Re: Wicket Date Field Validation

[Matthias Keller]

Rao Archana (HCTM/ETA) wrote:

Hi,

I am working on date fields and have problems with the validation. I
have referred to the link below which helped me.

http://www.nabble.com/Strict-4-digit-year-for-DateTextField--td18656889.
html


So I have subclassed the PatternDateConverter and have set the pattern
as,
dateFormat = "^(\\d{1,2})/(\\d{1,2})/(\\d{4})$";

I have 2 date fields, start_date and end_date. The start_date is a
required field and the end_date is not.
(...)
This works fine ie it does not allow entry of "03/03/09" or
"03/03/-2009"

BUT, the end_date becomes a required field. I have to enter the end_date
to click 'Save'. Else it complains that an invalid date has been
entered.
But my end_date is not a required field.
(...)
  
Possibly the simplest approach would be to use a regular expression that 
allows an empty string like making the whole expression optional by 
surrounding it with paranthesis and adding the optional operator '?' 
after it. This allows the empty string OR a valid date but nothing else:

dateFormat = "^((\\d{1,2})/(\\d{1,2})/(\\d{4}))?$";

Matt

--
matthias.kel...@ergon.ch  +41 44 268 83 98
Ergon Informatik AG, Kleinstrasse 15, CH-8008 Zürich
http://www.ergon.ch
__
e r g o nsmart people - smart software




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Wicket Date Field Validation

[Rao Archana (HCTM/ETA)]

Hi,

I am working on date fields and have problems with the validation. I
have referred to the link below which helped me.

http://www.nabble.com/Strict-4-digit-year-for-DateTextField--td18656889.
html


So I have subclassed the PatternDateConverter and have set the pattern
as,
dateFormat = "^(\\d{1,2})/(\\d{1,2})/(\\d{4})$";

I have 2 date fields, start_date and end_date. The start_date is a
required field and the end_date is not.

 some code

pdc = new
StrictPatternDateConverter(DateUtil.getDateFormatOnLocale(getLocale()),
false);

 more code

startDateField = DateTextField.withConverter("startDate", new
PropertyModel(this, "startDate"), pdc);
startDateField.add(new TMPDatePicker());
form.add(startDateField);
endDateField = DateTextField.withConverter("endDate", new
PropertyModel(this, "endDate"), pdc);
endDateField.add(new TMPDatePicker());
form.add(endDateField);

 more code

This works fine ie it does not allow entry of "03/03/09" or
"03/03/-2009"

BUT, the end_date becomes a required field. I have to enter the end_date
to click 'Save'. Else it complains that an invalid date has been
entered.
But my end_date is not a required field.

So if I replace it with,

endDateField = DateTextField.forDatePattern("endDate",
DateUtil.getDateFormatOnLocale(getLocale()));
endDateField.withConverter("endDate", pdc);
endDateField.add(new TMPDatePicker());

It allows, "03/03/-2009" and "03/03/09". Why does it allow the '-' sign.
It computes it to a value and displays a year.

My application has several date fields and I need to validate them.

I am a newbie to Wicket and have looked up the archive quite a bit to
find a solution.
Can someone please tell me a solution to my date validation problem?

Thanks very much

Re: Conversation scope in wicket

[James Carman]

I will.  I'm just keeping notes on what all listeners I'd like to see. :)


On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 1:08 AM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> jira it up.
>
> -igor
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:44 PM, James
> Carman wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:38 AM, Igor Vaynberg  
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> you are free to implement this as an open source addition to wicket.
>>> there is wicketstuff or googlecode or sf.net where you can host it.
>>>
>>> wicket is a ui framework and conversational scope management falls
>>> outside wicket's scope. it is our job to provide the hooks to make
>>> such things possible, not to provide an implementation.
>>
>> And, those hooks are very nice.  I would only ask for some more
>> listener registering opportunities (like for listening to request
>> cycle events like begin/end rather than having to implement your own
>> request cycle).
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Conversation scope in wicket

[Igor Vaynberg]

jira it up.

-igor

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:44 PM, James
Carman wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:38 AM, Igor Vaynberg  
> wrote:
>>
>> you are free to implement this as an open source addition to wicket.
>> there is wicketstuff or googlecode or sf.net where you can host it.
>>
>> wicket is a ui framework and conversational scope management falls
>> outside wicket's scope. it is our job to provide the hooks to make
>> such things possible, not to provide an implementation.
>
> And, those hooks are very nice.  I would only ask for some more
> listener registering opportunities (like for listening to request
> cycle events like begin/end rather than having to implement your own
> request cycle).
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Conversation scope in wicket

[James Carman]

On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:38 AM, Igor Vaynberg  wrote:
>
> you are free to implement this as an open source addition to wicket.
> there is wicketstuff or googlecode or sf.net where you can host it.
>
> wicket is a ui framework and conversational scope management falls
> outside wicket's scope. it is our job to provide the hooks to make
> such things possible, not to provide an implementation.

