at 3:31 PM, Scott Swank scott.sw...@gmail.com wrote:
I suspect that articles on broadly read sites, such as theserverside
dzone are significant vectors.
Scott
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Ricky ricky...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am interested in knowing as to how does a framework
Hi,
I am interested in knowing as to how does a framework reach its potential
developers in open source, for example Wicket, it started out and so how do
people know about it?
1.) Is it that person A tells person B tells person C sort of chain?
2.) Or is it well planned out? if so how?
Just
, they are inner classes of
Component so they dont have to specify that extra name..
Its just verbose. Also those 2 are protected final but i think they could
be
private if you ask me.
So they are just internal
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 02:49, Ricky ricky...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
This concerns
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2187
done. thank you.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Ricky ricky...@gmail.com wrote:
thanks, i'll create a JIRA issue and submit a patch tonight, appreciate
your time!
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Johan Compagner jcompag...@gmail.comwrote
.
Regards
Vyas, Anirudh
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Ricky ricky...@gmail.com wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2187
done. thank you.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Ricky ricky...@gmail.com wrote:
thanks, i'll create a JIRA issue and submit a patch tonight, appreciate
Hi,
This concerns Wicket Version : 1.4-rc2
In componentModelChange class, we see the following :
@Override
public String toString()
{
return ComponentModelChange[component: + getPath() + ];
}
ComponentModelChange[ piece of it, in toString( )
or better have a something like IChangeCLUSTERABLE extends IClusterable,
that would simply the change component type hierarchy and make our naming
conventions more apparent ... is that a valid opinion?
Regards
Vyas, Anirudh
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 9:49 PM, Ricky ricky...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Cant you enforce that in POM file (what version to use) so it doesn't
proceed at all ... (use jdk 5 or fail).
Regards
Vyas, Anirudh
On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Martijn Dashorst martijn.dasho...@gmail.com
wrote:
maven.test.skip=true was the first I needed to remember, so it is hard
to get
umm ... there is a -DdownloadJavaDocs=true ... u can use that too.
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 4:58 AM, Martijn Dashorst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this is not for including javadoc, this is for generating it. Pieter
wants to use the javadoc/source bundles we provide in the maven
repository.
mvn
I don't know if i should speak up amongst elite group of people discussing,
but hey i'll try ... :)
From what i understand most people have issues with readability of generics;
but as i have indicated time and again as java improves and generic types
become reified; and java becomes inferred
Hi,
Is there any reason getObject and setObject were not made final in Model
class? the reason why i am asking is that there might be the case when
people misuse this; for example (and i have seen this at my current
workplace);
Model xModel = new Model(new Long(1)) {
Hi,
My question has probably been asked before, but i just need some
clarification. This is pertinent from an architectural perspective. Are
pages, panels only holders of state for components or wicket models? Should
*ANY* logic (business, UI, Validation) be added directly to the pages? or
should
While using crystal report viewer to display reports; I use a method
getHtmlContent( ) which calls getWriter( ) on response, however as far as
i can make out, Wicket by default uses getOutputStream( ) on response,
therefore when getHtmlContent( ) is called on report view while displaying
report
for this?
Appreciate your help!
Rick
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 6:28 PM, Ricky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll give it a shot and see how it goes, thanks for your help Igor
appreciate it!
Regards
Vyas, Anirudh
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 3:03 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
my advice to you, if you
I enjoyed MEAP, and i like how slick and colorful ( ;=) ) it looks right
now, i havent gone through the whole thing to know what are the major
changes if any from MEAP. IMHO this is a great book, although i'd love to
see a part ii (i dont know how soon that would be considering the effort it
took
Hey,
so you've got a class CreateUser which is a factory that creates an Edit
Page? The name would be misleading i think. You could have something like
PageFactoryCONTAINERMODEL, CONTANER extends MarkupContainer, MODEL
extends IModel? (i kept capture (?) just as an example) and throw in a
create
to pull out the output from
that.
-igor
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 11:51 AM, Ricky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Igor,
Thanks for replying again and bearing with me, appreciate your help.
Here is what i have so far :
===
public static
Hi,
I was looking at Feedback Message and the levels defined as integers, in
move to Wicket 1.4, can we have an enumeration (or a class) like
FeedbackMessageLevel, here's the example :
public enum FeedbackMessageLevel{
// Debug level
DEBUG(100),
// Error level
ERROR (400),
// fatal level
Menu is a good idea! I worked on this piece a little bit, (Took some cues
from Swing menu component), but i hit a dead end with keeping markup
consistent. Probably because i dont know wicket well enough; But i am pretty
sure it will be a good add on!.
Rick
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 2:36 AM, [EMAIL
--- DataProviderForModelMODEL -- Biz
tier --- DAO tier.
Is that the right thinking?
Rick
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 8:48 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
whats wrong with passing models around?
