Hello all,
We have hosted a small vehicle retail website using tomcat as app server. The
site has been live from around 6-7 months, just that the number of vehicles on
our site is increasing. The site was working fine till last week, but in the
last week we are seeing that our site is
Hi all,
I am now preparing the deployment scenario for our new webapp and I am
not sure if it is better to have one Tomcat instance per server machine
or to have more instances.
I have 3 servers - dual Intel Xeon 3GHz, 4GB RAM each (about 3GB is
available for Tomcat etc.).
There will be
locate servlet-api
gives:
/usr/lib/java/common/lib/servlet-api.jar
/usr/share /tomcat5/common/lib/servlet-api.jar
Larry Isaacs wrote:
Yes, I have installed a packaged version (RPM via Suse Yast).
While mod_jk has been downloaded and moved to its modules directory.
What should I do, now?
For just 404 you can create your own page as another poster advised.
If you want to do this for all error/code pages, take a look part way
down the common section of this article.
http://www.owasp.org/index.php/Securing_tomcat#Common
On 13 Mar 2007, at 20:58, Susan Richards wrote:
How
Unless you have real memory requirements, one tomcat instance is
better, at least in terms of maintenance. There is no real advantage
in multi-instancing.
But the limit for max memory you can effectively use in your java
program on a 32bit linux, i assume you use (same for windows),
lies far
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Leon,
Leon Rosenberg wrote:
But the limit for max memory you can effectively use in your java
program on a 32bit linux, i assume you use (same for windows),
lies far below 2Gb.
I've been trying to find the real nature of this memory limit. I
Hi,
does your tomcat instance really use JRE 1.6 ?
You can easily check in the manager app.
Anyway I would suggest to always use
-source 1.4 -target 1.4
for older Classes, because you avoid all possible syntax problems.
Other combinations of source/target could be tested if you suspect a javac
I have a custom tag with attributes defined in the TLD
file as allowing run-time expression values, meaning:
rtexprvaluetrue/rtexprvalue
I also have a TagExtraInfo class that I am using to
validate the values provided.
Inside my TagExtraInfo sub-class I have code such as
this:
Object attr
En l'instant précis du 14/03/07 14:31, Christopher Schultz s'exprimait
en ces termes:
Leon,
Leon Rosenberg wrote:
But the limit for max memory you can effectively use in your java
program on a 32bit linux, i assume you use (same for windows),
lies far below 2Gb.
I've been trying to
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OT]Re: Is better one or more Tomcat instances per machine
The below applies only to 32-bit systems, of course.
Some claim that 32-bit OSs can't use more than 4GB RAM
Lots of people seem to confuse virtual space with real memory.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14/03/2007, at 2:31 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
The reading I've done so far on this subject leads me to believe that
most people don't know what they heck they're talking about. Some
claim
that 32-bit OSs can't use more than 4GB RAM (they
From: Leon Rosenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is no real advantage in multi-instancing.
A minor advantage is that if you allocate one webapp per container, if
one webapp fails it only takes down its own container. Well-coded
webapps should never cause this - and, of course, we all
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14/03/2007, at 3:11 PM, David Delbecq wrote:
This has changed. An new architecture was brought in CPU (at
pentium II
time?) that allowed OS to do a 4G/4G mapping in 32 bits mode. Since
you
don't access kernel space from user mode directly,
From: Andrew Miehs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
32bit OSes can not use more than 4GB RAM. What you are probably
referring
to is PAE, and there the kernel splits the 'extra' memory into
chunks, and
can give each process part of this chunk - a single process however,
under
linux can not
On 14/03/2007, at 3:17 PM, Peter Crowther wrote:
From: Leon Rosenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is no real advantage in multi-instancing.
A minor advantage is that if you allocate one webapp per container, if
one webapp fails it only takes down its own container. Well-coded
webapps
On 14/03/2007, at 3:21 PM, Peter Crowther wrote:
Let's be clear about the distinction between OS and process managed
by OS:
- The OS as a whole can manage 4 Gbytes of physical memory using
PAE;
- On some OSs (Linux, perhaps?), a user process cannot be allocated
4
Gbytes of RAM;
Sorry,
Thanks. I was hoping there was a way to just turn it off and not have a custom
error page.
Darren [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/14/2007 5:14 AM
For just 404 you can create your own page as another poster advised.
