On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 14:55 -0800, Kevin Miller wrote:
I did get it to work from the CLI, and wrote the following rule:
body CBJ_GiveMeABreak /\[br]{5,}/
This still is wrong. Something that has been mentioned, but not properly
explained to you is the char class, denoted by square
Adam Katz wrote:
On 04/21/2011 03:55 PM, Kevin Miller wrote:
Thanks (also to Martin who replied). I posted one of the spams
here: http://pastebin.com/9aBAxR7m
You can see the long series of break codes in it.
Yes I can. I can also see several other diagnostic bits in it, such
as the
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 14:55 -0800, Kevin Miller wrote:
I know it may trigger on some ham which is why I set the initial score
to 0.01. Better ideas are most welcome though!
It may be a good idea to look at the headers, especially From, From: and
Message-ID: and at body URIs to see if there
Stupid Outlook. Meant to reply to the list again. Sigh.
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
What you want. The string 'br', repeated five times (or more). For
the quantifier, you need to group the string.
/(?:br){5}/
Besides the above, do not use {5,} as a quantifier, UNLESS there is
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 15:47 -0800, Kevin Miller wrote:
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
What you want. The string 'br', repeated five times (or more). For
the quantifier, you need to group the string.
/(?:br){5}/
Great. I've changed my rule to that, and am going to look at Adam's
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 15:47 -0800, Kevin Miller wrote:
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
What you want. The string 'br', repeated five times (or more). For
the quantifier, you need to group the string.
/(?:br){5}/
Great. I've changed my rule to that, and am going
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011, Adam Katz wrote:
rawbody LOCAL_5X_BR_TAGS /(?:br\/?[\s\r\n]{0,4}){5}/mi
...when does \s{0,4} not match the same text as [\s\r\n]{0,4} ?
(i.e. \r and \n are whitespace, no?)
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 16:08 -0800, Kevin Miller wrote:
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
That should do the trick indeed.
After this, I strongly suggest to carefully re-read the entire
thread, and read some docs specifically about the points raised. That
includes RE peculiarities [1] you used
I'm trying to match any URL that points to a URL shortener.
They typically consist of http(s) followed by a domain name, a slash
and a small series of alphanumeric characters, *without a trailing /
or file extension*.
I seem to be having pretty good luck matching the URL, however I can't
On 3/21/2011 1:07 PM, Terry Carmen wrote:
I'm trying to match any URL that points to a URL shortener.
They typically consist of http(s) followed by a domain name, a slash
and a small series of alphanumeric characters, *without a trailing /
or file extension*.
I seem to be having pretty good
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 13:07 -0400, Terry Carmen wrote:
I'm trying to match any URL that points to a URL shortener.
They typically consist of http(s) followed by a domain name, a slash
and a small series of alphanumeric characters, *without a trailing /
or file extension*.
I seem to be
On 03/21/2011 10:07 AM, Terry Carmen wrote:
I'm trying to match any URL that points to a URL shortener.
They typically consist of http(s) followed by a domain name,
a slash and a small series of alphanumeric characters,
*without a trailing / or file extension*.
I seem to be having pretty
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 18:50 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Open Office might be worth it for him. It is what I use most of the
time
In that case one of you should suck a plain text newsletter body into
oowriter, make it look tidy, save it as HTML and then run it through a
validatoy, such
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 18:50 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Open Office might be worth it for him. It is what I use most of the
time
In that case one of you should suck a plain text newsletter body into
oowriter, make it look tidy, save it as
On 3/9/11 6:50 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 03/09/2011 06:33 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 17:33 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
It is almost better to build the html and have OE send it than to
let OE
do its own HTML building.
I couldn't agree more - provided he uses
On 03/09/2011 01:12 AM, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 8 Mar 2011, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have a friend that puts out a 'barter' list. He acts as a
clearinghouse for some equipment wholesalers.
He has been fighting getting tagged as spamming for some time and
finally came to me for help
On 03/09/2011 12:37 AM, haman...@t-online.de wrote:
I have a friend that puts out a 'barter' list. He acts as a
clearinghouse for some equipment wholesalers.
He has been fighting getting tagged as spamming for some time and
finally came to me for help. I had helped some, but finally told
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 16:45 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
His content is strictly text, coming from Outlook Express. So the
culprit might be OE putting the text into an HTML mime part.
