-file = /logs/808080.log log-level = 0 thanks and Regards, Hafez 2010/1/17 Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.com Hi, Β Please post detailed BB logs showing the problem and configuration. Β BR, Nikos - Original Message - *From:* hafez ahmad hafezad...@gmail.com *To:* users@kannel.org *Sent:* Sunday, January 17, 2010 10:55 AM *Subject:* Kannel ignoring sms-resend-retry Dears, I the following error: Β SMSC returned error code 0x0014 (Message Queue Full) in response to submit_sm As I know that errorΒ happenedΒ eitherΒ I am sending SMS more than the operator allowed me Β - (Β alreadyΒ I am using max-pending-submit = 1) ORΒ there are some users have full sms queue in the SMSC. I contact my operator and he found the some users haveΒ Β full sms queue , I set the followingΒ sms-resend-freq = 1200 sms-resend-retry = 5 wait-ack = 1Β wait-ack-expire = 0x02 but the kannelΒ ignoringΒ theΒ sms-resend-retry and stillΒ tryingΒ to send it again. Please Any Ideas, how can I solve this problem. Regards, Hafez -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile: 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile: 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com
Kannel ignoring sms-resend-retry
Dears, I the following error: SMSC returned error code 0x0014 (Message Queue Full) in response to submit_sm As I know that error happened either I am sending SMS more than the operator allowed me - ( already I am using max-pending-submit = 1) OR there are some users have full sms queue in the SMSC. I contact my operator and he found the some users have full sms queue , I set the following sms-resend-freq = 1200 sms-resend-retry = 5 wait-ack = 1 wait-ack-expire = 0x02 but the kannel ignoring the sms-resend-retry and still trying to send it again. Please Any Ideas, how can I solve this problem. Regards, Hafez
OTA change phone status
Hi All, Can I use Kannel to send OTA sms, that change the phone status to silent or another profile ? any Ideas how? many thanks for your kind help. Regards, hafez
Re: OTA change phone status
Hi, Thanks Nilkos for your kind feedback, but what I am asking for is the OTA can change the phone profile to silent or it is only used to download setting and software. Regards, Hafez 2009/11/4 Nikos Balkanas n...@amdtelecom.net Hi, Absolutely. Please refer to User's guide on how to configure OTA provisioning for kannel. BR, Nikos - Original Message - *From:* hafez ahmad hafezad...@gmail.com *To:* users@kannel.org *Sent:* Wednesday, November 04, 2009 10:23 AM *Subject:* OTA change phone status Hi All, Can I use Kannel to send OTA sms, that change the phone status to silent or another profile ? any Ideas how? many thanks for your kind help. Regards, hafez -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile: 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com
NACK/69/Submit failed
Hi All, I am trying to send billing SMS to my users, but I get in the Acknowledgement report this NACK/69/Submit failed for all users, any Ideas what happened, I read about the NACK in general and there many reasons for that like: - The PDU is unrecognised - The PDU is malformed - Invalid Field Length - The PDU data is unexpected and deemed invalid - The PDU is not allowed in the current session state - The ESME or MC is restricting the use of certain PDUs or features How can I determine the reason? note: My operator reject the SMS if the user don't have enough credit. Regards, Hafez
Re: Delivery Report Problem
Hi, you can use the %A in the DLR to get the status text submit date:0905251713 done date:0905251713 *stat:DELIVRD* err:000 hope this help. Regards, Hafez On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Sayed Hadi Rastgou Haghi hadi.rast...@gmail.com wrote: Hi In access.log I get this 2009-05-25 17:13:50 Receive DLR [SMSC:xxx] [SVC:xxx] [ACT:] [BINF:] [FID:xxx] [from:xxx] [to:xxx] [flags:-1:-1:-1:-1:*2*] [msg:93:id:0905... submit date:0905251713 done date:0905251713 *stat:DELIVRD* err:000 ] [udh:0:] as you can see, the delivery flag is set to *2* but in delivery message you can see *stat:DELIVRD. *How can I cover this? can I force kannel to parse delivery smsc report and get message status from it? -- Sincerely, Sayed Hadi Rastgou Haghi http://www.ubuntu.com -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile: 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com
Re: Error reading from fd 71
Hi All, Thanks for you help :) but I moved my web server to lighthttp , and Increase the max-fds to 4096 , but I am still get the following error in smsbox.log when I get the DLRs 2009-05-14 09:39:13 [3216] [8] ERROR: Couldn't fetch http://localhost:89/dlr.php?delivery=16act=NACK%2F69%2FSubmit+failedmsisdn=+message_id=2342424242 2009-05-14 09:39:13 [3216] [8] ERROR: Couldn't fetch http://localhost:89/dlr.php?delivery=1act=id%3A1741478574+sub%3A001+dlvrd%3A001+submit+date%3A090514093506+done+date%3A090514093511+stat%3ADELIVRD+err%3A000+text%3A%06%23%061%063%06Dmsisdn=+message_id=32342421113 2009-05-14 09:39:13 [3216] [8] ERROR: Couldn't fetch http://localhost:89/dlr.php?delivery=1act=id%3A0316458725+sub%3A001+dlvrd%3A001+submit+date%3A090514093505+done+date%3A090514093508+stat%3ADELIVRD+err%3A000+text%3A%06%23%061%063%06Dmsisdn=+message_id=47575757575 2009-05-14 09:39:13 [3216] [8] ERROR: Couldn't fetch http://localhost:89/dlr.php?delivery=16act=NACK%2F69%2FSubmit+failedmsisdn=+message_id=245453665 2009-05-14 09:39:45 [3216] [8] ERROR: Couldn't fetch http://localhost:89/dlr.php?delivery=1act=id%3A0309336539+sub%3A001+dlvrd%3A001+submit+date%3A090514093509+done+date%3A090514093513+stat%3ADELIVRD+err%3A000+text%3A%06%23%061%063%06Dmsisdn=+message_id=958392 2009-05-14 09:39:45 [3216] [8] ERROR: Couldn't fetch http://localhost:89/dlr.php?delivery=1act=id%3A1677010733+sub%3A001+dlvrd%3A001+submit+date%3A090514093105+done+date%3A090514093522+stat%3ADELIVRD+err%3A000+text%3A%06%23%061%063%06Dmsisdn=+message_id=958388 2009-05-14 09:39:45 [3216] [8] ERROR: Couldn't fetch http://localhost:89/dlr.php?delivery=1act=id%3A0390709218+sub%3A001+dlvrd%3A001+submit+date%3A090514093503+done+date%3A090514093513+stat%3ADELIVRD+err%3A000+text%3A%06%23%061%063%06Dmsisdn=+message_id=958413 Any Idea where is the problem, thanks in advance. Regards. Hafez On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com wrote: Okay, but anyway, as Nikos said, I think you'll find the solution in the error log of your webserver. Regards Falko Am 10.05.2009 um 14:06 schrieb hafez ahmad: On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 12:39 PM, hafez ahmad hafezad...@gmail.comwrote: Dear Falko, Thanks for reply it is example only I removed the real Url . Regards, Hafez On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com wrote: http://HOST/dlr.php?ID=3213123124131 Does the log really say HOST? Then you *maybe* should enter a valid address... Falko Am 10.05.2009 um 09:21 schrieb hafez ahmad: Dears, I get the following error in my logs, 2009-05-08 11:12:26 [10838] [8] ERROR: Error reading from fd 71: 2009-05-08 11:12:26 [10838] [8] ERROR: System error 104: Connection reset by peer 2009-05-08 11:12:26 [10838] [8] ERROR: Couldn't fetch http://HOST/dlr.php?ID=3213123124131 can you please advice what is the problem, and how can I let kannel retry to fetch the DLR url again, if there are any problems. Thanks. Regards. Hafez -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile: 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile: 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile: 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com
Error reading from fd 71
Dears, I get the following error in my logs, 2009-05-08 11:12:26 [10838] [8] ERROR: Error reading from fd 71: 2009-05-08 11:12:26 [10838] [8] ERROR: System error 104: Connection reset by peer 2009-05-08 11:12:26 [10838] [8] ERROR: Couldn't fetch http://HOST/dlr.php?ID=3213123124131 can you please advice what is the problem, and how can I let kannel retry to fetch the DLR url again, if there are any problems. Thanks. Regards. Hafez
Re: Error reading from fd 71
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 12:39 PM, hafez ahmad hafezad...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Falko, Thanks for reply it is example only I removed the real Url . Regards, Hafez On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com wrote: http://HOST/dlr.php?ID=3213123124131 Does the log really say HOST? Then you *maybe* should enter a valid address... Falko Am 10.05.2009 um 09:21 schrieb hafez ahmad: Dears, I get the following error in my logs, 2009-05-08 11:12:26 [10838] [8] ERROR: Error reading from fd 71: 2009-05-08 11:12:26 [10838] [8] ERROR: System error 104: Connection reset by peer 2009-05-08 11:12:26 [10838] [8] ERROR: Couldn't fetch http://HOST/dlr.php?ID=3213123124131 can you please advice what is the problem, and how can I let kannel retry to fetch the DLR url again, if there are any problems. Thanks. Regards. Hafez -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile: 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile: 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com
Couldn't fetch the DLR url
HI All, If kannel could not fetch the DLR url when the DLR recived is there any other retries to fetch the url again, I have this error 009-05-07 10:07:29 [10838] [8] ERROR: Couldn't fetch http:// can you please advice, Regards, Hafez
Re: Couldn't fetch the DLR url
Thanks all, Juanin is right, what I mean if kannel could not fetch the url, cause webserver down or heavy load or any other reasons, what kannel do with this senario? Regards, Hafez On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Juan Nin jua...@gmail.com wrote: The patch Alejandro submitted is for retrying when Kannel doesn't find a matching DLR What Hafez is asking seems to me to be that once Kannel invokes the dlr-url and fails (cause webserver is down or whatever) to have it retry again On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Alvaro Cornejo cornejo.alv...@gmail.com wrote: Alejandro Guerreri has just commites a patch that allow kannel to retry dlr delivery a couple of days ago to cvs check it out Regards Alvaro On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 2:13 AM, hafez ahmad hafezad...@gmail.com wrote: HI All, If kannel could not fetch the DLR url when the DLR recived is there any other retries to fetch the url again, I have this error 009-05-07 10:07:29 [10838] [8] ERROR: Couldn't fetch http:// can you please advice, Regards, Hafez -- |-| Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier celular y Nextel en el Perú, México y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via SMS y GPRS online Visitenos en www.perusms.NET www.smsglobal.com.mx y www.pravcom.com -- Juan Nin 3Cinteractive / Mobilizing Great Brands http://www.3cinteractive.com -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com
Re: smpp server
Hi, There are commercial addons for kannel called smppbox, you can contact Stip for the addons Regards, Hafez On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Elias Badenes ebade...@e-commfactory.comwrote: Hi, Do you know of any SMPP server that would run in a 2.6 linux server? Thanks
Re: dlr-url help
Dear Patrick, You need to compile kannel with mysql ./configure --with-mysql , then the send URL you have to set both variables dlr-url and dlr-mask e.g: http://localhost:13013/cgi-bin/sendsms?username=foopassword=barcharset=UTF-8coding=2to=xxxtext=testfrom=smsc=dlr-mask=31dlr-url=http%3A//localhost/dlr.php%3Fstatus%3D%25A%26answer%3D%25d when kaneel get the DLR for the SMS it will call the url in the DLR-URL. note that the dlr-url must be url encoded. Regards, Hafez On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:27 AM, patrick meye patrick_m...@hotmail.frwrote: Hi all, I want to settup dlr-storage=mysql.I'm a newbe,so i don't know how to parameter drl-url,i don't see how to parameter that in userguide.Can someone help me please?? Best regard! Patrick -- Téléchargez le nouveau Windows Live Messenger ! Téléchargez Messenger, c'est gratuit ! http://get.live.com/messenger/overview -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com
Re: Not ACKED message found, will retransmit
Dears Falko, Nikos, Thanks for your kind help, my configuration was like that: group = smsc smsc = smpp smsc-id = MOCONN host = xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx port = 0 receive-port = 8000 smsc-username = X smsc-password = XXX system-type = allowed-smsc-id = MOCONN interface-version = 34 address-range = reconnect-delay = 10 source-addr-ton = 1 source-addr-npi = 1 dest-addr-ton = 1 dest-addr-npi = 1 bind-addr-ton = 1 bind-addr-npi = 1 msg-id-type = 0x01 log-file = /var/log/mo.log group = smsc smsc = smpp smsc-id = MTCONN host = xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx port = 8000 receive-port = 0 smsc-username = X smsc-password = XXX system-type = allowed-smsc-id = MTCONN interface-version = 34 address-range = reconnect-delay = 10 source-addr-ton = 1 source-addr-npi = 1 dest-addr-ton = 1 dest-addr-npi = 1 bind-addr-ton = 1 bind-addr-npi = 1 msg-id-type = 0x01 log-file = /var/log/mt.log after that I make the transmitter and receiver in one SMSC group like that smsc = smpp smsc-id = MYCONN host = xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx port = 8000 receive-port = 8000 smsc-username = X smsc-password = XXX keepalive = 10 enquire-link-interval = 10 system-type = allowed-smsc-id = MYCONN interface-version = 34 address-range = reconnect-delay = 10 source-addr-ton = 5 source-addr-npi = 1 dest-addr-ton = 1 dest-addr-npi = 1 bind-addr-ton = 1 bind-addr-npi = 1 msg-id-type = 0x01 log-file = /var/log/conn.log but I still get the error in the logs until I changed the source-addr-npi = 1 to be source-addr-npi = 5. by the way is there different if I configure the transmitter and receiver in one SMSC group or 2 SMSC group? Thanks for help. Regards, Hafez On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 1:32 AM, Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com wrote: By the way, I just realised: transmitter and receiver? Are you using SMPP 3.3 instead of 3.4? Have you configured the receiver and transmitter in the same SMSC group?Normal SMPP 3.4 shouldn't have transmitter and receiver but only one transceiver. If you use 3.3 with divided transmitter and receiver connection, you need to configure both inside the same smsc-group, otherwise kannel cannot associate the ACK. (Well, no smsc I have seen so far could do this...) Falko Am 10.03.2009 um 00:26 schrieb Falko Ziemann: I just saw this behavior once before. There a service provider routed the ACK to another large account. So I send the message on MYMTCONN1 and received the ACK on MYMTCONN2. That's not the case, or? I can't see it from the log, the first line where kannel states the connection name is missing. But I really don't have a idea what this problem should have to do with keep alives. Are you loosing the connection between the submit and the ACK? Falko Am 09.03.2009 um 21:13 schrieb Nikos Balkanas: Well, there is an enquire-link-interval which you could tweak. It defaults to 30. BR, Nikos - Original Message - *From:* hafez ahmad hafezad...@gmail.com *To:* Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com *Cc:* users@kannel.org *Sent:* Monday, March 09, 2009 3:43 PM *Subject:* Re: Not ACKED message found, will retransmit Dears, I still have the same problem, Any Ideas? , by they my operator advice me that * * *use “ESME_QRYLINK” on both transmitter and receiver to keep the connection live* may be that related to this error . Please advice. Regards, Hafez On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com wrote: Hmm, sorry, no idea. Seems like kannel forgets about the ack... A hotfix would be to set wait-ack-expire = 0x02 in the smsc group. That would make kannel waiting forever for the ACK and never retry. Very dirty hack, but should do the job until someone comes around with a better solution... Regards Falko Am 05.03.2009 um 13:37 schrieb hafez ahmad: Sorry, thats the correct 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0xa732ad00 dump: 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: type_name: submit_sm 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: command_id: 4 = 0x0004 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: command_status: 0 = 0x 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: sequence_number: 3684 = 0x0e64 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: service_type: V 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: source_addr_ton: 5 = 0x0005 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: source_addr_npi: 0 = 0x 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: source_addr: T2ME 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: dest_addr_ton: 1 = 0x0001 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: dest_addr_npi: 1 = 0x0001 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: destination_addr: 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: esm_class: 67 = 0x0043 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: protocol_id: 0 = 0x 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: priority_flag: 0 = 0x 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: schedule_delivery_time: NULL 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: validity_period: NULL 2009-03-03
