the status of that infrastructure either. So I'd be
careful when using the public servers too. That's always true for public
gratis services, but maybe take some extra caution as the project seems
less alive.
Tom
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 6:53 PM Greg Troxel wrote:
> H
> Tom Bartel writes:
>
> > Starting March 1, 2024, we will allow up to 10,000 requests per user
> over a
> > 30-day time period. After the 10,000 requests, users must create a
> > MyValidity account to continue
questions and/or
feedback, LMK.
Thanks,
Tom
Dear SpamAssassin user,
We wanted to send you a quick reminder of the upcoming changes to accessing
Validity reputation data through DNS.
Starting March 1, 2024, we will allow up to 10,000 requests per user over a
30-day time period. After the 10,000
to that, I
had to configure Spamassassin to point to the local resolver and my
URIBL_BLOCKED issue pretty much went away.
Tom
/spamassassin_current_release_4.0.x/sql/README
Kind reagards,
Tom
-OPTIONS
Kind regards,
Tom
AN. But I want to let you know that your questions on this list are
useful, so please continue.
Kind regards,
Tom
ms there is some talk about accounts etc. Did you try to sign up?
Kind regards
Tom
customers.
So you need to get in touch with them, not with the SA community (but as
you can see, we're happy to point you in the correct direction ;-> ).
Kind regards,
Tom
On 12-08-2021 22:16, Lukasz Maik wrote:
Dear John,
Sure, please find full tests results here:
https://www.mail-tester.
ot support this type of syntax, or what
would be needed to get it supported? IMHO it makes it a lot easier for
end-users to understand a rule, and for rule developers to write or even
contribute new UTF-8-related rules, so it might be worth the effort to
get it supported?
Thanks in advance,
Tom
How about cloning outside your etc directory, for instance in
/usr/local? And then adding the correct paths to local.cf, as usual.
Kind regards,
Tom
On 08-04-2021 11:05, Michael Grant wrote:
I'm running debian on my mail server. I use etckeeper to track
changes in /etc.
Often I run
On 02-12-2020 16:18, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
X-Spam-Virus: _CLAMAVRESULT
I never integrated Clam using this plugin, but this seems a config typo
to be: there should be a Yes/No in there, and optionally a virus name.
Kind regards,
Tom
. In this case I called Amazon. They immediately returned my call
and provided an e-mail address: stop-spoof...@amazon.com
-Ramon F. Herrera
Yes, I've sent many samples of phishing email messages to that Amazon
email address. I know it well. :)
Peace...
Tom
On 5/3/20 1:16 AM, Bill Cole wrote:
> On 30 Apr 2020, at 14:59, Tom Williams wrote:
>
>> Hi! I'm new to this mailing list, but not new to SpamAssassin. I've
>> used it on and off for a number years. :) Recently, (within the
>> past 6 months or so) I enabled it for email
and DNS configuration.
Thanks!
Tom
On 5/2/20 3:25 AM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> I have too had a problem of this in my masscheck box. It is a cloud VM
> in Google Cloud and they do like to provide a /etc/resolv.conf for
> their own DNS which has been next to impossible to overc
SpamAssassin 3.0 (shudders, I know it's ancient).
Thanks in advance!
Tom
Hey everyone,
I have a few questions about something I'm encountering with spamd.
I've noticed cases where a bounce message to the server results in spamd
'exceeded time limit'. It reaches the limit of 300+ seconds. In this
particular case, the message size is 564kB and contains an attachment.
tworks/internal_networks are misconfigured, so the
authentication is not properly detected?
Kind regards,
Tom
witch to a decent one).
Anyway, the main harm is done when the email adresses in the 'addr'
field and the 'name' are different, and that's detectable.
Kind regards,
Tom
d open source, and it's a good thing. For details on the
philosophy behind it,
http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/cathedral-bazaar/ is
a good read.
In short: if you like your project to prosper, put it on github for
everyone to see.
Kind regards,
Tom
signature.as
ers) think that such a DNSBL should be
actually used. Can you disclose which parties you found?