Historically, any HTML generated by any MS program has been terrible,
what with proprietary attributes and
On 03/09/2011 01:12 AM, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 8 Mar 2011, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have a friend that puts out a 'barter' list. He acts as a
clearinghouse for some equipment wholesalers.
He has been fighting getting tagged as spamming for some time and
finally came to me for help
On 03/09/2011 05:22 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 16:45 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
His content is strictly text, coming from Outlook Express. So the
culprit might be OE putting the text into an HTML mime part.
Historically, any HTML generated by any MS program has been
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 17:33 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
It is almost better to build the html and have OE send it than to let OE
do its own HTML building.
I couldn't agree more - provided he uses something that generates valid
HTML, which doesn't mean MS Office.
I agree that sending plain
On 03/09/2011 06:33 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 17:33 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
It is almost better to build the html and have OE send it than to let OE
do its own HTML building.
I couldn't agree more - provided he uses something that generates valid
HTML, which
On Wed, 9 Mar 2011, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 03/09/2011 01:12 AM, John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 8 Mar 2011, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
MANY_SPAN_IN_TEXT=2.7,
Tell him to clean up his HTML.
Actually, I am telling him to turn off sending HTML.
...even better. :)
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ
I have a friend that puts out a 'barter' list. He acts as a
clearinghouse for some equipment wholesalers.
He has been fighting getting tagged as spamming for some time and
finally came to me for help. I had helped some, but finally told him to
add me to his distribution (he uses BCC lists
I have a friend that puts out a 'barter' list. He acts as a
clearinghouse for some equipment wholesalers.
He has been fighting getting tagged as spamming for some time and
finally came to me for help. I had helped some, but finally told him to
add me to his distribution (he uses
On Tue, 8 Mar 2011, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have a friend that puts out a 'barter' list. He acts as a clearinghouse
for some equipment wholesalers.
He has been fighting getting tagged as spamming for some time and finally
came to me for help.
Oh, and I am looking at setting up a mailman
are clear instructions on upgrading
under Windows. I am concerned that I will mess up one of the configuration
files so any help in this area would be appreciated! Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Help-updating-my-spam-assassin-forum-tp30799793p30799793.html
Sent
On 1/29/11 5:15 PM, Mark Martinec mark.martinec...@ijs.si wrote:
On Saturday January 29 2011 15:51:25 James Lay wrote:
Just did a new install and I'm seeing the below when spamassassin is
checking an email:
Jan 29 07:47:42 gateway spamd[15540]: dns: sendto() failed: Connection
refused at
Hey all
Just did a new install and I'm seeing the below when spamassassin is
checking an email:
Jan 29 07:47:42 gateway spamd[15540]: dns: sendto() failed: Connection
refused at
/usr/lib64/perl5/site_perl/5.10.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/DnsResolver.pm line 411,
GEN408 line 158.
Jan 29 07:47:42
On Saturday January 29 2011 15:51:25 James Lay wrote:
Just did a new install and I'm seeing the below when spamassassin is
checking an email:
Jan 29 07:47:42 gateway spamd[15540]: dns: sendto() failed: Connection
refused at
/usr/lib64/perl5/site_perl/5.10.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/DnsResolver.pm
Good morning List.
Apologies for this post but I do not know what else to try.
I am new to Suse Amavisd-new. (inherited system)
As such, I appear to have a problem getting bayes to learn.
I keep getting the errors
autolearn=failed
I have a feeling its a permission problem due to amavis but
On 2010/11/30 10:07 AM, Tom Kinghorn wrote:
Good morning List.
Apologies for this post but I do not know what else to try.
I am new to Suse Amavisd-new. (inherited system)
As such, I appear to have a problem getting bayes to learn.
Hi List.
Further to my post, when using amavis, the
Further to my post, when using amavis, the autolearn fails, when i
pass the same mail via spamassassin -t -D message, it shows
autolearn=spam, so it looks like an amavis issue.
I know its now OT, but any advice would be appreciated.
Thanks
Tom
Hi List
Please ignore.
Problem
:_Stands_in_a_Pristine_West_Coast_Beachside_Security_Village?=
I would like to match
_Stands_in_a_Pristine_West_Coast_Beachside_Security_Village
My last attempt was:
header VM_WESTCOAST_SUB Subject =~
/.*:_Stands_in_a_Pristine_West_Coast_Beachside_Security_Village/
any help would be appreciated.