If you want to do this for all error/code pages, take a look part way
down the common
Is it possible to use a 64-bit Apache (consequently 64-bit mod-jk) with
32-bit Tomcat instances?
Some Tomcats will be co-located with the Apache on the same box and some
will be remote. But all the Tomcats will run on 64-bit Linux kernel?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David,
David Delbecq wrote:
32 bits architecture, a memory pointer is 32 bits and thus can only
address memory ranges between 0 to 2^32, that makes 4G
back in kernel 2.4 time
Pointers didn't get bigger in 2.6, so the 4GB process limit is still
From: Andrew Miehs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OT]Re: Is better one or more Tomcat instances
per machine
The user space is the amount of RAM you as a process can
allocate for this single process.
No - RAM has nothing to do with the split. Process memory is the amount
of
Sharma, Siddharth wrote:
Is it possible to use a 64-bit Apache (consequently 64-bit mod-jk) with
32-bit Tomcat instances?
Some Tomcats will be co-located with the Apache on the same box and some
will be remote. But all the Tomcats will run on 64-bit Linux kernel?
You can even run mod_jk on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
I knew you'd come through. It's always nice to have a VM hacker around
for questions like this.
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
that they have 2GB/2GB kernel and process memory boundaries
Windows certainly does have such a boundary (although
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OT]Re: Is better one or more Tomcat instances
per machine
I don't think this has anything to do with hardware.
It does. To quote from the IA32 architecture spec:
Starting with the Pentium Pro processor, the IA-32
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew,
Andrew Miehs wrote:
32bit OSes can not use more than 4GB RAM.
??!
A process on a 32-bit OS can't use more than 4GB of RAM, but the OS
certainly can.
2GB/2GB kernel and process memory boundaries (they don't, except that I
think MS
1) We are using tomcat in production with -Xmx1524M up to 1700, but I
have never used
it with -Xmx more than 2G. I can also verify that top shows java process
using more than 1GB.
Java process shows 200MB more allocated memory than -Xmx in top.
2) I have CentOS 4.4 machine at home that has 4GB
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14/03/2007, at 3:52 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
The user space is the amount of RAM you as a process can
allocate for this single process.
No - RAM has nothing to do with the split. Process memory is the
amount
of virtual space
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OT]Re: Is better one or more Tomcat instances
per machine
Hmm perhaps I have a virtual memory limit. I have 1GB
of physical RAM. While allocating a 3GB heap is pretty
stupid for me, I still ought to be able to do it.
Hi,
If security is your main concern, you should really consider 2.6:
Technologies like AppArmor are are giving a lot of confidence.
And you have intrusion detection included.
And IMHO you have no long term alternative to using current and maintained
software.
R.
Am Dienstag, 13. März 2007
From: Andrew Miehs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OT]Re: Is better one or more Tomcat instances
per machine
Your kernel, and the things which are doing your process
switching need somewhere to run - if you switch them out
of your 4GB of virtual address space, how are they ever
From: Rahul Tandon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OutOfMemoryError
Caused by: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: unable to create new
native thread
I am checking vmstat at this time and see 3GB free memory.
You appear to have hit a limitiation on the number of threads you can
create
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hmm perhaps I have a virtual memory limit. I have 1GB
of physical RAM. While allocating a 3GB heap is pretty
stupid for me, I still ought to be able to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OT]Re: Is better one or more Tomcat instances
per machine
I don't think this has anything to do with hardware.
It does. To quote from the
I am using:
maxThreads=150 minSpareThreads=25 maxSpareThreads=75
Thanks,
Rahul Tandon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 11:52 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: OutOfMemoryError
From:
Heh - ask Murphy about that :)
just spawn a thread set priority high and loop forever.
At 10:23 3/14/2007, you wrote:
On 14/03/2007, at 3:17 PM, Peter Crowther wrote:
From: Leon Rosenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is no real advantage in multi-instancing.
A minor advantage is that if
Hi,
I am using following configuration:
Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 3 (Taroon Update 4)
4GB RAM
Tomcat version 5.5
Java version 1.5.0_06
. I am using CATALINA_OPTS -Xms512m -Xmx512m -Djava.awt.headless=true and
tomcat comes up fine and my http requests are processed
Curious with the talk about reliability.
Socket timouts will abort waiting on reads and writes that take too long.
