I started forwarding full headers and text to "ab...@outlook.com" and they
blocked my IP.
-Original Message-
From: David Jones via users
Sent: Tuesday, January 2, 2024 1:07 PM
To: Charles Sprickman
Cc: SA Mailing list
Subject: Re: MS-relayed spam
I would report this to
Hello,
I didn't get an update since 5 March (1908044).
FreeBSD 12.4-RELEASE-p2
spamassassin 4.0.0_2
Mar 17 08:19:41.458 [41854] dbg: channel: metadata version = 1908044,
from file /var/db/spamassassin/4.00/updates_spamassassin_org.cf
Mar 17 08:19:41.471 [41854] dbg: dns:
to share will all of you.
On my main spam filtering servers I advertise authenticated login even
though I don't actually have any authenticated users. Anyone who tries
to authenticate is a spammer.
I accept all passwords as good and we accept the email which is then
added to my black list and I
Also this is my /etc/default/spamass-milter
OPTIONS=-u nobody -i 127.0.0.1,209.102.124.20 -r 9 -M
What strikes me odd is that the message that was stopped the milter had
its id set to spamass-milter
Jun 15 06:27:31 mail spamd[981]: spamd: connection from localhost [127.0.0.1]
at port 42127
, 15 Jun 2011, User for SpamAssassin Mail List wrote:
Also this is my /etc/default/spamass-milter
OPTIONS=-u nobody -i 127.0.0.1,209.102.124.20 -r 9 -M
What strikes me odd is that the message that was stopped the milter had its
id set to spamass-milter
Jun 15 06:27:31 mail spamd[981]: spamd
=no
Jun 15 08:08:10 mail sm-mta[21077]: p5FF86ld021067: to=cli...@pcez.com,
delay=00:00:03, xdelay=00:00:02, mailer=local, pri=31672, dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent
As you can see the use is in the black list but yet the mail was
delivered. I checked other email that was over a score of 9 and the mail
.
Anyway I'm still looking for a clue why one is blocked and the other is
not.
Thanks,
Ken
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Lawrence @ Rogers wrote:
On 15/06/2011 10:00 PM, User for SpamAssassin Mail List wrote:
Hello,
I have something I cannot explain. We blacklisted an email address
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011, Lawrence @ Rogers wrote:
On 15/06/2011 11:13 PM, User for SpamAssassin Mail List wrote:
Lawrence,
Thanks for the responce. I know Spam Assassin doesn't stop it we use a
spamassassin milter for sendmail to reject it. (We been doing this for
years). Anyway here
Hello,
I don't keep constant eye on the mail server logs but did notice that
pyzor was not working. I've ping the server that I've been using for
years:
# pyzor ping
82.94.255.100:24441 TimeoutError:
And see it is not working. I did a pyzor discover and found a public
server and did a
http://wtogami.livejournal.com/33674.html
If you use spamassassin on Fedora or RHEL5, please see my blog post for
RPM packages and distro-specific notes.
quote
* STOP USING SARE or OpenProtect. They died a long time ago. Some of
their rules are dangerous or redundant. Many of the
So how do I stop using sare or openprotect?
remove the rules?
remove the channels?
I suppose you know if you use them or not, do you?
Yes I am using it. Since the blog advise to stop using it,
thus I am wondering how do I do so? I had remove the sa-update
from my crontab. Do I need to
Of course. You have to remove everything from
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.003000 that you do not want to use. As an example,
that is what remains here:
Thank you
Hi,
After upgrading to 3.3.0. I began to get an error
Jan 29 03:12:40.458 [9168] warn: plugin: failed to parse plugin (from @INC):
Can't locate Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/DomainKeys.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
lib /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi
: Sender is in Return Path Safe (trusted
relay)
[Return Path SenderScore Safe List (formerly]
Thanks with regards
is in Return Path Safe (trusted
relay)
[Return Path SenderScore Safe List (formerly]
Setting the score of any rule to 0 in local.cf, will disable it.
Although many people choose to disable such rules, reporting false
positives to list maintainers may help the rest
I did reported to list.dnswl.org but there is no reporting tool for
SenderScore
Well, there is, but it has been notoriously difficult to find.