And, those hooks are very nice.  I would only ask for some more
listener registering opportunities (like for listening to request
cycle events like begin/end rather than having to implement your own
request cycle).

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Conversation scope in wicket

[Igor Vaynberg]

you are free to implement this as an open source addition to wicket.
there is wicketstuff or googlecode or sf.net where you can host it.

wicket is a ui framework and conversational scope management falls
outside wicket's scope. it is our job to provide the hooks to make
such things possible, not to provide an implementation.

-igor

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:36 PM, Joe Fawzy wrote:
> Hiyou mean: injecting webbeans conversation component in wicket component at
> construction time
> this is only what we can achieve with webbeans, as wicket component cannot
> be webbeans components (wicket is unmanaged framework)
> my idea is about native conversation support, which enable wicket component
> to be the component and the target for injection in a natural wicket way
> beside, why depending on external project when we have all the functionality
> we need as wicket is stateful and each pagemap is a conversation(long one
> which may be easily break down to smaller pieces)
>
> Joe
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 7:22 AM, James Carman
> wrote:
>
>> There are a few folks working on implementing JSR-299 support for Wicket,
>> which would provide support for conversation-scoped beans.  I'm working on
>> one currently and I believe that the jboss folks have one working too.
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:08 AM, Joe Fawzy  wrote:
>>
>> > Hican this functionality added to the standard wicket?
>> > actually much of seam popularity came from supporting conversation
>> > scope...,
>> > so i think that adding explicit wicket support will have momentum
>> > i think that having just a store for conversation objects will be a good
>> > begin
>> > then we may add apis like beginConversation, endConversation
>> > ,joinConversation,mergeConversation
>> ,suspendConversation,resumeConversation
>> > and other concepts like workspace
>> > what do u think?
>> > Joe
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Igor Vaynberg > > >wrote:
>> >
>> > > only time will tell
>> > >
>> > > -igor
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Joe Fawzy
>> wrote:
>> > > > thanks dearwill wicket continue to support pageMap beyond 1.4 or it
>> is
>> > > now a
>> > > > deprecated feature?
>> > > > thanks
>> > > > Joe
>> > > >
>> > > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Igor Vaynberg <
>> > igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
>> > > >wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> if the scope of your conversation is a browser window then its the
>> > best
>> > > >> choice.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> -igor
>> > > >>
>> > > >> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Joe Fawzy
>> > wrote:
>> > > >> > Hi dearthanks for the reply and for the code snippet
>> > > >> > But, do u think that using pageMap is reliable or what
>> > > >> > i mean , is using pageMap is a good solution or just a hack, work
>> > > around
>> > > >> > thanks
>> > > >> > Joe
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Igor Vaynberg <
>> > > igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
>> > > >> >wrote:
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >> class mysession extends websesison {
>> > > >> >>  private map> coversations;
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >>  public map getconversation(ipagemap pmap) {
>> > > >> >>        return conversations.get(pmap.getid());
>> > > >> >>  }
>> > > >> >> }
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >> -igor
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Joe Fawzy
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >> >> > Hi alli need to implement something like a conversation scope
>> in
>> > > >> wicket
>> > > >> >> > i know that wicket is stateful by default and i can pass object
>> o
>> > > from
>> > > >> >> page
>> > > >> >> > A -> page B
>> > > >> >> > But if Object o in page A which -> page B -> page C -> page D
>> ->
>> > > page
>> > > >> E
>> > > >> >> > and i need Object o in page E ,that will be very tedious to
>> pass
>> > o
>> > > all
>> > > >> >> > throught the way from A > ..E
>> > > >> >> > also if i need to pass a large number of objects between a set
>> of
>> > > >> pages
>> > > >> >> > ,this will be a nightmare
>> > > >> >> >
>> > > >> >> > so How can i implement a Conversation object ala Session and
>> > store
>> > > >> these
>> > > >> >> > objects there
>> > > >> >> >
>> > > >> >> > i thought of using the IPageMap as a key in this situation as
>> it
>> > > >> >> represent
>> > > >> >> > an open browser window or tab ie. conversation, but in a
>> previous
>> > > mail
>> > > >> ,i
>> > > >> >> > 've been tald that it cannot be extended easily, and i cannot
>> > > provide
>> > > >> my
>> > > >> >> own
>> > > >> >> > factory for one
>> > > >> >> >
>> > > >> >> > so, any ideas about the conversation scope?
>> > > >> >> > what do u think about the pageMap ? will it work? is it
>> reliable?
>> > > >> >> > can the core team provide some hooks to implement something
>> like
>> > > >> >> > IPageMapFactory?
>> > > >> >> >
>> > > >> >> > thanks
>> > > >> >> > Joe
>> > > >> >> >
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >>
>> > -
>> > > >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>> 

Re: Conversation scope in wicket

[Joe Fawzy]

