It looks like EPEL is now stable on RHEL6 but I do not see any 389ds
packages in the epel or epel-testing repos. Any idea when that is
happening? I'm setting up a new machine and wanted to start using RHEL6 if
possible to take advantage of some of the new fun features of RHEL6.
Thanks for all
On 01/26/2011 12:25 PM, Aaron Hagopian wrote:
It looks like EPEL is now stable on RHEL6 but I do not see any 389ds
packages in the epel or epel-testing repos. Any idea when that is
happening? I'm setting up a new machine and wanted to start using
RHEL6 if possible to take advantage of some
This may be easy for some but, all of my Linux experience has been on
servers and I am just now trying to move into the desktop side.
I am trying to use a USB to Serial adapter by Belkin for a needed
application at work. I plan on using PuTTy as my comm plaform but, I
cannot figure out what
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Mike Dwiggins m...@azdwiggins.com wrote:
Anyone know a simple way or the correct place to look for info about
this on the Web?
When you plug it in, dmesg should tell you. It's probably something
like /dev/ttyUSB0
-c
--
users mailing list
On 1/26/2011 1:20 AM, Chris Smart wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Mike Dwigginsm...@azdwiggins.com wrote:
Anyone know a simple way or the correct place to look for info about
this on the Web?
When you plug it in, dmesg should tell you. It's probably something
like /dev/ttyUSB0
-c
On Jan 25, 2011, at 11:47 PM, Mike Dwiggins wrote:
This may be easy for some but, all of my Linux experience has been on
servers and I am just now trying to move into the desktop side.
I am trying to use a USB to Serial adapter by Belkin for a needed
application at work. I plan on using
On 1/26/2011 1:39 AM, Clark Martin wrote:
On Jan 25, 2011, at 11:47 PM, Mike Dwiggins wrote:
This may be easy for some but, all of my Linux experience has been on
servers and I am just now trying to move into the desktop side.
I am trying to use a USB to Serial adapter by Belkin for a
On Tue Jan 25 18:36:57 UTC 2011, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
# yum install systemd
Boot with init=/bin/systemd
Thanks for your answer, Rahul.
It seems to work: I tried on a laptop (Dell XPS M1330) and on a Athlon
X4 based PC.
Both systems are with sata disks.
As first impression boot time seems quite
Hello,
as I had some problems before in getting calendar sync between
evolution and gmail account, but it seems it works now in F14 I would
like to share.
I also would like to share some problems and questions
On an Ubuntu post
(https://help.ubuntu.com/community/GoogleCalendarWithEvolution) I
Ashley M. Kirchner ashley at pcraft.com writes:
...
You are much happier and reasonable this time - throwing books at Fedora,
however deserved and fun, will not change anything :-)
Please file a new bug report with Bugzilla as an F14 kernel problem.
If you need help, tell us.
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 09:50:42 + (UTC)
JB jb.1234a...@gmail.com wrote:
Ashley M. Kirchner ashley at pcraft.com writes:
...
You are much happier and reasonable this time - throwing books at Fedora,
however deserved and fun, will not change anything :-)
I agree with that :)
I have
Maurizio Marini maumar at datalogica.com writes:
...
I would delay the stream of lines before
waiting for hardware to initialize
or better it would be to avoiud the clear screen, can fedora ppl avoid this
clear screen?
I do not know if this kernel parameter may help you in your
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 10:36 +0100, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
Hello,
as I had some problems before in getting calendar sync between
evolution and gmail account, but it seems it works now in F14 I would
like to share.
I also would like to share some problems and questions
Since nothing in your
Hi galls and guys,
I saw that there are no up to date instuctions for getting Blender
2.56 running on Fedora, not even on Blender wiki so I wrote up this
blog post:
http://bit.ly/gLQgFS or long version:
http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com/index.php/archives/blender-2-56-on-fedora-13-and-fedora-14/
On 01/26/2011 02:36 PM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
But I don't know if speed is the main target or not at this time.
Perhaps a significant difference could be noted mostly on systems with SSD
disks
Speed is far from the main target and yes you should notice a
significant difference in SSD
On 01/26/2011 05:33 PM, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
I saw some Blender 2.56 packages in Koji for F15, does anybody know if
Blender 2.56 will ship with Fedora 15?