Thanks
Tom
260160
From: Tom Kinghorn [mailto:thomas.kingh...@gmail.com]
Sent: 24 November 2010 08:51
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: custom rule help
Morning List.
Firstly, apologies for posting this here.
I have tried dozens of times to get this rule working, without success.
I need to write
On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 10:50 +0200, Tom Kinghorn wrote:
My last attempt was:
header VM_WESTCOAST_SUB Subject =~
/.*:_Stands_in_a_Pristine_West_Coast_Beachside_Security_Village/
any help would be appreciated.
How are you testing your rules?
If you want to test and/or develop
Le 24/11/2010 09:50, Tom Kinghorn a écrit :
Subject:
=?windows-1252?Q?100%_Finance_with_No_Deposit_Required_:_Stands_in_a_Pristine_West_Coast_Beachside_Security_Village?=
I would like to match
_Stands_in_a_Pristine_West_Coast_Beachside_Security_Village
By default, header rules work on the
On 2010/11/24 02:55 PM, John Wilcock wrote:
Le 24/11/2010 09:50, Tom Kinghorn a écrit :
By default, header rules work on the *decoded* subject, not the raw
quoted-printable-encoded subject you've quoted. So you need to replace
the underscores with spaces in your regex.
Alternatively
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010, Bowie Bailey wrote:
header TO1To =~ /^\s*/
This will work with or without the space (or multiple spaces, or
tabs...). You don't need to escape anything in this regex. None of
those are special characters.
I just got one of these spams too.
Added to sandbox.
--
TO1 To:name =~ /EuroPrime Casino/i
in particular (to filter the less than symbol):
header TO1 To:name =~ /\/i
but it seems no to work... Could you please help me? I'm desperate!
Thanks :-)
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Help%21-Filter-spam
any documentation about it):
header TO1 To:name =~ /EuroPrime Casino/i
in particular (to filter the less than symbol):
header TO1 To:name =~ /\/i
but it seems no to work... Could you please help me? I'm desperate!
Thanks :-)
Have you tried escaping it with \x3c ?
--
Best
in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Help%21-Filter-spam-with-%22less-than%22-symbol-in-recipient-tp29970215p29970540.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 2010-10-15 12:58, Niente0 wrote:
Giles Coochey wrote:
Have you tried escaping it with \x3c ?
Thanks for your suggestion, I tried it now but with no success. Here's my
rule:
header TO1 To:name =~ /\x3c/i
score TO1 100
I have received other less than spam
this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Help%21-Filter-spam-with-%22less-than%22-symbol-in-recipient-tp29970215p29971041.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 2010-10-15 14:18, Niente0 wrote:
Yet Another Ninja wrote:
On 2010-10-15 12:58, Niente0 wrote:
pls post a spam sample on pastebin.com and send the link to the list
Hi, I tried with 3 different browsers but pastebin.com shows only a blank
page after submitting text. So I posted it here:
to an alias of my email. I sent him (myself) a test
message and it passed. I examined the header of the incoming message and
there are spamassassin infos, so it passed through SA rules and ignored the
less than filtering rule...
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Help%21-Filter
On 2010-10-15 14:49, Niente0 wrote:
Yet Another Ninja wrote:
On 2010-10-15 14:18, Niente0 wrote:
Untested:
# To: i...@aags.com
header TO1 To =~ /^/
Thank you!
I tested it but it still doesn't work. :-(
For testing purposes, I created a fake user in my Outlook address book,
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 05:18 -0700, Niente0 wrote:
Yet Another Ninja wrote:
On 2010-10-15 12:58, Niente0 wrote:
pls post a spam sample on pastebin.com and send the link to the list
Hi, I tried with 3 different browsers but pastebin.com shows only a blank
page after submitting text.
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010, Niente0 wrote:
Yet Another Ninja wrote:
On 2010-10-15 14:18, Niente0 wrote:
Untested:
# To: i...@aags.com
header TO1 To =~ /^/
Thank you!
I tested it but it still doesn't work. :-(
For testing purposes, I created a fake user in my Outlook address book,
On Fri, 15 Oct 2010, Niente0 wrote:
header TO1 To:name =~ /\/i
but it seems no to work... Could you please help me? I'm desperate!
Thanks :-)
That probably means the parser has a bug.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org
:
header TO1 To =~ /^/
score TO1 100
header TO2 To =~ /^\\\ \/
score TO2 100
(the second one has the space inside!)