Kind regards,
Tom
On 06-02-19 14:40, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
The spammers at gremlin.ru have just created a homepage, with no
information on how to delist an IP.
Their fake dnsbl is listed
On 10-10-18 21:51, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
> On 10-10-18 21:05, Gokan Atmaca wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> I'm using Postfix and Dovecot. I use Spamassassin as an antispam
>> service. I don't know how to do RBL checks.
>> How do I control RBL? (I don't want to do it with
ists.)
>
> Thanks.
>
Hi,
See: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=postfix+rbl
Please ask further questions on the Postfix mailinglist, as you have a
postfix question, and this is the spamassassin list.
Kind regards,
Tom
this up, and it has been running
without issues ever since. When you're interested, read up on
https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/NightlyMassCheck and try to set it
up. If you run into issues, other masscheckers can probably help you out.
Kind regards,
Tom
On 25-08-18 16:12, David Jones wrote
your Spam folder, otherwise it's not.
And when moving around the message, you don't end up with non-spam
messages that have a spam tag in the subject (because you never added one).
Kind regards,
Tom
On 18-06-18 14:22, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> I'd look
> at https://serverfault.com/
no
>
BAYES_00 means 'pretty sure it's ham'.
BAYES_99 means 'pretty sure it's spam'.
BAYES_50 means 'no idea'.
Scoring BAYES_50 at 4.3 is your scoring issue, nothing's wrong with
T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD.
Kind regards,
Tom
> always the score is -0.01 regardless; I will take your
Hi,
Sounds like a mimedefang question, not a spamassassin one. But did you
restart mimedefang after adding the rule?
Kind regards,
Tom
On 04-04-18 15:16, saqariden wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I'm using spamassassin with mimedefang, i have some custom rulesets, one
> of
efault. Not sure about the actual default in current SA code though.
Kind regards,
Tom
IKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_PASS,
> T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,URIBL_BLACK autolearn=no
> autolearn_force=no
> version=3.4.1
How about: https://aws.amazon.com/forms/report-abuse
Kind regards,
Tom
Alex just
>> made me aware of http://dkimwl.org/ which looks brilliant. Exactly lines up
>> with how I filter and what I have been wanted to do for a couple of years
>> now. A community-driven clearing house for trusted senders.
>>
> dkimwl.org looks promising, but tell them their https cert has expired.
> Giovanni
>
Also, they refer to the TOU for acceptable usage, but both /terms and
/license have a 404.
Kind regards,
Tom
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
amassassin?
Please show values for:
- dns_available
- dns_server
- clear_dns_servers
- dns_local_ports_permit
- dns_local_ports_avoid
- dns_local_ports_none
- dns_options
- dns_query_restriction
- clear_dns_query_restriction
- rbl_timeout
You can find the meaning of these (and many other) configuration opti
at, and then
subtract some points for everything that has '\bAmazon\b' is the
from:name. Header.
Kind regards,
Tom
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
email addresses: john@company.tld
server domain: mailserver.company.tld
Automatic generated addresses would look like
john@mailserver.company.tld, these are easily recogized because
nobody uses them.
Kind regards,
Tom
27 09:48:24 myhostname spamd[16256]: (Can't locate object method
>>> "check_dkim_valid_envelopefrom" via package "Mail:
>>> [...]:SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus" at (eval 1369) line 305.
>>> Oct 27 09:48:24 myhostname spamd[16256]: )
>>
>> The DKIM_VAL
Oct 27 09:48:24 myhostname spamd[16256]: (Can't locate object method
"check_dkim_valid_envelopefrom" via package "Mail:
[...]:SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus" at (eval 1369) line 305.
Oct 27 09:48:24 myhostname spamd[16256]: )
Any idea? This is ubuntu 16.04, latest ubuntu package (3.4.1-3) for
spammassassin.
Kind regards,
Tom
Hi,
Note that on at least Ubuntu from some time ago, unbound was
automatically configured to take the dns servers that were received from
an upstream server during DHCP, and configure those as forwarders.
Can you show us output of: unbound-control list_forwards
Kind regards,
Tom
On 13
g from the root role will not have
the same impact as running amavis using an init system.