Although the rule names have changed with the release of 3.3.0, you
can find reporting information in the SA wiki.
I am running a qmail + simscan + spamassassin + clamav on a
centos 5.3.
Regards
there are many ways to do it...
you could try
@example.com
in your
/var/qmail/control/badmailfrom
might work... depending on some factors...
you could smtp reject above a certain score and do a
Hi,
How do I exclude a domain from a server-wide envoirment?
regards
How do I exclude a domain from a server-wide envoirment?
with magic words ? *g
describe your mail spamassassin server setup ( cause there are
thousend ways which it might be implemented at your side ), then you
might get an answer
I am running a qmail + simscan + spamassassin + clamav
Hi,
My inbox is flooded by some new spams. Any idea how do I block it?
http://202.42.86.77/1.eml
http://202.42.86.77/2.eml
Best regards
Hello,
Were using sendmail and their feature mailertable for forwarding certain
domains to other mail servers. (using somedomain.com
esmtp:[mail.somedomain.com])
When an email comes in for one of these forwarded domains it will check
our greylist, our clamav, but will not do a
Checking into this more I notice this happens on any forwarded email to
another system. Spamassassin refuses to check it.
Any Ideas?
Thanks,
Ken
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, User for SpamAssassin Mail List wrote:
Hello,
Were using sendmail and their feature mailertable for forwarding certain
I have the same problem here:
traceroute to www.rulesemporium.com (72.52.4.74), 30 hops max, 38 byte
packets
1 roxanne.pcez.com (209.102.124.1) 0.179 ms 0.146 ms 0.143 ms
2 52.ATM5-0.GW9.POR3.ALTER.NET (157.130.180.65) 3.016 ms 3.190 ms 2.917 ms
3 0.so-4-3-0.XT2.POR3.ALTER.NET
Hi,
Will ImageInfo be able to detect and catch this picture spam soon?
http://dreams.741.com/spam.gif
Thanks
Hi List,
Does anyone encounter this error and how do you fix it?
Use of uninitialized value in string eq at
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Mail/DomainKeys/Key/Public.pm line 67,
GEN934 line 319.
Thanks
The original message was received at Tue, 14 Aug 2007 11:50:13 -0400
from localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(reason: 553 sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts
(#5.7.1))
(expanded from
Hello,
We are running a Debian Sarge system here with spamassassin version
Version: 3.0.3-2sarge1.
I tried to put these plugins (ImageInfo and loadplugin) into my system and
got the following errors when I restarted:
Aug 2
is that this is not the right Logger.pm file. Where do I find
the correct file so I can make this work? And is that my only problem???
Thanks,
Ken
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, User for SpamAssassin Mail List wrote:
Hello,
We are running a Debian Sarge system here with spamassassin version
Version: 3.0.3
Hi,
I just updated to 3.2.2. Encountered an error as follows:
Jul 30 21:00:33 beyond spamd[20765]: dcc: check failed: failed to read
header
Jul 30 21:00:36 beyond spamd[20767]: dcc: check failed: util: setuid 0 to
508 failed! at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Mail/SpamAssassin/Util.pm
line
Hello,
I've noticed a big jump in spam here and looking through logs it looks
like my system is not getting pyzor to respond.
When I do a spamassassin --lint -D
I show:
debug: Pyzor is available: /usr/bin/pyzor
debug: Pyzor: got response: 66.250.40.33:24441 TimeoutError:
debug: Pyzor:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Gary V wrote:
We noticed pyzor latency/timeouts last week and had to disable it.
User for SpamAssassin Mail List wrote:
Hello,
I've noticed a big jump in spam here and looking through logs it looks
like my system is not getting pyzor to respond.
When I
dalchri wrote:
I've recently put SpamAssassin in front of my Exchange server as an SMTP
proxy. Our previous spam filter would provide a 554 rejection notice for
anything that was identified as spam. This meant that any FP would be
notified so that email would not get silently ignored.
Other than FuzzyOCR, is there other way to filter graphic spams? I had
ImageInfo but seem like it is not working.
PS... also check out ImageInfo.pm
http://www.rulesemporium.com/plugins.htm
Yes I had that, but it is not working for me.