A HUGE THANK YOU :handshake:
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Help%21-Filter-spam
On 10/15/2010 10:00 AM, Niente0 wrote:
Yet Another Ninja wrote:
On 2010-10-15 14:49, Niente0 wrote:
works for me
After some more tests, it seems to work for me too! I discovered that in my
tests the server added a space after the second quote: (space)
while in real spam it was not
On fre 08 okt 2010 03:18:35 CEST, John Hardin wrote
But I believe we already crossed the line from meta to OT. ;)
This braindead message munging won't happen on this list.
Oh, agreed.
one could change it to be more helpfull signatures :)
To unsubscribe from this mailing list see the
I was going to suggest the footer should read:
To unsubscribe from this mailing list see the list-unsubscribe:
header
Ahaha! I vote yes to it. ;)
Le 07/10/2010 23:28, John Hardin a écrit :
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, Karsten Br�ckelmann wrote:
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 11:11 +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote:
before I unsubscribe I should note that the incoming messages from
this list
should have an Unsubscribe / How-to-get-help footer at teh bottom
On tor 07 okt 2010 11:11:09 CEST, Shlomi Fish wrote
before I unsubscribe I should note that the incoming messages from this list
should have an Unsubscribe / How-to-get-help footer at teh bottom of their
messages.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2919
eg using squirrelmail, roundcube, horde imp
On 07.10.10 11:11, Shlomi Fish wrote:
before I unsubscribe I should note that the incoming messages from this list
should have an Unsubscribe / How-to-get-help footer at teh bottom of their
messages.
They have standardized header:
list-unsubscribe: mailto:users-unsubscr
On Thursday 07 October 2010 11:46:58 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 07.10.10 11:11, Shlomi Fish wrote:
before I unsubscribe I should note that the incoming messages from this
list should have an Unsubscribe / How-to-get-help footer at teh bottom
of their messages.
They have
Furthermore, I suggest having a footer with unsubscription / help
information
in addition to the header because the header may not be visible, not
all E-
mail clients may display it, and people may otherwise be unaware of it.
I have
often seen some unsubscribe messages sent to mailing lists
Furthermore, I suggest having a footer with unsubscription / help
information in addition to the header because the header may not be
visible, not all E-mail clients may display it, and people may
otherwise be unaware of it. I have often seen some unsubscribe
messages sent to mailing
On 07.10.10 13:28, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
I see what you mean, but, well, I personally would vote no to this.
I'm really tired of all that mailing lists which can't stay from
attaching their own banners and general hints at the message tail.
I fully agree.
not mentioning breakage
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 11:11 +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote:
before I unsubscribe I should note that the incoming messages from this list
should have an Unsubscribe / How-to-get-help footer at teh bottom of their
messages.
Please tell me I am not the only one to see the irony.
I can't even
On tor 07 okt 2010 22:19:29 CEST, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote
It's not a matter of missing information forced onto each and any
post. Ultimately, it boils down to the subscribers' clue level, in
particular understanding email and mailing lists.
i see it as subscribers missing buttoms in there
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, Karsten Br?ckelmann wrote:
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 11:11 +0200, Shlomi Fish wrote:
before I unsubscribe I should note that the incoming messages from this list
should have an Unsubscribe / How-to-get-help footer at teh bottom of their
messages.
It's not a matter of missing
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 14:28 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
It's not a matter of missing information forced onto each and any
post. Ultimately, it boils down to the subscribers' clue level, in
particular understanding email and mailing lists.
I
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, Karsten Br�ckelmann wrote:
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 14:28 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
It's not a matter of missing information forced onto each and any
post. Ultimately, it boils down to the subscribers' clue level, in
particular
web form.
Am trying to build a tool which accepts a email message and checks it.
Any help with the installation instructions and the details regarding the
set up and modules will be appreciated.
--
Thanks and Regards,
Sabiha Fathima
is under someone else's control, then
you could use e.g. fetchmail to send it on through a local mailserver.
Any help with the installation instructions and the details regarding
the set up and modules will be appreciated.
--
Thanks and Regards,
Sabiha Fathima
Dominic
On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 16:00 +0530, Sabiha Fathima wrote:
Hi All,
Am trying to install spamassassin on unbuntu without a smtp running on
it.
Is it mandatory to have a smtp server to run spam assassin.