But if lets say a servlet takes an overly long time to process
something without reading or writing, is there a high priority
watchdog thread in tomcat which will monitor how
From: Rahul Tandon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: OutOfMemoryError
maxThreads=150 minSpareThreads=25 maxSpareThreads=75
Doesn't seem excessive. What does ulimit say about your user process
virtual memory limit?
- Chuck
THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OT]Re: Is better one or more Tomcat instances
per machine
I guess that Linux not only does optimistic malloc, but also
optimistic calloc as well. I had hoped that zeroing-out the
memory would count as a write, but
Hello All,
Is there a simple way to get a list of the HttpSession objects
associated w/ a particular context? I know that I can send a request to
the Manager servlet, but I'm looking to get the objects themselves. I
need to examine each session for a particular attribute.
Thanks!
-- john
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OT]Re: Is better one or more Tomcat instances
per machine
I guess that Linux not only does optimistic malloc, but also
optimistic calloc as
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OT]Re: Is better one or more Tomcat instances
per machine
The fact remains that you can't allocate a VM heap bigger than around
1750MB on my 32-bit, 2.6 Linux kernel. Why not?
You have to wait for a full moon...
- Chuck
I have following output for ulimit -a
core file size(blocks, -c) unlimited
data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited
file size (blocks, -f) unlimited
max locked memory (kbytes, -l) 4
max memory size (kbytes, -m) unlimited
open files(-n) 1024
| From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Wednesday, 14 March, 2007 10:37
|
| The fact remains that you can't allocate a VM heap bigger than around
| 1750MB on my 32-bit, 2.6 Linux kernel. Why not?
If, as you stated earlier, you only have 1G of physical and 1G of virtual
Hi,
I've recently set up and updated to the latest package a Fedora Core 6
box on x86_64 hardware. I also installed tomcat5-5.5.17-6jpp.2 from the
Fedora Extras repository and java-1.5.0-ibm-1.5.0.4-1jpp from JPackage
and IBM.
Using the stock / default configuration files, I get the following
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tracy,
Nelson, Tracy M. wrote:
| From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Wednesday, 14 March, 2007 10:37
|
| The fact remains that you can't allocate a VM heap bigger than around
| 1750MB on my 32-bit, 2.6 Linux kernel. Why
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OT]Re: Is better one or more Tomcat instances
per machine
For instance, java -Xmx512M -Xms512M -version bombs on this little
box, even though the heap is pretty much never used.
The JVM requests all 512 MB at startup;
TC v6.0.10
I have a 'multi-level' path webapp that I'm deploying via a WAR. The
WAR is named download#file.war.
If I permit the WAR to unpack, it will deploy.
If I instruct it to stay packed it will not deploy, throwing the
exception below. When I manually create the dir download/file the
Hi,
I am one of the web developers for a company that uses java technology. I've
noticed my changes (jsp's) don't take into effect unless I remove the file
from the server, refesh the browsers like 5 times till i get a 404, then
place the new file back on the server.
I assume the changes dont
Hello,
I'm using tomcat 5.5.20 with jdk 1.5 under Kubuntu 6.10 (linux 2.6.17-10) with
no particular configuration.
When I make a request.getRemoteAddr() I receive an IPv6 address while I want
the IPv4.
Is this behaviour related to my environment (OS), jdk, tomcat or to some mis-
configuration ?
even if the server.xml file's reloadable is set to true?
reloadable=true in the Context param?
-Original Message-
From: Steveswt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 12:15 PM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Is there a better way to do this?
Hi,
I am one of
Also, are you performing an Ant build or some sort of a build to move the JSP
from your project dir to Tomcat's / webapps dir?
If you are, you can change that by keeping the project outside Tomcat, and only
specify the absolute path of your project in appBase/docBase in server.xml.
With the
From: Propes, Barry L [GCG-NAOT]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Is there a better way to do this?
even if the server.xml file's reloadable is set to true?
reloadable=true in the Context param?
The reloadable attribute does not control the monitoring of JSP changes.
That's set
| From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Wednesday, 14 March, 2007 12:05
|
| Perhaps, but the JVM actually refuses to start right away. In my eat
| all my memory tests, I was able to eat around 1.6GB before I brought my
| machine to a crawl. It took more than a minute for my
From: Pid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Multilevel webapp WAR won't start when packed
TC v6.0.10
I have a 'multi-level' path webapp that I'm deploying via a WAR. The
WAR is named download#file.war.