-igor
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Ricky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
May be i am reading too much
() {
public appendingatringbuffer filter(appendingstringbuffer responsebuffer)
{
return responsebuffer.append(!-- generated at: +new Date()+ --);
}
}
that is an example filter that adds a comment at the end of the html
-igor
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Ricky [EMAIL PROTECTED
PROTECTED]
wrote:
see IResponseFilter.
as far as spitting out text, wicket works with xml not plain text. but
if you call setrenderbodyonly(true) on all components there wont be
any xml tags left in the output.
-igor
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 8:20 AM, Ricky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I
Hi,
I have two questions (related) :
1.) Is there a way in wicket to get Not the raw markup but markup
*AFTER*the actual data has been inserted? (meaning the final HTML as
we see it on
the page?).
2.) Similar to above scenario, can you use container to spit out markup in
some other form, for
Hi,
My apologies I did not follow up on this. I
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 1:29 PM, greeklinux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
reading the docs of ByteArrayResource I do not think it is dynamic.
The generated resource is in memory.
greetings
Ricky-22 wrote:
Hi,
I want to be able
ByteArrayOutputStream to get my data dynamically. I'll post the code
tommorrow, when i get to office.
Regards
Vyas, Anirudh
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 8:25 PM, Ricky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
My apologies I did not follow up on this. I
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 1:29 PM, greeklinux [EMAIL
orginally said by Martijn:
We don't say that, but without the core committers, you won't have a
framework. Treat us gently and you'll get a lot done. :D
Ok, Please, can we generify components? :D
I have already stated my opinion, but i think we should not really be
bothered about generic
Hi,
I want to be able to generate the byteArray (for MS - Excel report being
passed to a byteArrayResource every time the resource link is clicked. I was
trying to use getCacheDuration( ) for the same to allow for it to create
ByteArray every time the resource link is clicked on the page.
I have
Data View I have another refreshing view
createNestedDataView(NestedBackingModelListForPerspective);
Thanks
Rick
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 8:20 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
paste your code
-igor
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Ricky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
My page
Hi,
I know I have asked this question couple of times now, but is there a
fixed release date on this yet? sorry if it sounds like a duplicate
question; but we are being pushed to raise the concern over and over; Using
a 1.3-SNAPSHOT is not really a great idea, because if something changes at
I may be the dumb kid on the block, but why do we need to override
setModel and getModel( ) once it has already been done in Component class? (
meaning just have it in component class and then let all subclasses use the
same methods?)
Am i missing something?
Rick
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 2:49 PM,
OK, thanks for your response guys. appreciate it; I understand that it is a
time consuming process and also takes time to check if release has any
impacts etc. I guess we'll have to go with 1.3-SNAPSHOT for now.
Thanks,
Rick
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:39 AM, Martijn Dashorst
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't know if i was clear enough, sorry about that.
I meant if you have something like :
public ComponentMODEL extends IMODELID, ID extends Serializable{
// getter here
public MODEL getModel() { }
// setter here
public void setModel(final MODEL model){ }
}
then, you don't have to do
we are trying to avoid - having generics in
Component.
-Matej
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 6:19 PM, Ricky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know if i was clear enough, sorry about that.
I meant if you have something like :
public ComponentMODEL extends IMODELID, ID extends Serializable
:13 AM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
you dont actually show how you feed data to these dataviews. my guess
is that you cache the data you feed them and that is why it doesnt
refresh.
-igor
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 6:41 AM, Ricky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, I have tried to keep
Hi,
My page class consists of :
1.) Panel -A 2.) Panel - B.
Just for FYI - Panel A has Refreshing View and a refreshing view nested
within it (nested tables).
When I do a refresh (F5 or simple refresh clicked on browser) on a page, and
nothing seems to happen and all data that was present is
, Jun 5, 2008 at 7:39 PM, Sam Barnum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ricky, what are you using as the model for your refreshing view?
You should be using some sort of detachable model that re-fetches the
items
for the list from the DB each time.
--
Sam Barnum
360 Works
http://www
guys.
Rick
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Ricky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the help guys, but still cannot make it to work =(
Rick
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 3:22 AM, Maurice Marrink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If that does not work you can also force the list to recreate all
items
Hey,
This is fixed 1.4-m1 and 1.3.4 (to be released at some point, I am not sure
when).
Rick
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Michael Mehrle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am seeing the following problem with several AutoCompleteTextFields on
different pages:
When I type a letter and the menu
Use SNAPSHOT
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 8:17 PM, Michael Mehrle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Where can I get a build of 1.3.4, so I can test this?
Michael
-Original Message-
From: Ricky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 2:47 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re
err 1.3-SNAPSHOT for now, or 1.4-m1.
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 11:20 PM, Ricky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Use SNAPSHOT
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 8:17 PM, Michael Mehrle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Where can I get a build of 1.3.4, so I can test this?
Michael
-Original Message-
From
Hi,
I have a RefreshingView which has a delete button in it (this deletes the
model present in the backing list for the view.) The problem is that when a
delete is performed on DB, (see onSubmit( ) for
*deletePlanObjectiveDetailButton
below) *the size of the list changes, Is there a way to
Hi,
Is there an estimated release date for Wicket 1.3.4 or for 1.3-SNAPSHOT ?
