It's possible, the local DNS server becomes non-responsive -hate Microsoft-
restarting DNS service is not solution, I have to restart machine.
*** I DIDN'T VERIFY IT'S THE ROOT CAUSE OR NOT ***
I also have spamd crash problem, it crashes very often:
Application: spamd.exe,
version 3.3.1.2,
Emin Akbulut wrote:
I also have spamd crash problem, it crashes very often:
Application: spamd.exe,
version 3.3.1.2,
timestamp 0x4b75db31,
modul IPHLPAPI.DLL_unloaded,
version 0.0.0.0,
timestamp 0x49e037a4,
code 0xc005,
error loc 0x74f83386,
eventid 0xe98,
app startup
On 15-Jul-2010, at 00:59, Daniel Lemke wrote:
You may want to solve this by increasing your --max-spare, at least this
works for our servers.
Or sneaking in one night and ninja-installing FreeBSD/Linux on all those
windows boxes…
Not that I'm suggesting that, of course.
:D
--
Q: Does
I don't know the default --max-spare value if any and what do you suggest,
Daniel?
Our MTA thread limit is 6.
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Daniel Lemke le...@jam-software.comwrote:
Emin Akbulut wrote:
I also have spamd crash problem, it crashes very often:
Application: spamd.exe,
LuKreme wrote:
On 15-Jul-2010, at 00:59, Daniel Lemke wrote:
You may want to solve this by increasing your --max-spare, at least
this
works for our servers.
Or sneaking in one night and ninja-installing FreeBSD/Linux on all those
windows boxes…
Not that I'm suggesting that, of
Ah I understand now why they are treated differently.. I've never delved into
the details of that module.
Blacklisting might be a good idea!
Thanks
Dave
Giampaolo Tomassoni-2 wrote:
What I am asking is why a reference to http://querty.ru.gg generates a
URI
lookup for ru.gg (ie missing
Hi,
In continuation to my original posting here,
http://old.nabble.com/SpamAssassin-Integration-ts28903365.html
Gnanam wrote:
I want to integrate SpamAssassin in my web-based application to test spam
score of the email content that our application User's wish to send in
mail composing page
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 04:31 -0700, Gnanam wrote:
As I'm integrating SpamAssassin command-line tool in our web-based
application to test spam score of the email message, hundreds of application
Users may perform spam score test at the same time.
I'd say suck it and see initially, with your web
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 04:31 -0700, Gnanam wrote:
I want to integrate SpamAssassin in my web-based application to test spam
score of the email content that our application User's wish to send in
mail composing page itself - even before sending.
As I'm integrating SpamAssassin command-line
Testing hundreds of different email messages at the same time is a bit
excessive;
ram usage, harddisk I/O bottleneck, etc... In my case if threads are more
than 16
then server may become non-responsive because of virtual memory is too
high.
SA is not a cpu hunger application but it uses
quite high
I'm posting a reply which I received from Emin Akbulut here:
Testing hundreds of different email messages at the same time is a bit
excessive;
ram usage, harddisk I/O bottleneck, etc... In my case if threads are more
than 16
then server may become non-responsive because of virtual memory is too
Ops sorry, I use Gmail, it stacks messages well but when I hit the Reply
the message will send only the last person on thread. I have to modify
To: field : )
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Gnanam gna...@zoniac.com wrote:
I'm posting a reply which I received from Emin Akbulut here:
Martin Gregorie-2 wrote:
Its reliable enough, but concurrency will be limited by the number of
child processes you allow spamd to run - on normal MTAs this limit is in
single or low double figures. To allow 'hundreds' of simultaneous tests
you'd have to launch a copy of spamassassin as
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 06:09 -0700, Gnanam wrote:
Martin Gregorie wrote:
Its reliable enough, but concurrency will be limited by the number of
child processes you allow spamd to run - on normal MTAs this limit is in
single or low double figures. To allow 'hundreds' of simultaneous tests
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010, Matt Kettler wrote:
On 7/14/2010 11:27 AM, Emin Akbulut wrote:
I noticed randomly while I was testing SA. All I did is below:
WinSpamC realspam.txt result1.txt
NET STOP Spamassassin
NET START Spamassassin
WinSpamC realspam.txt result2.txt
WinSpamC realspam.txt
spamassassin.exe always calculates the same/correct score.
spamd second run reports only a few tests. Is it OK? I mean
spamd runs all test but only adds which one increases score
to it's report? Or these tests are processed tests list only?
First run has tons of tests, second run has only 5 tests.
On 15.7.2010 16:09, Gnanam wrote:
Where do I limit/configure the number of child processes that spamd can run?
Can you provide me documentation link for the same?
Can you share with me the normal limit imposed by a typical MTA?
