On 31/03/15 17:59, Nicolas Ecarnot wrote:
> Le 31/03/2015 15:55, Lior Vernia a écrit :
>
>> So the lower ones are allocated. But I would expect nic0 to receive a
>> lower MAC address than nic1 on the same VM. Have you encountered a
>> situation where that is not the case?
>
> Once again : YES.
- Original Message -
> From: "Koen Vanoppen"
> To: "Omer Frenkel" , users@ovirt.org
> Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2015 7:53:03 AM
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Snapshot issue
>
> Worked perfectly!!! BIG thanks Omer!!! All my VM's are back up. Nothing
> lost!
>
> SOLVED!!!
excellent :)
>
- Original Message -
> From: "Yedidyah Bar David"
> To: "mad Engineer"
> Cc: "users" , de...@ovirt.org
> Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2015 9:04:00 AM
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] engine-setup fails with FATAL: Cannot execute sql
> command:
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "mad E
- Original Message -
> From: "mad Engineer"
> To: "users"
> Cc: de...@ovirt.org
> Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2015 1:13:03 AM
> Subject: [ovirt-users] engine-setup fails with FATAL: Cannot execute sql
> command:
>
> Hello All,
>Trying ovirt on centos 6.5 but fails
Worked perfectly!!! BIG thanks Omer!!! All my VM's are back up. Nothing
lost!
SOLVED!!!
2015-03-31 9:53 GMT+02:00 Omer Frenkel :
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Koen Vanoppen"
> > To: "Omer Frenkel" , users@ovirt.org
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 7:35:57 AM
> > Subject: Re: [o
Finally got a chance to implement this, so testing this on my centos7 hosts,
and it looks good. I’ll keep eye on it for a couple days, but after a couple of
hours, there’s no evidence of any leakage.
> On Mar 30, 2015, at 4:14 PM, John Taylor wrote:
>
> Dan Kenigsberg writes:
>
>> On Sat, M
Hello All,
Trying ovirt on centos 6.5 but fails at PostgreSQL
configuration
with error
[ ERROR ] Failed to execute stage 'Misc configuration': Command
'/usr/share/ovirt-engine/dbscripts/create_schema.sh' failed to execute
Inside log it shows this
2015-03-31 17:47:15 DEBUG
otop
No worries!
I checked the scripts of the RPM and that line is in there.
I tried to reinstall it but no luck.
Then I began to run each line in the RPM script by hand.
What I found out is that there was already a KVM group but not in the
/etc/group file.
The system was connected to a IPA server an
Le 31/03/2015 15:55, Lior Vernia a écrit :
So the lower ones are allocated. But I would expect nic0 to receive a
lower MAC address than nic1 on the same VM. Have you encountered a
situation where that is not the case?
Once again : YES.
What I'm witnessing is that oVirt only uses the first free
On 31/03/15 16:02, Nicolas Ecarnot wrote:
> Le 31/03/2015 14:48, Lior Vernia a écrit :
>
I see. It seems MAC addresses are allocated according to the NIC name
order,
>>>
>>> I'm not sure this is exact.
>>> According to what I'm witnessing, MAC addresses are allocated in
>>> incremental
Hello,
Does anyone have a good reason to not remove the YAML support from the
RESTAPI? As far as I know it isn't used or tested in any reasonable way,
so I would like to remove it completely for 3.6. If anyone is using it
and can't move to JSON or XML please speak up.
Regards,
Juan Hernandez
--
On 03/31/2015 03:34 PM, Bloemen, Jurriën wrote:
Hi,
Please see the inline answers.
Thanks in advance,
Jurriën
Sorry that he took me awhile to check that (I didn't have el7
installation in hand) but now when checking that -
please run: rpm -q --scripts qemu-kvm-common-rhev
you'll see that
Le 31/03/2015 14:48, Lior Vernia a écrit :
I see. It seems MAC addresses are allocated according to the NIC name
order,
I'm not sure this is exact.
According to what I'm witnessing, MAC addresses are allocated in
incremental order, from the first free MAC address in the MAC pool range.
