On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 13:52:32 -0500
Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a bunch of rules that rely on the results of pyzor, razor or
> DCC. The problem is that they also match on an empty or nearly empty
> body.
You can use
pyzor local_whitelist < email.txt
at very least it's a good idea to run
Alex skrev den 2017-12-15 19:52:
Other ideas?
whitelist ?, dcc have whitelist, pyzor have whitelist if you run own
pyzord, razor have whitelist
how ?, all the 3 seen before content checkers should know your
internal_networks ips just like spamassin does
its not relevant imho on empty
If you get an E-Mail scoring in both Pyzor and DCC, the chances are
very high that the message is Spam. We only deal with around 90,000
incoming delivery attempts per day - but have not had a false
positive from Pyzor or DCC yet, and have been using both for some
years.
That's
Michael Hutchinson wrote:
I saw a test
message with just the word test in the subject hit DCC once.
That's really strange, I don't see how DCC would fire on the subject..
the checksum of the message must have somehow matched some Spam..
That's perfectly normal. DCC doen't just match spam,
From: Jonas Eckerman jonas_li...@frukt.org
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:37:11 +0200
Michael Hutchinson wrote:
I saw a test
message with just the word test in the subject hit DCC once.
That's really strange, I don't see how DCC would fire on the subject..
the
On 21.07.09 19:18, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
Ok, here is my doubt. I know who are Pyzor and DCC, and I really convinced
that a statistic test is a must to detect spam. But my doubt is next:
- It is good to have both tests or just one?
Both. They work in a different way, either of them
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 21.07.09 19:18, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
Ok, here is my doubt. I know who are Pyzor and DCC, and I really convinced
that a statistic test is a must to detect spam. But my doubt is next:
- It is good to have both tests or just one?
listing in
On 21.07.09 19:18, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote:
Ok, here is my doubt. I know who are Pyzor and DCC, and I really
convinced that a statistic test is a must to detect spam. But my
doubt is next:
- It is good to have both tests or just one?
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
listing in DCC
From: RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 03:45:50 +0100
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 13:42:52 +1200
Michael Hutchinson mhutchin...@manux.co.nz wrote:
If you get an E-Mail scoring in both Pyzor and DCC, the chances are
very high that the message is Spam. We only
-Original Message-
If you get an E-Mail scoring in both Pyzor and DCC, the chances are
very high that the message is Spam. We only deal with around 90,000
incoming delivery attempts per day - but have not had a false
positive from Pyzor or DCC yet, and have been using both for
Hello Luis,
-Original Message-
Ok, here is my doubt. I know who are Pyzor and DCC, and I really
convinced
that a statistic test is a must to detect spam. But my doubt is next:
- It is good to have both tests or just one?
It is good to have both tests. Pyzor and DCC are both rather
Le mardi 21 juillet 2009 20:42:52, Michael Hutchinson a écrit :
Hello Luis,
-Original Message-
Ok, here is my doubt. I know who are Pyzor and DCC, and I really
convinced
that a statistic test is a must to detect spam. But my doubt is next:
- It is good to have both tests or
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 13:42:52 +1200
Michael Hutchinson mhutchin...@manux.co.nz wrote:
If you get an E-Mail scoring in both Pyzor and DCC, the chances are
very high that the message is Spam. We only deal with around 90,000
incoming delivery attempts per day - but have not had a false
positive
13 matches
Mail list logo
