On 12.11.09 13:55, Chris Hoogendyk wrote:
I don't know about Linux viruses; BUT, I do remember less than ten years
ago when it was virtually impossible to build a Linux box with a hot
online connection, because you would get hacked before you could even
download the patches. I had a
On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 09:12 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 12.11.09 13:55, Chris Hoogendyk wrote:
I don't know about Linux viruses; BUT, I do remember less than ten years
ago when it was virtually impossible to build a Linux box with a hot
online connection, because you would
rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 09:12 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 12.11.09 13:55, Chris Hoogendyk wrote:
I don't know about Linux viruses; BUT, I do remember less than ten years
ago when it was virtually impossible to build a Linux box with a hot
Caveats such as week passwords, open ports and advertising insecure services
are the domain of poor administration and understanding - they are not
Operating
System dependent.
Exempting organised spam gangs and their infrastructure, it's probably fair
to say that
most of the spam I
On fre 13 nov 2009 18:26:07 CET, wrote
One admin admitted that they were hacked through login guest / pass guest
and this is a real hack :)
--
xpoint
On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 17:26 +, haman...@t-online.de wrote:
I've only used Red Hat flavours of Linux since RH 6.2 so I can't speak
for other distros, but here's my experience.
Where IPs looked like machines in a computer center, I occasionally
had a closer look and found newly created
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
Dream on. Obviously your a pro-Windows person and anti-Linux
person and you cannot tolerate your image of Windows being torn down.
I seriously doubt Giampaolo is 'pro-windows', and your argument started
with me, thinking that somehow I was
LuKreme wrote:
On 11-Nov-2009, at 18:34, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
I will point out that MacOS 7, os* os9 were HIGHLY virus-prone,
yet there were far fewer of them than OSX today.
Er… that is simply not true. Not in anyway.
As I recall, there were a total of 31 viruses for System 7 and one
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
LuKreme wrote:
On 11-Nov-2009, at 18:34, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
I will point out that MacOS 7, os* os9 were HIGHLY virus-prone,
yet there were far fewer of them than OSX today.
Er… that is simply not true. Not in anyway.
As I recall, there were a total of 31
Chris Hoogendyk wrote:
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
LuKreme wrote:
On 11-Nov-2009, at 18:34, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
I will point out that MacOS 7, os* os9 were HIGHLY virus-prone,
yet there were far fewer of them than OSX today.
Er… that is simply not true. Not in anyway.
As I recall, there
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Chris Hoogendyk wrote:
I also heard stories of my son doing battle with hackers who had
gotten into his Linux system.
Keep in mind that those were not the Linus-written Linux programs, those
were programs like Telnet, Sendmail, etc. which
Michael Scheidell wrote:
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
Dream on. Obviously your a pro-Windows person and anti-Linux
person and you cannot tolerate your image of Windows being torn down.
I seriously doubt Giampaolo is 'pro-windows', and your argument started
with me,
John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Chris Hoogendyk wrote:
I also heard stories of my son doing battle with hackers who had
gotten into his Linux system.
Keep in mind that those were not the Linus-written Linux programs,
those were programs like Telnet,
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
PS, if your really the SA porter, thanks for your effort!
easy enough to verify:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=scheidellstype=maintainer
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
Phone: 561-999-5000, x 1259
*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
* Certified
Michael Scheidell wrote:
...omissis...
If our clients were DELIBERATELY spamming, say they thought they
were going to send out a marketing mail or some such, then you would
be correct.
But they were not. They were simply using the largest software
company on Earth's products -
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
Michael Scheidell wrote:
...omissis...
If our clients were DELIBERATELY spamming, say they thought they
were going to send out a marketing mail or some such, then you
would be correct.
But they were not. They were simply using the largest software
company on
On 11-Nov-2009, at 18:34, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
I will point out that MacOS 7, os* os9 were HIGHLY virus-prone,
yet there were far fewer of them than OSX today.
Er… that is simply not true. Not in anyway.
As I recall, there were a total of 31 viruses for System 7 and one CD-ROM worm
for
if I reply to the mailing list and not you directly, you should reply to
the mailing list.
Original Message
Subject:Re: Getting off the Cloudmark formerly spamnet blacklist
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:25:20 -0800
From: Ted Mittelstaedt t...@ipinc.net
18 matches
Mail list logo
