>-Original Message-
>From: Bill Landry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 11:04 AM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Feature Request: Whitelist_DNSRBL
>
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <[EMAIL PROTEC
>> Thoughts, suggestions, or coffee?
>
>First, where's that coffee?
In my belly!
>then: I keep a .cf file with a quite a few lines like.
>
>uridnsbl_skip_domain ibill.com blabla.tld local-boobie-site.dom
Doh! It helps to RTFM I guess :) LOL at boobie-site!
Seeing as this feature is in place
>
>>Thinking one step bigger, it would be even better to feed
>this a file. This
>>way maybe SURBL can create a file for the top hit legit
>domains. Then using
>>SARE and RDJ, people could update that. This would reduce a
>lot of traffic
>>and time.
>
>Wait, now you're bringing SURBL into this.
ns so they are skipped would do away with this.
Thoughts, suggestions, or coffee?
Chris Santerre
System Admin and SARE Ninja
http://www.rulesemporium.com
http://www.surbl.org
'It is not the strongest of the species that survives,
not the most intelligent, but the one most responsive
Nextek has come under hacker fire recently. I'm sure they would like to take
down SARE if they could. THey have managed to give us s few minor problems,
but nothing major. I'll BCC this to Lord Phil and see what he says. :)
--Chris
>-Original Message-
>From: Owen McShane [mailto:[EMAIL P
>-Original Message-
>From: RD [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 8:21 PM
>To: Spamassassin List
>Subject: Non-Clickable URI's
>
>
>Hello List,
>
>I've seen spams where spammers are using
>"Cut&Paste_this_URL_to_your_browser" method reason why spamassassin
>won't
>-Original Message-
>From: Smart,Dan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 9:59 AM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: RE: Image Composition Analysis
>
>
>Agree on DCC, it only tells if bulk and doesn't discriminate
>on Spam or not.
>I have whitelists, and s
Yeah this is a definite candidate for SURBL. This is the
Huntsville-consulting spam gang:
http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBL20528
353+ domains diretly linked. This is going to be the next trend. The final
destination of this pron spam was throatstuffers . com, but it used a throw
away
afternoon just to be sure and it's still missing the
messages...
From: Chris
Santerre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 1:41
PMTo: Johnson, S;
users@spamassassin.apache.orgSubject: RE: Rules still not hitting
right
I beli
I believe you
have to restart Amavis?
--Chris
-Original Message-From: Johnson, S
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004
2:31 PMTo: users@spamassassin.apache.orgSubject: Rules
still not hitting right
I'm now running Spam Assassin
3.1
I've
>-Original Message-
>From: Martin Hepworth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 4:39 AM
>To: Smart,Dan
>Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Image Composition Analysis
>
>
>Dan
>
>I find the surbl.org URIRBL list provides very good protection against
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 8:26 PM
>To: Jim Maul
>Cc: Chris Santerre; SpamAssassin Users
>Subject: Re: SURBL and DNS wildcards
>
>
>On Monday, November 22, 2004, 11:08:26 AM, Jim Maul wro
>-Original Message-
>From: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 8:02 PM
>To: SpamAssassin Users
>Subject: Re: SURBL and DNS wildcards
>
>
>On Wednesday, November 17, 2004, 11:32:41 AM, Chris Santerre wrote:
>> That is corre
>-Original Message-
>From: Jon Dossey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 9:59 AM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Spamassassin on an E-Mail Gateway
>
>
>
>Redhat FC2, sendmail 8.13.1, and spamassassin 3.0.1 (spamc/spamd)
>
>Can't invoke spamassassin via
Hi Koby!
*SNIP*
>
>routing all traffic for port 25 is a problem for me as well
>although you
>gave me some nice ideas that I will think about.