[26559] dbg: config: read file
Other than FuzzyOCR, is there other way to filter graphic spams? I had
ImageInfo but seem like it is not working.
PS... also check out ImageInfo.pm
http://www.rulesemporium.com/plugins.htm
Yes I had that, but it is not working for me.
[26559] dbg: config: read file
I apologize if this is a duplicate. I posted the original using Nabble, but
there was an error message and not sure if it went through or not. Here
goes:
I am using Qmail-Scanner 1.25 and Spamassassin 3.1.8 which is the most
recent available of the 3.1.x series to Gentoo users.
Using qmail,
Hi,
Other than FuzzyOCR, is there other way to filter graphic spams? I had
ImageInfo but seem like it is not working.
regards
LC
He is bouncing emails. (See attachment.)
Scroom and the camel he rode in on.
I am getting the same thing
Spamassassin List schrieb:
Spamassassin List schrieb:
i just uninstalled FuzzyOCR from my system as it seems like its become
out of fashion to send those spam images that FuzzyOCR can read and I
noticed that I dont even need it to get the remaining imagespam above
a score of 10.
Thanks alot
i just uninstalled FuzzyOCR from my system as it seems like its become
out of fashion to send those spam images that FuzzyOCR can read and I
noticed that I dont even need it to get the remaining imagespam above a
score of 10.
Thanks alot to the author, the plugin was great when imagespam was
Spamassassin List schrieb:
i just uninstalled FuzzyOCR from my system as it seems like its
become out of fashion to send those spam images that FuzzyOCR can
read and I noticed that I dont even need it to get the remaining
imagespam above a score of 10.
Thanks alot to the author, the plugin
Spamassassin List schrieb:
Spamassassin List schrieb:
i just uninstalled FuzzyOCR from my system as it seems like its
become out of fashion to send those spam images that FuzzyOCR can
read and I noticed that I dont even need it to get the remaining
imagespam above a score of 10.
Thanks alot
?
Kris Deugau writes:
sa-list wrote:
Thanks!
Instead of messing with the /etc/sysconfig/spamassassin file, I just
commented out those lines. Any reason to keep this configuration, other
than wanting more headaches in the future when I try to figure this out
again?
Well, like I said, /etc/init.d
I can't seem to get SA Syslog to log messages to a log file other than
maillog.
I changed the spamassassin start up script to add -s local5 to the spamd
start up options. I modified syslog.conf to add local5 as an entity. I
restarted syslog, courier and spamd. I still get logging messages in
Thanks!
Instead of messing with the /etc/sysconfig/spamassassin file, I just
commented out those lines. Any reason to keep this configuration, other than
wanting more headaches in the future when I try to figure this out again?
Kris Deugau writes:
sa-list wrote:
I can't seem to get SA
Hi guys,
I cannot install spamassassin on FreeBSD. Does anyone experienced with this
before?
any advices will be appreciated.
thx
Hi,
spamassassin -D --lint shows that i am having some problem with domainkey
[31077] warn: plugin: failed to parse plugin (from @INC): Can't locate
Mail/DKIM.pm in @INC (@INC contains: lib
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8
Hi,
I am getting some errors when try to spamassassin -t email.txt
Subroutine FuzzyOcr::O_CREAT redefined at /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/Exporter.pm
line 65.
at /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/POSIX.pm line 19
Subroutine FuzzyOcr::O_EXCL redefined at /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/Exporter.pm
Have you installed the programs that FuzzyOcr is calling?
rpm -qa ocrad?
Yes i have.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spam]# rpm -qa ocrad
ocrad-0.16
Spamassassin List wrote:
I am getting some errors when try to spamassassin -t email.txt
Subroutine FuzzyOcr::O_CREAT redefined at
/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/Exporter.pm line 65.
at /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/POSIX.pm line 19
Subroutine FuzzyOcr::O_EXCL redefined at
/usr/lib/perl5
http://hege.li/howto/spam/spamassassin.html
Remove everything from Botnet.cf RULES-section and set it up this way:
Does the above line mean to remove from the # THE RULES?
regards
i think my spamassassin is performing no RBL checks, i disabled that
once, reset that change but it seems that the RBL are still not
working
Have you remove -L from the setup of SA?