Hiyou mean: injecting webbeans conversation component in wicket component at
construction time
this is only what we can achieve with webbeans, as wicket component cannot
be webbeans components (wicket is unmanaged framework)
my idea is about native conversation support, which enable wicket component
to be the component and the target for injection in a natural wicket way
beside, why depending on external project when we have all the functionality
we need as wicket is stateful and each pagemap is a conversation(long one
which may be easily break down to smaller pieces)

Joe


On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 7:22 AM, James Carman
wrote:

> There are a few folks working on implementing JSR-299 support for Wicket,
> which would provide support for conversation-scoped beans.  I'm working on
> one currently and I believe that the jboss folks have one working too.
>
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:08 AM, Joe Fawzy  wrote:
>
> > Hican this functionality added to the standard wicket?
> > actually much of seam popularity came from supporting conversation
> > scope...,
> > so i think that adding explicit wicket support will have momentum
> > i think that having just a store for conversation objects will be a good
> > begin
> > then we may add apis like beginConversation, endConversation
> > ,joinConversation,mergeConversation
> ,suspendConversation,resumeConversation
> > and other concepts like workspace
> > what do u think?
> > Joe
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Igor Vaynberg  > >wrote:
> >
> > > only time will tell
> > >
> > > -igor
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Joe Fawzy
> wrote:
> > > > thanks dearwill wicket continue to support pageMap beyond 1.4 or it
> is
> > > now a
> > > > deprecated feature?
> > > > thanks
> > > > Joe
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Igor Vaynberg <
> > igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
> > > >wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> if the scope of your conversation is a browser window then its the
> > best
> > > >> choice.
> > > >>
> > > >> -igor
> > > >>
> > > >> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Joe Fawzy
> > wrote:
> > > >> > Hi dearthanks for the reply and for the code snippet
> > > >> > But, do u think that using pageMap is reliable or what
> > > >> > i mean , is using pageMap is a good solution or just a hack, work
> > > around
> > > >> > thanks
> > > >> > Joe
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Igor Vaynberg <
> > > igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
> > > >> >wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> >> class mysession extends websesison {
> > > >> >>  private map> coversations;
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>  public map getconversation(ipagemap pmap) {
> > > >> >>return conversations.get(pmap.getid());
> > > >> >>  }
> > > >> >> }
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> -igor
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Joe Fawzy
> > > wrote:
> > > >> >> > Hi alli need to implement something like a conversation scope
> in
> > > >> wicket
> > > >> >> > i know that wicket is stateful by default and i can pass object
> o
> > > from
> > > >> >> page
> > > >> >> > A -> page B
> > > >> >> > But if Object o in page A which -> page B -> page C -> page D
> ->
> > > page
> > > >> E
> > > >> >> > and i need Object o in page E ,that will be very tedious to
> pass
> > o
> > > all
> > > >> >> > throught the way from A > ..E
> > > >> >> > also if i need to pass a large number of objects between a set
> of
> > > >> pages
> > > >> >> > ,this will be a nightmare
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> > so How can i implement a Conversation object ala Session and
> > store
> > > >> these
> > > >> >> > objects there
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> > i thought of using the IPageMap as a key in this situation as
> it
> > > >> >> represent
> > > >> >> > an open browser window or tab ie. conversation, but in a
> previous
> > > mail
> > > >> ,i
> > > >> >> > 've been tald that it cannot be extended easily, and i cannot
> > > provide
> > > >> my
> > > >> >> own
> > > >> >> > factory for one
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> > so, any ideas about the conversation scope?
> > > >> >> > what do u think about the pageMap ? will it work? is it
> reliable?
> > > >> >> > can the core team provide some hooks to implement something
> like
> > > >> >> > IPageMapFactory?
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> > thanks
> > > >> >> > Joe
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > -
> > > >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> > > >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> -
> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> > > For additional commands

Re: Conversation scope in wicket

[James Carman]

There are a few folks working on implementing JSR-299 support for Wicket,
which would provide support for conversation-scoped beans.  I'm working on
one currently and I believe that the jboss folks have one working too.

On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:08 AM, Joe Fawzy  wrote:

> Hican this functionality added to the standard wicket?
> actually much of seam popularity came from supporting conversation
> scope...,
> so i think that adding explicit wicket support will have momentum
> i think that having just a store for conversation objects will be a good
> begin
> then we may add apis like beginConversation, endConversation
> ,joinConversation,mergeConversation ,suspendConversation,resumeConversation
> and other concepts like workspace
> what do u think?
> Joe
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Igor Vaynberg  >wrote:
>
> > only time will tell
> >
> > -igor
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Joe Fawzy wrote:
> > > thanks dearwill wicket continue to support pageMap beyond 1.4 or it is
> > now a
> > > deprecated feature?
> > > thanks
> > > Joe
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Igor Vaynberg <
> igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >> if the scope of your conversation is a browser window then its the
> best
> > >> choice.
> > >>
> > >> -igor
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Joe Fawzy
> wrote:
> > >> > Hi dearthanks for the reply and for the code snippet
> > >> > But, do u think that using pageMap is reliable or what
> > >> > i mean , is using pageMap is a good solution or just a hack, work
> > around
> > >> > thanks
> > >> > Joe
> > >> >
> > >> > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Igor Vaynberg <
> > igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
> > >> >wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> class mysession extends websesison {
> > >> >>  private map> coversations;
> > >> >>
> > >> >>  public map getconversation(ipagemap pmap) {
> > >> >>return conversations.get(pmap.getid());
> > >> >>  }
> > >> >> }
> > >> >>
> > >> >> -igor
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Joe Fawzy
> > wrote:
> > >> >> > Hi alli need to implement something like a conversation scope in
> > >> wicket
> > >> >> > i know that wicket is stateful by default and i can pass object o
> > from
> > >> >> page
> > >> >> > A -> page B
> > >> >> > But if Object o in page A which -> page B -> page C -> page D ->
> > page
> > >> E
> > >> >> > and i need Object o in page E ,that will be very tedious to pass
> o
> > all
> > >> >> > throught the way from A > ..E
> > >> >> > also if i need to pass a large number of objects between a set of
> > >> pages
> > >> >> > ,this will be a nightmare
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > so How can i implement a Conversation object ala Session and
> store
> > >> these
> > >> >> > objects there
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > i thought of using the IPageMap as a key in this situation as it
> > >> >> represent
> > >> >> > an open browser window or tab ie. conversation, but in a previous
> > mail
> > >> ,i
> > >> >> > 've been tald that it cannot be extended easily, and i cannot
> > provide
> > >> my
> > >> >> own
> > >> >> > factory for one
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > so, any ideas about the conversation scope?
> > >> >> > what do u think about the pageMap ? will it work? is it reliable?
> > >> >> > can the core team provide some hooks to implement something like
> > >> >> > IPageMapFactory?
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > thanks
> > >> >> > Joe
> > >> >> >
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> -
> > >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> > >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> -
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> >
> >
>

Re: Conversation scope in wicket

[Joe Fawzy]

Hican this functionality added to the standard wicket?
actually much of seam popularity came from supporting conversation scope...,
so i think that adding explicit wicket support will have momentum
i think that having just a store for conversation objects will be a good
begin
then we may add apis like beginConversation, endConversation
,joinConversation,mergeConversation ,suspendConversation,resumeConversation
and other concepts like workspace
what do u think?
Joe


On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:

> only time will tell
>
> -igor
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Joe Fawzy wrote:
> > thanks dearwill wicket continue to support pageMap beyond 1.4 or it is
> now a
> > deprecated feature?
> > thanks
> > Joe
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Igor Vaynberg  >wrote:
> >
> >> if the scope of your conversation is a browser window then its the best
> >> choice.
> >>
> >> -igor
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Joe Fawzy wrote:
> >> > Hi dearthanks for the reply and for the code snippet
> >> > But, do u think that using pageMap is reliable or what
> >> > i mean , is using pageMap is a good solution or just a hack, work
> around
> >> > thanks
> >> > Joe
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Igor Vaynberg <
> igor.vaynb...@gmail.com
> >> >wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> class mysession extends websesison {
> >> >>  private map> coversations;
> >> >>
> >> >>  public map getconversation(ipagemap pmap) {
> >> >>return conversations.get(pmap.getid());
> >> >>  }
> >> >> }
> >> >>
> >> >> -igor
> >> >>
> >> >> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Joe Fawzy
> wrote:
> >> >> > Hi alli need to implement something like a conversation scope in
> >> wicket
> >> >> > i know that wicket is stateful by default and i can pass object o
> from
> >> >> page
> >> >> > A -> page B
> >> >> > But if Object o in page A which -> page B -> page C -> page D ->
> page
> >> E
> >> >> > and i need Object o in page E ,that will be very tedious to pass o
> all
> >> >> > throught the way from A > ..E
> >> >> > also if i need to pass a large number of objects between a set of
> >> pages
> >> >> > ,this will be a nightmare
> >> >> >
> >> >> > so How can i implement a Conversation object ala Session and store
> >> these
> >> >> > objects there
> >> >> >
> >> >> > i thought of using the IPageMap as a key in this situation as it
> >> >> represent
> >> >> > an open browser window or tab ie. conversation, but in a previous
> mail
> >> ,i
> >> >> > 've been tald that it cannot be extended easily, and i cannot
> provide
> >> my
> >> >> own
> >> >> > factory for one
> >> >> >
> >> >> > so, any ideas about the conversation scope?
> >> >> > what do u think about the pageMap ? will it work? is it reliable?
> >> >> > can the core team provide some hooks to implement something like
> >> >> > IPageMapFactory?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > thanks
> >> >> > Joe
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> -
> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>

Wicket Date Field Validation

[Rao Archana (HCTM/ETA)]

Hi,

I am working on date fields and have problems with the validation. I
have referred to the link below which helped me.