Kind regards,
Tom
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 17-07-17 16:39, Robert Kudyba wrote:
>
>> On Jul 17, 2017, at 10:28 AM, Tom Hendrikx <t...@whyscream.net
>> <mailto:t...@whyscream.net>> wrote:
>>
>> On 17-07-17 16:00, Robert Kudyba wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Jul 17, 2017, at 9:39 AM,
e=15.0,size=1843,user=spamd,uid=1001,required_score=5.0,rhost=localhost,raddr=::1,rport=53074,mid=<32889a456ed9c9911ff0034513796858.squirrel@ourdomain>,bayes=0.00,autolearn=no
> autolearn_force=no
> Jul 17 09:55:28 storm spamd[28041]: prefork: child states: II
>
The error is still the same. Do you even have access to those cloudmark
razor servers? Does razor work outside of spamassassin/amavisd?
Tom
would say '3.0', you would be asking why a message with score 3
wasn't blocked. So the 2.9 indicates that it's not 3 ;)
Kind regards,
Tom
On 25-04-17 10:27, Geoff Soper wrote:
> X-Spam-Status: No, Score=2.9
>
> X-Spam-Report:
>
> * -0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was
rds,
Tom
On 04-04-17 23:09, Jim McLachlan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a problem with the huge amount of messages being logged by
> spamassassin. I have around 10 active e-mail users on the system, none
> of whom have any unusual e-mail usage. This is what I've seen in
On 16-02-17 06:22, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> On 2017-02-15 16:30, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
>
>> Note that the period that you describe as 'seen by SA a bit later' is
>> typically less than a second.
>
> Not in my case. I have a custom Exim configuration where I
> inte
response time to new (types of) spam and their TTLs.
Kind regards,
Tom
ate.
>
> Dave
>
I think I can say the same about my platform, but since this issue keeps
popping up I just applied for an account just to find out if my
contribution could help. I can't speculate so I'm just gonna try if it
helps :)
Kind regards,
Tom
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
hat the message contains a large
> amount of non-latin1 text? I do get a lot of legitimate non-ISO-8859-1
> messages but usually it's just a name or at most an address. So less
> than 100 bytes.
>
Please start a new thread and show us a sample of such a message, and
the scores you are seeing with your setup.
Kind regards,
Tom
On 29-12-16 19:40, Marc Stürmer wrote:
> Zitat von Tom Hendrikx <t...@whyscream.net>:
>
>> Did you file a ticket with them? I'm curious as to what they are saying
>> about it.
>
> Actually I got this info by their phone support, and the info was back
> the
their DNS software - tried it myself.
>
Did you file a ticket with them? I'm curious as to what they are saying
about it.
Kind regards,
Tom
hecks.
If you expect to have any useful mail contact by relaying mail with a
gmail/aol/yahoo sender envelope through your own mail platform, (i.e.
delivering without using their SMTP relay), you're dreaming. The
freemail providers are making that harder and harder by deploying DMARC
p=reject.
The question arises: why would you use a Gmail address at all if you
don't want to use their services?
Regards,
Tom
gt;>> instead of
>>> uridnsbl
>>>
>>> so no "as said the syntax seems to be correct" it is NOT
>
> again: what about fix
> https://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.4.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Plugin_URIDNSBL.html
> which says still:
>
Please suggest an proved documentation text so the devs can add it.
Kind regards,
Tom
elf.fp.readline()
> KeyboardInterrupt
>
This happens when you CTRL-C the pyzor client (KeyboardInterrupt) that
is waiting for data at standard input. See 'man pyzor' for details.
What were you trying to achieve?
Kind regards,
Tom
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ur, set RESOLVCONF_FORWARDERS=false in
/etc/default/unbound, and restart unbound.
Regards,
Tom
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ow about using "whitelist_to r...@example.tld", possibly with an
adapted negative score for the associated rule (which is not really
clear from the documentation)?
Kind regards,
Tom
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
; certain that a mail is spam which is *not* backed by a single header,
> deep inspection or not
>
That is true, but I think you should put your money where your mouth is:
just run the masscheck on your corpus and send the results to the devs
for inspection. If it's not working, you lost nothing. If the data *is*
useful, we all win from your work by getting better scores.