Re: Not ACKED message found, will retransmit
Hi, try to delete the receive-port from the config and set: transceiver-mode = on I tried before but my operator disable the transceiver mode from his side. I'm not sure how kannel handles the notification problem. The MT gets send on the MTCONN while the DLR arrives on the MOCONN. I don't know if kannel can assign the DLR to message when they arrive in two diffrent SMSCs, but I don't think that this works. Maybe the same problem with ACKs ?! for the DLR that send using MT and received with another MO, I have it before and I solved it using the DLR group id batch, now every thing works fine, but I will monitor and update the list. Regards and many thanks for help. Hafez Am 10.03.2009 um 10:00 schrieb hafez ahmad: Dears Falko, Nikos, Thanks for your kind help, my configuration was like that: group = smsc smsc = smpp smsc-id = MOCONN host = xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx port = 0 receive-port = 8000 smsc-username = X smsc-password = XXX system-type = allowed-smsc-id = MOCONN interface-version = 34 address-range = reconnect-delay = 10 source-addr-ton = 1 source-addr-npi = 1 dest-addr-ton = 1 dest-addr-npi = 1 bind-addr-ton = 1 bind-addr-npi = 1 msg-id-type = 0x01 log-file = /var/log/mo.log group = smsc smsc = smpp smsc-id = MTCONN host = xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx port = 8000 receive-port = 0 smsc-username = X smsc-password = XXX system-type = allowed-smsc-id = MTCONN interface-version = 34 address-range = reconnect-delay = 10 source-addr-ton = 1 source-addr-npi = 1 dest-addr-ton = 1 dest-addr-npi = 1 bind-addr-ton = 1 bind-addr-npi = 1 msg-id-type = 0x01 log-file = /var/log/mt.log after that I make the transmitter and receiver in one SMSC group like that smsc = smpp smsc-id = MYCONN host = xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx port = 8000 receive-port = 8000 smsc-username = X smsc-password = XXX keepalive = 10 enquire-link-interval = 10 system-type = allowed-smsc-id = MYCONN interface-version = 34 address-range = reconnect-delay = 10 source-addr-ton = 5 source-addr-npi = 1 dest-addr-ton = 1 dest-addr-npi = 1 bind-addr-ton = 1 bind-addr-npi = 1 msg-id-type = 0x01 log-file = /var/log/conn.log but I still get the error in the logs until I changed the source-addr-npi = 1 to be source-addr-npi = 5. by the way is there different if I configure the transmitter and receiver in one SMSC group or 2 SMSC group? Thanks for help. Regards, Hafez On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 1:32 AM, Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com wrote: By the way, I just realised: transmitter and receiver? Are you using SMPP 3.3 instead of 3.4? Have you configured the receiver and transmitter in the same SMSC group? Normal SMPP 3.4 shouldn't have transmitter and receiver but only one transceiver. If you use 3.3 with divided transmitter and receiver connection, you need to configure both inside the same smsc-group, otherwise kannel cannot associate the ACK. (Well, no smsc I have seen so far could do this...) Falko Am 10.03.2009 um 00:26 schrieb Falko Ziemann: I just saw this behavior once before. There a service provider routed the ACK to another large account. So I send the message on MYMTCONN1 and received the ACK on MYMTCONN2. That's not the case, or? I can't see it from the log, the first line where kannel states the connection name is missing. But I really don't have a idea what this problem should have to do with keep alives. Are you loosing the connection between the submit and the ACK? Falko Am 09.03.2009 um 21:13 schrieb Nikos Balkanas: Well, there is an enquire-link-interval which you could tweak. It defaults to 30. BR, Nikos - Original Message - *From:* hafez ahmad hafezad...@gmail.com *To:* Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com *Cc:* users@kannel.org *Sent:* Monday, March 09, 2009 3:43 PM *Subject:* Re: Not ACKED message found, will retransmit Dears, I still have the same problem, Any Ideas? , by they my operator advice me that * * *use “ESME_QRYLINK” on both transmitter and receiver to keep the connection live* may be that related to this error . Please advice. Regards, Hafez On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com wrote: Hmm, sorry, no idea. Seems like kannel forgets about the ack... A hotfix would be to set wait-ack-expire = 0x02 in the smsc group. That would make kannel waiting forever for the ACK and never retry. Very dirty hack, but should do the job until someone comes around with a better solution... Regards Falko Am 05.03.2009 um 13:37 schrieb hafez ahmad: Sorry, thats the correct 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0xa732ad00 dump: 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: type_name: submit_sm 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: command_id: 4 = 0x0004 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: command_status: 0 = 0x 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: sequence_number: 3684 = 0x0e64 2009-03-03 21:00
Re: mysql storage frequent complains
Hi,
or can use *--with-mysql-dir=DIR* Where to look for MySQL libs and header
files. DIR points to the installation of MySQL.
Regards,
Hafez
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
you have to install the mysql-dev package first and then compile (!) kannel
with ./configure --with-mysql
Regards
Falko
Am 10.03.2009 um 10:42 schrieb Elton Hoxha:
Hi guys,
I have been searching in the list a lot regarding mysql storage issue. I
noticed that users complains are very similar (including mine that i`m not
able to configure mysql, in different machines as well), all of them using
the magic keyword DLR: storage type 'mysql' is not supported!
Which part of kannel is generating this error?
I went through the dlr_init just wondering why is that?
if (octstr_compare
http://doxygen.kannel.org/d1/da8/octstr_8h.html#a35(dlr_type
http://doxygen.kannel.org/d1/dcd/dlr_8c.html#a12, octstr_imm
http://doxygen.kannel.org/d1/da8/octstr_8h.html#a14(mysql)) == 0) {
handles http://doxygen.kannel.org/d1/dcd/dlr_8c.html#a3 = dlr_init_mysql
http://doxygen.kannel.org/de/d6b/dlr__p_8h.html#a8(cfg);
if (handles http://doxygen.kannel.org/d1/dcd/dlr_8c.html#a3 == NULL) {
panic http://doxygen.kannel.org/d7/d7f/log_8h.html#a0(0, DLR:
storage type '%s' is not supported!, octstr_get_cstr
http://doxygen.kannel.org/d1/da8/octstr_8h.html#a5(dlr_type
http://doxygen.kannel.org/d1/dcd/dlr_8c.html#a12));
}
Why kannel is failing to retrieve the initial configuration? I suspect, the
DLR-storage would fail for every type of database connection here, oracle
postgre.
Is it something wrong with my conf file?
dlr-storage=mysql
group=mysql-connection
id=mydlr
host=10.1.21.184
username=kannel
password=kannel
database=dlr
group = dlr-db
id = mydlr
table = dlr
field-smsc = smsc
field-timestamp = ts
field-source=source
field-destination = destination
field-service = service
field-url = url
field-mask = mask
field-status = status
Thanks
Elton
--
Hafez A.Ahmad
Amman-Jordan
mobile:962-785259011
962-795708728
http://blog.hafezadnan.com
ESME_QRYLINK
Hi All, My operator says *use “ESME_QRYLINK” on both transmitter and receiver to keep the connection live * , how can I do that with kannel (keeplive).? Regards, Hafez
Re: Not ACKED message found, will retransmit
Dears, I still have the same problem, Any Ideas? , by they my operator advice me that * * *use “ESME_QRYLINK” on both transmitter and receiver to keep the connection live* may be that related to this error . Please advice. Regards, Hafez On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com wrote: Hmm, sorry, no idea. Seems like kannel forgets about the ack... A hotfix would be to set wait-ack-expire = 0x02 in the smsc group. That would make kannel waiting forever for the ACK and never retry. Very dirty hack, but should do the job until someone comes around with a better solution... Regards Falko Am 05.03.2009 um 13:37 schrieb hafez ahmad: Sorry, thats the correct 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0xa732ad00 dump: 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: type_name: submit_sm 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: command_id: 4 = 0x0004 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: command_status: 0 = 0x 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: sequence_number: 3684 = 0x0e64 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: service_type: V 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: source_addr_ton: 5 = 0x0005 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: source_addr_npi: 0 = 0x 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: source_addr: T2ME 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: dest_addr_ton: 1 = 0x0001 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: dest_addr_npi: 1 = 0x0001 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: destination_addr: 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: esm_class: 67 = 0x0043 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: protocol_id: 0 = 0x 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: priority_flag: 0 = 0x 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: schedule_delivery_time: NULL 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: validity_period: NULL 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: registered_delivery: 0 = 0x 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: replace_if_present_flag: 0 = 0x 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: data_coding: 8 = 0x0008 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: sm_default_msg_id: 0 = 0x 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: sm_length: 140 = 0x008c 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: short_message: 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:Octet string at 0xa732af00: 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: len: 140 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: size: 1024 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: immutable: 0 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: data: 05 00 03 83 04 01 06 23 06 47 06 45 00 20 06 48 ...#.G.E. .H 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: data: 06 35 06 41 06 27 06 2a 00 20 06 4a 06 48 06 33 .5.A.'.*. .J.H.3 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: data: 06 41 00 20 06 27 06 44 06 34 06 31 06 41 06 27 .A. .'.D.4.1.A.' 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: data: 06 21 00 20 06 44 06 39 06 44 06 27 06 2c 00 20 .!. .D.9.D.'.,. 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: data: 06 27 06 44 06 43 06 48 06 44 06 4a 06 33 06 2a .'.D.C.H.D.J.3.* 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: data: 06 31 06 48 06 44 00 3a 00 20 06 2a 06 24 06 2e .1.H.D.:. .*.$.. 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: data: 06 30 00 20 06 46 06 33 06 28 00 20 06 45 06 2a .0. .F.3.(. .E.* 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: data: 06 33 06 27 06 48 06 4a 06 29 00 20 06 45 06 46 .3.'.H.J.). .E.F 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: data: 00 20 06 27 06 44 06 44 06 48 06 32 . .'.D.D.H.2 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:Octet string dump ends. 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: more_messages_to_send: 1 = 0x0001 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends. 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP[MYMTCONN]: Got PDU: 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0xa732ad00 dump: 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: type_name: submit_sm_resp 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: command_id: 2147483652 = 0x8004 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: command_status: 0 = 0x 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: sequence_number: 3684 = 0x0e64 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: message_id: 4129216897 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends. Regards, Hafez On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com wrote: Nope take a closer look: submit_sm: sequence_number: 3684 = 0x0e64 submit_sm_resp: sequence_number: 3680 = 0x0e60 That's not the ACK for the message you have posted but for 4 messages earlier. Regards Falko Am 05.03.2009 um 12:10 schrieb hafez ahmad: Dear falko, Thanks for reply I check the submit_sm_respon and I think everything works fine, Please advice, this is my log 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0xa732ad00 dump: 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG
Not ACKED message found, will retransmit
Hi All,
Hope your all doing well, I have the following warning in my logs,
2009-03-04 16:45:56 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not ACKED
message found, will retransmit. SENT62sec. ago, SEQ11674,
DST+
2009-03-04 16:47:24 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not ACKED
message found, will retransmit. SENT88sec. ago, SEQ11684,
DST+9888
2009-03-04 16:47:24 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not ACKED
message found, will retransmit. SENT88sec. ago, SEQ11685,
DST+
2009-03-04 16:47:24 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not ACKED
message found, will retransmit. SENT88sec. ago, SEQ11686,
DST+
2009-03-04 16:47:24 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not ACKED
message found, will retransmit. SENT88sec. ago, SEQ11682,
DST+
2009-03-04 16:47:24 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not ACKED
message found, will retransmit. SENT88sec. ago, SEQ11683,
DST+9888
2009-03-04 16:48:54 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not ACKED
message found, will retransmit. SENT90sec. ago, SEQ11693,
DST+
2009-03-04 16:48:54 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not ACKED
message found, will retransmit. SENT89sec. ago, SEQ11694,
DST+
2009-03-04 16:48:54 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not ACKED
message found, will retransmit. SENT89sec. ago, SEQ11695,
DST+9888
2009-03-04 16:48:54 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not ACKED
message found, will retransmit. SENT90sec. ago, SEQ11691,
DST+9888
2009-03-04 16:48:54 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not ACKED
message found, will retransmit. SENT90sec. ago, SEQ11692,
DST+
2009-03-04 16:50:24 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not ACKED
message found, will retransmit. SENT90sec. ago, SEQ11701,
DST+9888
2009-03-04 16:50:24 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not ACKED
message found, will retransmit. SENT90sec. ago, SEQ11702,
DST+9888
2009-03-04 16:50:24 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not ACKED
message found, will retransmit. SENT89sec. ago, SEQ11703,
DST+
2009-03-04 16:50:24 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not ACKED
message found, will retransmit. SENT90sec. ago, SEQ11699,
DST+
some users like the user +, received the SMS 2 times and every
time he is billed, I search about the problem and I found the following
code:
case SMPP_WAITACK_REQUEUE: /* requeue */
smpp_msg = dict_remove(smpp-sent_msgs, key);
if (smpp_msg != NULL) {
warning(0, SMPP[%s]: Not ACKED message found, will retransmit.