Whatever is in Koji will usually end up in the appropriate release.
So if Blender 2.56 turns out to be stable could it be
On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 17:34 -0500, Jim wrote:
Fedora 14/KDE Live CD
Some of the keys won't work on Sony Vaio PCG-7142L, like the L key
and others if you try to type.
I tried to type in lspci , and the l won't show but the s would.
I forgotten whether this machine is a laptop. If not
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 08:07 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 01/26/2011 05:23 AM, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
I'm not sure how new users are supposed to find evince.
Maybe it is the same method that many folks should use to find things.
http://tinyurl.com/6ce2nvo :-) :-)
I am not sure
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/25/2011 09:10 PM, Jorge Fábregas wrote:
On 01/25/2011 10:03 PM, Linuxguy123 wrote:
That is all well and good, but when I issue the command (as root), it
hangs. Only Ctrl C will terminate the command.
However, if I omit the -P, it works.
Hi Valent,
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 13:03 +0100, valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi galls and guys,
I saw that there are no up to date instuctions for getting Blender
2.56 running on Fedora, not even on Blender wiki so I wrote up this
blog post:
http://bit.ly/gLQgFS or long version:
On 26.01.2011, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
The real issue is that there isn't a good activity log. While I can
install tripwire to watch for changed files
I would have used aide instead of tripwire.
it probably won't tell me how they got in.
Is there something that addresses that
I'm picking up chatter that Libre Office as downloaded from their
community site will install side-by-side the existing OOo install on F14
(and other distros as well). Anyone have experience with this they'd
like to share? Does it actually work?
I'm interested in trying, but don't really have
Does any one know when LibreOffice will be released to the Fedora repo's.
Fedora 14 or Fedora 15 ?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines:
On 01/26/2011 08:52 PM, Jim wrote:
Does any one know when LibreOffice will be released to the Fedora repo's.
Fedora 14 or Fedora 15 ?
It has been in the Rawhide repo for several weeks already. Won't be
released for Fedora 14
Rahul
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/26/2011 08:52 PM, Jim wrote:
Does any one know when LibreOffice will be released to the Fedora repo's.
Fedora 14 or Fedora 15 ?
It has been in the Rawhide repo for several weeks already. Won't be
released for
On Wednesday 26 January 2011 01:06 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Tuesday, January 25, 2011 02:28:15 pm Jatin K did opine:
On Tuesday 25 January 2011 10:44 PM, Tim wrote:
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 01:13 +1030, Tim wrote:
Then, you've got several things to think about:
Another one: Does your ISP
On Tuesday, January 25, 2011 06:43:27 pm JB wrote:
Thirdly, stick around the thread for many days (even weeks) - there is
a good chance somebody will have time (like Lamar next week) and come up
with a good idea.
Given what I've seen of Ashley's symptoms, it may be more BIOS related than
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:50:12 -0300,
Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/26/2011 08:52 PM, Jim wrote:
Does any one know when LibreOffice will be released to the Fedora repo's.
Fedora 14 or Fedora 15 ?
On 01/26/2011 09:20 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 01/26/2011 08:52 PM, Jim wrote:
Does any one know when LibreOffice will be released to the Fedora repo's.
Fedora 14 or Fedora 15 ?
It has been in the Rawhide repo for several weeks
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 10:13 -0600, Steven Stern wrote:
Cannot login. Check Edit-Plugins-Bugzilla and
/etc/abrt/plugins/Bugzilla.conf. Server said: libcurl failed to execute
the HTTP POST transaction. Peer certificate cannot be authenticated
with known CA certificates
I'm getting this too,
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 21:27 +0530, Jatin K wrote:
I surprised that this kind of things/action can be take by the ISP
Over here, in Australia...
Some ISPs block port 80 by default, though you may enable it. I seem to
recall that was an ISP-reaction to a worm.
Some ISPs block port 80, unless
On Wednesday, January 26, 2011 12:37:11 pm Christopher A. Williams did
opine:
I'm picking up chatter that Libre Office as downloaded from their
community site will install side-by-side the existing OOo install on F14
(and other distros as well). Anyone have experience with this they'd
like
I have successfully installed the intermediate CA certificates into the cert
database and no longer having an issue.