No. I run two copies of SA - one on my main mail server for normal
production mail
Hello,
I'm using SA since 5 years now. Yesterday I was switching my Debian
system to a gentoo Server and had to reinstall SA this way. I thought I
transfered the config nearly identical, but it seems to not be the case,
since I get results in filtering, which I dont understand:
In an older episode, on 2010-08-15 15:57, Marc Richter wrote:
http://pastebin.com/Rhj2UMLS
I don't understand 3 things:
1)
Why is it recognized as not beeing spam, although the required score is
3.0 and the actual score is 101.0?
It says score=-101.0, that is *not* the same as score=101.0.
On Sun, 15 Aug 2010, Marc Richter wrote:
http://pastebin.com/Rhj2UMLS
I don't understand 3 things:
1) Why is it recognized as not beeing spam, although the required score
is 3.0 and the actual score is 101.0?
Look a little closer. The actual score is -101.0 (negative).
Is this because
Hi @all,
I just had a chat with wolfgang by phone, and we discovered, that a
Webformular on my own site seems to deliver this spam to my GMX -
Account richter_marc -at- gmx.net .
This would explaid this result: When my own server is the initial
sender, it's clear why the USER_IN_WHITELIST -
On søn 15 aug 2010 15:57:57 CEST, Marc Richter wrote
Could anybody please give me a hint with this?
do you send spam to your own email address ?
to solve it, remove any instance of whitelist_from
or if you like to track this change score on user_in_whitelist to
something that is not -100
If it looks like you send spam to you, I've simple solution. SPF
record in your domain zone and you tell in your SPF record that for
your domain could send email your servers and any others are possibly
spammers - see http://www.openspf.org/
For example for my domain could send emails
Hi J.K.
No, it seemes as if my server really sent it, not only that the from -
matched. Seems as if an open Webformular sent it.
But thank you anyway.
Am 15.08.2010 18:54, schrieb Josef Karliak:
If it looks like you send spam to you, I've simple solution. SPF
record in your domain zone
On 6/17/2010 2:19 PM, gwilodailo wrote:
I've discovered that some mail between two of my clients (on separate hosts)
is getting flagged as spam, because of this rule (FH_HOST_IN_ADDRARPA). I'm
not at all an expert with spamassassin, and I'm having some difficulty
finding what this rule is
help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Please-Help-with-SA-Rule%3A-FH_HOST_IN_ADDRARPA-tp28917943p28917943.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010, gwilodailo wrote:
I've discovered that some mail between two of my clients (on separate hosts)
is getting flagged as spam, because of this rule (FH_HOST_IN_ADDRARPA). I'm
not at all an expert with spamassassin, and I'm having some difficulty
finding what this rule is about
). I'm
not at all an expert with spamassassin, and I'm having some difficulty
finding what this rule is about and what to do about it.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!
On 03.06.10 20:45, cviebrock wrote:
Thanks for the link. That'll help.
In general, though, can I write a SA rule that looks at the raw message body
with trying to decode attachments, etc.? I thought that would be the
easiest way to catch these messages (and some other spam that comes
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 19:44 -0700, cviebrock wrote:
I'm trying to write a rule to catch a bunch of spam I'm getting recently that
contain only an .RTF file. The filename, subject line, and other details
vary, but the raw message body is always the same i.e. the base64 encoded
RTF file.
See
#.##.##.###
line.
I guess my question is more general: how do I write a rule that looks at the
undecoded content of the emails, versus one that looks at the decoded parts?
- Colin
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Help-with-new-rule%2C-and-local.cf-tp28775147p28780895.html
Sent
On Fri 04 Jun 2010 04:44:46 AM CEST, cviebrock wrote
http://pastebin.com/xFddVaX8
http://sanesecurity.org/ dont know what clamav rules helps for this,
but this is another way to stop spam attachements
remember to make good choice of official sigs in clamd if using clamav
milter, only
to help.
Thanks, and sorry if I'm being a newb!
- Colin
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Help-with-new-rule%2C-and-local.cf-tp28775147p28775147.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
/xFddVaX8
Any suggestions? Actually, I'm not sure if any of my rules in local.cf are
firing. I'm running SA 3.3.0 via spampd 2.30-22 and Postfix 2.5.5, Perl
5.10.0 on Debian Lenny. I'll post any config settings needed to help.
Thanks, and sorry if I'm being a newb!
- Colin
--
View
Thanks for the link. That'll help.