SENT%ldsec. ago, SEQ%s, DST%s,
octstr_get_cstr(smpp-conn-id),
(long)difftime(now, smpp_msg-sent_time) ,
octstr_get_cstr(key),
octstr_get_cstr(smpp_msg-msg-sms.receiver));
bb_smscconn_send_failed(smpp-conn, smpp_msg-msg,
SMSCCONN_FAILED_TEMPORARILY,NULL);
smpp_msg_destroy(smpp_msg, 0);
(*pending_submits)--;
}
As I understand from the code that the connection was down so kannel
requeue the SMS, is that right? and how can I be sure that the user will
get the SMS only one time? please advice.
BR,
Hafez
Re: Not ACKED message found, will retransmit
Dear falko, Thanks for reply I check the submit_sm_respon and I think everything works fine, Please advice, this is my log 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0xa732ad00 dump: 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: type_name: submit_sm 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: command_id: 4 = 0x0004 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: command_status: 0 = 0x 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: sequence_number: 3684 = 0x0e64 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: service_type: V 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: source_addr_ton: 5 = 0x0005 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: source_addr_npi: 0 = 0x 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: source_addr: T2ME 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: dest_addr_ton: 1 = 0x0001 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: dest_addr_npi: 1 = 0x0001 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: destination_addr: 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: esm_class: 67 = 0x0043 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: protocol_id: 0 = 0x 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: priority_flag: 0 = 0x 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: schedule_delivery_time: NULL 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: validity_period: NULL 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: registered_delivery: 0 = 0x 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: replace_if_present_flag: 0 = 0x 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: data_coding: 8 = 0x0008 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: sm_default_msg_id: 0 = 0x 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: sm_length: 140 = 0x008c 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: short_message: 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:Octet string at 0xa732af00: 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: len: 140 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: size: 1024 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: immutable: 0 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: data: 05 00 03 83 04 01 06 23 06 47 06 45 00 20 06 48 ...#.G.E. .H 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: data: 06 35 06 41 06 27 06 2a 00 20 06 4a 06 48 06 33 .5.A.'.*. .J.H.3 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: data: 06 41 00 20 06 27 06 44 06 34 06 31 06 41 06 27 .A. .'.D.4.1.A.' 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: data: 06 21 00 20 06 44 06 39 06 44 06 27 06 2c 00 20 .!. .D.9.D.'.,. 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: data: 06 27 06 44 06 43 06 48 06 44 06 4a 06 33 06 2a .'.D.C.H.D.J.3.* 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: data: 06 31 06 48 06 44 00 3a 00 20 06 2a 06 24 06 2e .1.H.D.:. .*.$.. 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: data: 06 30 00 20 06 46 06 33 06 28 00 20 06 45 06 2a .0. .F.3.(. .E.* 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: data: 06 33 06 27 06 48 06 4a 06 29 00 20 06 45 06 46 .3.'.H.J.). .E.F 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: data: 00 20 06 27 06 44 06 44 06 48 06 32 . .'.D.D.H.2 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:Octet string dump ends. 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: more_messages_to_send: 1 = 0x0001 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends. 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP[MYMTCONN]: Got PDU: 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0xa732ad00 dump: 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: type_name: submit_sm_resp 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: command_id: 2147483652 = 0x8004 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: command_status: 0 = 0x 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: sequence_number: 3680 = 0x0e60 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: message_id: 4129215894 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends. 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP[MYMTCONN]: Manually forced source addr ton = 5, source add npi = 1 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP[MYMTCONN]: Manually forced dest addr ton = 1, dest add npi = 1 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP[MYMTCONN]: Sending PDU: BR, Hafez On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com wrote: It looks like your SMPP service provider hasn't send a correct ACK for the message but delivered it. Please take a look in the smpp-logfile, what you provider answered to the submit_sm. Strongly looks like an error on your providers side. Regards Falko Am 05.03.2009 um 10:40 schrieb hafez ahmad: Hi All, Hope your all doing well, I have the following warning in my logs, 2009-03-04 16:45:56 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not ACKED message found, will retransmit. SENT62sec. ago, SEQ11674, DST+ 2009-03-04 16:47:24 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not ACKED message found, will retransmit. SENT88sec. ago, SEQ11684, DST+9888 2009-03-04 16:47:24 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not ACKED message found, will retransmit. SENT88sec. ago, SEQ11685, DST+ 2009-03-04 16:47:24 [2825] [14] WARNING
Re: Not ACKED message found, will retransmit
Sorry, thats the correct 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0xa732ad00 dump: 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: type_name: submit_sm 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: command_id: 4 = 0x0004 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: command_status: 0 = 0x 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: sequence_number: 3684 = 0x0e64 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: service_type: V 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: source_addr_ton: 5 = 0x0005 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: source_addr_npi: 0 = 0x 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: source_addr: T2ME 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: dest_addr_ton: 1 = 0x0001 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: dest_addr_npi: 1 = 0x0001 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: destination_addr: 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: esm_class: 67 = 0x0043 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: protocol_id: 0 = 0x 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: priority_flag: 0 = 0x 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: schedule_delivery_time: NULL 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: validity_period: NULL 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: registered_delivery: 0 = 0x 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: replace_if_present_flag: 0 = 0x 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: data_coding: 8 = 0x0008 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: sm_default_msg_id: 0 = 0x 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: sm_length: 140 = 0x008c 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: short_message: 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:Octet string at 0xa732af00: 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: len: 140 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: size: 1024 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: immutable: 0 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: data: 05 00 03 83 04 01 06 23 06 47 06 45 00 20 06 48 ...#.G.E. .H 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: data: 06 35 06 41 06 27 06 2a 00 20 06 4a 06 48 06 33 .5.A.'.*. .J.H.3 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: data: 06 41 00 20 06 27 06 44 06 34 06 31 06 41 06 27 .A. .'.D.4.1.A.' 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: data: 06 21 00 20 06 44 06 39 06 44 06 27 06 2c 00 20 .!. .D.9.D.'.,. 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: data: 06 27 06 44 06 43 06 48 06 44 06 4a 06 33 06 2a .'.D.C.H.D.J.3.* 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: data: 06 31 06 48 06 44 00 3a 00 20 06 2a 06 24 06 2e .1.H.D.:. .*.$.. 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: data: 06 30 00 20 06 46 06 33 06 28 00 20 06 45 06 2a .0. .F.3.(. .E.* 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: data: 06 33 06 27 06 48 06 4a 06 29 00 20 06 45 06 46 .3.'.H.J.). .E.F 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: data: 00 20 06 27 06 44 06 44 06 48 06 32 . .'.D.D.H.2 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:Octet string dump ends. 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: more_messages_to_send: 1 = 0x0001 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends. 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP[MYMTCONN]: Got PDU: 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0xa732ad00 dump: 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: type_name: submit_sm_resp 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: command_id: 2147483652 = 0x8004 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: command_status: 0 = 0x 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: sequence_number: 3684 = 0x0e64 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: message_id: 4129216897 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends. Regards, Hafez On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com wrote: Nope take a closer look: submit_sm: sequence_number: 3684 = 0x0e64 submit_sm_resp: sequence_number: 3680 = 0x0e60 That's not the ACK for the message you have posted but for 4 messages earlier. Regards Falko Am 05.03.2009 um 12:10 schrieb hafez ahmad: Dear falko, Thanks for reply I check the submit_sm_respon and I think everything works fine, Please advice, this is my log 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0xa732ad00 dump: 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: type_name: submit_sm 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: command_id: 4 = 0x0004 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: command_status: 0 = 0x 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: sequence_number: 3684 = 0x0e64 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: service_type: V 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: source_addr_ton: 5 = 0x0005 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: source_addr_npi: 0 = 0x 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: source_addr: T2ME 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: dest_addr_ton: 1 = 0x0001 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: dest_addr_npi: 1 = 0x0001 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: destination_addr: 2009-03
Re: how to send and receive sms in chinese character
Hi, use charset=UTF-8coding=2 in the URL like the following: curl http://Kannel_URL?username=testerpassword=foobarcharset=UTF-8coding=2to=xxtext=TESTfrom=Hafezsmsc=SMSC_ID Regards, Hafez On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Low Weng Kin powered182...@live.comwrote: Hi all, Can anyone help me on the configuration required to receive sms in chinese character? My current configuration pass the incoming SMS to a page called http://localhost:4242/ReceiveSMS.aspx?phone=%ptext=%a;. During the page load event of my page, I will store the sms parameter to my database. Somehow, the message I got in the database is ? instead of what I sent from the SMPPSIM. Here is my config for the smsbox: *group = smsbox bearerbox-host = 127.0.0.1 sendsms-port = 13013 global-sender = 13013 mo-recode = true #sendsms-chars = 0123456789 +- log-file = /tmp/smsbox.log log-level = 0 #access-log = /tmp/access.log *Btw, I am using Cygwin to run Kannel. Regards, Low -- Chat online and in real-time with friends and family! Windows Live Messenger http://get.live.com/messenger/overview -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com
Re: SUBMIT_MULTI with kannel
Dear Stipe,
Many Thanks for your advice and tips :)
Regards,
Hafez
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 7:39 PM, Stipe Tolj s...@tolj.org wrote:
hafez ahmad schrieb:
Hi all,
Thanks for reply, what about this patch
http://www.kannel.org/pipermail/devel/2006-August/000136.html , did
someone test it before?
Stipe: can you please add simple page to the documentation that show how
we can become a Kannel developers ( need skills , resources,
spacifications...etc ) , I started with C programming to contribute with
Kannel what next :).
now, it's hard to give a road map here. What you need to be aware of
(skills
that are required):
- C in a POSIX.1 environment
- POSIX threads (pthreads)
- how the Kannel gwlib library abstracts arbitrary data types we use
everywhere
(i.e. Octstr, List, etc)
- architecture of the Kannel daemons (i.e. abstraction layers of bearerbox)
and
inter-process communication of the daemons using our Kannel msg struct TCP
channel.
To be honest: It's FAIRLY not enough to know how you can compile a hello
world
example C source code, to be able to contribute to Kannel with the quality
of
patches we expect. But don't let me dis encourage you, go ahead and
LEARN.
You're source is the sources of Kannel. :)
Join the devel@ mailing list, which is more related to development
aspects, then
the users@ list that handles more the usage cases.
Stipe
--
---
Kölner Landstrasse 419
40589 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
tolj.org system architecture Kannel Software Foundation (KSF)
http://www.tolj.org/ http://www.kannel.org/
mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org st_%7Bat%7D_tolj.org mailto:
stolj_{at}_kannel.org stolj_%7Bat%7D_kannel.org
---
--
Hafez A.Ahmad
Amman-Jordan
mobile:962-785259011
962-795708728
http://blog.hafezadnan.com
Re: How to send midi ring tone in UDH headers using kannel?
Hi, Hope this help http://dev.sellingsource.com/2006/12/07/sending-wap-push-messages-with-kannel-php/ Regards, Hafez On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Maroof Raza Khan maroofmi...@gmail.comwrote: HI, Can anyone help to send midi ring tone in UDH headers to subscriber without wappush / mms? Maroof Raza +92 333 4442223 Maroof Raza Khan _ Mob: +92 345 444 2223 Mob: +92 333 444 2223 Email: maroofmi...@gmail.com Email (+ MSN): maroofmi...@hotmail.com _ -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com
Re: (retry) How to set up routing to different SMSC's ?
Hi, Is there any easy way to configure the mapping between SMSC ID's and short codes? We have the following requirements for a project, and I'm trying to determine what is the best and cleanest way to configure kannel to achieve them. I'm using kannel v1.4.1 . I prefer to use 1.4.3 , solve many things and have many new features i) We need to be able to receive SMS messages from various SMSC's , e.g. messages sent by people to short code 111 would be received through one particular SMSC, and those sent to 222 would be received through another SMSC. this is depend on you operator configuration, may be you operator define one SMSC connection and route all the SMS ( from 111 and 222) to the same SMSC (and in this case you need to check the receiver number) , or may be you operator give you more than one session for single short code (for example SMSC1 + SMSC2 for the short code 111 and SMSC3 and SMSC4 for 222) So you can ask the team who handel the Kannel configration. ii) An application processes each message, and sends any reply back to the sender via kannel's normal sendsms interface: http://localhost:13013/cgi-bin/sendsms?. The message must be sent back through the same SMSC from which it was originally received, and with the same short code. (i.e. if a message is received from SMSC with short code 222, the reply has to go back through SMSC and appear to the customer as coming from '222'. ) you need to let you application use the parameter *smsc* in the sendsms interface, (e.g when your application fetch the rows from the mo table , there are field that determine the incoming smsc , so use it the same to send SMS) , but not to do that you SMPP connections must be transiver not reciver only ( ask your kannel team) iii) An application should also be able to send a random application-initiated message through SMSC that it wishes. If it doesn't specify any particular SMSC, it should through a specific default SMSC. I think the following relevant bits of configuration are a good start. group = smsc smsc-id = allowed-smsc-id = group = smsc smsc-id = allowed-smsc-id = group = smsc smsc-id = allowed-smsc-id = group = smsc smsc-id = denied-smsc-id = ;; From my testing, this means that if the application specifies smsc= as a parameter, i.e. http://localhost:13013/cgi-bin/sendsms?smsc= it will ALWAYS go through and nowhere else. If the application doesn't specify the smsc= parameter (or specifies a non-existant one), then the message will ALWAYS go through and nowhere else. That's what I want and I hope that's how it's meant to work. It does mean that if I add a new SMSC in the future, then we have to remember to also add it to the denied-smsc-id configuration above. A bit convoluted, but that's how kannel seems to work. Now, regarding the 'from=' parameter: From my observations, the SMSC's here (over which I have no control), tolerate only certain source numbers. So for example if I try sending back a SMS reply to a customer through SMSC , then that SMSC will accept a 'from' address of 222, but not 111 for example. http://localhost:13013/cgi-bin/sendsms?smsc=from=222 I was hoping that maybe I could leave out the from= parameter and then perhaps the SMSC itself would fill it in with a default correct value (I have no idea if our SMSC's are set up like that, but at least I would have liked to test it). But if I leave out the from= parameter from the URL above, kannel itself refuses to accept the URL, giving: ERROR 400: Bad Request Is there any clean way to configure kannel to tell it the relationships between the short codes and the SMSC ID? Continuing from above, requirement #4 is: I can't get you here. iv) Ideally the application should be able to specify just the smsc or the 'from' field, and kannel should be able to supply the rest. http://localhost:13013/cgi-bin/sendsms?smsc= or http://localhost:13013/cgi-bin/sendsms?from=222 There's a lot of documentation in the kannel user guide so the solution may be staring me in the face, but I find a lot of it challenging to understand, especially the parts about 'routing'. The only way I could find to implement this is the following: I haven't tried to test this yet. I could set up one sendsms-user per SMSC. So for example for SMSC , I could set up with user: group = sendsms-user username = user_ default-smsc = default-sender = 61421260388 That way if the application wants to sends a message to SMSC , it (hopefully) only needs to do http://localhost:13013/cgi-bin/sendsms?username=user_ and can leave out either or both the smsc= and from= parameters. Of
Re: SUBMIT_MULTI with kannel
Hi all,
Thanks for reply, what about this patch
http://www.kannel.org/pipermail/devel/2006-August/000136.html , did someone
test it before?