The ldap server is up and running with SSL now.
To summarize my issues and resolution:
The First issue I found was that I was not utilizing the proper intermediate
certificates
Which disk would I download to get into rescue mode on F14 x86_64?
All I need to do is reinstall grub, after (hopefully) repairing a broken
Windows XP that I have not been able to boot for a year because of having
gotten a new motherboard a year ago.
I do not have a floppy drive or any type of
On 01/26/2011 09:57 AM, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
Which disk would I download to get into rescue mode on F14 x86_64?
Either the DVD or the first disk of the CD set will do. You can also do
it from a LiveCD if you prefer; the choice is yours.
--
users mailing list
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 10:57 -0700, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
Which disk would I download to get into rescue mode on F14 x86_64?
All I need to do is reinstall grub, after (hopefully) repairing a broken
Windows XP that I have not been able to boot for a year because of having
gotten a new
Heyyas,
Actually http://clan-speak.de/ offers free mumble servers without any
requirements. After subscribing for a free server from today on they
instantly activate them. Sorry for the offtopic post but this is a
great service. Mumble is actually packaged in fedora and i thought
this might be
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 18:25:15 +0100,
Rudolf Kastl che...@gmail.com wrote:
Heyyas,
Actually http://clan-speak.de/ offers free mumble servers without any
requirements. After subscribing for a free server from today on they
instantly activate them. Sorry for the offtopic post but this is a
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 16:14:22 -0300,
Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
Packages are in the repository because someone is volunteering to
maintain them. No because of any voting.
So if someone from Oracle
On 01/27/2011 12:44 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Packages are in the repository because someone is volunteering to
maintain them. No because of any voting.
So if someone from Oracle choose to build and maintain it for Fedora
and cleared
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
A maintainer wouldn't have to be from Oracle, anyone could do it. They'd
still have to leave out the stuff that had patent issues.
I´m not following wrt patents. It´s the same bloody code.
And why didn´t it prevent Fedora
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
They'd
still have to leave out the stuff that had patent issues.
Sine the USPTO basically gives patents on about anything, it´s a mine
field. Basically you don´t know if something infringes on someone
else´s patent until you
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 16:43:08 -0300,
Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
A maintainer wouldn't have to be from Oracle, anyone could do it. They'd
still have to leave out the stuff that had patent issues.
I´m
On 01/27/2011 01:13 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
A maintainer wouldn't have to be from Oracle, anyone could do it. They'd
still have to leave out the stuff that had patent issues.
I´m not following wrt patents. It´s the same
On 01/27/2011 01:15 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
They'd
still have to leave out the stuff that had patent issues.
Sine the USPTO basically gives patents on about anything, it´s a mine
field. Basically you don´t know if
On Wednesday, January 26, 2011 03:14:12 pm Rahul Sundaram did opine:
On 01/27/2011 12:44 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Packages are in the repository because someone is volunteering to
maintain them. No because of any voting.
So if
Isn't it possible to use Red Hat Directory Service
From: 389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:389-users-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Aaron
Hagopian
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 2:25 PM
To: General discussion list for the
Aaron Konstam akons...@sbcglobal.net writes:
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 08:07 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 01/26/2011 05:23 AM, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
I'm not sure how new users are supposed to find evince.
Maybe it is the same method that many folks should use to find things.
Joe Zeff j...@zeff.us writes:
On 01/25/2011 02:34 PM, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
That lowered ssh security allowed a second intrusion at user
level (probably by password guessing)
No need. Once they had root they could add a user and use that for their
user-level work.
I understand.
On 01/26/2011 02:22 PM, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
OK. Thanks to both of you. Yes, I had feared that this might be the only way.
I didn't want to have to download 700MB just to be able to reinstall grub, but
I guess that is the only way.
I don't have an installation disk, since I did a
Marko Vojinovic vvma...@gmail.com writes:
Shouldn't this be the other way around? I mean, ordinary user gets
compromized
first, and then root gets compromized later?
Oh, I'm sure there was an initial user-level attack that I haven't found
yet and probably won't. Apache will all that
Hi list
mplayer http://www.radiotunisienne.tn/popup/rtci.asx
I have a problem with my radio on linux.
mplayer could not play the radio on linux. However, the same link works fine
with windows media player.
