about had it with bamboo, and are dusting off our old Jenkins
> instance.
> >
> > I recall some messages here about things _not_ to do with Jenkins and
> > Maven. Do we avoid the 'maven build type' altogether and just run
> > Maven from the shell, or is my memory faulty?
had it with bamboo, and are dusting off our old Jenkins instance.
>
> I recall some messages here about things _not_ to do with Jenkins and
> Maven. Do we avoid the 'maven build type' altogether and just run
> Maven from the shell, or is my memory faulty
For pipeline you want to use the mavenLocalRepo property of the withMaven
step in the
https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Pipeline+Maven+Plugin
On 13 October 2016 at 16:41, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So, here's a specific puzzle. I want to enable multiple
To make concurrent Jenkins builds work, simply enable the "Use private Maven
repository" option in the Jenkins Maven build jobs and select the appropriate
"Strategy" (e.g., "Local to the workspace" or "Local to the executor"). This
works fine for us...
You install
https://github.com/takari/takari-local-repository
Or fix the bug from, like, 2007 ?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-2802
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> So, here's a specific puzzle. I want to enable multiple branches in
>
So, here's a specific puzzle. I want to enable multiple branches in
the Jenkins job and concurrent builds. How do I avoid two jobs trying
to write the same local repo at the same time?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
into a Maven bug/limitation (like
MNG-5889).
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Connolly [mailto:stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 9:39 AM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: Jenkins and Maven
When they work, they work... when they don't work they blow up in your
that my day job is
actually developing Jenkins... feel free to take my opinions however you
see fit
On 13 October 2016 at 15:24, Robert Patrick <robert.patr...@oracle.com>
wrote:
> Well... Some of us, my team included, are using the Maven jobs in Jenkins
> and they generally works
Well... Some of us, my team included, are using the Maven jobs in Jenkins and
they generally works fine for our projects (and is much simpler to configure).
Be warned that Maven 3.3 support is still busted for projects that use
.mvn/maven.config waiting on https://issues.apache.org/jira
.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> https://javaadventure.blogspot.ie/2013/11/jenkins-
>> maven-job-type-considered-evil.html
>> is the message from your friendly neighbourhood Apache Maven PMC member and
>> Jenkins committer!
>>
>> Two options:
>&
+1 for pipeline build.
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> https://javaadventure.blogspot.ie/2013/11/jenkins-
> maven-job-type-considered-evil.html
> is the message from your friendly neighbourhood Apache Maven PMC membe
https://javaadventure.blogspot.ie/2013/11/jenkins-maven-job-type-considered-evil.html
is the message from your friendly neighbourhood Apache Maven PMC member and
Jenkins committer!
Two options:
1. (oldschool) Freestyle Job with a Maven build step
2. (coolkids) Multibranch Pipeline Job
We've about had it with bamboo, and are dusting off our old Jenkins instance.
I recall some messages here about things _not_ to do with Jenkins and
Maven. Do we avoid the 'maven build type' altogether and just run
Maven from the shell, or is my memory faulty? Anything else
]
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
[INFO]
[INFO] Total time: 1.760s
[INFO] Finished at: Mon Sep 22 12:25:39 EDT 2014
--
View this message in context:
http://maven.40175.n5.nabble.com/Jenkins-via-Maven-deploy
14 matches
Mail list logo