http://www.nabble.com/Strict-4-digit-year-for-DateTextField--td18656889.
html


So I have subclassed the PatternDateConverter and have set the pattern
as,
dateFormat = "^(\\d{1,2})/(\\d{1,2})/(\\d{4})$";

I have 2 date fields, start_date and end_date. The start_date is a
required field and the end_date is not.

 some code

pdc = new
StrictPatternDateConverter(DateUtil.getDateFormatOnLocale(getLocale()),
false);

 more code

startDateField = DateTextField.withConverter("startDate", new
PropertyModel(this, "startDate"), pdc);
startDateField.add(new TMPDatePicker());
form.add(startDateField);
endDateField = DateTextField.withConverter("endDate", new
PropertyModel(this, "endDate"), pdc);
endDateField.add(new TMPDatePicker());
form.add(endDateField);

 more code

This works fine ie it does not allow entry of "03/03/09" or
"03/03/-2009"

BUT, the end_date becomes a required field. I have to enter the end_date
to click 'Save'. Else it complains that an invalid date has been
entered.
But my end_date is not a required field.

So if I replace it with,

endDateField = DateTextField.forDatePattern("endDate",
DateUtil.getDateFormatOnLocale(getLocale()));
endDateField.withConverter("endDate", pdc);
endDateField.add(new TMPDatePicker());

It allows, "03/03/-2009" and "03/03/09". Why does it allow the '-' sign.
It computes it to a value and displays a year.

My application has several date fields and I need to validate them.

I am a newbie to Wicket and have looked up the archive quite a bit to
find a solution.
Can someone please tell me a solution to my date validation problem?

Thanks very much

Re: Apache Logs, Session IDs, and PageExpiredException

[Igor Vaynberg]

if your servlet container loses the session there isnt much we can do

-igor

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Jeremy Levy wrote:
> We see a very similar issue: Between one request to another that happen
> within a matter of seconds / minutes the sessionid disappears.  A lot of our
> traffic is mobile so I assume some of it is crappy browser implementation.
>  We have not been able to reproduce it any meaningful way.
> We have been able to mitigate the effect on our
> users by making as many pages as possible bookmarkable as well as
> including cookie based auto-login.
>
> I have seen other things cause this however, if you are using jvmRoute
> with a node that is down and your don't properly fail over you will
> consistently get this error.
>
> For what it's worth we are using Wicket 1.3.6 (but been anecdotally having
> the issue since 1.3.0 or earlier) in Tomcat/JBoss 4.2.2.
>
> Jeremy
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Dane Laverty  wrote:
>
>> Thanks for pointing that out. I've tried some other changes, so I'll wait
>> and see how they work out. However, if the problem persists I'll look into
>> the possibility of it being an HTTPS-related issue. That line of reasoning
>> hadn't ever occurred to me.
>>
>> Dane
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Igor Vaynberg 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > good catch Jason.
>> >
>> > We have also ran into this when implementing wicket's @RequireHttps
>> > annotation, there is a javadoc section in HttpsRequestCycleProtocol
>> > that talks about this cookie pain.
>> >
>> > -igor
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Jason Lea wrote:
>> > > I notice there are some secure requests there (https)... so I will now
>> > > blindly assume you are having the same problem I had in the past...
>> > >
>> > > I had a problem with session ids changing when trying to swtich between
>> > > secure/insecure pages.
>> > > If your first request to a tomcat server is secure, and a session is
>> > > created, tomcat will create a secure session id cookie that will only
>> be
>> > > sent in https requests.  If you request a non-secure (http) page
>> request
>> it
>> > > will not send the cookie, and a new insecure session cookie is created.
>> > >
>> > > One way to fix* this is to use a http request filter that checks for
>> new
>> > > session id cookie creation, and writing a new insecure cookie if a
>> secure
>> > > one has been created.  Something like this:
>> > >  http://forum.springsource.org/archive/index.php/t-65651.html
>> > >
>> > > *when I say fix, I mean make the system less secure :)
>> > >
>> > > Igor Vaynberg wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> yes, a changing sessionid will cause a page expired error because the
>> > >> client all of a sudden gets a new blank session.
>> > >>
>> > >> changing session ids can be caused by either session expiration or a
>> > >> manual session invalidation - like during a logout procedure.
>> > >>
>> > >> you have to figure out what causes the session to get dumped and a new
>> > >> one to be created in your application/servlet container.
>> > >>
>> > >> -igor
>> > >>
>> > >> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Dane Laverty
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> I'm trying to track down the source of frequent PageExpiredExceptions
>> > >>> that
>> > >>> we're getting on our deployment server. One of the errors occured at
>> > >>> 01:28:06 this morning. In the Apache logs, I discovered that the
>> user's
>> > >>> session ID spontaneously changed at that time, (see the change
>> between
>> > >>> lines
>> > >>> 4 & 5 below, and then again between lines 11 & 12). Is that just a
>> > >>> coincidence, or would a changing session ID cause the
>> > >>> PageExpiredException?
>> > >>> And if so, what causes the session ID to change? (I'm using Wicket
>> 1.3.6.
>> > >>> I
>> > >>> can't replicate the errors in development, which sounds common
>> according
>> > >>> to
>> > >>> the several PageExpiredException threads. I'm not seeing any sort of
>> > >>> serialization errors either.) Thanks for your help!
>> > >>>
>> > >>> XXX.XXX.29.22 - - [11/Jun/2009:01:28:03 -0700] "GET
>> > >>> /resources/comp.Comp/Oregon2.jpg HTTP/1.1" 200 22145 "
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>>
>> https://www.foodhandler.org/login%3bjsessionid=E0381EA98B6C107CD1D4DF8FDE5D88C3
>> > >>> "...
>> > >>> XXX.XXX.29.22 - - [11/Jun/2009:01:28:03 -0700] "GET
>> > >>> /resources/comp.Comp/newVGrad.png HTTP/1.1" 200 48736 "
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>>
>> https://www.foodhandler.org/login%3bjsessionid=E0381EA98B6C107CD1D4DF8FDE5D88C3
>> > >>> "...
>> > >>> XXX.XXX.29.22 - - [11/Jun/2009:01:28:03 -0700] "GET
>> > >>> /resources/comp.Comp/navBoxBottom.jpg HTTP/1.1" 200 14140 "
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>>
>> https://www.foodhandler.org/login%3bjsessionid=E0381EA98B6C107CD1D4DF8FDE5D88C3
>> > >>> "...
>> > >>> XXX.XXX.29.22 - - [11/Jun/2009:01:28:05 -0700] "GET
>> > >>> /pay%3bjsessionid=E0381EA98B6C107CD1D4DF8FDE5D88C3 HTTP/1.1" 302 -
>> "-"...
>> > >>> XXX.XXX.29.22 - - [11/Jun/2009:01:28:05 -0700] "GET
>> > >>> /foodhandler/lo