My q
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 02:36:55PM +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 02:14:28PM +0200, Uwe Laverenz wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Am 25.02.2015 um 09:31 schrieb Christophe Fergeau:
> >
> > >>The Windows clients have installed Windows 7 Enterprise gets from Windows
> > >>MSDN
On 31/03/15 15:34, Nicolas Ecarnot wrote:
> Le 31/03/2015 13:57, Lior Vernia a écrit :
>>
>>
>> On 31/03/15 14:21, Nicolas Ecarnot wrote:
>>> Hi Lior,
>>>
>>> Le 31/03/2015 12:55, Lior Vernia a écrit :
Indeed, if you're using oVirt 3.4 and up, and you supply all the NICs
whenever you cr
Hi Adam,
Can you please take a look? By the provided information, there seems to be an
issue of synchronization failure between engine and vdsm regarding the storage
pool which the 2 domains are attached to.
Thanks
- Original Message -
From: "VONDRA Alain"
To: "Elad Ben Aharon"
C
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 02:14:28PM +0200, Uwe Laverenz wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Am 25.02.2015 um 09:31 schrieb Christophe Fergeau:
>
> >>The Windows clients have installed Windows 7 Enterprise gets from Windows
> >>MSDNAA and it is installed in all machines here in our University.
> >>
> >>If you nee
Hi,
Please see the inline answers.
Thanks in advance,
Jurriën
On 31/03/15 14:18, "ybronhei" wrote:
>On 03/31/2015 02:07 PM, Bloemen, Jurriën wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> First of all thanks Yaniv for your reply!
>
>Sure. Anytime
>
>Basically kvm group should be created by qemu rpm installation,
>s
Le 31/03/2015 13:57, Lior Vernia a écrit :
On 31/03/15 14:21, Nicolas Ecarnot wrote:
Hi Lior,
Le 31/03/2015 12:55, Lior Vernia a écrit :
Indeed, if you're using oVirt 3.4 and up, and you supply all the NICs
whenever you create the VM (not afterwards - as part of the new VM
dialog), the NICs
On 03/31/2015 02:07 PM, Bloemen, Jurriën wrote:
Hi all,
First of all thanks Yaniv for your reply!
Sure. Anytime
Basically kvm group should be created by qemu rpm installation,
so first check "egrep "kvm" /etc/group" - it should return
kvm:x:36:qemu,sanlock if your system is installed properl
Hi all,
Am 25.02.2015 um 09:31 schrieb Christophe Fergeau:
The Windows clients have installed Windows 7 Enterprise gets from Windows
MSDNAA and it is installed in all machines here in our University.
If you need some other information, please, feel free to ask me.
I'm asking about remote-vie
On 31/03/15 14:21, Nicolas Ecarnot wrote:
> Hi Lior,
>
> Le 31/03/2015 12:55, Lior Vernia a écrit :
>> Indeed, if you're using oVirt 3.4 and up, and you supply all the NICs
>> whenever you create the VM (not afterwards - as part of the new VM
>> dialog), the NICs should receive MAC addresses acc
Hi Lior,
Le 31/03/2015 12:55, Lior Vernia a écrit :
Indeed, if you're using oVirt 3.4 and up, and you supply all the NICs
whenever you create the VM (not afterwards - as part of the new VM
dialog), the NICs should receive MAC addresses according to their
ordering by names, e.g. nic1 will always
- Original Message -
> From: "Jorick Astrego"
> To: users@ovirt.org
> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 2:07:02 PM
> Subject: [ovirt-users] firewalld rules for engine
>
> Hi,
>
> After running engine-setup (3.5.2rc2) on Centos 7, the setup tells me the
> following
>
> In order to configure
The situation you got to (where there are ovirtmgmt bridges over both
bond0 directly and over the bond0.231 VLAN device), likely via manual
intervention, is indeed inconsistent from oVirt's perspective.
You should be able to SSH into the host and run something like "brctl
delif ovirtmgmt bond0", t
Hi all,
First of all thanks Yaniv for your reply!
This is a fresh new installed system. It was not registered to another
oVirt engine before.
So...
The output of "groups sanlock² is
sanlock : sanlock disk qemu
KVM is missing. There is no kvm group at all or user for that matter!?