Stipe: can you please add simple page to the documentation that show how we
can become a Kannel developers ( need skills , resources,
spacifications...etc ) , I started with C programming to contribute with
Kannel what next :).
Thanks for help again.
BR,
Hafez
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 1:15 AM, Stipe Tolj s...@tolj.org wrote:
Nikos Balkanas schrieb:
There seems to be support for it in gw/smsc/smpp_pdu.def:
PDU(submit_multi,
0x0021,
HEADER
NULTERMINATED(service_type, 6)
INTEGER(source_addr_ton, 1)
INTEGER(source_addr_npi, 1)
NULTERMINATED(source_addr, 21)
INTEGER(number_of_dests, 1)
Can someone confirm if it is actually implemented?
the SMPP PDU [un]packing for it IS supported, but we don't use it for
multi-destination purposes as it is intended by the spec.
Stipe
--
---
Kölner Landstrasse 419
40589 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
tolj.org system architecture Kannel Software Foundation (KSF)
http://www.tolj.org/ http://www.kannel.org/
mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org st_%7Bat%7D_tolj.org mailto:
stolj_{at}_kannel.org stolj_%7Bat%7D_kannel.org
---
--
Hafez A.Ahmad
Amman-Jordan
mobile:962-785259011
962-795708728
http://blog.hafezadnan.com
Re: SUBMIT_MULTI with kannel
Thanks Michael, I search in code and I found that * 4. SubmitMulti PDUs not supported in the file gw/smsc/smsc_smasi.c , so I will try the patch. Thanks again. Hafez On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 8:19 AM, Michael Bochkaryov mi...@rattler.kiev.uawrote: Hi Hafez, As far as I know, kannel doesn't support submit_multi PDU in SMPP protocol. However you can try to applly necessary changes from patch mentioned here: http://www.kannel.org/pipermail/devel/2006-August/000136.html 2009/2/16 hafez ahmad hafezad...@gmail.com: Hi All, dose kannel support the SUBMIT_MULTI ?. Regards, Hafez -- Michael Bochkaryov Phone: +380 67 2206770 Net Style: VAS and IT solutions www.netstyle.com.ua -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com
Re: Kannel left open connections on provider's side
Dears, I had similar problem, I find workaround (not efficient but work for me), that I increase the reconnect-delay so the TCP connections (from client side) closed. Hope that work for you. BR, Hafez On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 9:53 PM, Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Just to add that this is not a kannel issue, but network. Kannel, like any application, doesn't control the 3-way TCP handshake or the 3-way closing. It just opens and closes a connection. The underlying OS is taking care of the rest, which it is safe to assume it is not at fault. I see 2 problems: 1) Network: Something is hanging up connections to dry. Since the SMSc says that no other client has this issue, it could be a device on your side. If you don't get any hang connections with other servers, it could be something in the middle. 2) Server: The SMSc server needs to configure tcp_close_timeouts on the tcp driver. I am surprised if it is the only time they noticed. BR, Nikos - Original Message - From: Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.com To: Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com; Manuel Fernando Aller manuel.al...@gmail.com Cc: users@kannel.org Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 8:56 PM Subject: Re: Kannel left open connections on provider's side Well, actually it shows that the local SMPP server (192.x) is waiting on a FIN from 10.10.x. There is an issue why 10.10 is not sending a fin (brute disconnection?), but the provider should fine-tune his tcp-close-wait-interval, nevertheless. In Solaris: ndd /dev/tcp tcp_time_wait_interval 6 (for 1' CLOSE_WAIT interval) BR, Nikos - Original Message - From: Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com To: Manuel Fernando Aller manuel.al...@gmail.com Cc: users@kannel.org Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 8:14 PM Subject: Re: Kannel left open connections on provider's side Ok, the operator sent the output of netstat -n to me: tcp0 0 192.168.1.55:3000 10.10.2.10:55740 CLOSE_WAIT tcp0 0 192.168.1.55:3000 10.10.2.10:41852 CLOSE_WAIT tcp0 0 192.168.1.55:3000 10.10.2.10:40574 CLOSE_WAIT tcp0 0 192.168.1.55:3000 10.10.2.10:45049 CLOSE_WAIT tcp0 0 192.168.1.55:3000 10.10.2.10:43960 CLOSE_WAIT tcp0 0 192.168.1.55:3000 10.10.2.10:45496 CLOSE_WAIT tcp0 0 192.168.1.55:3000 10.10.2.10:56315 CLOSE_WAIT tcp0 0 192.168.1.55:3000 10.10.2.10:57205 CLOSE_WAIT . . where 192.168.1.55 is the local ip for his smsc server, and 10.10.2.10 is my ip (yes, I've chage that!). That's NAT, that's normal. But, I admit, I have forgot a lot about the TCP stack since my apprentienceship, but doesn't CLOSE_WAIT mean, the foreign side (you) closed the connection and the stack is waiting for the LOCAL software to acknowledge the FIN? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Tcp_state_diagram_fixed.svg Regards Falko -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com
Re: error code 0x00000058
Dears, Thanks for reply, I contact my operator and I solve the problem, but I have the error SMSC returned error code 0x0014 (Message Queue Full) in response to submit_sm , and they says that I have to wait the sms response then send a new sms, How can I control the waiting time for the response? i set both throughput = 25 and max-pending-submit = 5, if I set the max-pending-submit = 6 I get the error, but if I do that the actual throughput = 4 sms/sec. Please advice, Thanks again for help. Hafez On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.com wrote: No. Actually bearerbox is the one with the SMSc connections. smsbox has nothing to do with it. BR, Nikos - Original Message - *From:* hafez ahmad hafezad...@gmail.com *To:* Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com *Cc:* users@kannel.org *Sent:* Monday, February 16, 2009 9:48 AM *Subject:* Re: error code 0x0058 Dear Falko, 1st thanks Falko for you usual help :). I ask my operator if there are daily limitation, but he answer me NO, he gave me a TX connection with 25sms/sec, and I set the throughput = 20sms and the max-pending-submit = 10 , but I have the same problem, the max throughput that I get is 5 sms/sec, and I still get the Queue full error and Throttling error. I check my bandwidth, my I/O, my hardware and everything works fine, any Ideas why I cant get the actual throughput? and if I have more than one SMSbox , is that improve the performance? Regards, Hafez On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 3:58 PM, hafez ahmad hafezad...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Flko, I will contact my Provider. Regards, Hafez On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com wrote: Well, throughput is a technical limitation, lets say 10 sms/sec. But maybe you also have a legal limitation (100.000 sms/day) and get the error because of this? (spam) Simply ask your provider which limitation you have broken. Regards Flko Am 11.01.2009 um 12:35 schrieb hafez ahmad: Thanks falko, thanks for reply , but I set the throughput correctly, is there any thing can I do it more ? regards. Hafez On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com wrote: SMPP Spec says: Throttling error (ESME has exceeded allowed message limits) Too many messages in a too short time. Regards Falko Am 11.01.2009 um 12:10 schrieb hafez ahmad: Dears I get this error when I send using my TX session, any I ideas what it mean: 2009-01-11 13:04:53 [8532] [39] ERROR: SMPP[MYTXCONN]: SMSC returned error code 0x0058 (Throttling error) in response to submit_sm. Regards, Hafez -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com
Re: error code 0x00000058
Thanks Nikos for help what I need reference the smpp specification is * synchronous *connection*.* *The exchange of SMPP request and response PDUs between an ESME Transmitter and SMSC may occur synchronously or asynchronously as shown above. Thus an ESME may, if desired, send multiple requests to the SMSC, without synchronously waiting for the associated response PDUs.* is that down by max-pending-submit ? Regards and many thanks for your help Regards, Hafez On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.com wrote: ESME_RMSGQFUL 0x0014 Message Queue Full. Used to indicate a resource error within the MC. This may be interpreted as the maximum number of messages addressed to a single destination or a global maximum of undelivered messages within the MC. The waiting time for the Ack is in wait-ack. But I am not sure that this is what you want. BR, Nikos - Original Message - *From:* hafez ahmad hafezad...@gmail.com *To:* Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.com *Cc:* Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com ; users@kannel.org *Sent:* Monday, February 16, 2009 3:00 PM *Subject:* Re: error code 0x0058 Dears, Thanks for reply, I contact my operator and I solve the problem, but I have the error SMSC returned error code 0x0014 (Message Queue Full) in response to submit_sm , and they says that I have to wait the sms response then send a new sms, How can I control the waiting time for the response? i set both throughput = 25 and max-pending-submit = 5, if I set the max-pending-submit = 6 I get the error, but if I do that the actual throughput = 4 sms/sec. Please advice, Thanks again for help. Hafez On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.comwrote: No. Actually bearerbox is the one with the SMSc connections. smsbox has nothing to do with it. BR, Nikos - Original Message - *From:* hafez ahmad hafezad...@gmail.com *To:* Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com *Cc:* users@kannel.org *Sent:* Monday, February 16, 2009 9:48 AM *Subject:* Re: error code 0x0058 Dear Falko, 1st thanks Falko for you usual help :). I ask my operator if there are daily limitation, but he answer me NO, he gave me a TX connection with 25sms/sec, and I set the throughput = 20sms and the max-pending-submit = 10 , but I have the same problem, the max throughput that I get is 5 sms/sec, and I still get the Queue full error and Throttling error. I check my bandwidth, my I/O, my hardware and everything works fine, any Ideas why I cant get the actual throughput? and if I have more than one SMSbox , is that improve the performance? Regards, Hafez On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 3:58 PM, hafez ahmad hafezad...@gmail.comwrote: Thanks Flko, I will contact my Provider. Regards, Hafez On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com wrote: Well, throughput is a technical limitation, lets say 10 sms/sec. But maybe you also have a legal limitation (100.000 sms/day) and get the error because of this? (spam) Simply ask your provider which limitation you have broken. Regards Flko Am 11.01.2009 um 12:35 schrieb hafez ahmad: Thanks falko, thanks for reply , but I set the throughput correctly, is there any thing can I do it more ? regards. Hafez On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.comwrote: SMPP Spec says: Throttling error (ESME has exceeded allowed message limits) Too many messages in a too short time. Regards Falko Am 11.01.2009 um 12:10 schrieb hafez ahmad: Dears I get this error when I send using my TX session, any I ideas what it mean: 2009-01-11 13:04:53 [8532] [39] ERROR: SMPP[MYTXCONN]: SMSC returned error code 0x0058 (Throttling error) in response to submit_sm. Regards, Hafez -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com
Re: error code 0x00000058
Many Thanks nikos :) Hafez. On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.com wrote: Yes. Asynchronous communication in SMPP is done with max-pending-submit. wait-ack and wait-ack-expire fine tune this behaviour. Nikos - Original Message - *From:* hafez ahmad hafezad...@gmail.com *To:* Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.com *Cc:* Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com ; users@kannel.org *Sent:* Monday, February 16, 2009 3:23 PM *Subject:* Re: error code 0x0058 Thanks Nikos for help what I need reference the smpp specification is * synchronous *connection*.* *The exchange of SMPP request and response PDUs between an ESME Transmitter and SMSC may occur synchronously or asynchronously as shown above. Thus an ESME may, if desired, send multiple requests to the SMSC, without synchronously waiting for the associated response PDUs.* is that down by max-pending-submit ? Regards and many thanks for your help Regards, Hafez On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.comwrote: ESME_RMSGQFUL 0x0014 Message Queue Full. Used to indicate a resource error within the MC. This may be interpreted as the maximum number of messages addressed to a single destination or a global maximum of undelivered messages within the MC. The waiting time for the Ack is in wait-ack. But I am not sure that this is what you want. BR, Nikos - Original Message - *From:* hafez ahmad hafezad...@gmail.com *To:* Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.com *Cc:* Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com ; users@kannel.org *Sent:* Monday, February 16, 2009 3:00 PM *Subject:* Re: error code 0x0058 Dears, Thanks for reply, I contact my operator and I solve the problem, but I have the error SMSC returned error code 0x0014 (Message Queue Full) in response to submit_sm , and they says that I have to wait the sms response then send a new sms, How can I control the waiting time for the response? i set both throughput = 25 and max-pending-submit = 5, if I set the max-pending-submit = 6 I get the error, but if I do that the actual throughput = 4 sms/sec. Please advice, Thanks again for help. Hafez On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.comwrote: No. Actually bearerbox is the one with the SMSc connections. smsbox has nothing to do with it. BR, Nikos - Original Message - *From:* hafez ahmad hafezad...@gmail.com *To:* Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com *Cc:* users@kannel.org *Sent:* Monday, February 16, 2009 9:48 AM *Subject:* Re: error code 0x0058 Dear Falko, 1st thanks Falko for you usual help :). I ask my operator if there are daily limitation, but he answer me NO, he gave me a TX connection with 25sms/sec, and I set the throughput = 20sms and the max-pending-submit = 10 , but I have the same problem, the max throughput that I get is 5 sms/sec, and I still get the Queue full error and Throttling error. I check my bandwidth, my I/O, my hardware and everything works fine, any Ideas why I cant get the actual throughput? and if I have more than one SMSbox , is that improve the performance? Regards, Hafez On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 3:58 PM, hafez ahmad hafezad...@gmail.comwrote: Thanks Flko, I will contact my Provider. Regards, Hafez On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.comwrote: Well, throughput is a technical limitation, lets say 10 sms/sec. But maybe you also have a legal limitation (100.000 sms/day) and get the error because of this? (spam) Simply ask your provider which limitation you have broken. Regards Flko Am 11.01.2009 um 12:35 schrieb hafez ahmad: Thanks falko, thanks for reply , but I set the throughput correctly, is there any thing can I do it more ? regards. Hafez On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.comwrote: SMPP Spec says: Throttling error (ESME has exceeded allowed message limits) Too many messages in a too short time. Regards Falko Am 11.01.2009 um 12:10 schrieb hafez ahmad: Dears I get this error when I send using my TX session, any I ideas what it mean: 2009-01-11 13:04:53 [8532] [39] ERROR: SMPP[MYTXCONN]: SMSC returned error code 0x0058 (Throttling error) in response to submit_sm. Regards, Hafez -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http
SUBMIT_MULTI with kannel
Hi All, dose kannel support the SUBMIT_MULTI ?. Regards, Hafez
Re: error code 0x00000058