inmethod trunk for a wicket app 1.3.6

[Fernando Wermus]

Hi all,
I put the following dependence in my pom:


org.wicketstuff
inmethod-grid
1.4-SNAPSHOT


But my project is a wicket app 1.3.6. The wicketstuff page says that it
could work depending on the proyect. I would like to know if in the case of
inmethod I could use the trunk or I have to use an older version.

Thanks in advance!

-- 
Fernando Wermus.

www.linkedin.com/in/fernandowermus

Re: Apache Logs, Session IDs, and PageExpiredException

[Jeremy Levy]

We see a very similar issue: Between one request to another that happen
within a matter of seconds / minutes the sessionid disappears.  A lot of our
traffic is mobile so I assume some of it is crappy browser implementation.
  We have not been able to reproduce it any meaningful way.
We have been able to mitigate the effect on our
users by making as many pages as possible bookmarkable as well as
including cookie based auto-login.

I have seen other things cause this however, if you are using jvmRoute
with a node that is down and your don't properly fail over you will
consistently get this error.

For what it's worth we are using Wicket 1.3.6 (but been anecdotally having
the issue since 1.3.0 or earlier) in Tomcat/JBoss 4.2.2.

Jeremy





On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Dane Laverty  wrote:

> Thanks for pointing that out. I've tried some other changes, so I'll wait
> and see how they work out. However, if the problem persists I'll look into
> the possibility of it being an HTTPS-related issue. That line of reasoning
> hadn't ever occurred to me.
>
> Dane
>
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Igor Vaynberg 
> wrote:
> >
> > good catch Jason.
> >
> > We have also ran into this when implementing wicket's @RequireHttps
> > annotation, there is a javadoc section in HttpsRequestCycleProtocol
> > that talks about this cookie pain.
> >
> > -igor
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Jason Lea wrote:
> > > I notice there are some secure requests there (https)... so I will now
> > > blindly assume you are having the same problem I had in the past...
> > >
> > > I had a problem with session ids changing when trying to swtich between
> > > secure/insecure pages.
> > > If your first request to a tomcat server is secure, and a session is
> > > created, tomcat will create a secure session id cookie that will only
> be
> > > sent in https requests.  If you request a non-secure (http) page
> request
> it
> > > will not send the cookie, and a new insecure session cookie is created.
> > >
> > > One way to fix* this is to use a http request filter that checks for
> new
> > > session id cookie creation, and writing a new insecure cookie if a
> secure
> > > one has been created.  Something like this:
> > >  http://forum.springsource.org/archive/index.php/t-65651.html
> > >
> > > *when I say fix, I mean make the system less secure :)
> > >
> > > Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> > >>
> > >> yes, a changing sessionid will cause a page expired error because the
> > >> client all of a sudden gets a new blank session.
> > >>
> > >> changing session ids can be caused by either session expiration or a
> > >> manual session invalidation - like during a logout procedure.
> > >>
> > >> you have to figure out what causes the session to get dumped and a new
> > >> one to be created in your application/servlet container.
> > >>
> > >> -igor
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Dane Laverty
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>> I'm trying to track down the source of frequent PageExpiredExceptions
> > >>> that
> > >>> we're getting on our deployment server. One of the errors occured at
> > >>> 01:28:06 this morning. In the Apache logs, I discovered that the
> user's
> > >>> session ID spontaneously changed at that time, (see the change
> between
> > >>> lines
> > >>> 4 & 5 below, and then again between lines 11 & 12). Is that just a
> > >>> coincidence, or would a changing session ID cause the