I can see allowing business customers to go straight out, but I don't see
how routing private users to only go to your MX servers port 25 is hard? But
I
>-Original Message-
>From: Dallas L. Engelken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 2:23 PM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: RE: SURBL and DNS wildcards
*snip*
>
>Chris or Jeff can correct me if I'm wrong, but only the registered
>domain names go into S
I just got a spam that hit 2 SURBL domains. Advert for "Send your kids an
email from santa!" How nice of spammers to not only tkae your $10, but
harvest your children's email account and name as well. I'll be drafting up
a warning to my users shortly. Others may want to do the same. Spread the
love
>-Original Message-
>From: Dave Sill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 9:19 AM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Spam with ``=?utf-8?q?'' in From/To/Subject
>
>
>I'm getting lots of messages with UTF-8 encoding specified in the
>header, e.g.:
>
>From: =
t;>>From where do you know this? There's no note about that on the SARE
>> website.
>>
>> Jan
>>
>> --
>> Jan Theofel Fon: +49 (7 11) 48
>90 83 - 0
>> ETES - EDV-Systemhaus GbRFax: +49 (7 11) 48
>90 83 - 50
>> Liban
Number of hits for the bigevil file in Oct: 109328
Um.I'm not updating it anymore! Haven't in quite a while.
Tell your RDJ script to stop asking for updates :)
--Chris
>-Original Message-
>From: Mike Brodbelt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 10:58 AM
>To: Phil Ellett
>Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Spamassassin Proxy - Help need.
>
>
>Phil Ellett wrote:
>> I have been using Spamassassin for years via Sendmail
>-Original Message-
>From: Ian FREISLICH [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 5:12 AM
>To: Jeff Chan
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: very interesting article on refi spam
>
>
>Jeff Chan wrote:
>> On Wednesday, October 27, 2004,
This is what we all strive for in any enviorment, not just college. I would
try the vanilla install of SA and SURBL. There are a few rulesets on the
SARE site that should work well with no FPs. But start with general install
first.
Also setup a test system, and grab a few people to test it out. Y
>-Original Message-
>From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 8:45 PM
>To: .rp; users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: chickenpox rule - ignoring extremely high scores
>
>
>At 04:38 PM 10/20/2004 -0700, .rp wrote:
>
>>we are using Version 1.18 a
>-Original Message-
>From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2004 4:11 PM
>To: Chris Santerre; users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: RE: Question about spamassassin system wide
>
>
>At 03:39 PM 10/20/2004, Chris Santerre wr
>-Original Message-
>From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 1:26 PM
>To: Lior Marantenboim; users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Question about spamassassin system wide
>
>
>At 01:27 PM 10/19/2004, Lior Marantenboim wrote:
>>SpamAssassin is on
>-Original Message-
>From: Mathieu Nantel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 2:32 PM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: [OFFTOPIC] Opinions on DSPAM
>
>
>Good day list,
>
>As I've read a few articles on DSPAM claiming that it's
>better/faster/sexier
>tha
>-Original Message-
>From: Jim Maul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 10:09 AM
>To: Chris Santerre
>Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [RD] incorrect real name (was Re: feeding frenzy for
>ws.surbl .org!!!)
>
>-Original Message-
>From: John Wilcock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 5:19 AM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: [RD] incorrect real name (was Re: feeding frenzy for
>ws.surbl.org!!!)
>
>
>On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 08:51:56 +0200, John Wilcock wrote:
>> I
>-Original Message-
>From: ChupaCabra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 11:56 AM
>Cc: SpamAssassin Users
>Subject: Re: OT: Ninja Blanket
>
>
>
>
>Kenneth Porter wrote:
>
>> Was browsing ThinkGeek just now (looking for the Swiss Army
>USB memory
>> fob) and noti
>-Original Message-
>From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 11:45 AM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Default SURBL scores low?
>
>
>On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 08:27:02AM -0700, Potato Chip wrote:
>> -3.3 ALL_TRUSTED Most of these un
Use spamstats:
http://freshmeat.net/projects/spamstats/
and run against old and new maillogs.
