On 07/08/2017 07:51 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/09/17 10:36, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
I admit that I am newbie here and might be making wrong conclusions, but with
each
correction I get a little bit better understanding.
I feel that if you're really interested into why certain repos
On 07/09/17 10:36, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
> I admit that I am newbie here and might be making wrong conclusions, but with
> each
> correction I get a little bit better understanding.
I feel that if you're really interested into why certain repos release certain
versions of nVidia driver SW
On 07/08/2017 07:07 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/09/17 09:51, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
Thanks for info.
I found this for long-lived:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item=OTkxOA.
I am assuming short-lived is for Fedoras and the like in which they may
want/need
to move to another
On 07/09/17 09:51, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
> Thanks for info.
>
> I found this for long-lived:
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item=OTkxOA.
>
> I am assuming short-lived is for Fedoras and the like in which they may
> want/need
> to move to another version and will abandon the prior
On 07/08/2017 06:33 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/09/17 08:35, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
Oh, I definitely missed that aspect. Middle of page of
https://elrepo.org/tiki/kmod-nvidia where it lists kmod-nvidia-xx is
what
led me to believe that. I can see on https://negativo17.org/nvidia-driver/
On 07/09/17 08:35, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
> Oh, I definitely missed that aspect. Middle of page of
> https://elrepo.org/tiki/kmod-nvidia where it lists kmod-nvidia-xx
> is what
> led me to believe that. I can see on https://negativo17.org/nvidia-driver/
> that
> they list driver version for
On 07/08/2017 05:11 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/09/17 07:17, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
Thanks for correcting me on the Centos vs Fedora issue, I made a leap of faith
that
I shouldn't have. That being said, if you say RPMFusion is 375.66 then that is
the
same one available at ElRepo. Isn't
On 07/09/17 07:17, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
> Thanks for correcting me on the Centos vs Fedora issue, I made a leap of
> faith that
> I shouldn't have. That being said, if you say RPMFusion is 375.66 then that
> is the
> same one available at ElRepo. Isn't the version available based on graphic
On 07/08/2017 02:45 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/08/17 16:47, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
I can't begin to figure out what is happening and where to report as I am too
much
of a newbie regarding NVidia on Linux
Problems with nouveau, like all packages actually supplied by fedora project,
On Sat, 8 Jul 2017 09:29:30 +0200
François Patte wrote:
> Bonjour,
>
> I have an nvidia graphic card (NVIDIA Corporation G92 [GeForce 8800
> GT] (rev a2)) and sometimes, with the nouveau driver, the X system
> freeze and I have to reboot.
>
> I get these
On 07/08/17 16:47, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
>
>
> On 07/08/2017 12:29 AM, François Patte wrote:
>> Bonjour,
>>
>> I have an nvidia graphic card (NVIDIA Corporation G92 [GeForce 8800 GT]
>> (rev a2)) and sometimes, with the nouveau driver, the X system freeze
>> and I have to reboot.
>>
>> I get
On 07/08/2017 01:47 AM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
On 07/08/2017 12:29 AM, François Patte wrote:
Bonjour,
I have an nvidia graphic card (NVIDIA Corporation G92 [GeForce 8800 GT]
(rev a2)) and sometimes, with the nouveau driver, the X system freeze
and I have to reboot.
I get these messages
On 07/08/2017 12:29 AM, François Patte wrote:
Bonjour,
I have an nvidia graphic card (NVIDIA Corporation G92 [GeForce 8800 GT]
(rev a2)) and sometimes, with the nouveau driver, the X system freeze
and I have to reboot.
I get these messages in the logs:
nouveau :01:00.0: Direct firmware
Bonjour,
I have an nvidia graphic card (NVIDIA Corporation G92 [GeForce 8800 GT]
(rev a2)) and sometimes, with the nouveau driver, the X system freeze
and I have to reboot.
I get these messages in the logs:
nouveau :01:00.0: Direct firmware load for nouveau/nv84_xuc00f
failed with error -2
14 matches
Mail list logo