Hi,
I am running CentOS 4.4 and have netpbm installed.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] textspam]# rpm -q netpbm-devel
netpbm-devel-10.25-2.EL4.3
[EMAIL PROTECTED] textspam]# rpm -q netpbm-progs
netpbm-progs-10.25-2.EL4.3
[EMAIL PROTECTED] textspam]# rpm -q netpbm-devel
netpbm-devel-10.25-2.EL4.3
I still have
Hi,
I am getting hit by the online game spam.
If i test it using spamassassin -t email, the result score 24.9.
Please see http://202.42.86.68/result.txt
But the header says:-
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.5 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06,
HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY autolearn=disabled
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Spamassassin List wrote:
But the header says:-
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.5 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06,
HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY autolearn=disabled version=3.1.7
I see no network tests (e.g. RCVD_IN_XBL) - do your logs show *any*
messages hitting
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Spamassassin List wrote:
But the header says:-
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.5 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06,
HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY autolearn=disabled version=3.1.7
I see no network tests (e.g. RCVD_IN_XBL) - do your logs show *any*
messages hitting
Use patches from here http://www200.pair.com/mecham/spam/image_spam2.html
to solve your problem.
thanks. but is the site down? unable to access to it.
http://www.peregrinehw.com/downloads/SpamAssassin/contrib/KAM.cf
I had encountered errors
[21895] info: rules: meta test KAM_RPTR_PASSED has undefined dependency
'__URIBL_ANY'
[21895] info: rules: meta test KAM_REAL has undefined dependency
'__KAMREAL1'
[21895] info: rules: meta test
Hi List,
Anyone having intermittance problem with URIBL? I got a few of the same spam
which are having different scores, with and without scoring from blacklist
of URIBL.
Regards,
LC
This is the guy's www site
http://www.blars.org/errors/block.html
I had some trouble with his list before too. Not many people is using that
list, so i guess, not much of damage done anyway.
...
That's where the human tweaking is supposed to happen; if gobs of spam
flag the 80% meter of some test while no ham does, and the 90% meter is
almost never hit by anything, it should have a higher value than the 80%
meter does. If the 90% meter has more ham than spam despite the 80% meter
Has anyone come up with a rule that will combat the spam that I have been
seeing lately?
That is a spam that rambles about much of nothing then has an image or a
link at the bottom.
I see more and more of these and it seems like the spammers have figured
out a way to get this past SA.
I
...
On 10/23/2006 7:01 PM, John Rudd wrote:
Eric A. Hall wrote:
http://www.ehsco.com/misc/spamassassin/std_compliance.cf might help or
work for what you're doing.
Make sure to read the disclaimers and warnings
Those helped a lot. There's only three checks I can't do with them
(probably
Which rule will help me in checking if senders domain has MX record or not.
E.g I am getting email from [EMAIL PROTECTED], then the rule should check
whether domain.com has an MX record or not.
I think this should be a question on your mail daemon. Not spamassassin.
...
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
From: Evan Platt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Moderator: User needs to be unsubscribed...
...
For every post, I'm getting:
Subject: Autoreply from [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was Re:perl hogging
my memory? )
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the junk went to each poster
instead of the list:
...
Subject: Tom Van Overbeke is out of the office.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: List Mail User [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 08:28
The stock spams are killing me. I had 70_sare_stocks.cf and its not blocking
them. Below is part of the spam and the score. What can i do to beat them?
W a t c h o u t!
ALLINACE ENTERPRSIE (A ETR)
Curernt Pirce: 0.80
Add this g e m to your wat ch list, and w atch it tard closely!
Nwes
I'd like SA to make a extra line/section under all my mails where it
tells what score the mail got (or maybe even which rules scored on the
mail) is there such a setting?
it would help me to finetune my SA.
tnx
Stephane Bentebba wrote:
hi all,
i am more or less happy with my spamassassin configuration
works good for one year
but i have problem with a new kind of spam which easylly go throught it :
spam which has poor text, poor token, or none, and a subject always
changing
the only thing which
Spamassassin List wrote:
Stephane Bentebba wrote:
hi all,
i am more or less happy with my spamassassin configuration
works good for one year
but i have problem with a new kind of spam which easylly go
throught it :
spam which has poor text, poor token, or none, and a subject
always changing
While skimming thru my daily rejected spam pile, did a double take when a
GIF spam seemed to blink at me. Thought it was a sw glitch at first...
then realized the sneaky Borg had adapted again.