--Chris
>-Original Message-
>From: Ronan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 9:27 AM
>To: spam
>Subject: comparison
>
>
>Is there any way to compare the effectiveness or o
>-Original Message-
>From: Brett Romero [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 11:15 AM
>To: Chris Santerre; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: What Missing Subject?
>
>
>
>- Original Message -----
>From: "Chris Santerre"
t belive.
And I'm willing to defend against that statment all damn day!
--Chris (angered the gorilla you have.)
>-Original Message-
>From: Gary Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 12:52 PM
>To: Chris Santerre; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Cc: Spamass
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 11:52 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [ot] If you see this domain in spam....
>
>
>Chris Santerre wrote:
>> Which is exactly why I'm asking
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 11:25 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [ot] If you see this domain in spam
>
>
>Chris Santerre wrote:
>> I ne
I need a shower after we removed this domain from SURBL:
hypnoticsellingsecrets.com
I would like to know if anyone gets a report of spam that has this domain in
it. They just make me feel all icky. The more I read their site, the more I
wished we didn't remove them. But...I need a spam.
Thanks.
>-Original Message-
>From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 6:10 PM
>To: Brett Romero; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: What Missing Subject?
>
>
>At 05:37 PM 10/12/2004, Brett Romero wrote:
>>What is this test:
>> MISSING_SUBJECT 1.40 Missing S
>-Original Message-
>From: jdow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 6:39 PM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: feeding frenzy for ws.surbl.org!!!
>
>
>From: "martin f krafft" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>>also sprach jdow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.12.1158
>-Original Message-
>From: Alan Munday [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 8:11 PM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: [OT] Spammer behaviour
>
>
>
>I'm in the process of building a couple of new servers and to
>run some test
>mail through, put one of them
>-Original Message-
>From: Jonathan Nichols [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 3:23 PM
>To: Keith Hackworth
>Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: *SPAM* feeding frenzy for ws.surbl.org!!!
>
>
>Keith Hackworth wrote:
>
>> I just got a gold-mine for surbl c
It is my goal to act like a twelve year old until I'm ashes. :)
So nanny nanny boo booo.whatever you say bounces
;)
--Chris
>-Original Message-
>From: snowjack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 3:57 PM
>To: jdow; users@spamassassin.apache.org
>S
A computer, internet access, and an email account.
--Chris (You said quick!)
>-Original Message-
>From: Robert Bartlett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 10:39 PM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Quick setup question
>
>
>Just real quick if you started
I use a quick grep to pull up stats for problem users. I think Dallas's
script could be changed around pretty easy to look up users instead of
rules.
--Chris
>-Original Message-
>From: Thomas Kinghorn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 2:07 AM
>To: Spamassassin-Tal
>-Original Message-
>From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 8:18 AM
>To: Thomas Kinghorn; Spamassassin-Talk
>([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>Subject: Re: inconsistencies in message checking
>There's no actual drug names in the subject or body of the
>untagged
>-Original Message-
>From: Brett Romero [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 10:27 AM
>To: Chris Santerre; users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: How to find out installed modules?
>
>
>
>- Original Message -----
>From: &quo
>-Original Message-
>From: Shaun T. Erickson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 10:39 AM
>To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
>Subject: Re: Book has gone to press
>
>
>Chris Santerre wrote:
>
>>http://www.packtpub.com/book/spamassass
>-Original Message-
>From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 10:34 AM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed
>
>
>Jim Maul wrote:
>
>>
>> The subject is not changed if there is no subject. This is
>a feature,
http://www.packtpub.com/book/spamassassin
Chris Santerre
System Admin and SARE Ninja
http://www.rulesemporium.com
http://www.surbl.org
'It is not the strongest of the species that survives,
not the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.'
Charles Darwin
>-Original Message-
>From: Rick Macdougall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 10:00 AM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed
>
>
>
>
>Carnegie, Martin wrote:
>> We just upgraded to SA 3 and so far it has been working
>grea
are
installed by default now. But Razor, DCC, ect well that info is in the
INSTALL file. Additional _unofficial_ rules can be found at
www.rulesemporium.com
You can also run: spamassassin -D --lint
This will show you the setup of SA.