> > >>> PageExpiredException?
> > >>> And if so, what causes the session ID to change? (I'm using Wicket
> 1.3.6.
> > >>> I
> > >>> can't replicate the errors in development, which sounds common
> according
> > >>> to
> > >>> the several PageExpiredException threads. I'm not seeing any sort of
> > >>> serialization errors either.) Thanks for your help!
> > >>>
> > >>> XXX.XXX.29.22 - - [11/Jun/2009:01:28:03 -0700] "GET
> > >>> /resources/comp.Comp/Oregon2.jpg HTTP/1.1" 200 22145 "
> > >>>
> > >>>
>
> https://www.foodhandler.org/login%3bjsessionid=E0381EA98B6C107CD1D4DF8FDE5D88C3
> > >>> "...
> > >>> XXX.XXX.29.22 - - [11/Jun/2009:01:28:03 -0700] "GET
> > >>> /resources/comp.Comp/newVGrad.png HTTP/1.1" 200 48736 "
> > >>>
> > >>>
>
> https://www.foodhandler.org/login%3bjsessionid=E0381EA98B6C107CD1D4DF8FDE5D88C3
> > >>> "...
> > >>> XXX.XXX.29.22 - - [11/Jun/2009:01:28:03 -0700] "GET
> > >>> /resources/comp.Comp/navBoxBottom.jpg HTTP/1.1" 200 14140 "
> > >>>
> > >>>
>
> https://www.foodhandler.org/login%3bjsessionid=E0381EA98B6C107CD1D4DF8FDE5D88C3
> > >>> "...
> > >>> XXX.XXX.29.22 - - [11/Jun/2009:01:28:05 -0700] "GET
> > >>> /pay%3bjsessionid=E0381EA98B6C107CD1D4DF8FDE5D88C3 HTTP/1.1" 302 -
> "-"...
> > >>> XXX.XXX.29.22 - - [11/Jun/2009:01:28:05 -0700] "GET
> > >>> /foodhandler/login;jsessionid=271042707F280E26F7A08E6FFF108C22
> HTTP/1.1"
> > >>> 302
> > >>> 263 "-"...
> > >>> XXX.XXX.29.22 - - [11/Jun/2009:01:28:05 -0700] "GET
> > >>> /login%3bjsessionid=271042707F280E26F7A08E6FFF108C22 HTTP/1.1" 200
> 8056
> > >>> "-"...
> > >>> XXX.XXX.29.22 - - 

Re: Conversation scope in wicket

[Igor Vaynberg]

only time will tell

-igor

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Joe Fawzy wrote:
> thanks dearwill wicket continue to support pageMap beyond 1.4 or it is now a
> deprecated feature?
> thanks
> Joe
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
>
>> if the scope of your conversation is a browser window then its the best
>> choice.
>>
>> -igor
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Joe Fawzy wrote:
>> > Hi dearthanks for the reply and for the code snippet
>> > But, do u think that using pageMap is reliable or what
>> > i mean , is using pageMap is a good solution or just a hack, work around
>> > thanks
>> > Joe
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Igor Vaynberg > >wrote:
>> >
>> >> class mysession extends websesison {
>> >>  private map> coversations;
>> >>
>> >>  public map getconversation(ipagemap pmap) {
>> >>        return conversations.get(pmap.getid());
>> >>  }
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> -igor
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Joe Fawzy wrote:
>> >> > Hi alli need to implement something like a conversation scope in
>> wicket
>> >> > i know that wicket is stateful by default and i can pass object o from
>> >> page
>> >> > A -> page B
>> >> > But if Object o in page A which -> page B -> page C -> page D -> page
>> E
>> >> > and i need Object o in page E ,that will be very tedious to pass o all
>> >> > throught the way from A > ..E
>> >> > also if i need to pass a large number of objects between a set of
>> pages
>> >> > ,this will be a nightmare
>> >> >
>> >> > so How can i implement a Conversation object ala Session and store
>> these
>> >> > objects there
>> >> >
>> >> > i thought of using the IPageMap as a key in this situation as it
>> >> represent
>> >> > an open browser window or tab ie. conversation, but in a previous mail
>> ,i
>> >> > 've been tald that it cannot be extended easily, and i cannot provide
>> my
>> >> own
>> >> > factory for one
>> >> >
>> >> > so, any ideas about the conversation scope?
>> >> > what do u think about the pageMap ? will it work? is it reliable?
>> >> > can the core team provide some hooks to implement something like
>> >> > IPageMapFactory?
>> >> >
>> >> > thanks
>> >> > Joe
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> -
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

RE: 1.4 trunk broken?

