Martin Gregorie wrote:
I don't remotely intend to go vigilante: I don't know how you got that
from what I said, which I thought boiled down to:
a) If an acquaintance asks you become a member that is not a problem.
In fact, acquaintance or otherwise, that is the whole idea :-)
b) If a
Le 13/12/2010 23:45, Martin Gregorie a écrit :
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 22:19 +0100, mouss wrote:
Le 13/12/2010 10:38, Martin Gregorie a écrit :
As others have said, it depends who sent it and why. Invitations sent
specifically by people who know you aren't spam, but I've heard it said
several
Michelle Konzack wrote:
300-500 INVITE spams per day from more than 400 socialnetworks
worldwide is realy annoying or better, I would call it terrorism.
On 12.12.10 22:03, Per Jessen wrote:
Just reject them all?
Do those invitations contain headers by whose they could be detected and
as far as I know, linkedin mail comes from linkedin domains, and has
valid DKIM sigs.
Yep, I'm pretty certain of that too. I think I have a rule that scores
on coming from linkedin, but without verified dkim signature.
now the question is, if we know it's an linkedin invitation, if we
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
as far as I know, linkedin mail comes from linkedin domains, and
has valid DKIM sigs.
Yep, I'm pretty certain of that too. I think I have a rule that
scores on coming from linkedin, but without verified dkim signature.
now the question is, if we know it's
Le 13/12/2010 09:04, Matus UHLAR - fantomas a écrit :
as far as I know, linkedin mail comes from linkedin domains, and has
valid DKIM sigs.
Yep, I'm pretty certain of that too. I think I have a rule that scores
on coming from linkedin, but without verified dkim signature.
now the question
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Michelle Konzack wrote:
300-500 INVITE spams per day from more than 400 socialnetworks
worldwide is realy annoying or better, I would call it terrorism.
On 12.12.10 22:03, Per Jessen wrote:
Just reject them all?
Do those invitations contain headers by
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 08:17 +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
mouss wrote:
the sample posted by Michelle came to her via a debian list. debian
lists are open (no subscription required) and thus attract a lot of
spam.
And whilst invitations such as those broadcasted are annoying, they're
not
Hello Per Jessen,
Am 2010-12-12 22:03:34, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
Michelle Konzack wrote:
300-500 INVITE spams per day from more than 400 socialnetworks
worldwide is realy annoying or better, I would call it terrorism.
Just reject them all?
Not possibel, because the are
Michelle Konzack wrote:
300-500 INVITE spams per day from more than 400 socialnetworks
worldwide is realy annoying or better, I would call it terrorism.
On 12.12.10 22:03, Per Jessen wrote:
Just reject them all?
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Do those invitations contain headers
as far as I know, linkedin mail comes from linkedin domains, and has
valid DKIM sigs.
Yep, I'm pretty certain of that too. I think I have a rule that scores
on coming from linkedin, but without verified dkim signature.
Le 13/12/2010 09:04, Matus UHLAR - fantomas a écrit :
now the question
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Michelle Konzack wrote:
300-500 INVITE spams per day from more than 400 socialnetworks
worldwide is realy annoying or better, I would call it
terrorism.
On 12.12.10 22:03, Per Jessen wrote:
Just reject them all?
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Do
Michelle Konzack wrote:
Hello Per Jessen,
Am 2010-12-12 22:03:34, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
Michelle Konzack wrote:
300-500 INVITE spams per day from more than 400 socialnetworks
worldwide is realy annoying or better, I would call it terrorism.
Just reject them all?
Not
Michelle Konzack wrote:
300-500 INVITE spams per day from more than 400 socialnetworks
worldwide is realy annoying or better, I would call it
terrorism.
On 12.12.10 22:03, Per Jessen wrote:
Just reject them all?
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Do those invitations
Le 13/12/2010 11:47, Matus UHLAR - fantomas a écrit :
as far as I know, linkedin mail comes from linkedin domains, and has
valid DKIM sigs.
Yep, I'm pretty certain of that too. I think I have a rule that scores
on coming from linkedin, but without verified dkim signature.
Le 13/12/2010
Le 13/12/2010 15:33, Matus UHLAR - fantomas a écrit :
Michelle Konzack wrote:
300-500 INVITE spams per day from more than 400 socialnetworks
worldwide is realy annoying or better, I would call it
terrorism.
On 12.12.10 22:03, Per Jessen wrote:
Just reject them all?
Matus UHLAR - fantomas
Le 13/12/2010 11:30, Michelle Konzack a écrit :
Hello Per Jessen,
Am 2010-12-12 22:03:34, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
Michelle Konzack wrote:
300-500 INVITE spams per day from more than 400 socialnetworks
worldwide is realy annoying or better, I would call it terrorism.
Just reject
Le 13/12/2010 10:38, Martin Gregorie a écrit :
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 08:17 +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
mouss wrote:
the sample posted by Michelle came to her via a debian list. debian
lists are open (no subscription required) and thus attract a lot of
spam.
And whilst invitations such as those
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 22:19 +0100, mouss wrote:
Le 13/12/2010 10:38, Martin Gregorie a écrit :
As others have said, it depends who sent it and why. Invitations sent
specifically by people who know you aren't spam, but I've heard it said
several times that Facebook auto-generates
Hello Greg Troxel,
Am 2010-12-12 10:51:50, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
Trying to block this is a bit tricky, because when a user of one of
these sites invites a specific person by entering an email address, it
isn't really spam. The problem appears to be that the sites offer the
ability
Michelle Konzack wrote:
300-500 INVITE spams per day from more than 400 socialnetworks
worldwide is realy annoying or better, I would call it terrorism.
Just reject them all?
/Per Jessen, Zürich
Hello Greg Troxel,
Am 2010-12-12 10:51:50, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
Trying to block this is a bit tricky, because when a user of one of
these sites invites a specific person by entering an email address, it
isn't really spam. The problem appears to be that the sites offer the
mouss wrote:
as far as I know, linkedin mail comes from linkedin domains, and has
valid DKIM sigs.
Yep, I'm pretty certain of that too. I think I have a rule that scores
on coming from linkedin, but without verified dkim signature.
the sample posted by Michelle came to her via a debian
23 matches
Mail list logo