In general, though, can I write a SA rule that looks at the raw message body
with trying to decode attachments, etc.? I thought that would be the
easiest way to catch these messages (and some other spam that comes in as
PNG files).
- Colin
--
View
This rule is in my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf as FH_DATE_PAST_20XX 0
and in /var/lib/spmassassin//3.002004/updates_spamassassin_org as #score
FH_DATE_PAST_20XX 2.075 3.384 3.554 3.188 # n=2 i've commented the line in
/var/lib/spamassassin.
How can i set spamassassin as to not check my local
Anshul Chauhan wrote:
This rule is in my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf http://local.cf
as FH_DATE_PAST_20XX 0 and in
/var/lib/spmassassin//3.002004/updates_spamassassin_org as #score
FH_DATE_PAST_20XX 2.075 3.384 3.554 3.188 # n=2 i've commented the
line in /var/lib/spamassassin.
How
blacklist checks and such. If a local user sends a
spammy message, it will still be caught (although the ALL_TRUSTED rule
gives a -1 to the score, to help prevent false positives from your own
network).
Take an example mail and run in through SA manually to see exactly what
is happening.
$ spamassassin
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 11:16 +0530, Tux Techie wrote:
I've inserted score FH_DATE_PAST_20XX 0 without the quotes to the
end of your local.cf file to disable the rule for 2010 bug.
According to the timestamps the samples are older than your mail.
Assuming you restarted spamd, these hits should
hi,
I'm new to linux and Need help in configuring spamassassin on my mail
server,I'm using spamassassin-3.2.4-1.el4.1 on CentOS4 with
sendmail-8.13.1-3.3.el4
This is my local.cf
# This is the right place to customize your installation of SpamAssassin.
#
# See 'perldoc Mail
Tux Techie wrote:
hi,
I'm new to linux and Need help in configuring spamassassin on my
mail server,I'm using spamassassin-3.2.4-1.el4.1 on CentOS4 with
sendmail-8.13.1-3.3.el4
This is my local.cf http://local.cf/
bayes_ignore_header X-Spam-Flag
On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 21:15 +0530, Tux Techie wrote:
I'm new to linux and Need help in configuring spamassassin on my mail
server,I'm using spamassassin-3.2.4-1.el4.1 on CentOS4 with
sendmail-8.13.1-3.3.el4
[ massive snip ]
This is my /etc/procmailrc
DROPPRIVS=yes
:0fw
| /usr/bin/spamc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4/22/10 10:45 AM, Tux Techie wrote:
I'm new to linux and Need help in configuring spamassassin on my
mail server,I'm using spamassassin-3.2.4-1.el4.1 on CentOS4 with
My first guess without seeing real samples would be that you
I've inserted score FH_DATE_PAST_20XX 0 without the quotes to the end of
your local.cf file to disable the rule for 2010 bug.
If i'm upgrading SA to 3.3.1, my mail processing is very slow and my server
load average is going up.
I've googled all the stuff in my local.cf its not inherited from
John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 6 Apr 2010, Ned Slider wrote:
John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 6 Apr 2010, Ned Slider wrote:
uriLOCAL_URI_BITLY m{https?://bit\.ly/\w{6}}
describe LOCAL_URI_BITLY contains bit.ly link
bit.ly is a legitimate URL-shortening service. Are you sure
Hi,
I'm having a problem with emails that are from a freemail domain with
simply a shorturl in them, like this:
bra
href=http://bit.ly/aqI4o1http://bit.ly/aqI4o1/Benjamin/abrbrbrlovee
yabr
rawbodyLOC_BITLY
/href\=http:\/\/bit\.ly\/.+\w{1,8}http:\/\/bit\.ly\/.+\w{1,15}\/.+\w{1,15}\/abrbr/
Alex wrote:
Hi,
I'm having a problem with emails that are from a freemail domain with
simply a shorturl in them, like this:
bra
href=http://bit.ly/aqI4o1http://bit.ly/aqI4o1/Benjamin/abrbrbrlovee
yabr
rawbodyLOC_BITLY
On Tue, 6 Apr 2010, Ned Slider wrote:
uri LOCAL_URI_BITLY m{https?://bit\.ly/\w{6}}
describeLOCAL_URI_BITLY contains bit.ly link
bit.ly is a legitimate URL-shortening service. Are you sure you want to
penalize them?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ
601 - 700 of 1889 matches
Mail list logo