Regards,
Vyas, Anirudh
Thanks. I meant 1.3 - SNAPSHOT being finalized to a release version.
appreciate your response.
--
Regards
Vyas, Anirudh
|| ॐ ||
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Frank Bille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1.3.4 is sometime this week.
Frank
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 6:58 PM, Ricky [EMAIL PROTECTED
[X ] Can best be done like currently in the 1.4 branch, where models
and components are both generified. I care most about the improved
static type checking generified models and components give Wicket.
I think generifying Components give more clarity (Don't blame Wicket for
Messed up Generic
wow this has a pattern for sure doesn't it ? ;)
Rick
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 7:25 PM, Matthew Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[X] Can best be done in a limited fashion, where we only generify
IModel but not components. I care more about what generifying can do
for API clarity (declaring a
Hi,
I am trying to add a behavior to my autoComplete text field, where if i
press enter, it should be able to run a default search (with some text
input) and display a list of possible choices);
is it possible with autoComplete.add(new AjaxBehavior() {
@Override
public
the form (default is to just populate
the
box), is this what you mean? unfortunatly to do this you need to hack the
wicket-autocomplete.js at the point where the enter key is pressed and ad
some manual javascript to do what you want.
Richard
Ricky-22 wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to add
Hi,
The AutoCompleteTextField doesn't seemed to be fixed for corrupt IE behavior
in wicket 1.4-m1 release; Can someone confirm this ? If so, any ideas as to
when this issue will be addressed or fixed ?
Thanks and appreciate your time.
Rick
Hi,
In Firefox 2.x, when i type on AutoCompleteTextField; I am presented with
list of possible choices, But when i select one of possible candidates on
the list using a mouse, the Page scrolls down to the bottom (and so i can
only see the last choice from the list of possible choices) , and so
Hi,
I am trying to get a model object when an autocomplete selection is made;
but model object comes back as a string rather than the model that was
selected. Is there a way to get the selected Model (Actor) in the example
below ?
final AutoCompleteTextField actorAutoComplete = new
for autocomplete
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 12:29 PM, Ricky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to get a model object when an autocomplete selection is
made;
but model object comes back as a string rather than the model that was
selected. Is there a way to get the selected Model (Actor
Hi,
I am trying to look for 1.3.2 example? (I am using 1.3.3. for auto complete
feature, its working fine with Firefox 2 but with IE it goes Wiggy). Can
someone point me where is 1.3.2 example ?
Regards
Vyas, Anirudh
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Vatroslav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is 1.3.4 release out yet?
Rick
, Ricky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is 1.3.4 release out yet?
Rick
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I have implemented autocomplete using 1.3.3. examples in wicket stuff. It
is working fine in firefox, however doesnt work in IE. Is there a fix for
this ? Is scriptaculous thing the answer ? if so can someone point me to the
example source or give me a rough idea ?
thanks
Rick
at 3:50 PM, Ricky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have implemented autocomplete using 1.3.3. examples in wicket stuff.
It
is working fine in firefox, however doesnt work in IE. Is there a fix
for
this ? Is scriptaculous thing the answer ? if so can someone point me to
the
example
Great thanks!!! saved me some work :)
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Gerolf Seitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
to quote johan, maybe in about 1-2 weeks.
Gerolf
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 7:34 PM, Ricky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But there isn't a 1.3.4 in very near future is it ?
Btw
Can someone post some code on this ? (only rough sketch ... nothing
elaborate really.
Thanks in advance.
Rick
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 8:54 PM, John Krasnay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi RG,
You probably want to look at how DataTable in wicket-extensions works.
The idea is you set up an array
Hey Mike,
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/newuserguide.html#Newuserguide-UnitTest
^^ try that. I tried adding whatever i know (bear in mind, i am new to
wicket so my knowledge is limited to whatever i have experienced so far, i
hope this helps ).
Thanks,
Rick
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 10:51 AM,
Hi,
question : you said : (I'm inside a form, so I don't want to use a panel).
(it may sound stupid, but had to ask)
Why is that ?
Rick
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 6:09 PM, Michael Mehrle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Good idea and it worked! :-)
Thanks, I feel silly for not thinking of this
()));
}
jk
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 09:25:41PM -0400, Ricky wrote:
Can someone post some code on this ? (only rough sketch ... nothing
elaborate really.
Thanks in advance.
Rick
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 8:54 PM, John Krasnay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi RG,
You probably want
Those people who do are still in struts 1.x mode. And thats what ... ? 85%
of the commercial java world ? ... i hear lots of those are moving to JSF
... **sigh** =(
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been surprised that we have not had a single
AM, Ricky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to test drop down values in a list using WicketTester ... like is
there wicketTester.assertXXX or something that i could use ? I tried
getTagByWicketId(some_thing_).getValue() but it only gives me the HTML
for
it ...
my drop down is something
63 matches
Mail list logo