Just my 2 cents.
Regards,
Tom
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
:
chown spamuser:wheel
chmod 0660
Then restart spamd and see of it doesn't complain. This should allow
access for spamd and for users in the wheel group (administrative accounts).
Regards,
Tom
On 03-03-16 16:35, Robert Chalmers wrote:
> ok, I can see that. Interesting I mis
; The only thing I’ve been contemplating is a local spamtrap and DNSBL.
> We have a site that’s regularly trawled for email addresses, so
> seeding it should not be too difficult…
>
Hi,
You want to give the RBLs a bit more time to kick in, you could consider
greylisting (or postscreen after-220 checks which also cause a delay and
a retry).
Regards,
Tom
ing list.
IMHO, removing the markup is simply not a good idea: probably easier
to use headers only (i.e. no subject tagging), and then use IMAP flags
to highlight spam messages for the user. These can be unset later
without 'nasty' tricks.
Regards,
Tom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE---
On 26-01-16 10:33, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 26.01.2016 um 09:45 schrieb Tom Hendrikx:
>> On 25-01-16 16:38, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 25.01.2016 um 16:22 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
>>>> On 25.01.16 15:17, Reindl Harald wrote:
>&
ed an upgrade.
In any way, it would be interesting to see what type of ham mail
triggers such a rule when masscheck allows such a high score, before
starting an argument about it.
Regards,
Tom
am#content
_tokenizing
In general, OSB gave the best results IIRC.
Regards,
Tom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWn/kZAAoJEJPfMZ19VO/1JnMP/j7DCm1frjbJZy/uhyEZzskQ
+o010elBUdzubXgW0QIaHdxvkbbPgyu6yyEZHe/lj04h/vMgRmFHjbAWo+ZF1DZX
rjt2Aa85fLtoAxKojZjh/df
d is
correct, so for messages that fail my own SPF record, I want a stricter
policy (i.e. a higher score, or a plain reject).
If this is what you mean, then a meta rule that combines your envelope
sender domain with SPF_FAIL would be a correct solution.
Or you could add something like below, which adds a penalty for *all*
messages using your domain, and SPF saves the real ones.
whitelist_from_spf: *@example.tld (your domain)
header Return-Path =~ example.tld
Regards,
Tom
Thank you both, please stop this pissing contest.
On 24-11-15 12:35, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 24.11.2015 um 12:29 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
>> Reindl Harald skrev den 2015-11-24 11:56:
>>
>>> it's the exim of the ISP
>>
>> with old version of exim
>
> it's still the exim of the ISP
>
>>>
bles like
> SMPTMAILFROM
> and SMTPRCPTTO and either does nothing or outputs a single line of text like
> E550 your mail is not welcome. Go away
Nobody should be sending from a different mail server. We use IMAPS and
authenticated SMTPS for
external users (mobiles, laptops, etc.).
Thanks,
Tom
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Benny,
thanks for your email.
On 28/09/15 13:29, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> Tom Robinson skrev den 2015-09-28 05:02:
>
>> From tena...@qka.com Thu Sep 24 13:29:50 2015
>
> is this the envelope sender domain ?
I believe so. How can I be sure?
>
>> From:
,
Tom
From tena...@qka.com Thu Sep 24 13:29:50 2015
MIME-Version:1.0
X-Spam-Status:No, hits=2.8 required=5.0
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-Authsource:ga8r9nl0j6u7...@motec.com.au
Content-Type:multipart/mixed;
boundary="=_Next_54920_1367254513.7341918864818"
implemented this at my previous $workjob, using a webservice in stead
of a DNSBL, and limiting the amount of requests by selecting a max of 10
URLs picked randomly from the message.
Client-side performance was OK, but the dataset in the BL was meager,
making the test results not very useful.
Using a DNSBL in stead of a webservice should be fairly easy, by using a
hash values of the URIs in stead of the URI itself; I've seen
implementations of that technique before.