Dear Falko, 1st thanks Falko for you usual help :). I ask my operator if there are daily limitation, but he answer me NO, he gave me a TX connection with 25sms/sec, and I set the throughput = 20sms and the max-pending-submit = 10 , but I have the same problem, the max throughput that I get is 5 sms/sec, and I still get the Queue full error and Throttling error. I check my bandwidth, my I/O, my hardware and everything works fine, any Ideas why I cant get the actual throughput? and if I have more than one SMSbox , is that improve the performance? Regards, Hafez On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 3:58 PM, hafez ahmad hafezad...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Flko, I will contact my Provider. Regards, Hafez On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com wrote: Well, throughput is a technical limitation, lets say 10 sms/sec. But maybe you also have a legal limitation (100.000 sms/day) and get the error because of this? (spam) Simply ask your provider which limitation you have broken. Regards Flko Am 11.01.2009 um 12:35 schrieb hafez ahmad: Thanks falko, thanks for reply , but I set the throughput correctly, is there any thing can I do it more ? regards. Hafez On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com wrote: SMPP Spec says:Throttling error (ESME has exceeded allowed message limits) Too many messages in a too short time. Regards Falko Am 11.01.2009 um 12:10 schrieb hafez ahmad: Dears I get this error when I send using my TX session, any I ideas what it mean: 2009-01-11 13:04:53 [8532] [39] ERROR: SMPP[MYTXCONN]: SMSC returned error code 0x0058 (Throttling error) in response to submit_sm. Regards, Hafez -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com
Re: Receiving long messages
Hi, Solved, It was a configuration from the operator side. Regards, Hafez On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 5:44 PM, hafez ahmad hafezad...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, Did any one test this feature with new release. Regards, hafez On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 3:09 PM, hafez ahmad hafezad...@gmail.com wrote: Dears, I test the concatenated MO sms, and it looks dose not work, I set the option sms-combine-concatenated-mo , and I receiving the SMS , 2 parts. 2009-01-27 15:01:30 Receive SMS [SMSC:TESTRX] [SVC:] [ACT:] [BINF:] [FID:] [from:+] [to:66] [flags:-1:2:-1:0:-1] [msg:134:063A062F0627062C062806460637062C06270628062F06410637062C062706280633062F062C0637064106460633062F062C0627062806410637062C062F063306280627062F062C064106330628062C062F0641063306280627062F063306330641062F0641063706410633062800200627062E062A06280627063100200644063706480644] [udh:0:] 2009-01-27 15:01:40 Receive SMS [SMSC:TESTRX] [SVC:] [ACT:] [BINF:] [FID:] [from:+] [to:66] [flags:-1:2:-1:0:-1] [msg:30:002006270631063306270644064700200627064406420635064A06310647] [udh:0:] Any Ideas. Regards, Hafez On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Monim Benaiad bena...@gmail.com wrote: I think it's sms-combine-concatenated-mo = true in the core group. with the stable release -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com
Re: Receiving long messages
Hi All, Did any one test this feature with new release. Regards, hafez On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 3:09 PM, hafez ahmad hafezad...@gmail.com wrote: Dears, I test the concatenated MO sms, and it looks dose not work, I set the option sms-combine-concatenated-mo , and I receiving the SMS , 2 parts. 2009-01-27 15:01:30 Receive SMS [SMSC:TESTRX] [SVC:] [ACT:] [BINF:] [FID:] [from:+] [to:66] [flags:-1:2:-1:0:-1] [msg:134:063A062F0627062C062806460637062C06270628062F06410637062C062706280633062F062C0637064106460633062F062C0627062806410637062C062F063306280627062F062C064106330628062C062F0641063306280627062F063306330641062F0641063706410633062800200627062E062A06280627063100200644063706480644] [udh:0:] 2009-01-27 15:01:40 Receive SMS [SMSC:TESTRX] [SVC:] [ACT:] [BINF:] [FID:] [from:+] [to:66] [flags:-1:2:-1:0:-1] [msg:30:002006270631063306270644064700200627064406420635064A06310647] [udh:0:] Any Ideas. Regards, Hafez On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Monim Benaiad bena...@gmail.com wrote: I think it's sms-combine-concatenated-mo = true in the core group. with the stable release -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com
Getting the message_id from submit_sm_response
Hi, Is the patch that get the message_id from submit_sm_responsehttp://www.blogalex.com/archives/10by Alejandro included in the Last stable release. Thanks Alejandro for your effort. Regards, -- Hafez A.Ahmad
shutdown or restart one SMPP connection
Dears, if I have 25 SMPP connection, is there a way to stop or restart one connection without stop other connections? and by the way I use only one SMSBOX. Regards, Hafez
Re: shutdown or restart one SMPP connection
Hi, Thanks falko for reply, but I used it before, I set the same password and port number of the admin, and it print out *Denied* and by the way the status url work fine with the same password and port number. Any Ideas? Regards, Hafez On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com wrote: lynx http://localhost:13000/stop-smsc?password=pwdsmsc=smsc1; http://localhost:13000/stop-smsc?password=pwdsmsc=smsc1%22; Regards Falko Am 27.01.2009 um 09:53 schrieb hafez ahmad: Dears, if I have 25 SMPP connection, is there a way to stop or restart one connection without stop other connections? and by the way I use only one SMSBOX. Regards, Hafez -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com
Re: shutdown or restart one SMPP connection
Thanks all, it works fine now. Regards, Hafez On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Ishtiaq Ahmed ishtiaq.ah...@ooober.comwrote: Hi Hafez, Sure the http administration gives you the control to stop / start any specific smsc... I hope this will help you... http://kannel:box :AdminPort/stop-smsc?password=youradminpasswordsmsc=yourSMSCid Regards, Ishtiaq Ahmed hafez ahmad wrote: Dears, if I have 25 SMPP connection, is there a way to stop or restart one connection without stop other connections? and by the way I use only one SMSBOX. Regards, Hafez -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com
Re: shutdown or restart one SMPP connection
But another related question please, if I add new SMPP connection , can I start the connection without shutdown the bearerbox and the smsbox? Regards, hafez On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 12:56 PM, hafez ahmad hafezad...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks all, it works fine now. Regards, Hafez On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Ishtiaq Ahmed ishtiaq.ah...@ooober.comwrote: Hi Hafez, Sure the http administration gives you the control to stop / start any specific smsc... I hope this will help you... http://kannel:box :AdminPort/stop-smsc?password=youradminpasswordsmsc=yourSMSCid Regards, Ishtiaq Ahmed hafez ahmad wrote: Dears, if I have 25 SMPP connection, is there a way to stop or restart one connection without stop other connections? and by the way I use only one SMSBOX. Regards, Hafez -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com
Re: Receiving long messages
Dears, I test the concatenated MO sms, and it looks dose not work, I set the option sms-combine-concatenated-mo , and I receiving the SMS , 2 parts. 2009-01-27 15:01:30 Receive SMS [SMSC:TESTRX] [SVC:] [ACT:] [BINF:] [FID:] [from:+] [to:66] [flags:-1:2:-1:0:-1] [msg:134:063A062F0627062C062806460637062C06270628062F06410637062C062706280633062F062C0637064106460633062F062C0627062806410637062C062F063306280627062F062C064106330628062C062F0641063306280627062F063306330641062F0641063706410633062800200627062E062A06280627063100200644063706480644] [udh:0:] 2009-01-27 15:01:40 Receive SMS [SMSC:TESTRX] [SVC:] [ACT:] [BINF:] [FID:] [from:+] [to:66] [flags:-1:2:-1:0:-1] [msg:30:002006270631063306270644064700200627064406420635064A06310647] [udh:0:] Any Ideas. Regards, Hafez On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Monim Benaiad bena...@gmail.com wrote: I think it's sms-combine-concatenated-mo = true in the core group. with the stable release -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com
Re: Receiving long messages
Hi, I think this problem solved with the new release from kannel , like the new release announcement contains * Added concatenation MO support. Regards, Hafez On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Matti Koljonen matti.koljo...@kontaktia.fi wrote: Hi, Is there way to concatenate incoming long SMS to one msg? When sending SMS out Kannel does that automatically. Is there identical feature for receiving long messages? For some reason we are receiving UDH as null so we are not able to use that to do concatenation. Best Regards Matti Koljonen -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com
Re: How DLR matched with in the Database
Dear Nikos, So this is invalid behavior from Kannel or what ? , and another thing may be related to this thing, when the DLR from TRX connection, and we use msg-id-type like 0x01 (deliver_sm decimal, submit_sm_resp hex) , is that may cause the kannel to can not find the requested DLR , or the recived DLR with msg id from type HEX convert internaly to decimal Regards, Hafez On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.com wrote: Pretty much, except for ts. If that were true for ts, you should get your DLR sometime in 4000 AD :-) If I ma not mistaken, ts is actully the DLR meesage-id. It is related to your original message-id, (hence kannel can find it) but is not the same. BR, Nikos - Original Message - *From:* hafez ahmad hafezad...@gmail.com *To:* Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.com *Cc:* users@kannel.org *Sent:* Monday, January 12, 2009 12:09 PM *Subject:* Re: How DLR matched with in the Database Dear Nikos, Thanks for reply, but can you please explain more, I have the following in my config file: and my log: field-smsc = smsc field-timestamp = ts field-destination = destination field-source = source field-service = service field-url = url field-mask = mask field-status = status field-boxc-id = boxc 2009-01-12 11:49:09 [29596] [36] DEBUG: DLR[mysql]: Looking for DLR smsc=MYCONN, ts=643779203, dst=9xxx, type=1 is that mean that kannel look for the recorde with timestamp = 643779203 and destination = 9xxx and smsc = MYCONN. and thanks again. Regards, Hafez On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.comwrote: No. It matches your configuration file, where you describe the exact matching between variables and columns in your table. BR, Nikos - Original Message - *From:* hafez ahmad hafezad...@gmail.com *To:* users@kannel.org *Sent:* Sunday, January 11, 2009 3:57 PM *Subject:* How DLR matched with in the Database Dears, when DLR back to kannel from the SMSC, how it match with the mysql DLR table ?, is it using the *Message id *? Regards, Hafez -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com
Re: How DLR matched with in the Database
Dear Nikos, Thanks for reply, but can you please explain more, I have the following in my config file: and my log: field-smsc = smsc field-timestamp = ts field-destination = destination field-source = source field-service = service field-url = url field-mask = mask field-status = status field-boxc-id = boxc 2009-01-12 11:49:09 [29596] [36] DEBUG: DLR[mysql]: Looking for DLR smsc=MYCONN, ts=643779203, dst=9xxx, type=1 is that mean that kannel look for the recorde with timestamp = 643779203 and destination = 9xxx and smsc = MYCONN. and thanks again. Regards, Hafez On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.com wrote: No. It matches your configuration file, where you describe the exact matching between variables and columns in your table. BR, Nikos - Original Message - *From:* hafez ahmad hafezad...@gmail.com *To:* users@kannel.org *Sent:* Sunday, January 11, 2009 3:57 PM *Subject:* How DLR matched with in the Database Dears, when DLR back to kannel from the SMSC, how it match with the mysql DLR table ?, is it using the *Message id *? Regards, Hafez -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com
error code 0x00000058
Dears I get this error when I send using my TX session, any I ideas what it mean: 2009-01-11 13:04:53 [8532] [39] ERROR: SMPP[MYTXCONN]: SMSC returned error code 0x0058 (Throttling error) in response to submit_sm. Regards, Hafez
Re: error code 0x00000058
Thanks falko, thanks for reply , but I set the throughput correctly, is there any thing can I do it more ? regards. Hafez On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com wrote: SMPP Spec says:Throttling error (ESME has exceeded allowed message limits) Too many messages in a too short time. Regards Falko Am 11.01.2009 um 12:10 schrieb hafez ahmad: Dears I get this error when I send using my TX session, any I ideas what it mean: 2009-01-11 13:04:53 [8532] [39] ERROR: SMPP[MYTXCONN]: SMSC returned error code 0x0058 (Throttling error) in response to submit_sm. Regards, Hafez -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com
How DLR matched with in the Database
Dears, when DLR back to kannel from the SMSC, how it match with the mysql DLR table ?, is it using the *Message id *? Regards, Hafez
Re: error code 0x00000058
Thanks Flko, I will contact my Provider. Regards, Hafez On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 3:14 PM, Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com wrote: Well, throughput is a technical limitation, lets say 10 sms/sec. But maybe you also have a legal limitation (100.000 sms/day) and get the error because of this? (spam) Simply ask your provider which limitation you have broken. Regards Flko Am 11.01.2009 um 12:35 schrieb hafez ahmad: Thanks falko, thanks for reply , but I set the throughput correctly, is there any thing can I do it more ? regards. Hafez On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com wrote: SMPP Spec says:Throttling error (ESME has exceeded allowed message limits) Too many messages in a too short time. Regards Falko Am 11.01.2009 um 12:10 schrieb hafez ahmad: Dears I get this error when I send using my TX session, any I ideas what it mean: 2009-01-11 13:04:53 [8532] [39] ERROR: SMPP[MYTXCONN]: SMSC returned error code 0x0058 (Throttling error) in response to submit_sm. Regards, Hafez -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com
ton npi
Dears, can someone please explain the functionality of the following parameters in details: source-addr-ton source-addr-npi dest-addr-ton dest-addr-npi bind-addr-ton bind-addr-npi Regards, -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com
SMS routing
Dears, I have 2 TX SMPP connection for the same operator, I need to send SMSs using the first connection, but if the 1st connection have load , the SMSs served using the 2nd connection. can I do that using kannel or it is Application level? , and if yes it is using the *allowed-smsc-id? * Thanks for help, Hafez
Re: SMS routing
Thanks Mike :) On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Mike Nwaogu michael_nwa...@yahoo.comwrote: Sorry had supposed you were using the cgi via http to send. If that's the case you'll need to specify which smsc you wish to use, it's done programatically at the application level. Your URL will look like this ... http://localhost:13003/cgi-bin/sendsms?username=password=to=$tofrom=$frm; default_smsc=smsc1text=$msg Regards, Mike Nwaogu Tel: 234_802_325_6437 -- *From:* hafez ahmad hafezad...@gmail.com *To:* Mike Nwaogu michael_nwa...@yahoo.com *Cc:* users@kannel.org users@kannel.org *Sent:* Monday, January 5, 2009 1:34:39 PM *Subject:* Re: SMS routing Dear Mike, thanks for reply, but can you please explain more? Regards, Hafez On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Mike Nwaogu michael_nwa...@yahoo.comwrote: default-smsc=[smsc_id_name] Regards, Mike Nwaogu Tel: 234_802_325_6437 -- *From:* hafez ahmad hafezad...@gmail.com *To:* users@kannel.org users@kannel.org *Sent:* Monday, January 5, 2009 9:13:55 AM *Subject:* SMS routing Dears, I have 2 TX SMPP connection for the same operator, I need to send SMSs using the first connection, but if the 1st connection have load , the SMSs served using the 2nd connection. can I do that using kannel or it is Application level? , and if yes it is using the *allowed-smsc-id? * Thanks for help, Hafez -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com
Re: SMS routing
Dear Mike, thanks for reply, but can you please explain more? Regards, Hafez On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Mike Nwaogu michael_nwa...@yahoo.comwrote: default-smsc=[smsc_id_name] Regards, Mike Nwaogu Tel: 234_802_325_6437 -- *From:* hafez ahmad hafezad...@gmail.com *To:* users@kannel.org users@kannel.org *Sent:* Monday, January 5, 2009 9:13:55 AM *Subject:* SMS routing Dears, I have 2 TX SMPP connection for the same operator, I need to send SMSs using the first connection, but if the 1st connection have load , the SMSs served using the 2nd connection. can I do that using kannel or it is Application level? , and if yes it is using the *allowed-smsc-id? * Thanks for help, Hafez -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com
Re: anyone here from Pakistan and can guide me regarding GSM modem ... which is cheap and reliable ?