Took a look at the frames in PaintShopPro's AnimationShop, and the first
three are all but blank (wee
- Original Message -
From: Gary Funck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 12:04 AM
Subject: RE: Image spam with inline jpeg image
Menno wrote:
Ramprasad wrote:
But still this mail is getting thru
decoder wrote:
See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/FuzzyOcrPlugin
Major changes: Replaced imagemagick with netpbm, support png, invoked
giffix for broken gifs, detect image format with magic bytes and not
by content-type, added various configuration options.
I install the above plugin,
Spamassassin List wrote:
decoder wrote:
See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/FuzzyOcrPlugin
Major changes: Replaced imagemagick with netpbm, support png,
invoked giffix for broken gifs, detect image format with magic
bytes and not by content-type, added various configuration
options.
I
...
Mark Martinec wrote:
As required per docs, the MTA is considered trusted and internal,
and MSA is declared trusted and NOT internal.
(both MSA and MTA are on the same IP network)
...
Is it normal that our own MSA ip address is being submitted for RBL tests?
It' normal, in the sense
I wonder if it is pure coincidence or not - There seems to have
been an upswing in the use of 0-day domains today (which don't get caught
by DOB - e.g. stedatlan.com-M olpartmen.com-M in the past hour). But
we still have the various BLs, so these are still high scoring spams:-)
Hi,
Is there a port which I have to open to allow pyzor to run properly? I keep
having the below error.
[26217] dbg: util: executable for pyzor was found at /usr/bin/pyzor
[26217] dbg: pyzor: pyzor is available: /usr/bin/pyzor
[26217] dbg: info: entering helper-app run mode
[26217] dbg:
...
Jeff Chan wrote:
On Thursday, June 22, 2006, 10:35:10 AM, Ken A wrote:
Rick Wesson over at Alice's Registry has a dnsrbl listing recently
registered domains (see below). I thought this might be of interest to
SA users. Anyone used this, or other rbl with similar functions?
Scoring?
...
Well - I'm a member of the Exim cult - but if something better comes
along I might convert. :)
And you're not even British:) Actually I count Exim in the short
list of well done and readily usable/useful MTAs (i.e. works as expected,
not can be made to work). Still, I'm partial
not found in registry whois server.
But this domain appears to be delegated in dns. This is either an error with
registrar whois database or it is possible this domain was recently registered
and whois data is not yet available. Completewhois domain information above
should list current nameservers as has
...
Is anyone else getting spam from gmail? The ones I'm getting are very
lengthy but doesn't look like bayes poison.
headers
Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0
Received: from mail2.adventureaquarium.com ([10.0.0.205]) by
MAIL-I.adventureaquarium.com with Microsoft
...
Here's what I'm trying. I'm using MyDNS but added a few fields.
Basically I'm createing a white list and a black list. The while list
merely prevents an IP from getting on the black list. An IP gets on the
whitelist for 12 hours and on the blacklist for 4 hours. The idea being
to prevent
...
From: List Mail User [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All of this would use up 6 bits and still leave 17 for any other
purposes you have in mind (assuming codes from 127.0.0.2 to 127.0.0.126).
Uses up 6 of the 7 bits in that range, Paul. Did you mean 127.0.0.2
through 127.255.255.254?
{o.o
...
From: List Mail User [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
From: List Mail User [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All of this would use up 6 bits and still leave 17 for any other
purposes you have in mind (assuming codes from 127.0.0.2 to 127.0.0.126).
Uses up 6 of the 7 bits in that range, Paul. Did you mean 127.0.0.2
...
Paul,
I've always thought of you as chief scientist among everyone on the spam
assassin list... I've seen you dissect the inner mysterious workings of a
spam like no other... uncovering the spammer's tracks like a superhero FBI
agent meticulously piecing together data from the forensics lab
...