Regards,
Tom
noob. I have no recent
experience with MailChimp and friends, but I hope they're educating
users to use the GOOD version.
So a clear spam indicator for me.
Regards,
Tom
to hack SA's logging and write out all you
want and then filter it out via syslog/regex.. now if that is more
efficient I/O-wise
I send all my logs to logstash + elasticsearch. Works like a charm,
but when there's nothing (message-id, sender recipient(s)) to search
on you're still screwed...
Tom
.
Regards,
Tom
for valid results, and has no safety net for temporary errors...
Tom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVX7BLAAoJEJPfMZ19VO/1uBgQALspECJCWAHO6YGuwtFnKtDv
GGEYlIT2E5KNH07HlIk70BzLFlhqgCa4ymKcSdSBkVtVHQK7FlEYjxkFJ0yOyhhj
lm8sd2f0tVJvlfRK
Hi,
Below is the source from an email that is clearly spam but the AWL is -1.3
defeating the spam classification. How can I best adjust the AWL to get this
classified as SPAM.
Kind regards,
Tom
--
Tom Robinson
IT Manager/System Administrator
MoTeC Pty Ltd
121 Merrindale Drive
Croydon
On 30/04/15 09:56, Marieke Janssen wrote:
Hi,
Besides your awl problem, you have other problems.
0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was
blocked.
See
On 30/04/15 12:15, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 4/29/2015 10:10 PM, Tom Robinson wrote:
I have the mail server and a separate name server set up in a DMZ. The name
server already runs as a
caching nameserver but does forwarding to our ISP.
Hi Tom,
Your ISP is doing too many queries
Tom Robinson
IT Manager/System Administrator
MoTeC Pty Ltd
121 Merrindale Drive
Croydon South
3136 Victoria
Australia
T: +61 3 9761 5050
F: +61 3 9761 5051
E: tom.robin...@motec.com.au
On 30/04/15 10:10, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Tom Robinson skrev den 2015-04-30 01:38:
0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED
On 30/04/15 15:09, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 30.04.2015 um 04:10 schrieb Tom Robinson:
Is it correct that currently, because I'm forwarding, the DNSBL query is
denied because the DNSBL server thinks I'm the ISP making a query? Sorry,
I'm not understanding the
mechanism
it is the ISP making
Hi List
Sorry to post here with this.
Does anyone know if its possible to use Spamassassin for SMS filtering?
The powers that be are looking for a spam solution for the SMSC and
asked if SA is an option.
I have advised NO but thought I would ask the list for idea's
Many thanks
T
the machine accepts both addresses, but rejects at end-of-data.
Harald, if one of the used recipient addresses accepts all spam
messages (all_spam_to), you should have one copy of the message,
right? Could you share the result of my test with us?
Kind regards,
Tom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
information. Like all bothers, this is a risky assumption.
Change the milter decision to HOLD the message in stead of rejecting,
and inspect it after arrival.
Tom
you don't even understand is a lot harder.
Tom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJU7PebAAoJEJPfMZ19VO/14HAP/A57vNLDgHjmt0JvBi98RAnY
Jez138atfRynhLIFxy2w8MDwWy2HWSi6v/NpnXMVjZ2DYmyMBrJNC1Tn2aYrM3Mu
uxPxfOTVNlyG2FjY3iw8XwvlSJ28shcuU8WrbTrvvD81Mv2UyBVhsaNcFNNss5Gg
USER_IN_WHITELIST in my
logs. No blacklist entries here, so grep your own logs or headers.
Tom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJU4Q/oAAoJEJPfMZ19VO/1duYP/0dvfCGym4EKenWGNnD+7ry9
5M0OEp/b21xKZKc7bDMhP0mKWCEy8XM2jWP8IdDV8E2pgkkQ2ml0ClSX5uh02BVn
I73Rt9a8GE940VVq6ZMo7WEdaIS
while both where present
and so it looks the whole rule enigne is going crazy because one
unescaped @
If you add custom rule that don't pass a lint test, you pretty much
screwed it up yourself. You can't blame spamassassin for that.
Regards,
Tom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version
editing.