Hi Lain, can you please provide us with link. Regards, Hafez On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Iain Dooley i...@workingsoftware.com.auwrote: hi wahib, i've dealt with kls electronic in china to get a good, compact power over usb gsm modem. i live in australia and including shipping they were still reasonably priced. i've run them both with kannel, and also just using a direct terminal connection from a script, on freebsd, and have no problems so far (been running them for about 8 months). cheers iain On Sun, 28 Dec 2008, wahib wrote: Hi. I have worked on kannel regarding sms applications for some time using W700i as smsc. But my project advisor wants to buy a GSM modem once and for all coz its a much better option. I have searched on reliable GSM modems and found many. But i need to know that is there any GSM modem available in pakistan ? and which one and of how much ??? Regards, wahib -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/anyone-here-from-Pakistan-and-can-guide-me-regarding-GSM-modem-...-which-is-cheap-and-reliable---tp21190836p21190836.html Sent from the Kannel - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com
Re: anyone here from Pakistan and can guide me regarding GSM modem... which is cheap and reliable ?
Hi Nikos, Please advice as with cheap and stable one. Regards, Hafez On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.comwrote: Just be careful. Solaris doesn't support *any* usb modems. Linux has drivers for some, which are ported also to freeBSD. As a rule of thumb, serial GSM modems (lower throuput, though) are always compatible with kannel. BR, Nikos - Original Message - *From:* hafez ahmad hafezad...@gmail.com *To:* Iain Dooley i...@workingsoftware.com.au *Cc:* users@kannel.org *Sent:* Sunday, December 28, 2008 11:20 AM *Subject:* Re: anyone here from Pakistan and can guide me regarding GSM modem... which is cheap and reliable ? Hi Lain, can you please provide us with link. Regards, Hafez On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Iain Dooley i...@workingsoftware.com.au wrote: hi wahib, i've dealt with kls electronic in china to get a good, compact power over usb gsm modem. i live in australia and including shipping they were still reasonably priced. i've run them both with kannel, and also just using a direct terminal connection from a script, on freebsd, and have no problems so far (been running them for about 8 months). cheers iain On Sun, 28 Dec 2008, wahib wrote: Hi. I have worked on kannel regarding sms applications for some time using W700i as smsc. But my project advisor wants to buy a GSM modem once and for all coz its a much better option. I have searched on reliable GSM modems and found many. But i need to know that is there any GSM modem available in pakistan ? and which one and of how much ??? Regards, wahib -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/anyone-here-from-Pakistan-and-can-guide-me-regarding-GSM-modem-...-which-is-cheap-and-reliable---tp21190836p21190836.html Sent from the Kannel - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com
Re: anyone here from Pakistan and can guide me regarding GSM modem... which is cheap and reliable ?
Thanks Nikos :) Regards, Hafez On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry, I am not the right person. I don't know of any vendors close to Pakistan, and I have Solaris. I am happy with the stability of the Wavecom Fastrack Supreme 10 (serial), but it is not cheap (~250 E). BR, Nikos - Original Message - *From:* hafez ahmad hafezad...@gmail.com *To:* Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.com *Cc:* Iain Dooley i...@workingsoftware.com.au ; users@kannel.org *Sent:* Sunday, December 28, 2008 12:55 PM *Subject:* Re: anyone here from Pakistan and can guide me regarding GSM modem... which is cheap and reliable ? Hi Nikos, Please advice as with cheap and stable one. Regards, Hafez On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.comwrote: Just be careful. Solaris doesn't support *any* usb modems. Linux has drivers for some, which are ported also to freeBSD. As a rule of thumb, serial GSM modems (lower throuput, though) are always compatible with kannel. BR, Nikos - Original Message - *From:* hafez ahmad hafezad...@gmail.com *To:* Iain Dooley i...@workingsoftware.com.au *Cc:* users@kannel.org *Sent:* Sunday, December 28, 2008 11:20 AM *Subject:* Re: anyone here from Pakistan and can guide me regarding GSM modem... which is cheap and reliable ? Hi Lain, can you please provide us with link. Regards, Hafez On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Iain Dooley i...@workingsoftware.com.au wrote: hi wahib, i've dealt with kls electronic in china to get a good, compact power over usb gsm modem. i live in australia and including shipping they were still reasonably priced. i've run them both with kannel, and also just using a direct terminal connection from a script, on freebsd, and have no problems so far (been running them for about 8 months). cheers iain On Sun, 28 Dec 2008, wahib wrote: Hi. I have worked on kannel regarding sms applications for some time using W700i as smsc. But my project advisor wants to buy a GSM modem once and for all coz its a much better option. I have searched on reliable GSM modems and found many. But i need to know that is there any GSM modem available in pakistan ? and which one and of how much ??? Regards, wahib -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/anyone-here-from-Pakistan-and-can-guide-me-regarding-GSM-modem-...-which-is-cheap-and-reliable---tp21190836p21190836.html Sent from the Kannel - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com
Re: SMPP connection disconnected when request DLR
Dear Falko, Many thanks for your replay, my operator refuse to give me the TRX ( and I don't know why) , is there a way to solve the problem from our side ? Regards, Hafez On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 1:23 PM, Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com wrote: Hmm, that really looks very much like the SMSC tries to submit the DLR on the TXCONN.But I don't understand why you use TX+RX instead of TRX on protocol version 3.4. But anyway this really seems to be a problem on your providers side. Regards Falko Am 23.12.2008 um 12:08 schrieb hafez ahmad: Hi, Sorry for late, please find my config file and my log file. Thanks for help, Hafez On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.comwrote: Could you please post your configuration and bearerbox log files (max verbosity possible)? BR, Nikos - Original Message - *From:* hafez ahmad hafezad...@gmail.com *To:* Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com *Cc:* users@kannel.org *Sent:* Monday, December 22, 2008 10:03 AM *Subject:* Re: SMPP connection disconnected when request DLR Hi all, Is there any another ideas? Regards, Hafez On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 4:20 PM, hafez ahmad hafezad...@gmail.comwrote: Dear Falko, Thanks for reply, I have RX connection and I receiving MO there, so is it configuration thing from operator side? that he may be routing the DLR or something like that ? Regards Hafez On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com wrote: I might have a idea: Could it be that you only have a TX connection and no RX conn? When you send a message with DLR request, the smsc answers with a message waiting flag. When a smpp TX connection get's a message waiting flag it disconnects and connects a RX connection. So either you have to configure the RX connection or better you try to get a TRX connection, but you cannot receive DLRs over a TX connection. This is only a guess. Maybe you want to send the logfile of your SMPP connection. Regards Falko Am 15.12.2008 um 14:28 schrieb hafez ahmad: Hi, is there any ideas ? , is the problem from kannel side ot the operator side ? Regards, Hafez On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 2:46 PM, hafez ahmad hafezad...@gmail.comwrote: Dears, I am using kannel with the DLR group patch, when I send sms without adding the dlr-url and dlr-mask the SMS sent fine and there are no problem like the following: http://localhost:13013/cgi-bin/sendsms?username=testpassword=foocharset=UTF-8coding=2to=text=testfrom=1234smsc=TESTSMSCbinfo=100 but whene I add the dlr-url and dlr-mask to the URL my TX connection dissconected and reconecting like the following: http://localhost:13013/cgi-bin/sendsms?username=testpassword=foocharset=UTF-8coding=2to=text=testfrom=1234smsc=TESTSMSCbinfo=100dlr-mask=31dlr-url=http%3A//localhost/test.php%3Fdl%3D%25d is there any ideas why this happen? Regards, Hafez -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com smskannel.confmy.log -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com
Re: SMPP connection disconnected when request DLR
Hi all, Is there any another ideas? Regards, Hafez On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 4:20 PM, hafez ahmad hafezad...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Falko, Thanks for reply, I have RX connection and I receiving MO there, so is it configuration thing from operator side? that he may be routing the DLR or something like that ? Regards Hafez On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com wrote: I might have a idea: Could it be that you only have a TX connection and no RX conn? When you send a message with DLR request, the smsc answers with a message waiting flag. When a smpp TX connection get's a message waiting flag it disconnects and connects a RX connection. So either you have to configure the RX connection or better you try to get a TRX connection, but you cannot receive DLRs over a TX connection. This is only a guess. Maybe you want to send the logfile of your SMPP connection. Regards Falko Am 15.12.2008 um 14:28 schrieb hafez ahmad: Hi, is there any ideas ? , is the problem from kannel side ot the operator side ? Regards, Hafez On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 2:46 PM, hafez ahmad hafezad...@gmail.comwrote: Dears, I am using kannel with the DLR group patch, when I send sms without adding the dlr-url and dlr-mask the SMS sent fine and there are no problem like the following: http://localhost:13013/cgi-bin/sendsms?username=testpassword=foocharset=UTF-8coding=2to=text=testfrom=1234smsc=TESTSMSCbinfo=100 but whene I add the dlr-url and dlr-mask to the URL my TX connection dissconected and reconecting like the following: http://localhost:13013/cgi-bin/sendsms?username=testpassword=foocharset=UTF-8coding=2to=text=testfrom=1234smsc=TESTSMSCbinfo=100dlr-mask=31dlr-url=http%3A//localhost/test.php%3Fdl%3D%25d is there any ideas why this happen? Regards, Hafez -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com
Re: Re: ringtone : a simple tutorial
Hi creeds, the below tutorial to send the content as wap push, hope it help you http://dev.sellingsource.com/2006/12/07/sending-wap-push-messages-with-kannel-php/ Hafez On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 1:42 PM, creeds su...@nt.com.np wrote: Even i am in need of this solution. Hope u have already got the solution as this post is quite a long time so help me out to send a ringtones when one send sms with certain keywords requesting ringtones. regards, mamunbabubd wrote: please answer me the following question: I want to set up a ringtone service using kannel and for that i want to use wap push SI. The sequence of the service will be as follow: 1.users will send a request via sms specifying a keyword for ringtone. 2.In response of that keyword kannel will send a wap push. To do so what will be my kannel.conf configuration. where will i specify the keyword for ringtone in kannnel.conf for incoming message that will eventually pass the request for wap push SI. Thanks Mamun -- This message was sent on behalf of mamunbab...@yahoo.com at openSubscriber.com http://www.opensubscriber.com/message/users@kannel.org/4111775.html -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ringtone-%3A-a-simple-tutorial-tp4381955p21114322.html Sent from the Kannel - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com
Re: SMPP connection disconnected when request DLR
Dear Falko, Thanks for reply, I have RX connection and I receiving MO there, so is it configuration thing from operator side? that he may be routing the DLR or something like that ? Regards Hafez On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com wrote: I might have a idea: Could it be that you only have a TX connection and no RX conn? When you send a message with DLR request, the smsc answers with a message waiting flag. When a smpp TX connection get's a message waiting flag it disconnects and connects a RX connection. So either you have to configure the RX connection or better you try to get a TRX connection, but you cannot receive DLRs over a TX connection. This is only a guess. Maybe you want to send the logfile of your SMPP connection. Regards Falko Am 15.12.2008 um 14:28 schrieb hafez ahmad: Hi, is there any ideas ? , is the problem from kannel side ot the operator side ? Regards, Hafez On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 2:46 PM, hafez ahmad hafezad...@gmail.com wrote: Dears, I am using kannel with the DLR group patch, when I send sms without adding the dlr-url and dlr-mask the SMS sent fine and there are no problem like the following: http://localhost:13013/cgi-bin/sendsms?username=testpassword=foocharset=UTF-8coding=2to=text=testfrom=1234smsc=TESTSMSCbinfo=100 but whene I add the dlr-url and dlr-mask to the URL my TX connection dissconected and reconecting like the following: http://localhost:13013/cgi-bin/sendsms?username=testpassword=foocharset=UTF-8coding=2to=text=testfrom=1234smsc=TESTSMSCbinfo=100dlr-mask=31dlr-url=http%3A//localhost/test.php%3Fdl%3D%25d is there any ideas why this happen? Regards, Hafez -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com
SMPP connection disconnected when request DLR
Dears, I am using kannel with the DLR group patch, when I send sms without adding the dlr-url and dlr-mask the SMS sent fine and there are no problem like the following: http://localhost:13013/cgi-bin/sendsms?username=testpassword=foocharset=UTF-8coding=2to=text=testfrom=1234smsc=TESTSMSCbinfo=100 but whene I add the dlr-url and dlr-mask to the URL my TX connection dissconected and reconecting like the following: http://localhost:13013/cgi-bin/sendsms?username=testpassword=foocharset=UTF-8coding=2to=text=testfrom=1234smsc=TESTSMSCbinfo=100dlr-mask=31dlr-url=http%3A//localhost/test.php%3Fdl%3D%25d is there any ideas why this happen? Regards, Hafez
I/O error or other error. Re-connecting
