WHAT A WONDERFUL WORLD
I see trees of green, red roses too
I see them bloom for me and you
And I think to myself, what a wonderful world
I see skies of blue and clouds of white
The bright blessed day, the dark sacred night
And I think to myself, what a wonderful world
The colours of the
I am gathering more evidence that this is related to a session expiring on
one hand and a request being processed for that same session.
I have been debugging the tomcat code a bit, and I have the *impression*
that the expiration handling is not thread safe. It seems possible at first
sight that
On 12/30/06, Peter Coppens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am gathering more evidence that this is related to a session expiring on
one hand and a request being processed for that same session.
I have been debugging the tomcat code a bit, and I have the *impression*
that the expiration handling is
Hi,
I don't want to start a flame war on microsoft or something, but I
stubbled on this article and was quite shocked what vista really is...
Maybe you will be shocked as well, maybe you don't care, but it's
worth reading anyway :-)
http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/vista_cost.txt
Is'nt this the OS that walks on water?
Thanks Leon,
M-
---
This e-mail message (including attachments, if any) is intended for the use of
the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
that
Linux has chance to become top platform for watching and coping pirate HD-DVD :)
I guess there would be Ubuntu Media Edition soon or Mubuntu.
Happy New Year!
Saturday, December 30, 2006, 4:02:48 PM, you wrote:
LR Hi,
LR I don't want to start a flame war on microsoft or something, but I
LR
Hi,
I don't want to start a flame war on microsoft or something, but I
stubbled on this article and was quite shocked what vista really is...
Maybe you will be shocked as well, maybe you don't care, but it's
worth reading anyway :-)
http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/vista_cost.txt
Nope, my server is only running Tomcat. There is nothing else involved.
-rg
On 12/30/06, Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
rg wrote:
I am using Tomcat 5.5.17 on Windows.
I have a problem setting a 408 error-page in my web.xml on form based
authentication.
Random thought. Are you using
Actually it just seems to be related to the fact that under heavy load the db
connection starts to take longer than the timeout.
Apparently, a call to request.getSession() somewhere in the middel of the
doGet processing will also trigger invalidating the session, which is kind
of a nuisance as
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: How can JSPs be part of an integrated component?
Sure, that works if you're banking on Tomcat as your
deployment target, but the classes that you've compiled
and hardwired (there many lines of hardwiring in the
admin web.xml)
It's not the web.xml that's specific to Tomcat, it's the compiled JSP
classes (to be frank other JSP compilers might select totally different
filenames rendering the web.xml specific to Tomcat too).
Have a look at the .class files that are in the catalina-admin.jar. The
classes look like:
I first downloaded windows service installer of 5.5.20 and can't get it work,
then I switched to zip file version. Reason is I checked doc for how-to and
it indicated service.bat which can only be found in zip version.
I followed how-to and ran service.bat install, which was successful based
on
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: How can JSPs be part of an integrated component?
public final class banner_jsp
extends org.apache.jasper.runtime.HttpJspBase
implements org.apache.jasper.runtime.JspSourceDependent
Jasper is not Tomcat-specific - it's
From: kkus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: How to run tomcat service in JDK6?
Double-posting won't improve your chances of getting an answer, but it
will annoy people.
Has anyone used JDK 6 for 5.5.20? Any idea?
I'm using it right now, with no problems. However, the JDK is installed
in
I just installed 5.5.20 with JDK 1.6.0 on Windows XP. Run smooth as service. No
problem at all.
Following is my configuration:
(1) Install java in c:\jdk1.6.0. Also set JAVA_HOME
(2) While installing tomcat, it detected jre from c:\Program
Files\Java\jre1.6.0 and installed
Tomcat in
On 12/30/06, Peter Coppens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually it just seems to be related to the fact that under heavy load the db
connection starts to take longer than the timeout.
Thats a lot. What is your timeout configured to?
Apparently, a call to request.getSession() somewhere in the
Hmm...
I can see two senarios that can cause this situation:
1. Your sessions are configured to be way too short. I'd
recommend at sessions live at least until the request times out.
2. You have a reference to the session in a servlet instance -- either
directly or indirectly.
Thanks for the suggestions.
I have been playing with the timeouts to trigger the problem. Typically I
would like to have them around 15minutesand yes that is apparently not
sufficient for the load test I am doing.
The setup is three machines. One with tomcat running that connects to a 2nd
thanks
On 12/30/06, Vijay Hatewar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WHAT A WONDERFUL WORLD
I see trees of green, red roses too
I see them bloom for me and you
And I think to myself, what a wonderful world
I see skies of blue and clouds of white
The bright blessed day, the dark sacred night
And I
On 12/30/06, Peter Coppens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That said, I am baffled by the fact that some connections take 15minutes.
Are you referring to MySQL connection setup time? Or query time?
Either way, it certainly doesn't sound like a Tomcat problem... :-)
--
Hassan Schroeder
Are you referring to MySQL connection setup time? Or query time?
Connection time (using a dbcp pool)
Either way, it certainly doesn't sound like a Tomcat problem... :-)
Absolutely agree.
--
View this message in context:
Mark Thomas wrote:
I plan to look at modifying the current RD code over the holiday.
In 5.5.21 onwards, the RD will be thread safe so the OP's code should
work without modification.
Mark
-
To start a new topic, e-mail:
Im still waiting for the usual insults from chuck..then again maybe he took the
day off..
---
This e-mail message (including attachments, if any) is intended for the use of
the individual or entity to which it is addressed
Martin Gainty wrote:
Im still waiting for the usual insults from chuck..then again maybe he took
the day off..
Martin,
This sort of comment is completely out of line. There is no
justification whatsoever for your behaviour on this thread.
I expect to see a public apology on this thread from
Also be aware of the distinction between Request.getSession(true) and
Request.getSession(false) where
Request.getSession(true) will attempt to create a new session (if none exists)
Request.getSession(false) will NOT create a new session
(perhaps you should use option 2)
Also which mechanism are
Happy New Year All.
Does anyone use sessions to temporarily hold confirmation codes for user
registrations? I have a setup where when the user registers a random
confirmation code is generated and appended to a url which is emailed to the
user. The user's registration data is stored in a session
We have several domains that each have several WAR files deployed. How
can misbehaving deployed WAR's be identified and 1. killed off (maybe an
issue if they hold onto threads or instance references when undeploy or
stop is called) 2. be controlled (ie: throttle/cap a specific domain
and/or WAR
Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Martin Gainty wrote:
Im still waiting for the usual insults from chuck..then again maybe he
took the day off..
Martin,
This sort of comment is completely out of line. There is no
justification whatsoever for your
Frack, after all Chuck started it. Get a life, and let these two little
kiddies get on with their mud fight.
Who started what is debatable but there's no need to continue it -- or
invite it as is the case here.
--David
Bill Barker wrote:
Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
29 matches
Mail list logo
