Re: Adding to list of URL shorteners

I am open to modifying my rules as needed. Send spamples via pastebin or see the instructions in KAM.cf. On Mon, Apr 9, 2018, 21:40 Alex Regan wrote: > Hi, > > What's the best way to add a URL shortener to the current list? Would I > have to rewrite __URL_SHORTENER? I

Adding to list of URL shorteners

Hi, What's the best way to add a URL shortener to the current list? Would I have to rewrite __URL_SHORTENER? I also notice this subrule doesn't account for the https version of the list. Is that intentional? More specifically, we've received some spam from back.ly. I could reject it

Re: Check for valid MX of sender and rspamd testing

On 09/04/18 15:24, David Jones wrote: I was wondering if anyone knows of an SA plugin or another method to determine if the envelope-from domain has a valid MX record that is listening on TCP port 25.  I don't think it would be a major scorer but it could be useful in meta rules. This might

Re: Synthesizing an Mbox Header

formail so far is working exactly as I need. -- Kevin A. McGrail Asst. Treasurer & VP Fundraising, Apache Software Foundation Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171 On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 1:59 PM, RW wrote: >

Re: Synthesizing an Mbox Header

On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 10:48:31 -0400 Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > Hi All, > > I get a lot of spamples submitted to me and it would be nice if there > was an automated way to synthesize the mbox separator. Looking to > see if there is an existing process before I reinvent the wheel. And it's quite

Re: Check for valid MX of sender and rspamd testing

On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 09:24:23 -0500 David Jones wrote: > I was wondering if anyone knows of an SA plugin or another method to > determine if the envelope-from domain has a valid MX record that is > listening on TCP port 25. I don't think it would be a major scorer > but it could be useful in

Re: MSGID_SPAM_CAPS fp's hitting messages from The Pension Regulator in UK

On Sun, 8 Apr 2018 07:41:50 -0500 David Jones wrote: > On 04/07/2018 10:42 AM, Sebastian Arcus wrote: > > I've enclosed one of the messages received here: > > > > https://pastebin.com/9Bmu3pj1 > > I added this to the 60_whitelist_auth.cf to trust this sender: > > def_whitelist_auth

Re: bayes: cannot open bayes databases lock failed: File exists

Hello, thanks for the reply. I use one database bayes for all email accounts (not sites, sorry for the error) here i show some spamassassin configuration local.cf bayes_expiry_max_db_size 15 bayes_learn_to_journal 1 bayes_auto_learn 0 include custom_rules include whitelist include

Re: bayes: cannot open bayes databases lock failed: File exists

On 09.04.18 11:01, Emanuel Gonzalez wrote: I use one bayes database to all sites in my server. sites? afaik spamd and MTAs differ between mailboxes, not sites. What would be the best way to avoid my problem?? create a database of bayes by email account? Or create a unique database of bayes

Re: Synthesizing an Mbox Header

I'm receiving attachments from webforms primarily that are just the message headers & body but missing the mbox separator. However, most of my tooling is designed for mbox. I'll try the formail idea, thanks! -- Kevin A. McGrail Asst. Treasurer & VP Fundraising, Apache Software Foundation Chair

Re: Check for valid MX of sender and rspamd testing

Kevin A. McGrail skrev den 2018-04-09 16:46: If you are interested, let me know. i am interested to learn how to setup mimedefang, not how to test mx :=) that will always be a job for mta to make sure this is valid

Re: Synthesizing an Mbox Header

Kevin A. McGrail wrote: Hi All, I get a lot of spamples submitted to me and it would be nice if there was an automated way to synthesize the mbox separator.  Looking to see if there is an existing process before I reinvent the wheel. formail < messagefile >> mboxfile However, whatever

Re: Check for valid MX of sender and rspamd testing

David Jones skrev den 2018-04-09 16:24: I was wondering if anyone knows of an SA plugin or another method to determine if the envelope-from domain has a valid MX record that is listening on TCP port 25. I don't think it would be a major scorer but it could be useful in meta rules. thats a job

Re: Check for valid MX of sender and rspamd testing

On 09/04/2018 16:24, David Jones wrote: Been playing around with rspamd over the weekend to see how it compares and so far not that impressed.  It has a few features that are interesting like the MX check but other than that it's not as impressive as the author makes it out to be on the

Re: Check for valid MX of sender and rspamd testing

Well, here's the code I use in filter_sender in MD to check for a validMX. The module needs a public release with some updates and doesn't work great with IPv6 but the code is solid and been in use for a long time at my firm. #IF NOT A BOUNCE, THEN CHECK VALID MX RECORDS if ($sender ne '<>') {

Re: Check for valid MX of sender and rspamd testing

On 04/09/2018 09:58 AM, Dianne Skoll wrote: On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 09:56:20 -0500 David Jones wrote: On 04/09/2018 09:44 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: you simply don't want connect to every innocent MX which inbound mail is forged because for the sake of god you are attacking the

Re: Check for valid MX of sender and rspamd testing

On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 09:56:20 -0500 David Jones wrote: > On 04/09/2018 09:44 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > you simply don't want connect to every innocent MX which inbound > > mail is forged because for the sake of god you are attacking the > > victim of spoofed mails and you are

Re: Check for valid MX of sender and rspamd testing

On 04/09/2018 09:46 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: Hi Dave, I do similar work in MIMEDefang using the a redis backend for caching valid recipients combined with Net::validMX that can check to see if a sender has valid MX before sending.  I have a release of Net::validMX I'm about to post this

Re: Check for valid MX of sender and rspamd testing

On 04/09/2018 09:44 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 09.04.2018 um 16:24 schrieb David Jones: I was wondering if anyone knows of an SA plugin or another method to determine if the envelope-from domain has a valid MX record that is listening on TCP port 25.  I don't think it would be a major scorer

Synthesizing an Mbox Header

Hi All, I get a lot of spamples submitted to me and it would be nice if there was an automated way to synthesize the mbox separator. Looking to see if there is an existing process before I reinvent the wheel. Regards, KAM

Re: Check for valid MX of sender and rspamd testing

Hi Dave, I do similar work in MIMEDefang using the a redis backend for caching valid recipients combined with Net::validMX that can check to see if a sender has valid MX before sending. I have a release of Net::validMX I'm about to post this week in fact. If you are interested, let me know.

Check for valid MX of sender and rspamd testing

I was wondering if anyone knows of an SA plugin or another method to determine if the envelope-from domain has a valid MX record that is listening on TCP port 25. I don't think it would be a major scorer but it could be useful in meta rules. Been playing around with rspamd over the weekend

Re: bayes: cannot open bayes databases lock failed: File exists

Hello, thans for the reply. I use one bayes database to all sites in my server. What would be the best way to avoid my problem?? create a database of bayes by email account? Or create a unique database of bayes for all email accounts? Thanks, De: Pedro David

Re: MSGID_SPAM_CAPS fp's hitting messages from The Pension Regulator in UK

On 08/04/18 13:41, David Jones wrote: On 04/07/2018 10:42 AM, Sebastian Arcus wrote: I'm not entirely sure what is the cause of this - notification emails from The Pension Regulator in UK (a government body overseeing pensions) have the destination email in upper case as part of the