I ran the co
Hi,
After running engine-setup (3.5.2rc2) on Centos 7, the setup tells me
the following
In order to configure firewalld, copy the files from
/etc/ovirt-engine/firewalld to /etc/firewalld/services
and execute the following commands:
firewall-cmd
Indeed, if you're using oVirt 3.4 and up, and you supply all the NICs
whenever you create the VM (not afterwards - as part of the new VM
dialog), the NICs should receive MAC addresses according to their
ordering by names, e.g. nic1 will always get a lower MAC address than
nic2. For a newly-created
Hello Bojan,
I'm still having difficulties understanding the exact situation. Could
you please click the "Refresh Capabilities" button in the hosts tab when
the relevant host is selected and supply a screenshot of the Setup Host
Networks dialog on that host afterwards. Then explain what about that
Hi, Lior,
On 03/30/2015 04:01 PM, Lior Vernia wrote:
> Hello,
>
> You're right. It might be something we should consider adding in the
> hosted engine script - maybe a flag to also install the Neutron agent
> packages?...
>
> For now, there should be an easy workaround as long as you have more
> t
I have a hosted engine. It is on the same VLAN as the hosts are, so I am
not having connectivity issues. I am not going to alter that part of the
setup but I do need to add more networks, and I can not because I can
not save the configuration, no matter what I change it is not saved.
Ovirtmgmt is
I have enabled the VLAN tagging but no dice. Still I cannot attach
logical network to the VLANS in oVirt, and I see them represented in the
list, like this:
namebond vlan Network nameaddress
eth0bond0.50ovirtmgmt
bond0
eth1
Le 31/03/2015 09:21, Sven Kieske a écrit :
You should file an RFE on bugzilla for this
kind of stuff and maybe raise awareness during
the weekly meeting on irc.
this increases the chance of an implementation
taking place dramatically ;)
HTH
Hi Sven,
I found and append this :
https://bugzil
Hey guys,
Probably the problem is that sanlock service cannot stop properly - was
the host registered to another ovirt engine before and you missed to put
it on maintenance before adding it to another system?
Such issue raised before when sanlock service fails to stop - can you
explicitly ch
- Original Message -
> From: "Koen Vanoppen"
> To: "Omer Frenkel" , users@ovirt.org
> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 7:35:57 AM
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Snapshot issue
>
> I just wanted to remove the snapshots in ovirt... That's all... And now
> they are locked. Without the possibili
actually i just recently reinstalled CentOS on the server as well as the
freenas server before i tried installing ovirt. but, okay i will try
reinstalling centos and recreate the volume to make sure that the volume is
empty and i will post the said logs.
Thanks,
Jaicel
- Original Message -
Hi,
here's the rpm -qa output.
Thanks,
Jaicel
- Original Message -
From: "Yedidyah Bar David"
To: "Jaicel"
Cc: users@ovirt.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 3:24:27 PM
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Hosted-Engine "misc configuration"
- Original Message -
> From: "Yedidyah Bar Davi
- Original Message -
> From: "Yedidyah Bar David"
> To: "Jaicel"
> Cc: users@ovirt.org
> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 10:20:35 AM
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Hosted-Engine "misc configuration"
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Jaicel"
> > To: "Yedidyah Bar David"
> > Cc: us
You should file an RFE on bugzilla for this
kind of stuff and maybe raise awareness during
the weekly meeting on irc.
this increases the chance of an implementation
taking place dramatically ;)
HTH
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards
Sven Kieske
Systemadministrator
Mittwald CM Service GmbH
- Original Message -
> From: "Jaicel"
> To: "Yedidyah Bar David"
> Cc: users@ovirt.org
> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 9:52:28 AM
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Hosted-Engine "misc configuration"
>
> i attached the setup log.
Seems from the log that the storage space was not empty - perha
I did that also. I forgot to mention it because you only have to run --force if
you didn’t stop the sanlock process of running.
The result of with and without is the same. Still the vdsmd process cannot
start.
From: Roy Golan mailto:rgo...@redhat.com>>
Date: Monday 30 March 2015 23:25
To: Jurr
41 matches
Mail list logo