HTH,
Chris Santerre
System Admi
a
>message this morning that I do not understand why the subject was not
>changed. Here is the header info.
>
Do you have anything in your /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf ?
rewrite_header Subject *SPAM*
Chris Santerre
System Admin and SARE Ninja
http://www.rulesemporium.com
ht
>-Original Message-
>From: Gaal Yahas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 9:39 AM
>To: Spamassassin talk list
>Subject: Spellcheck plugin?
>
>
>I'm wondering, would it be useful to have a plugin that
>penalizes messages
>with many spelling mistakes? This might he
>-Original Message-
>From: scohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 4:35 PM
>To: Chris Santerre
>Cc: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
>Subject: RE: scan times up!
>
>
>
>
>On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Chris Santerre wrote:
>
>> If
>-Original Message-
>From: Daniel Quinlan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 2:50 PM
>To: Chris Santerre
>Cc: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
>Subject: Re: HUMOR: Legit ham subject
>
>
>Chris Santerre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
&
essage-
>> From: Chris Santerre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 7:26 AM
>> To: 'Nick Leverton'; Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
>> Subject: RE: scan times up!
>>
>>
>>
>> >-Original Message-
>> &g
This is from an FP I got this morning. Legit ham subject!
"See Children's Letters To God- as low as $25*!":-)
Its the name of a Broadway show. Good grief these legit newsletters need to
meet us halfway!
--Chris
nt advice visit
>http://www.nmsusers.org
>
>To have principles...
> First have courage.. With principles comes integrity!!!
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Chris Santerre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 9:23
if you're using procmail, you could put formail into the mix.
--Chris
>-Original Message-
>From: Bob Branch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 9:42 AM
>To: sa-list
>Subject: multiple score based subject/headers
>
>
>I want to set spamassassin so that messages that
>-Original Message-
>From: Carnegie, Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 3:48 PM
>To: Spamassassin-Users
>Subject: [SA-List] IPlanet and SA
>
>
>We are currently seeing emails from external customers being marked as
>spam in SA when they come from an ISP calle
>-Original Message-
>From: John Rudd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 2:11 PM
>To: Kurt Buff
>Cc: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail); 'Chris Santerre'
>Subject: Re: [ot] NASCAR fans gonna be mad at me :)
>
>
>
>On Oct 1, 2004, at 1
er 01, 2004 11:52 AM
>To: Chris Santerre
>Cc: Matt Kettler; users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: SA 3.0 is eating up all my memory!!!
>
>
>ok, all I had in the /etc/mail/spamassassin dir was my local.cf and
>the init.pre. I've cleaned the local.cf according to th
I don't get his one at all!!! WTH???
I'm CC'ing to SURBL because look at the MX for this domain!
uniprepacademy.com dns_mx:
neti-outblaze-com.mr.outblaze.com
neti-outblaze-com-bk.mr.outblaze.com
I know it didn't come form that domain, but the advertised part of this
email points
Something is seriously wrong with your setup! Move all cf files except
local.cf out of the
/etc/mail/spamassassin dir and restart spamd. What does it read then?
There is no way spamd should be that large!!
--Chris
>-Original Message-
>From: Luis Hernán Otegui [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Tim Litwiller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 8:14 PM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: spamassassin stats from the new log file format
>
>
>I've been admiring the new logging that SA 3.* does and wondered if
>anyone has
>-Original Message-
>From: Nick Leverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 6:49 AM
>To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
>Subject: Re: scan times up!
>
>
>On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 05:10:27PM -0400, Chris Santerre wrote:
>> Well...