Kind regards,
Tom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJUj0ErAAoJEJPfMZ19VO/1UBkQAMH9iUJBMnoU30UmH142IrYQ
Hdh/8CzS77kNHJ/P4vslFDumHca6vLVhEEc8tivLa0OlPl5gs7d0jOEmyDP5XWdq
+B6OUZIiwhsDfmKzT2FiO8xxw2JK4qwC+CDae0K+ul+SLOz9mbhuDWg+GamvuqmK
yoVu4tWkKQ4Kl
We (MailRoute) would be happy to pitch in. We can host mirrors in a couple of
datacenters (Los Angeles and Chicago). And we'll help out wherever else we can.
Tom
anywhere.
Please help.
Regards,
Tom
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 12/11/14 09:45, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 11.11.2014 um 23:41 schrieb Tom Robinson:
Hopefully someone can answer this simply with a link to the right
documentation.
I want to adjust the score on a test but I have no idea what the four
numbers actually are. e.g.
score
to a config file
too: one tuneable (and one location to look at) is better than two.
Besides, the config file is far easier to read for the not so
regex-capable admin :)
Regards,
Tom
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
of tokens over the time?
Or it is a good machine that is rooted, and then cleaned up and restored
to business by its whitehat admin. But it still is blocked by your
self-inflicted 'bayes poison' :)
Use rbls for ip-based reputation, not bayes.
Tom
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 02-10-14 12:38, Axb wrote:
On 10/02/2014 11:13 AM, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
Hi,
I am using dspam besides spamassassin, and am interested in
comparing the bayesian data between the two. Dspam reports
statistics that include somewhat standardised
it be possible to show these in the
sa-learn output?
Kind regards,
Tom
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
money to get
delisted.
If you decide that you don't like a list because it doesn't accept user
submissions, that's your opinion of course. But not very strong one,
IMHO: Spamhaus also doesn't accept user submissions, and they run lists
that are used by virtually everyone.
Regards,
Tom
). In the end we settled
with a 4M limit. Never seen any timeout (or other) issues with larger
files, but it didn't matter: there was no significant traffic above that
limit.
Tom
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 08/25/2014 04:51 AM, Alex wrote:
Hi all,
I'm having difficulty understanding this one:
http://pastebin.com/LYJVas5e
It looks like a host in Japan relayed this message through a few systems
within trendmicro.com http://trendmicro.com, then on to our system
before being tagged as
, for all I can see.
That does not say much about Lunarpages support, who only are trying to
dodge your questions in stead of pointing you to the documentation on
how to configure your MUA.
Tom
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
?
Kind regards,
Tom
--
Tom Robinson
IT Manager/System Administrator
MoTeC Pty Ltd
121 Merrindale Drive
Croydon South
3136 Victoria
Australia
T: +61 3 9761 5050
F: +61 3 9761 5051
E: tom.robin...@motec.com.au
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05-06-14 20:54, Andreas Schulze wrote:
Tom Hendrikx:
but postfix has a feature that can check the MX and NS records of
the envelope sender or hostname of the connecting ip.
I know and use that.
If these are all the same, you could block
can assist with?
Regards,
Tom
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 05/22/2014 03:36 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 5/22/2014 9:04 AM, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
After checking the results of sa-update and doing some manual dns
queries, it seems that last rule updates were done more than a month
ago. This used to be an almost daily process, even when there were
.html#smtpd_client_restrictions,
especially the check_*_mx_access and check_*_ns_access directives.
Tom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJTdlmZAAoJEJPfMZ19VO/1OCwQAN1yS5CAyOJAeYnzbiNAwbmP
it was stored by cyrus. You seem to use 2
hosts, be sure to get full logging from both
inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca and inet07.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca
Tom
On 11-05-14 21:26, James B. Byrne wrote:
CentOS-6.5 Postfix-2.6.6 Amavisd-new-2.8.0 Spamassassin-3.3.1
OpenDKIM-2.9.0 pypolicyd-spf-1.2
We use
sending, which is an important part of DMARC.
Regards,
Tom
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
1 - 100 of 344 matches
Mail list logo