And it is not a codec problem.
Playing http://www.radiotunisienne.tn/popup/rtci.asx.
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 12:58 -0800, Dave Stevens wrote:
Package libobasis3.3-en-US-base-3.3.0-6.x86_64.rpm is not signed
[dave@davehost RPMS]$
I know how to disable gpg checking in a .repo file but don't know how
to deal
with it here where there doesn't seem to be one. Ideas? F14 if it
Hello,
I am encountering problems when
attempting to install F14 on a
Notebook (Terra Mobile 1020G Greenline).
I am installing from DVD.
I am installing as
1) Install a new system or upgrade an existing system
After a number of screens of error messages, the computer freezes with
the
Adel ESSAFI ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on 26/01/2011
22:06:
Hi list
mplayer http://www.radiotunisienne.tn/popup/rtci.asx
I have a problem with my radio on linux.
mplayer could not play the radio on linux. However, the same link
works fine with windows media player.
And it
On Wednesday, January 26, 2011 01:16:36 pm Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 12:58 -0800, Dave Stevens wrote:
Package libobasis3.3-en-US-base-3.3.0-6.x86_64.rpm is not signed
[dave@davehost RPMS]$
I know how to disable gpg checking in a .repo file but don't know how
to
On Wednesday, January 26, 2011 03:46:54 pm Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
The fact is that not only is the evince name non-decriptive, but the man
-k short description likewise has no mention of pdf so it won't be
found as a pdf viewer either.
And that is a fault of upstream GNOME, not Fedora.
On Wednesday, January 26, 2011 04:23:40 pm Rahul Sundaram did opine:
On 01/27/2011 01:50 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
What about LibreOffice?
IMO it should be one or the other, and given the politics involved, I
personally would prefer that LibreOffice gets the nod by most of the
distro's
On 01/27/2011 03:22 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
Well, since there are many more folks working in LO than on OOo, I'm
wondering if the code is now flowing the other way? Possibly w/o their
(LO's) knowledge.
That isn't a likely scenarios for several different reasons. One of the
primary
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 25/01/2011 16:25, Walter Cazzola a écrit :
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011, François Patte wrote:
BTW why do you want a2ps it is quite obsolete now for it is unable to
handle utf-8 encodage.
I'm a long time user of a2ps and I've several scripts that
On 01/27/2011 02:28 AM, Dave Stevens wrote:
I know how to disable gpg checking in a .repo file but don't know how to deal
with it here where there doesn't seem to be one. Ideas? F14 if it matters.
yum --nogpgcheck foo*.rpm would work. Note that the Fedora 15 version
has a change that doesn't
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Gene Heskett gene.hesk...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, since there are many more folks working in LO than on OOo, I'm
wondering if the code is now flowing the other way? Possibly w/o their
(LO's) knowledge.
I don´t think this is accurate. Two thirds of the former
On 01/27/2011 03:55 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Libreoffice however has the
strategic advantage because LibreOffice can continue to inherit code
from Openoffice but not the other way around because of Oracle's policies.
Rahul
So
On 01/27/2011 03:53 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
I don´t think this is accurate. Two thirds of the former Sun
developers continue working at Oracle, on OpenOffice.org. This is part
of the exodus towards LibreOffice myth, that, given quoted figures,
included only ~30 people. But it serves well
$ mplayer -playlist http://www.radiotunisienne.tn/popup/rtci.asx
works for me, playing right now
f12
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines:
On 26/01/11 22:06, Adel ESSAFI wrote:
Hi list
mplayer http://www.radiotunisienne.tn/popup/rtci.asx
I have a problem with my radio on linux.
mplayer could not play the radio on linux. However, the same link works fine
with windows media player.
It works fine from the gui.
--
Erik
--
this suggestion is long shot.
Back when I was an install newbie, on f10
the install would always fail upon trying to bring up X.
None of the usual kernel things like vesa= worked.
No further ideas from this list ( this list was critical to me getting this
far).
Finally I found via googling
Rahul Sundaram writes:
On 01/27/2011 01:13 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
A maintainer wouldn't have to be from Oracle, anyone could do it. They'd
still have to leave out the stuff that had patent issues.