It depends. If you are using *nix it is dependent on the *nix
Karsten Bräckelmann-2 wrote:
No stability concerns with either.
However, with anything other than a trivial load, do not use the plain
spamassassin script, but the spamd daemon with the light-weight spamc
client. The daemon is much faster and consumes less resources, because
SA does not
Hi,
My SpamAssassin setup:
SpamAssassin version 3.3.1 running on Perl version 5.8.8 installed on Red
Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5 (Tikanga)
My problem is, the spamc client is not at all working and it is always
returning 0/0. At the same time, if I use spamassassin script, it's
Gnanam wrote:
Karsten Bräckelmann-2 wrote:
No stability concerns with either.
However, with anything other than a trivial load, do not use the plain
spamassassin script, but the spamd daemon with the light-weight spamc
client. The daemon is much faster and consumes less resources,
Gnanam wrote:
My problem is, the spamc client is not at all working and it is always
returning 0/0. At the same time, if I use spamassassin script, it's
working and is giving back spam score result.
Did you start the Daemon?
Karsten Bräckelmann-2 wrote:
man spamd
--
View this
Daniel Lemke wrote:
Did you start the Daemon?
You're right, it was not started. I now started using the command:
# spamd -d
Then I ran netstat -tulpn |grep spamd, it returned:
tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:783 0.0.0.0:*
LISTEN 17382/spamd -d
Now when I
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 06:58 -0700, Gnanam wrote:
My problem is, the spamc client is not at all working and it is always
returning 0/0. At the same time, if I use spamassassin script, it's
working and is giving back spam score result.
That indicates an error. Did you start spamd?
You can use
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 06:40 -0700, Gnanam wrote:
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
No stability concerns with either.
However, with anything other than a trivial load, do not use the plain
spamassassin script, but the spamd daemon with the light-weight spamc
client. The daemon is much faster
On 15.7.2010 16:58, Gnanam wrote:
Also, how do I print only Content analysis details from spamassassin
command-line tool by suppressing the whole mail message from being printed?
Is there any option that controls this?
Not possible as far as I know. SpamAssassin's idea is to be a *filter*,
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 07:02 -0700, Daniel Lemke wrote:
Thanks for making me understand this important and critical difference.
But why then spamassassin script should exist - just for my understanding?
Like already mentioned, Spamd needs a lot of memory and runs as a Daemon,
therefore it
Karsten Bräckelmann-2 wrote:
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 07:02 -0700, Daniel Lemke wrote:
Thanks for making me understand this important and critical difference.
But why then spamassassin script should exist - just for my
understanding?
Like already mentioned, Spamd needs a lot of memory
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 17:21 +0300, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
Also, how do I print only Content analysis details from spamassassin
command-line tool by suppressing the whole mail message from being printed?
Is there any option that controls this?
Not possible as far as I know.
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 07:17 -0700, Gnanam wrote:
You're right, it was not started. I now started using the command:
# spamd -d
Then I ran netstat -tulpn |grep spamd, it returned:
tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:783 0.0.0.0:*
LISTEN 17382/spamd -d
Now
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010, Emin Akbulut wrote:
spamassassin.exe always calculates the same/correct score.
Good... Goood.
pamd second run reports only a few tests. Is it OK? I mean spamd runs
all test but only adds which one increases score to it's report? Or
these tests are processed tests
Hi all,
Few months ago I asked this list if using SA on outgoing smtp was a good
idea (Thread: SA on outgoing SMTP).
This thread quickly moved to Block direct port 25 for non-mta users!
I was really afraid of doing so and didn't really wanted to go this
way.
now about 6 months later I have to
I am wondering if someone has a rule to deal with the current spam being
sent with just a small png attachment the name of which changes
There is no text in the email, just the attachment - the subject line is
always different
Thanks
Peter
On 7/15/10 9:04 PM, Peter Lowish wrote:
I am wondering if someone has a rule to deal with the current spam
being sent with just a small png attachment the name of which changes
There is no text in the email, just the attachment – the subject line
is always different
reputation lists,
and that ip is listed on 12 blacklists. my point exactly.
you wanted to know how to block them? use the blacklists.
On 7/15/10 9:14 PM, Peter Lowish wrote:
From my mailwatch report
186.4.15.18 (Reverse Lookup Failed) (GeoIP Lookup Failed)
ID: 1OYnOW-00019S-8I
Message
Great!
1 down, 19,587,294,872,875 more admins to go! ;-)
Ted
On 7/15/2010 5:55 PM, Alexandre Chapellon wrote:
Hi all,
Few months ago I asked this list if using SA on outgoing smtp was a good
idea (Thread: SA on outgoing SMTP).
This thread quickly moved to Block direct port 25 for non-mta
35 matches
Mail list logo