Hi list, I have 2 connection one RX and the other TX, the both connections are connected fine, I can receive the SMS using the RX, but when I use the TX connection to send SMS it is changed to reconnecting and I get the following error in my logs: 2008-12-02 14:21:07 [10148] [7] DEBUG: SMPP[MYTXCONNECTION]: Manually forced dest addr ton = 1, dest add npi = 1 2008-12-02 14:21:07 [10148] [7] DEBUG: SMPP[MYTXCONNECTION]: Sending PDU: 2008-12-02 14:21:07 [10148] [7] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0x81b5430 dump: 2008-12-02 14:21:07 [10148] [7] DEBUG: type_name: submit_sm 2008-12-02 14:21:07 [10148] [7] DEBUG: command_id: 4 = 0x0004 2008-12-02 14:21:07 [10148] [7] DEBUG: command_status: 0 = 0x 2008-12-02 14:21:07 [10148] [7] DEBUG: sequence_number: 5 = 0x0005 2008-12-02 14:21:07 [10148] [7] DEBUG: service_type: 200 2008-12-02 14:21:07 [10148] [7] DEBUG: source_addr_ton: 1 = 0x0001 2008-12-02 14:21:07 [10148] [7] DEBUG: source_addr_npi: 1 = 0x0001 2008-12-02 14:21:07 [10148] [7] DEBUG: source_addr: 6119 2008-12-02 14:21:07 [10148] [7] DEBUG: dest_addr_ton: 1 = 0x0001 2008-12-02 14:21:07 [10148] [7] DEBUG: dest_addr_npi: 1 = 0x0001 2008-12-02 14:21:07 [10148] [7] DEBUG: destination_addr: 2008-12-02 14:21:07 [10148] [7] DEBUG: esm_class: 3 = 0x0003 2008-12-02 14:21:07 [10148] [7] DEBUG: protocol_id: 0 = 0x 2008-12-02 14:21:07 [10148] [7] DEBUG: priority_flag: 0 = 0x 2008-12-02 14:21:07 [10148] [7] DEBUG: schedule_delivery_time: NULL 2008-12-02 14:21:07 [10148] [7] DEBUG: validity_period: NULL 2008-12-02 14:21:07 [10148] [7] DEBUG: registered_delivery: 1 = 0x0001 2008-12-02 14:21:07 [10148] [7] DEBUG: replace_if_present_flag: 0 = 0x 2008-12-02 14:21:07 [10148] [7] DEBUG: data_coding: 8 = 0x0008 2008-12-02 14:21:07 [10148] [7] DEBUG: sm_default_msg_id: 0 = 0x 2008-12-02 14:21:07 [10148] [7] DEBUG: sm_length: 14 = 0x000e 2008-12-02 14:21:07 [10148] [7] DEBUG: short_message: 2008-12-02 14:21:07 [10148] [7] DEBUG:Octet string at 0x81b5538: 2008-12-02 14:21:07 [10148] [7] DEBUG: len: 14 2008-12-02 14:21:07 [10148] [7] DEBUG: size: 15 2008-12-02 14:21:07 [10148] [7] DEBUG: immutable: 0 2008-12-02 14:21:07 [10148] [7] DEBUG: data: 00 74 00 65 00 73 00 74 00 33 00 35 00 30 .t.e.s.t.3.5.0 2008-12-02 14:21:07 [10148] [7] DEBUG:Octet string dump ends. 2008-12-02 14:21:07 [10148] [7] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends. 2008-12-02 14:21:21 [10148] [7] DEBUG: SMPP[MYTXCONNECTION]: Sending enquire link: 2008-12-02 14:21:21 [10148] [7] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0x81b5430 dump: 2008-12-02 14:21:21 [10148] [7] DEBUG: type_name: enquire_link 2008-12-02 14:21:21 [10148] [7] DEBUG: command_id: 21 = 0x0015 2008-12-02 14:21:21 [10148] [7] DEBUG: command_status: 0 = 0x 2008-12-02 14:21:21 [10148] [7] DEBUG: sequence_number: 6 = 0x0006 2008-12-02 14:21:21 [10148] [7] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends. 2008-12-02 14:21:21 [10148] [6] DEBUG: SMPP[MYRXCONNECTION]: Sending enquire link: 2008-12-02 14:21:21 [10148] [6] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0x81b5430 dump: 2008-12-02 14:21:21 [10148] [6] DEBUG: type_name: enquire_link 2008-12-02 14:21:21 [10148] [6] DEBUG: command_id: 21 = 0x0015 2008-12-02 14:21:21 [10148] [6] DEBUG: command_status: 0 = 0x 2008-12-02 14:21:21 [10148] [6] DEBUG: sequence_number: 5 = 0x0005 2008-12-02 14:21:21 [10148] [6] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends. 2008-12-02 14:21:22 [10148] [6] DEBUG: SMPP[MYRXCONNECTION]: Got PDU: 2008-12-02 14:21:22 [10148] [6] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0x81b5430 dump: 2008-12-02 14:21:22 [10148] [6] DEBUG: type_name: enquire_link_resp 2008-12-02 14:21:22 [10148] [6] DEBUG: command_id: 2147483669 = 0x8015 2008-12-02 14:21:22 [10148] [6] DEBUG: command_status: 0 = 0x 2008-12-02 14:21:22 [10148] [6] DEBUG: sequence_number: 5 = 0x0005 2008-12-02 14:21:22 [10148] [6] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends. 2008-12-02 14:21:26 [10148] [7] ERROR: SMPP[MYTXCONNECTION]: I/O error or other error. Re-connecting. 2008-12-02 14:21:26 [10148] [7] ERROR: SMPP[MYTXCONNECTION]: Couldn't connect to SMS center (retrying in 10 seconds). *and the following is my SMSC * group = smsc smsc = smpp smsc-id = MYRXCONNECTION host = xx.xxx.xxx.xxx port = 0 receive-port = 6566 smsc-username = USERNAME smsc-password = PASSWORD system-type = smpp dlr-group-id = MYDLRGROUP allowed-smsc-id = MYRXCONNECTION;MYDLRGROUP interface-version = 34 reconnect-delay = 10 source-addr-ton = 1 source-addr-npi = 1 dest-addr-ton = 1 dest-addr-npi = 1 bind-addr-ton = 1 bind-addr-npi = 1 msg-id-type = 0x00 log-file = /var/log/kannel/error/1.log log-level = 0 group = smsc smsc = smpp smsc-id = MYTXCONNECTION host = xx.xxx.xxx.xxx port = 6566 receive-port = 0 smsc-username = USERNAME smsc-password = PASSWORD system-type = smpp dlr-group-id = MYDLRGROUP allowed-smsc-id = MYTXCONNECTION;MYDLRGROUP interface-version = 34 reconnect-delay = 10 source-addr-ton = 1 source-addr-npi = 1
DLR group patch bug or what?
Dears,
I have SMPP connection one RX and TX, when I send SMS using the TX
connection, the DLR back on the RX one, so I used this patch -DLR group -
http://www.nabble.com/Multiple-SMSCs-and-a-DLR-group-td8655999.html#a8655999
but I always get the following error
2008-11-24 22:48:41 [24613] [7] DEBUG: message_id: 4049149130
2008-11-24 22:48:41 [24613] [7] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends.
2008-11-24 22:48:41 [24613] [7] DEBUG: DLR[mysql]: Adding DLR
smsc=MYDLRGROUP, *ts=1226084656*, src=9, dst=96xx, mask=31,
boxc=
2008-11-24 22:48:41 [24613] [7] DEBUG: sql: INSERT INTO dlr (smsc, ts,
source, destination, service, url, mask, boxc, status) VALUES ('MYDLRGROUP',
'1226084656', '9', '96xx', 'tester', '
http://localhost/my.php?status=%danswer=%A', '31', '', '0');
2008-11-24 22:48:41 [24613] [7] DEBUG: SMSC[MYTXCON]: creating DLR message
-
--
-
2008-11-24 22:49:01 [24613] [6] DEBUG: SMPP[MYRXCON] handle_pdu, got DLR
2008-11-24 22:49:01 [24613] [6] DEBUG: DLR[mysql]: Looking for DLR
smsc=MYDLRGROUP,* ts=4049149130*, dst=96xx, type=1
2008-11-24 22:49:01 [24613] [6] DEBUG: sql: SELECT mask, service, url,
source, destination, boxc FROM dlr WHERE smsc='MYDLRGROUP' AND *
ts='4049149130';*
2008-11-24 22:49:01 [24613] [6] DEBUG: no rows found
2008-11-24 22:49:01 [24613] [6] WARNING: DLR[mysql]: DLR from
SMSCMYDLRGROUP for DST96xx not found.
2008-11-24 22:49:01 [24613] [6] ERROR: SMPP[MYRXCON]: got DLR but could not
find message or was not interested in it id4049149130 dst96xx,
type1
*NOTE: the kannel when insert the DLR the ts === 1226084656(the timestamp)
when looking for the DLR ts =** **4049149130 which is the message id*
following my config =
group = smsc
smsc = smpp
smsc-id = MYRXCON
host = xx.xxx.xxx.xxx
port = 0
receive-port =
smsc-username = MYUSER
smsc-password = x
system-type = smtype
service-type = 200
dlr-group-id = MYDLRGROUP
allowed-smsc-id = MYRXCON
interface-version = 34
address-range = 9
max-pending-submits = 1
reconnect-delay = 10
source-addr-ton = 1
source-addr-npi = 1
dest-addr-ton = 1
dest-addr-npi = 1
bind-addr-ton = 1
bind-addr-npi = 1
msg-id-type = 0x01
log-file = /var/log/kannel/9.log
log-level = 0
group = smsc
smsc = smpp
smsc-id = MYTXCON
host = xx.xxx.xxx.xxx
port =
receive-port = 0
smsc-username = MYUSER
smsc-password = x
system-type = smtype
service-type = 200
dlr-group-id = MYDLRGROUP
allowed-smsc-id = MYTXCON
interface-version = 34
address-range = 9
max-pending-submits = 1
reconnect-delay = 10
source-addr-ton = 5
source-addr-npi = 1
dest-addr-ton = 1
dest-addr-npi = 1
bind-addr-ton = 1
bind-addr-npi = 1
msg-id-type = 0x01
log-file = /var/log/kannel/9.log
log-level = 0
Any Ideas what is the problem, please ?
Regards,
Hafez
SMS status
Dears, Is there any way to know the SMS status(accepted, rejected ) other than using the DLR . Regards, Hafez
Re: SMS status
Dear shanmugam, Thanks for reply, I send user MT billing sms, I need the to check the status of the SMS, so I change the user status in my DB. Regards, Hafez On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 2:56 PM, raj shan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi hafez yes well have the entire dashboard to monitor the kannel status i.e connection status of bearerbox, smsbox, the number of messages, the sms pumping rate and delivery rate etc pls let me knw the requirement, is it for knowlegde or for business oriented. Pls lets know the existing kannel deployment 2 cheers shanmugam On 11/19/08, hafez ahmad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dears, Is there any way to know the SMS status(accepted, rejected ) other than using the DLR . Regards, Hafez -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com
Re: SMS status
thanks, but in my case my operator give the following error codes: status DELIVRD err:027 absent subscriber (switch off mobile) status:DELIVRD err:000 subscriber receive sms successfully status :REJECTD err:028 subscriber has no enough credit I search about these error codes, but I didn't find anything. Regards, Hafez On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 3:32 PM, Eduardo Raad [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Our operator provides us with a propietary http interface to query the status of mt-billed messages. We have a daemon polling the operator's server for the status of each message and updating the database accordingly. I guess this is the only non native dlr way to do what you need. Aks your operator about it. Eduardo Sent from my BlackBerry(R) wireless device -- *From*: hafez ahmad [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Date*: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:25:32 +0200 *To*: raj shan[EMAIL PROTECTED] *CC*: users@kannel.orgusers@kannel.org *Subject*: Re: SMS status Dear shanmugam, Thanks for reply, I send user MT billing sms, I need the to check the status of the SMS, so I change the user status in my DB. Regards, Hafez On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 2:56 PM, raj shan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi hafez yes well have the entire dashboard to monitor the kannel status i.e connection status of bearerbox, smsbox, the number of messages, the sms pumping rate and delivery rate etc pls let me knw the requirement, is it for knowlegde or for business oriented. Pls lets know the existing kannel deployment 2 cheers shanmugam On 11/19/08, hafez ahmad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dears, Is there any way to know the SMS status(accepted, rejected ) other than using the DLR . Regards, Hafez -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com
Re: SMS status
it is SMPP :) On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Eduardo Raad [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: What kind of smsc connection are you using? Eduardo Sent from my BlackBerry(R) wireless device -- *From*: hafez ahmad [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Date*: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:44:09 +0200 *To*: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *CC*: raj shan[EMAIL PROTECTED]; users@kannel.orgusers@kannel.org *Subject*: Re: SMS status thanks, but in my case my operator give the following error codes: status DELIVRD err:027 absent subscriber (switch off mobile) status:DELIVRD err:000 subscriber receive sms successfully status :REJECTD err:028 subscriber has no enough credit I search about these error codes, but I didn't find anything. Regards, Hafez On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 3:32 PM, Eduardo Raad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Our operator provides us with a propietary http interface to query the status of mt-billed messages. We have a daemon polling the operator's server for the status of each message and updating the database accordingly. I guess this is the only non native dlr way to do what you need. Aks your operator about it. Eduardo Sent from my BlackBerry(R) wireless device -- *From*: hafez ahmad [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Date*: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:25:32 +0200 *To*: raj shan[EMAIL PROTECTED] *CC*: users@kannel.orgusers@kannel.org *Subject*: Re: SMS status Dear shanmugam, Thanks for reply, I send user MT billing sms, I need the to check the status of the SMS, so I change the user status in my DB. Regards, Hafez On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 2:56 PM, raj shan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi hafez yes well have the entire dashboard to monitor the kannel status i.e connection status of bearerbox, smsbox, the number of messages, the sms pumping rate and delivery rate etc pls let me knw the requirement, is it for knowlegde or for business oriented. Pls lets know the existing kannel deployment 2 cheers shanmugam On 11/19/08, hafez ahmad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dears, Is there any way to know the SMS status(accepted, rejected ) other than using the DLR . Regards, Hafez -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com
Re: service-type
Dear Rolandow , it works fine, thanks for help. Regards, Hafez On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Rolandow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Use the binfo parameter in sendsms, to send the service_type value. Check *Table 6-16 *in the Kannel manual, and look at the binfo parameter. hafez ahmad wrote: Dears, I need to send the service type value for the bailing issue, is there something I have to do except set the variable service-type in the SMSC group like that : group = smsc smsc = smpp smsc-id = MYSMPPCONN host = xxx..xxx.xxx.xxx port = receive-port = 0 smsc-username = VASUSER smsc-password = VASPASS system-type = VASTYPE service-type = 520 Regards, Hafez -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com
Re: dlr table is not empty
Hi, Check if your kannel receiving the dlr on the same connection that used to send SMS, I had the same problem when I used two sessions for my connection one TX and the other RX , I was send the SMS using the TX and the dlr back on the Rx session , so the kannel could not find the dlr cos it matching with the connection id , so i convert the connection to transceiver and every thing works fine ( there are also patch for the DLR group which solve my problem) Regards, Hafez On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Alejandro Guerrieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Check on your logs what states you're really receiving. dlrs records are deleted only when they reach a final state. What it's considered final depends on your dlr-mask setting, so maybe you're setting it too wide, or maybe you're having problems finding the dlrs, or maybe there's some other problem. Regards, Alejandro Guerrieri On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 6:23 AM, Marcelo Aguila [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Hi, guys. We are using dlr with mysql and at the moment the system is working ok. But, since some weeks ago (probably after some new configuration) the dlr records are not deleted from this table. Is this ok ... or may be we made a mistake with kannel conf files ? Regards, rm -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com
error code 0x00000045
Hi List, when I trying to send sms using one of my smpp connections I get the following error from the SMSC: SMPP[MYSMSC]: SMSC returned error code 0x0045 (Submit failed) in response to submit_sm. I check with my operator and everything fine, please advice. Thanks, Hafez
dlr with mysql
Hi all, I want to use the DLR with mysql I set up all the needed configuration like the user guide, but I didn't receive anything, is the there anything else I must add it?, and when I must use the dlr-mask and dlr-url in the sendsms? thanks for help.
