I've now checked in my work to reduce some of the known coding overhead
in proton-c.
There were 3 parts to this:
1. Stop generating nulls at the end of described lists - if they are
not there the decoder must assume they are null - defualt values.
2. Generate nulls instead of default values
Whilst the recommendation is clearly not what is being used, how much
of an issue is this? It doesnt seem to be a hard requirement for
example.
I wonder if the disruption caused from changing it after ~6 years and
dealing with any resulting confusion actually outweighs the benefits
of it being as
The proton ruby gem and package are incorrectly named according to the
standard gem naming rules, see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-1760 for details.
The short story is we want to change the name from "qpid_proton" to
"qpid-proton" for the next release (0.22, not the 0.21 release
The Apache Qpid (http://qpid.apache.org) community is pleased to
announce the immediate availability of Apache Qpid JMS 0.30.0.
This is the latest release of our newer JMS client supporting the
Advanced Message Queuing Protocol 1.0 (AMQP 1.0, ISO/IEC 19464,
http://www.amqp.org), based around the
These are good improvements. Proton-j is doing most of this already.
PROTON-1780 is perhaps more complicated than it seems however. One of
the things proton-j always did is try to encode the smallest list/map
types it could, and a lot of the time it was notably slower because of
the time spent
Good work. These changes will be a great candidate to test with
qpid-interop to make sure that it still works with the other
implementations. And if not then why not.
- Original Message -
> From: "Andrew Stitcher"
> To: "Qpid Users"
> Sent:
Hi Brian,
The steps for restoring of BDB virtual host node store are correct.
Though, please be aware that in case of moving node into a different
machine you need to reset the bdb ha group as per [1].
As for BDBBackup utility provided by Qpid, it works simply by
acquiring locks on je files and
There were 4 binding +1 votes, and no other votes received. The vote has
passed.
The voting thread can be found here:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/19d8a355d54be1e28dad288bb5f1079452a62f6963b2e7a74a0b56ab@%3Cusers.qpid.apache.org%3E
I will add the archives to the dist release repo and
On 27 February 2018 at 14:57, Oleksandr Rudyy wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I built a release candidate for a Qpid Broker-J 7.0.2.
> Please give it a test out and vote accordingly.
>
> The source and binary archives can be grabbed from:
>
On 28 February 2018 at 19:33, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I have put together a spin for a Qpid Proton 0.21.0 release, please
> give it a test out and vote accordingly.
>
> The source archive can be grabbed from:
>
Hi Niklas,
the client you are using is very old (the final release was about 3 ago I
think), and has been replaced by the new Qpid JMS client (
https://qpid.apache.org/components/jms/index.html) - I would strongly
advise migrating your ode to use the new client.
Having said that I'm not aware of
+1
* Verified sha512
* Build/install on fedora 27
* Pass self tests
* Build/install with current qpid-dispatch master
* Pass self tests
- Original Message -
> From: "Robbie Gemmell"
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2018 2:33:29 PM
>
I'm planning on using the broker-j provided
org.apache.qpid.server.store.berkeleydb.BDBBackup class to backup our HA BDB
database. I want to make sure I understand the restore process. To restore
the DB for the Virtual Host Node the backup was taken for do we simply:
1. Stop the VirtualHostNode
13 matches
Mail list logo