If I instruct it to stay packed it will not deploy, throwing the
exception
| From: jt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Tuesday, 13 March, 2007 13:11
|
| When I make a request.getRemoteAddr() I receive an IPv6 address while I
| want the IPv4.
Is the request coming across an IPv6 interface? If so, I don't know that
you can get an IPv4 address (without calling
Hi,
I'm using Tomcat 5.5.20. In the docs says You may define as many
*Context* elements as you wish
I'm going to design a new web application that will act as a kernel
for other lightweight webapps that will implement different services and
may be hot installed at any time. My plan
Diego Rodriguez wrote:
Hi,
I'm using Tomcat 5.5.20. In the docs says You may define as many
*Context* elements as you wish
I'm going to design a new web application that will act as a kernel
for other lightweight webapps that will implement different services
and may be hot
Diego--
This comes straight from the doc
Each Context definition must have a unique context path, which is defined by
the path attribute. The possible attributes for the Context element are
described below.
If you want to look at how one servlet can service multiple entities such as
modules
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Pid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Multilevel webapp WAR won't start when packed
TC v6.0.10
I have a 'multi-level' path webapp that I'm deploying via a WAR. The
WAR is named download#file.war.
If I instruct it to stay packed it will not deploy,
Greetings,
I'm trying to get the 1.2.21 JK connector working with IIS 6 and
TomCat 5.5. Thus far, I have not been successful. Is there anyone
out there who has successfully configured this? I have followed the
documentation to a 'T' and have been frigging around with this for
days
Hi,
This is embarrassing. Apparently yum install tomcat5 on Fedora doesn't
pull in all the packages I was (perhaps wrongfully) expecting. It turns
out I was missing the packages tomcat5-webapps and tomcat5-admin-webapps
A comparison of the stock tomcat.apache.org conf/ subdirectory versus
the
Hi there.
I am new to Tomcat and have installed Tomcat6 and JDK1.5 on Windows.
I get Tomcat to run and can include my own JSP's. However, whenever I
use classes like HashMap I get a compiler error (HashMap cannot be
resolved to a type).
I've dug all through the web, documentation and mail
Hello,
I am trying to setup a build.xml file for a servlet. I am using the
following 2 URL's as references:
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.0-doc/manager-howto.html#Executing%20Manager%20Commands%20With%20Ant
http://www.onjava.com/onjava/2003/01/08/examples/build.xml.html
So my problem is
might need an updated jar file for that.
Might have been included with one package earlier and is now in another one.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Hale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 2:29 PM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Classpath Problem
Hi there.
I
James Javaman wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to setup a build.xml file for a servlet. I am using the
following 2 URL's as references:
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.0-doc/manager-howto.html#Executing%20Manager%20Commands%20With%20Ant
Michael Clovis wrote:
Filip,
Great article. We were already having some memory issues using the
NIO connector in 6.0.10 yet REALLY need this functionality. Our quick
question is the following , can we in your estimation use the nightly
build of your code and apply to 6.0.10 until version 11
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tracy,
Nelson, Tracy M. wrote:
I imagine that when the JVM calls [cm]alloc, one of the first things alloc()
does is call sbrk() to expand your process' memory space. That'll fail
right away if you don't have enough VM available.
I do not
Apologies if this sounds insulting, but ... you did include
java.util.HashMap in your jsp, didn't you?
IE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] import=java.util .HashMap %
--David
Mark Hale wrote:
Hi there.
I am new to Tomcat and have installed Tomcat6 and JDK1.5 on Windows.
I get Tomcat to run and can
james.javaman wrote:
Hi Dan,
Thanks for your response. Let me just make sure I heard you right:
So I have a javac target in my build.xml file. It simply compiles code in
${source} and puts it in {$build}. You are suggesting that I point {$build}
to the Tomcat directory?
For example, since
LOL
You danced around that one well. Actually, I didn't include it
because I am migrating from WebLogic to Tomcat. WebLogic let's me get
away without the includes for java.util. I've been using Workshop for
so long I overlooked it.
That resolved it. Thank you David.
I will migrate to
I have noticed some funny behavior with 1.2.21 also...
We have tomcat hosting jira and jira is using the ntlm plugin for sso
authentication.
