t;Oved Ourfalli"
>> To: "Jiri Belka" , medieval...@gmail.com
>> Cc: users@ovirt.org
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 3:50:45 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Users] Ovirt 3.1 and Samba4 AD
>>
>>
>>
>> - Original Message -
>>
ctory page and
retain all the AD-specific language.
--Charlie
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Oved Ourfalli wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Jiri Belka"
>> To: users@ovirt.org
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 9:30:39 AM
>> Su
- Original Message -
> From: "Oved Ourfalli"
> To: "Jiri Belka" , medieval...@gmail.com
> Cc: users@ovirt.org
> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 3:50:45 PM
> Subject: Re: [Users] Ovirt 3.1 and Samba4 AD
>
>
>
> - Original Mess
- Original Message -
> From: "Jiri Belka"
> To: users@ovirt.org
> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 9:30:39 AM
> Subject: Re: [Users] Ovirt 3.1 and Samba4 AD
>
> On 11/13/2012 09:40 PM, Charlie wrote:
> > I would like to help oVirt gain compatibility
On 11/13/2012 09:40 PM, Charlie wrote:
I would like to help oVirt gain compatibility with standards-based
services like OpenLDAP, but the code's in a language I haven't used
and a version control system I haven't used and the wiki has no LDAP
interaction design documents (other than the sources t
- Original Message -
> From: "Alon Bar-Lev"
> To: "Charlie"
> Cc: "users"
> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 10:46:37 PM
> Subject: Re: [Users] Ovirt 3.1 and Samba4 AD
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > Fr
2012/11/13 Yair Zaslavsky
> There is a reason why we query for userPrincipalName so it has to include
> this information.
>
>
From
http://theessentialexchange.com/blogs/michael/archive/2007/11/13/the-user-principle-name-and-you.aspx
:
"The user principal name is not a required attribute (that is
- Original Message -
> From: "Charlie"
> To: "Itamar Heim"
> Cc: "users"
> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 10:40:34 PM
> Subject: Re: [Users] Ovirt 3.1 and Samba4 AD
>
> FreeIPA is a microsoft "clone" solution. It is a
FreeIPA is a microsoft "clone" solution. It is an emulator for AD,
much like Samba4 is. Neither of them is based on Open Standards,
although both are Open Source. This is a very important distinction.
In our test RHEVM environment, only closed-source, proprietary
Microsoft Active Directory coul
On 11/13/2012 05:55 PM, Alejandro wrote:
2012/11/13 Yair Zaslavsky mailto:yzasl...@redhat.com>>
Hi ALejandro,
Officially we're not supporting Sambra4rc5, but I talked with Alon
Bar-Lev (CC'ed) and he explained me Sambra4rc5 is 2003 AD compliant.
Hi Yair
I know it, but is very
On 11/13/2012 05:55 PM, Alejandro wrote:
2012/11/13 Yair Zaslavsky mailto:yzasl...@redhat.com>>
Hi ALejandro,
Officially we're not supporting Sambra4rc5, but I talked with Alon
Bar-Lev (CC'ed) and he explained me Sambra4rc5 is 2003 AD compliant.
Hi Yair
I know it, but is very in
2012/11/13 Yair Zaslavsky
> Hi ALejandro,
> Officially we're not supporting Sambra4rc5, but I talked with Alon Bar-Lev
> (CC'ed) and he explained me Sambra4rc5 is 2003 AD compliant.
>
>
Hi Yair
I know it, but is very interesting the idea to avoid Microsoft solutions
and move to OpenSource Envirom
Hi ALejandro,
Officially we're not supporting Sambra4rc5, but I talked with Alon
Bar-Lev (CC'ed) and he explained me Sambra4rc5 is 2003 AD compliant.
On 11/13/2012 03:53 PM, Alejandro wrote:
I'm triing to use Samba4rc5 like autenticator for Ovirt 3.1.0-3.26
First problem is Ovirt is user use
I'm triing to use Samba4rc5 like autenticator for Ovirt 3.1.0-3.26
First problem is Ovirt is user usernameprincipal (login@domain in place of
login) to autenticate with Samba4, But samba4 don't use it.
I use
engine-manage-domains -action=add -domain=DOMAINFQDN -user=LOGIN
-provider=ActiveDirecto
14 matches
Mail list logo