>>
Island is part of NY, or I'd
be in trouble! Sorry for the OT post, but its not everyday you get to take
part in breaking a celeb's leg :)
Chris Santerre
System Admin and SARE Ninja
http://www.rulesemporium.com
http://www.surbl.org
'It is not the strongest of the species that surv
>-Original Message-
>From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 5:23 PM
>To: Chris Santerre; Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
>Subject: Re: scan times up!
>
>
>At 05:10 PM 9/30/2004, Chris Santerre wrote:
>>Well...
>>
&
>-Original Message-
>From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 5:05 PM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: 2.6 -> 3.0 migration questions
>
>
>At 04:43 PM 9/30/2004, Ben Rosengart wrote:
>>we are pretty unhappy about the skimpy upgrade d
Well...
ver avg scan time
2.4x2.7 seconds
3.0 30.4 seconds
OH MY! Network test :)
Any longer and I might just be doing greylisting by accident. ;)
Chris Santerre
System Admin and SARE Ninja
http://www.rulesemporium.com
http://www.surbl.org
'It is not the strongest of the sp
Yes, I asked SURBL a while back about this as well. I saw a slight decline
during the Huricane weeks.
--Chris
>-Original Message-
>From: AltGrendel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 3:10 PM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Sorry Florida.
>
>
>I've
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 6:37 PM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: 'Spam Forensics: Reverse-Engineering Spammer Tactics'
>
>
>My slides from the presentation I gave at Toorcon 2004, 'Spam
>Foren
I decided not to go, because Gary wouldn't bunk with me :) Well, then there
is the whole bail money thing..
For those of you going, remember to bring your airhorns to heckle with! ;)
--Chris
>-Original Message-
>From: Gary Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, September
>-Original Message-
>From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 1:56 PM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: RE: Why such a low score?
>
>
>At 01:31 PM 9/29/2004, Chris Santerre wrote:
>>Any chance of getting a
Any chance of getting a run for rescoring of the SURBL lists?
--Chris (Perceptron is on my list of things to master.)
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 1:26 PM
>To: Matt Kettler
>Cc: Chris
>-Original Message-
>From: Raymond Dijkxhoorn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 11:10 AM
>To: Chris Santerre
>Cc: SURBL Discussion list (E-mail); Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
>Subject: Re: Why such a low score?
>
>
>Chris,
>
>&g
e 3.0 running. Best to tackle those later.
HTH,
Chris Santerre
System Admin and SARE Ninja
http://www.rulesemporium.com
http://www.surbl.org
'It is not the strongest of the species that survives,
not the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.'
Charles Darwin
>-Original Message-
>From: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 10:31 AM
>To: SpamAssassin Users
>Subject: Re: SA 3.0 and Bigevil
>
>
>On Wednesday, September 29, 2004, 6:46:00 AM, Chuck Campbell wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 26, 2004 at 05:03:34PM -0700, Jeff
What was the reason WS got such a low score in SA 3.0??? .5 is a joke! Hell
BigEvil was scored a 3 and now one complained, and it is the same data!! I
don't understand. Did the mass check not go well?
Chris Santerre
System Admin and SARE Ninja
http://www.rulesemporium.com
http://www.surb
>-Original Message-
>From: Ed Kasky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 6:01 PM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Congratulations and Thank You!!
>
>
>Just wanted to pass along a note of congratulations for the release of
>version 3.0.0. My upgrade wen
>-Original Message-
>From: Mário Gamito [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 5:18 AM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Is there a way...
>
>
>... to prevent a single and specific account only to be parsed by
>spamassassin ?
>
>Any help would be apprecia
Just as it says. exit0.us seems to be down with a DB error.
Chris Santerre
System Admin and SARE Ninja
http://www.rulesemporium.com
http://www.surbl.org
'It is not the strongest of the species that survives,
not the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.'
Charles Darwin
>-Original Message-
>From: Ed Kasky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 5:56 PM
>To: Raymond Dijkxhoorn
>Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Preferred DNSBL
>
>
>At 12:59 PM Monday, 9/27/2004, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote -=>
>>Hi!