I´m not following
Fernando Cassia writes:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
Libreoffice however has the
strategic advantage because LibreOffice can continue to inherit code
from Openoffice but not the other way around because of Oracle's policies.
Rahul
So basically
On 01/27/2011 04:49 AM, Jim wrote:
If Libreoffice is in the rawhide repo, what is the name of rpm, I did a
search on libreoffice with no results.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=11024
Rahul
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change
On 01/27/2011 04:57 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Rahul Sundaram writes:
On 01/27/2011 01:13 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to
wrote:
A maintainer wouldn't have to be from Oracle, anyone could do it.
They'd
still have to leave out the
Rahul Sundaram writes:
On 01/27/2011 04:57 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Rahul Sundaram writes:
On 01/27/2011 01:13 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to
wrote:
A maintainer wouldn't have to be from Oracle, anyone could do it.
They'd
still
On 01/26/2011 06:28 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 01/27/2011 04:49 AM, Jim wrote:
If Libreoffice is in the rawhide repo, what is the name of rpm, I did a
search on libreoffice with no results.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=11024
Rahul
How do you install libreoffice
fedora 13, firefox 3.6.13
the link
http://www.lemonde.fr/ is sending me to static.php.org
I was accessing the site when i noted my french dictionary was not
working
reinstalled dict
now when I hit the lemonde link it looks up static.php.org and sends me
there
any ideas?
TIa
rfjones
--
On Wednesday, January 26, 2011 07:01:26 pm Rahul Sundaram did opine:
On 01/27/2011 04:57 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Rahul Sundaram writes:
On 01/27/2011 01:13 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to
wrote:
A maintainer wouldn't have
On 01/27/2011 05:25 AM, Jim wrote:
On 01/26/2011 06:28 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 01/27/2011 04:49 AM, Jim wrote:
If Libreoffice is in the rawhide repo, what is the name of rpm, I did a
search on libreoffice with no results.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=11024
On 01/26/2011 01:06 PM, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
Oh, I'm sure there was an initial user-level attack that I haven't found
yet and probably won't.
Check /etc/passwd for users you don't recognize.
grep -v nologin /etc/passwd
will give you a list of users who can log in. The few who aren't
On 01/27/2011 05:18 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
All of that may very well be true, but isn't really a factor if an
Oracle representative submits a package that says this package
contains GPLed code.
Openoffice.org codebase is not under GPL but even in that case,
different vendors have
On 01/26/2011 08:02 AM, Randolph Jones wrote:
the link
http://www.lemonde.fr/ is sending me to static.php.org
I was accessing the site when i noted my french dictionary was not
working
It's working for me. Maybe it was just a temporary glitch with your dns
servers?
--
users
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 13:22 -0700, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
OK. Thanks to both of you. Yes, I had feared that this might be the only way.
I didn't want to have to download 700MB just to be able to reinstall grub,
but
I guess that is the only way.
I don't have an installation disk,
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com wrote:
Generally, the GPL does not mandate giving anyone credit, in some particular
form or fashion.
I wasn´t thinking of the legal angle. I was thinking about public
discourse of portraying Oracle as some sort of enemies
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 9:05 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
Openoffice.org codebase is not under GPL but even in that case,
different vendors have different considerations.
Oh really?
http://www.openoffice.org/license.html
OpenOffice.org uses a single open-source license for the
On 01/27/2011 06:48 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 9:05 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
Openoffice.org codebase is not under GPL but even in that case,
different vendors have different considerations.
Oh really?
Yes, really.
On 01/27/2011 06:44 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Generally, the GPL does not mandate giving anyone credit, in some particular
form or fashion.
I wasn´t thinking of the legal angle. I was thinking about public
discourse of portraying
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:18 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
Read carefully what you are quoting. The license is LGPL and not GPL
Lesser GPL is what it implies.
I take GPL and LGPL as part of the same family of licenses. ie GPL
and LGPL have more in common than, say, the BSD
On 01/26/2011 05:49 PM, Mike Wright wrote:
Hi all,
Subject says it all.
I've gone through every option I could find, right clicked everything,
grepped through .nautilus and .gnome2* and haven't the slighted idea why
nautilus insists on opening Chrome when the system default is set to
86 matches
Mail list logo