With 1.2.21 -
1. We are unable to use internet explorer to connect to jira(page cannot
be displayed error).
2. Firefox with the ntlm options turned on
Hi Dan,
Sorry if I’m being dense here, but how does the newly compiled code get into
$CATALINA_HOME/webapps/myWebApp?
I don’t see the part in your build.xml where the new changes (newly compiled
changes) make it to the Tomcat directory.
According to your response, ${build} can point
james.javaman wrote:
Hi Dan,
Sorry if I’m being dense here, but how does the newly compiled code get into
$CATALINA_HOME/webapps/myWebApp?
I don’t see the part in your build.xml where the new changes (newly compiled
changes) make it to the Tomcat directory.
According to your response,
Hello
I am running a very straightforward Tomcat on Windows
XP set up with everything as default settings
If I run ant list I get the error
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: protocol = http
host = null
I can't work out why - any chance of a few pointers?
thanks for any help
Richard
Tomcat
| From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Wednesday, 14 March, 2007 15:02
|
| In my tests on the larger machine, the JVM kindly tells me that it can't
| give me that much memory, rather than crashing and burning as I would
| expect after being tricked by the OS.
Perhaps the
On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 19:34 +0100, Gregor Schneider wrote:
I guess you're talking about JSSOSessionID-Cookie, right?
Indeed.
I believe the whole design is not too smart:
Since all webapps are sharing the same session, I'd store the needed
values as session-attributes (too lazy to look it
I recently installed Tomacat 6.0 and see that I now need to make my web
application privalaged in order to use InvokerServlet to allow users to
execute arbitrary servlets. This seems to continue a trend that may
eventually result in Invoker being widthdrawn.
My question is why is allowing
Hi, all
I've seen some postings regarding the tomcat5.exe executable for Windows
services. We are also running into the problem that we cannot use the
existing tomcat5.exe for setting up Tomcat as a service in Win 2003 on a
64-bit Intel box. We've tried the tomcat5.exe.amd64 file, but that
I am a newbee here but as a work around, I would think you could have
a master servlet and it could scan and load all the servlets in the
directory into a map, and then dispatch requests to them from /*
(having them properly initialized in another question)
I would be interested in the
http://tomcat.apache.org/faq/misc.html#evil
-Tim
Paul Mendelson wrote:
I recently installed Tomacat 6.0 and see that I now need to make my web
application privalaged in order to use InvokerServlet to allow users to
execute arbitrary servlets. This seems to continue a trend that may
Tim Funk wrote:
http://tomcat.apache.org/faq/misc.html#evil
-Tim
Paul Mendelson wrote:
I recently installed Tomacat 6.0 and see that I now need to make my
web application privalaged in order to use InvokerServlet to allow
users to execute arbitrary servlets. This seems to continue a trend
-Original Message-
From: Tim Funk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 8:39 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Rationale for makeing Invoker harder to user
http://tomcat.apache.org/faq/misc.html#evil
Keep in mind this opens with This is opinions of the
-Original Message-
From: John Cartwright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 11:47 AM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: list of session objects associated w/ a context
Hello All,
Is there a simple way to get a list of the HttpSession objects
associated
At 20:38 3/14/2007, you wrote:
http://tomcat.apache.org/faq/misc.html#evil
-Tim
All very good points escpecially since it will load classes outside
the webapps sandbox. Definately evil.
What I would probably do in the large # of servlets situation for a
single webapp during development is
Dear All,
I've already modified my program based on Mr. Christopher's solution but
thers's still the word null in the file.
You probably have a null content variable. String.valueOf(null) returns
null, so that's probably what's happening.
I only declared URL servletUrl = null but
Could anyone suggest me what is the following error related to.
error
at
org.apache.jasper.compiler.DefaultErrorHandler.javacError(DefaultErrorHandle
r.java:85)
at
org.apache.jasper.compiler.ErrorDispatcher.javacError(ErrorDispatcher.java:2
48)
at
Hi,
We want to configure an application in Tomcat 5.5.23 with FORM authentication.
Q : How to configure it for users without any role being assigned to a user ?
Rakesh Kumar
-
To start a new topic, e-mail:
I am using servlet. How to open a window in a new session?
I tried javascript
onclick=window.open(...)
but the opened window belongs to the same servlet session (see from user
login name).
Thanks for help!
David
-
Never
88 matches
Mail list logo