Re: receive concatenated SMS
Dear iain, Thanks for reply, can you please tell me how can I get the patch. thanks. On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Iain Dooley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi hafez, How can I receive concatenated SMS as one hit, not many hits, i have the following confugration for my sms-service: there's a patch on the CVS version that allows this, but if you want to run the release version, i wrote this script which does concatenation in PHP: http://www.workingsoftware.com.au/concatenate_mo.php.txt in order to do this you have to filter all messages through that single URL. i needed to also get the destination phone number to route messages to different applications, so i developed a method of parsing the error logs to find out what number a message was sent *to* instead of what number it was sent from. let me know if you need this snippet. cheers iain group = sms-service keyword = default get-url = http://localhost/scripts/myscript.php?sms_txt_binary=%bsender_number=%preceiver_number=%Psmsc_id=%imessage_coding=%cudh=%uoriginating_smsc=%fmessage_charset=%Cfirst_word=%ksecond_word_encoded=%ssecond_word_uncoded=%Srest_sms_txt=%rsms_txt_spaces_squeezed=%asent_datetime=%tsent_timestamp=%Tsender_number_no_zeros=%qreciver_number_no_zeros=%Qsmsc_id_internal=%Idelivery_report=%ddelivery_report_reply=%Asendsms_user_service=%nmessage_class=%mmwi=%Mbilling_identifier=%Baccount_identifier=%o omit-empty = true max-messages = 10 concatenation = true Any Ideas, Thanks, Hafez -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com
receive concatenated SMS
Hi All, How can I receive concatenated SMS as one hit, not many hits, i have the following confugration for my sms-service: group = sms-service keyword = default get-url = http://localhost/scripts/myscript.php?sms_txt_binary=%bsender_number=%preceiver_number=%Psmsc_id=%imessage_coding=%cudh=%uoriginating_smsc=%fmessage_charset=%Cfirst_word=%ksecond_word_encoded=%ssecond_word_uncoded=%Srest_sms_txt=%rsms_txt_spaces_squeezed=%asent_datetime=%tsent_timestamp=%Tsender_number_no_zeros=%qreciver_number_no_zeros=%Qsmsc_id_internal=%Idelivery_report=%ddelivery_report_reply=%Asendsms_user_service=%nmessage_class=%mmwi=%Mbilling_identifier=%Baccount_identifier=%o omit-empty = true max-messages = 10 concatenation = true Any Ideas, Thanks, Hafez
setup a receiver connection only
HI, how can I configure a receiver(*only*) SMPP connection , I use the following setting but always I get dead connection: group = smsc smsc = smpp smsc-id = MYSMC host = xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx port = x receive-port = same of port smsc-username = x smsc-password = x system-type= SM denied-smsc-id = SMSC1;SMSC2 bind-addr-ton = 0 bind-addr-npi = 0 msg-id-type = 0x00 wait-ack = 120 wait-ack-expire = 0x02 any Ideas, thanks for help. Hafez
Re: synchronous SMPP connection
Thanks Praveen for reply, please see below my SMPP configuration , thanks for help group = smsc smsc = smpp throughput = 1 smsc-id = xx denied-smsc-id =y;z host = xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx port = 1 transceiver-mode = 1 #receive-port = 0 smsc-username = x smsc-password = x system-type = x interface-version = 34 address-range = 8 max-pending-submits = 1 reconnect-delay = 30 source-addr-ton = 5 source-addr-npi = 1 dest-addr-ton = 1 dest-addr-npi = 1 bind-addr-ton = 1 bind-addr-npi = 1 msg-id-type = 0x00 log-file = /var/log/kannel/sender.log log-level = 0 On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Praveen .K.R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can u send ur SMPP configuration file? -- Forwarded message -- From: hafez ahmad [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 3:07 PM Subject: synchronous SMPP connection To: users@kannel.org users@kannel.org Hi, I have synchronous SMPP connection with operator, how I configure the kannel to be synchronous?, I set the max-pending-submits = 1, and is there need to check if the smsc accept the sms to send another one? thanks, Hafez -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com
synchronous SMPP connection
Hi, I have synchronous SMPP connection with operator, how I configure the kannel to be synchronous?, I set the max-pending-submits = 1, and is there need to check if the smsc accept the sms to send another one? thanks, Hafez
heartbeat with load value 0 received
Hi All, I have this message in my logs, what this is mean, and is it mean there are load and delay, and what the reasons for this error 2008-02-14 06:54:54 [2528] [9] DEBUG: boxc_receiver: heartbeat with load value 0 received Thanks for Help. Hafez.
sending many SMS using PHP through the HTTP interface
Hi, I have PHP script that run every 10 seconds, every time the script run , read the messages from DB table, and hit the send URL inside loop, every thing run ok , but when I have concatenated SMS I get only the first part of the SMS ended with (some text missing) , do I have to check if the bearbox accept the request every time to hit the URL again for the next request or what? Thanks for help, Hafez
check the OM messages
Hi all, I could test my kannel configuration to send sms through the HTTP interface, I need to test the received SMS from the SMSC, using kannel to serving them using the http interface, or using PHP to serving the request. Thanks for help :) hafez --
Re: fake SMSC
Thanks Alejandro for replay, I read the document and I run the fake SMSC, but how can i test the sending and reciving SMS using the fake SMSC, And another question please is there an PHP system that deal as CMS for kannel , I found playsms I will test it , but is there are another alternatives. thanks again, regards. On 10/20/07, Alejandro Guerrieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Check the docs. You have to run bearerbox first. Regards, Alejandro On 10/19/07, hafez ahmad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, I setup kannel on my ubuntu box using apt-get, I need to run and test the SMS gateway, I don't have SMSC to test with, is there a fake SMSC that I could testing with, when I run the command smsbox I get the following output: 2007-10-19 22:50:02 [12832] [0] INFO: Starting to log to file /var/log/kannel/smsbox.log level 0 2007-10-19 22:50:02 [12832] [0] INFO: Added logfile `/var/log/kannel/smsbox.log' with level `0'. 2007-10-19 22:50:02 [12832] [0] DEBUG: -- 2007-10-19 22:50:02 [12832] [0] DEBUG: Kannel smsbox version 1.4.1starting 2007-10-19 22:50:02 [12832] [0] DEBUG: Started thread 1 (gw/smsbox.c:obey_request_thread) 2007-10-19 22:50:02 [12832] [0] DEBUG: Started thread 2 (gw/smsbox.c:url_result_thread) 2007-10-19 22:50:02 [12832] [0] DEBUG: Started thread 3 (gw/smsbox.c:http_queue_thread) 2007-10-19 22:50:02 [12832] [0] ERROR: connect failed 2007-10-19 22:50:02 [12832] [0] ERROR: System error 111: Connection refused 2007-10-19 22:50:02 [12832] [0] ERROR: error connecting to server `localhost' at port `13002' 2007-10-19 22:50:02 [12832] [0] PANIC: Couldn't connect to the bearerbox. 2007-10-19 22:50:02 [12832] [0] PANIC: smsbox(gw_panic+0x107) [0x8086367] 2007-10-19 22:50:02 [12832] [0] PANIC: smsbox(main+0xf0a) [0x8053baa] 2007-10-19 22:50:02 [12832] [0] PANIC: /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xdc) [0xb78b9ebc] 2007-10-19 22:50:02 [12832] [0] PANIC: smsbox [0x80524e1] Is there problem with this output my kannel.conf file is: group = core admin-port = 13000 admin-password = bar admin-deny-ip = *.*.*.* admin-allow-ip = smsbox-port = 13002 #wapbox-port = 13002 #wdp-interface-name = * #wdp-interface-name = * log-file = /var/log/kannel/bearerbox.log box-deny-ip = *.*.*.* box-allow-ip = 127.0.0.1 #group = wapbox #bearerbox-host = localhost #log-file = /var/log/kannel/wapbox.log group = smsbox bearerbox-host = localhost log-file = /var/log/kannel/smsbox.log any help, Thanks, Hafez -- Alejandro Guerrieri Magicom http://www.magicom-bcn.net/ LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/aguerrieri -- Hafez A.Ahmad Amman-Jordan mobile:962-785259011 962-795708728 http://blog.hafezadnan.com
Re: Sending Multiple SMS's using PHP script
I think you have to try with CURL, to open the url , as alternative of file
also you can use fopen too.
regards,
hafez
On 10/20/07, Raphael Maseko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have tried using file_get_contents( $url ) of file( $url ) to call
kannel
but I keep ending up with the error:
[a href='function.file'function.file/a]: failed to open stream:
Success in /usr/local/apache/
I am using PHP Version 5.2.3 on Redhat
I used the function below that I found using Google:
function sendSmsMessage($in_phoneNumber, $in_msg)
{
$url = '/cgi-bin/sendsms?username=' . CONFIG_KANNEL_USER_NAME
. 'password=' . CONFIG_KANNEL_PASSWORD
. 'charset=UCS-2coding=2'
. to={$in_phoneNumber}
. 'text=' . urlencode(iconv('utf-8', 'ucs-2', $in_msg));
$results = file('http://'
. CONFIG_KANNEL_HOST . ':'
. CONFIG_KANNEL_PORT . $url);
}
-Original Message-
From: Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 5:25 PM
To: users@kannel.org
Subject: Re: Sending Multiple SMS's using PHP script
Why are you redirecting with a header?
Use file_get_contents( $url ) or file( $url ) to call kannel.
Alternatively, use sqlbox and insert a row for each message to send
(if you pretend to send a high load of messages that's definitely the
way to go).
Regards,
Alejandro
On 10/18/07, Raphael Maseko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I am trying to use kannel to send multiple SMS' with different content
retrieved from a database.
I have a php script that is accessing a database and retrieving a value
corresponding to a mobile number. It is then supposed to send SMS's to
the
numbers retrieved.
What is happening is that it will only send the first one and stop. No
error
is given. I have tried to remove the 'function send_many_sms' and use
and
include with the 'hearder (location)' but getting the same error. I am
calling the php file using lynx.
I know that this may not be strictly a kannel issue but I would
appreciate
pointers. Thanks for your help in advance.
Ralph
--
?php
function send_many_sms($to, $message)
{
ob_start();
header(Location:
http://1.2.3.4:13013/cgi-bin/sendsms?username=usernamepass
word=passwordto=$totext=$message);
ob_get_flush();
flush();
}
if (!$link = mysql_connect('localhost', 'user', '')){echo 'Could not
connect to mysql';
exit;
}
if (!mysql_select_db('DBase', $link)) {
echo 'Could not select database';
exit;
}
SELECT STATEMENT HERE
if (!$result) {
echo DB Error, could not query the Database\n;
exit;
}
else
{
while ($row = mysql_fetch_assoc($result))
{
$to=$row['MobileNumber'];
$Balance = $row['Value'];
$message=Your balance is .$Balance;
send_many_sms($to, $message);
}
mysql_close($link);
}
--
Alejandro Guerrieri
Magicom
http://www.magicom-bcn.net/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/aguerrieri
--
Hafez A.Ahmad
Amman-Jordan
mobile:962-785259011
962-795708728
http://blog.hafezadnan.com
fake SMSC
Hi All, I setup kannel on my ubuntu box using apt-get, I need to run and test the SMS gateway, I don't have SMSC to test with, is there a fake SMSC that I could testing with, when I run the command smsbox I get the following output: 2007-10-19 22:50:02 [12832] [0] INFO: Starting to log to file /var/log/kannel/smsbox.log level 0 2007-10-19 22:50:02 [12832] [0] INFO: Added logfile `/var/log/kannel/smsbox.log' with level `0'. 2007-10-19 22:50:02 [12832] [0] DEBUG: -- 2007-10-19 22:50:02 [12832] [0] DEBUG: Kannel smsbox version 1.4.1 starting 2007-10-19 22:50:02 [12832] [0] DEBUG: Started thread 1 (gw/smsbox.c:obey_request_thread) 2007-10-19 22:50:02 [12832] [0] DEBUG: Started thread 2 (gw/smsbox.c:url_result_thread) 2007-10-19 22:50:02 [12832] [0] DEBUG: Started thread 3 (gw/smsbox.c:http_queue_thread) 2007-10-19 22:50:02 [12832] [0] ERROR: connect failed 2007-10-19 22:50:02 [12832] [0] ERROR: System error 111: Connection refused 2007-10-19 22:50:02 [12832] [0] ERROR: error connecting to server `localhost' at port `13002' 2007-10-19 22:50:02 [12832] [0] PANIC: Couldn't connect to the bearerbox. 2007-10-19 22:50:02 [12832] [0] PANIC: smsbox(gw_panic+0x107) [0x8086367] 2007-10-19 22:50:02 [12832] [0] PANIC: smsbox(main+0xf0a) [0x8053baa] 2007-10-19 22:50:02 [12832] [0] PANIC: /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xdc) [0xb78b9ebc] 2007-10-19 22:50:02 [12832] [0] PANIC: smsbox [0x80524e1] Is there problem with this output my kannel.conf file is: group = core admin-port = 13000 admin-password = bar admin-deny-ip = *.*.*.* admin-allow-ip = smsbox-port = 13002 #wapbox-port = 13002 #wdp-interface-name = * #wdp-interface-name = * log-file = /var/log/kannel/bearerbox.log box-deny-ip = *.*.*.* box-allow-ip = 127.0.0.1 #group = wapbox #bearerbox-host = localhost #log-file = /var/log/kannel/wapbox.log group = smsbox bearerbox-host = localhost log-file = /var/log/kannel/smsbox.log any help, Thanks, Hafez