My guess is that these came in before any of razor, uribl, etc, got ahold of
them. I just checked them all:
score=3D43.64
score=3D16.961
score=3D24.61
score=3D13.893
score=3D10.81
score=3D34.878
score=3D39.367
score=3D23.321
score=3D41.673
score=3D47.624
score=3D36.642
score=3D14.435
You have a bunch of problems; You have no PTR record for your MXs
except to the dead end of worldfamousgiftbaskets.net - That domain has bogus
Whois/registration data (i.e. Not Given is invalid). Also that domain has
no 'A' or 'MX' records. Your NS records in the TLD zone files don't
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
...
Um... Syntax?
RFC3912 Section 3
3. Protocol Example
If one places a request of the WHOIS server located at whois.nic.mil
for information about Smith, the packets on the wire will look
like
...
From: Kai Schaetzl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jamie L. Penman-Smithson wrote on Fri, 26 May 2006 00:52:39 +0100:
After some research, I came to the conclusion that .de is, indeed,
still broken:
ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc3912.txt
And *where exactly* does this RFC say that the whois
1st problem - now I got a lot of empty messages after deleting spam
(I have compiled vpopmail with this options - 'WITH_SPAMASSASSIN=yes
SPAM_THRESHOLD=15 RELAYCLEAR=15 LOGLEVEL=e' on freebsd). Those
e-mails are empty with this header (margaret.starnet.cz is my
server):
I dont think
I'm doing some research using WHOIS to find the owners of domains in the
URI blocklists and finding that many of them have the same owners. I
thing that a database of owners of the URIs that spam links to could be
extremely useful in detecting spam.. I;m seeing that a huge amount of
spam is
Christian Reiter wrote:
Hi Patrick!
is there any WebGUI for training and managing Spamassassin
like DSPAM uses one?
May Maia Mailguard could help you:
http://www.renaissoft.com/maia/
Or MailWatch if you use MailScanner/SA.
http://mailwatch.sourceforge.net/
Ken A
Any SA/Qmail?
...
What are your thoughts guys? Lower the score for URI_BLACK and JP?
seriously? the domains is 3 days old and is unreachable, and uses
outfitter.net NS's which appear to have an identity crisis.
April 25th,
ns1.outfiter.net 206.173.156.105
ns2.outfiter.net 24.98.13.40
April
...
For the last week, I feel like I should receive a paycheck from Geocities!
All I've been doing is submitting damn redirect web pages. I even did some
testing and found some sites listed in NANAS as far back as 5 days that were
still active.
The source code for these pages use at most 3-4
...
I run mail on the secondary server against 3 RBLs (the slightly slower
response is the
price they pay for going to the secondary), which things things out, but
running a
second implementation of SA on the secondary is not something I really
considered.
Do most people run SA or something
...
I believe that's a fundamental logic rule, so yes.
A B == ~A || ~B
--Russell
Almost:
-- Not to confuse things with C's short ciruit operations
|
v
( A and B ) equals ( not ( ( not A ) or ( not B ) ) )
^
...
Matt Kettler replied:
John Tice wrote:
Greetings,
This is my first post after having lurked some. So, I'm getting these
same RE: good spams but they're hitting eight rules and typically
scoring between 30 and 40. I'm really unsophisticated compared to you
guys, and it begs the
...
Bart Schaefer wrote:
The largest number of spam messages currently getting through SA at my
site are short text-only spams with subject Re: good followed by an
obfuscated drug name (so badly mangled as to be unrecognizable in many
cases). The body contains a gappy-text list of several other
. Nobody normally queries it from there except
my own server. Most folks find out the NS list from the servers for .com (ie:
a.gtld-servers.net). This makes it impractical to perform poison URIs if SA is
only looking up NS records.
Matt,
While I'd like to see two classes of rules
Leo's pill domains. Feed several to sa-learn (gets you a high BAYES
score), make sure that net tests are enabled and do use digests (DCC, Razor
and Pyzor); Then these spam will get 30+ point scores. Even with no net
tests, your example scores 4 points without BAYES, so training BAYES
Hi,
Is anyone here familiar with the web page email address scraping
software sold at: http://newsman.asp.be/featuresu.jsp ?
I only found this because one of their programmers, subscribed to
this list (i.e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]), is running an out-of-office auto-responder
1 - 100 of 385 matches
Mail list logo