ction, we should disconnect from the target.
If this is not the case, this is ovirt-engine bug.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: on behalf of Nelson Lameiras
>
> Date: Friday, 3 March 2017 at 20:55
> To: Nir Soffer
> Cc: users
> Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] best wa
Nelson Lameiras"
Cc: "Gianluca Cecchi" , "Adam Litke"
, "users"
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2017 8:27:26 AM
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] best way to remove SAN lun
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Nelson Lameiras
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Not sure it is the
ot;
Cc: "Gianluca Cecchi" , "Adam Litke"
, "users"
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2017 8:27:26 AM
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] best way to remove SAN lun
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Nelson Lameiras
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Not sure it is the same issue, but w
070>
> > nelson.lamei...@lyra-network.com
> >
> > www.lyra-network.com | www.payzen.eu
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Lyra Network, 109 rue de l'innovation, 31670 Labège, FRANCE
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From:
>
>
>
>
>
> Lyra Network, 109 rue de l'innovation, 31670 Labège, FRANCE
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Nir Soffer"
> To: "Gianluca Cecchi" , "Adam Litke"
>
> Cc: "users"
> Sent: Tuesday, February 21,
Lyra Network, 109 rue de l'innovation, 31670 Labège, FRANCE
- Original Message -
From: "Nir Soffer"
To: "Gianluca Cecchi" , "Adam Litke"
Cc: "users"
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 6:32:18 PM
Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] best way to remove
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 7:25 PM, Gianluca Cecchi
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Nir Soffer wrote:
>>
>> This is caused by active lvs on the remove storage domains that were not
>> deactivated during the removal. This is a very old known issue.
>>
>> You have remove the remove device ma
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Nir Soffer wrote:
> This is caused by active lvs on the remove storage domains that were not
> deactivated during the removal. This is a very old known issue.
>
> You have remove the remove device mapper entries - you can see the devices
> using:
>
> dmsetup s
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 7:06 PM, Gianluca Cecchi
wrote:
> The id of the removed storage domain was
> 900b1853-e192-4661-a0f9-7c7c396f6f49 and on the not yet reboted hosts I get
> this
> The multipath device was 3600a0b8000299902cd3c5501458f
>
> With pvs command I get this errors related to the
The id of the removed storage domain was
900b1853-e192-4661-a0f9-7c7c396f6f49 and on the not yet reboted hosts I get
this
The multipath device was 3600a0b8000299902cd3c5501458f
With pvs command I get this errors related to them:
[root@ovmsrv06 ~]# pvs
/dev/mapper/3600a0b8000299902cd3c55
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 5:42 PM, Andrea Ghelardi
wrote:
> Hello Gianluca,
>
> I have ISCSI SAN here and not FC but process should be very similar.
>
> Correct operation is
>
> Storage maintenance -> detach -> remove
>
>
>
> Once you have removed the storage, Ovirt will release the sanlock.
>
> No
_Guide/removing_devices.html
* If you do face command freeze etc, re-enable LUN mappings and check your
multipath.conf
Cheers
AG
From: users-boun...@ovirt.org [mailto:users-boun...@ovirt.org] On Behalf Of
Gianluca Cecchi
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 4:19 PM
To: users
Subject: [ovirt-users] best
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 6:12 PM, Adam Litke wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Gianluca Cecchi
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>> currently I have a cluster of 3 hosts where each one has FC SAN
>> connectivity to 4 LUNs: 3 are already configured as storage domains (1TB,
>> 2TB, 4TB), one is fre
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Adam Litke wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Gianluca Cecchi <
> gianluca.cec...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> currently I have a cluster of 3 hosts where each one has FC SAN
>> connectivity to 4 LUNs: 3 are already configured as storage domains (1
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> Hello,
> currently I have a cluster of 3 hosts where each one has FC SAN
> connectivity to 4 LUNs: 3 are already configured as storage domains (1TB,
> 2TB, 4TB), one is free, not allocated.
> See here for screenshot:
> https://drive.googl
Hello,
currently I have a cluster of 3 hosts where each one has FC SAN
connectivity to 4 LUNs: 3 are already configured as storage domains (1TB,
2TB, 4TB), one is free, not allocated.
See here for screenshot:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwoPbcrMv8mvRVZZMTlNcTQ5MGs/view?usp=sharing
At the mome
16 matches
Mail list logo