>>
>>>Rejects Since Sunda
This is what I use:
> : sbl.spamhaus.org
> : bl.spamcop.net
> : cbl.abuseat.org
> : http.dnsbl.sorbs.net
> : socks.dnsbl.sorbs.net
> : misc.dnsbl.sorbs.net
> : smtp.dnsbl.sorbs.net
> : web.dnsbl.sorbs.net
> : zombie.dnsbl.sorbs.net
> : dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net
> : nomail.dnsbl.sorbs.net
Use DelayCh
>-Original Message-
>From: Bob Apthorpe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2004 3:30 PM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [sa-list] Re: Bundle::SpamAssassin
>
>
>Hi,
>
>On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 19:26:04 +0100 Julian Field
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> A
LOL, it is official, I am taking my own advice. I am upgrading my live
server from 2.4x! And I think the experiment was a complete success
I never upgraded live server from 2.4x because I wanted to see how good I
could get that system working without Bayes and net tests. 2.4x ran
perfectly the
ewing with people's minds. :-)
Chris Santerre
System Admin and SARE Ninja
http://www.rulesemporium.com
http://www.surbl.org
'It is not the strongest of the species that survives,
not the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.'
Charles Darwin
>-Original Message-
>From: Martin Huber
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 12:49 PM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: timeout www.spamassasin.org ?
>
>
>Chris Santerre wrote:
>
>> I keep getting a timeout go
>-Original Message-
>From: Dan Mahoney, System Admin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 12:06 PM
>To: Chris Santerre
>Cc: 'Jim Maul'; users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: SlashDotting spammers
>
>
>On Thu, 23 Se
I keep getting a timeout going to www.spamassassin.org. And the
spamassassin.apache.org site as well.
Anyone else?
Chris Santerre
System Admin and SARE Ninja
http://www.rulesemporium.com
http://www.surbl.org
'It is not the strongest of the species that survives,
not the most intelligent
Is anyone else having trouble getting to the SA website?
--chris
>-Original Message-
>From: Jim Maul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 10:21 AM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Re: SlashDotting spammers
>
>
>Quoting Raquel Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 01:11:39 -0700
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
I just updated Bigevil, which now is 1.25 megs in size. It will consume the
souls of your server, your family, and that cute girl/guy at your local
coffee shop!
With the release of SA 3.0, for the love of all that is digital, use SURBL!!
Tell your ISP's to upgrade. Tell them to contact me to be
>-Original Message-
>From: Kang , Joseph S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 4:18 PM
>To: 'Chris Santerre'
>Subject: RE: [OT]: Charting the history of SPAM
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Chris
>-Original Message-
>From: Kang , Joseph S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 3:56 PM
>To: Spamassassin-Users (users@spamassassin.apache.org)
>Subject: [OT]: Charting the history of SPAM
>
>
>I got this off of boingboing.net:
>
>"I [Raymond Chen, Microsoft] ha
ssage-
>> From: Matt Krause [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 6:05 PM
>> To: Robert G. Werner
>> Cc: Chris Santerre; Ken Jackson; users@spamassassin.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: O'Reilly Spamassassin book
>>
>> I finis
>-Original Message-
>From: Ken Jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 8:12 AM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: O'Reilly Spamassassin book
>
>
>Has anyone got a copy and read through the O'Reilly book for
>SpamAssassin?
>http://www.oreilly.com/cata
Passing this on
>-Original Message-
>From: jdow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, September 20, 2004 8:57 PM
>To: Chris Santerre
>Subject: Apache bounced my email
>
>
>Please pass this along to the list. Apache.org is using the dsbl.org
>blacklist tha
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 7:02 AM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: After starting spamd, spamc fails to connect to it and spamd
>stops running!?
>
>
>Will anyone please help me?
>
> I've recently ha
>-Original Message-
>From: Robert Bartlett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 9:24 AM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: RE: Memory usage question
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, September 17,
501 - 600 of 642 matches
Mail list logo
