+1 for wicket-candi :)
All,
I've run into a problem. I'd like to start up a project to integrate
the new WebBeans Specification (JSR-299) based on the Apache
OpenWebBeans project
(http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html)
in the Apache Incubator. Unfortunately, there already exists a
project
James Carman wrote:
All,
I've run into a problem. I'd like to start up a project to integrate
the new WebBeans Specification (JSR-299) based on the Apache
OpenWebBeans project
(http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/1.0.0-SNAPSHOT/index.html)
in the Apache Incubator. Unfortunately, there
a
wicket-webbeans project.
Is wicketwebbeans project active currently? It looks like it's still using
wicket 1.3...
I don't know, but it's a pretty popular framework.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
If the original WWB project isn't active - I don't think it would be a
problem to take over the name.
If there is a problem with doing that, what about wicket-openwebbeans?
Or, in wicketstuff-core, we have removed the wicket- from all names
because it was redundant. Make your groupId
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Jeremy Thomerson
jer...@wickettraining.com wrote:
If the original WWB project isn't active - I don't think it would be a
problem to take over the name.
If there is a problem with doing that, what about wicket-openwebbeans?
OpenWebBeans is the name of the
On Thu, 2009-03-19 at 10:01 -0500, Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
If the original WWB project isn't active - I don't think it would be a
problem to take over the name.
If there is a problem with doing that, what about wicket-openwebbeans?
Or, in wicketstuff-core, we have removed the wicket- from
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Martin Grotzke
martin.grot...@javakaffee.de wrote:
Just for consideration: this would create a jar like webbeans-1.4.jar
which would be confusing...
Right, that's why I stuck with wicket-webbeans. :)
On Thu, 2009-03-19 at 11:53 -0400, James Carman wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Martin Grotzke
martin.grot...@javakaffee.de wrote:
Just for consideration: this would create a jar like webbeans-1.4.jar
which would be confusing...
Right, that's why I stuck with wicket-webbeans. :)
The Wicket Web Beans project (wicketwebbeans) is active, but it has nothing
to do with the Web Beans JSR. Whatever name you choose is fine by me, but
you probably want to prevent confusion. I'd say having two projects or two
jars both with webbeans in the name would be confusing.
Is that JSR
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Dan Syrstad dsyrs...@ener-j.org wrote:
Is that JSR still kicking?
I would think so. The OpenWebBeans project is active.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For
) sometime next week, and starting a port to W 1.4 shortly after, with
a release expected after W 1.4 goes final.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-WebBeans-Project...-tp22601152p22604311.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive
: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-WebBeans-Project...-tp22601152p22605336.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
I just overheard that webbeans (the spec) has been renamed:
http://www.jroller.com/Solomon/entry/it_s_official_web_beans
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:12 PM, James Carman
ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote:
All,
I've run into a problem. I'd like to start up a project to integrate
the new WebBeans
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/RevisedPublicDraftOfJSR299JavaContextsAndDependencyInjection
So now we'll have to come up with another name: wicket-jcadi,
wicket-cadi, wicket-candi ?
Martijn
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
I just overheard
Awesome! Now we can have:
groupId: org.apache.wicket
artifactId: wicket-java-contexts-and-dependency-injection
Just think of the convenient package naming:
org.apache.wicket.extensions.java-contexts-and-dependency-injection.foo.bar
:)
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On
I want candi! I like it.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Martijn Dashorst
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/RevisedPublicDraftOfJSR299JavaContextsAndDependencyInjection
So now we'll have to come up with another name: wicket-jcadi,
wicket-cadi, wicket-candi ?
+1 for wicket-candi !! ;-)
18 matches
Mail list logo