[Stefan Lindner]

The problem occurs when I klicked around on a page an then deploy a new version 
of the app.
When I klick on a page link now then the error occurs. In former trunk versions 
and all former wicket version I was redirected to the application's homepage.

Stefan

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Johan Compagner [mailto:jcompag...@gmail.com] 
Gesendet: Dienstag, 16. Juni 2009 20:19
An: users@wicket.apache.org
Betreff: Re: 1.4 trunk broken?

i do remember one change for that invalidurlexception
(that we should throw that as an exception instead of just a page expired or
something)

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 18:09, Stefan Lindner  wrote:

> Using current 1.4 trunk gives me the error
>
> [RequestCycle] org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.PageExpiredException:
> Cannot find the rendered page in session [pagemap=nu
> ll,componentPath=1,versionNumber=0]
> org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.request.InvalidUrlException:
> org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.PageExpiredException: Cannot find the
> rendered
> page in session [pagemap=null,componentPath=1,versionNumber=0]
>at
> org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WebRequestCycleProcessor.resolve(WebRequ
> estCycleProcessor.java:250)
>at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.step(RequestCycle.java:1301)
>at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.steps(RequestCycle.java:1419)
>at org.apache.wicket.RequestCycle.request(RequestCycle.java:545)
>at
> org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doGet(WicketFilter.java:456
> )
>at
> org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.doFilter(WicketFilter.java:
> 289)
>at
> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(Applica
> tionFilterChain.java:235)
>at
> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilt
> erChain.java:206)
>at
> org.jboss.web.tomcat.filters.ReplyHeaderFilter.doFilter(ReplyHeaderFilte
> r.java:96)
>at
> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(Applica
> tionFilterChain.java:235)
>at
> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilt
> erChain.java:206)
>at
> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValv
> e.java:235)
>at
> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValv
> e.java:191)
>at
> org.jboss.web.tomcat.security.SecurityAssociationValve.invoke(SecurityAs
> sociationValve.java:190)
>at
> org.jboss.web.tomcat.security.JaccContextValve.invoke(JaccContextValve.j
> ava:92)
>at
> org.jboss.web.tomcat.security.SecurityContextEstablishmentValve.process(
> SecurityContextEstablishmentValve.java:126)
>at
> org.jboss.web.tomcat.security.SecurityContextEstablishmentValve.invoke(S
> ecurityContextEstablishmentValve.java:70)
>at
> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java
> :127)
>at
> org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java
> :102)
>at
> org.jboss.web.tomcat.service.jca.CachedConnectionValve.invoke(CachedConn
> ectionValve.java:158)
>at
> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.
> java:109)
>at
> org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:3
> 30)
>at
> org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:82
> 9)
>at
> org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process(
> Http11Protocol.java:598)
>at
> org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$Worker.run(JIoEndpoint.java:447)
>at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
> Caused by: org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.PageExpiredException: Cannot
> find the rendered page in session [pagemap=null,componentPath=1,vers
> ionNumber=0]
>at
> org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WebRequestCycleProcessor.resolve(WebRequ
> estCycleProcessor.java:197)
>... 25 more
>
>
> On loading a page. Did I miss some big change?
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Conversation scope in wicket

[Joe Fawzy]

thanks dearwill wicket continue to support pageMap beyond 1.4 or it is now a
deprecated feature?
thanks
Joe

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:

> if the scope of your conversation is a browser window then its the best
> choice.
>
> -igor
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Joe Fawzy wrote:
> > Hi dearthanks for the reply and for the code snippet
> > But, do u think that using pageMap is reliable or what
> > i mean , is using pageMap is a good solution or just a hack, work around
> > thanks
> > Joe
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Igor Vaynberg  >wrote:
> >
> >> class mysession extends websesison {
> >>  private map> coversations;
> >>
> >>  public map getconversation(ipagemap pmap) {
> >>return conversations.get(pmap.getid());
> >>  }
> >> }
> >>
> >> -igor
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Joe Fawzy wrote:
> >> > Hi alli need to implement something like a conversation scope in
> wicket
> >> > i know that wicket is stateful by default and i can pass object o from
> >> page
> >> > A -> page B
> >> > But if Object o in page A which -> page B -> page C -> page D -> page
> E
> >> > and i need Object o in page E ,that will be very tedious to pass o all
> >> > throught the way from A > ..E
> >> > also if i need to pass a large number of objects between a set of
> pages
> >> > ,this will be a nightmare
> >> >
> >> > so How can i implement a Conversation object ala Session and store
> these
> >> > objects there
> >> >
> >> > i thought of using the IPageMap as a key in this situation as it
> >> represent
> >> > an open browser window or tab ie. conversation, but in a previous mail
> ,i
> >> > 've been tald that it cannot be extended easily, and i cannot provide
> my
> >> own
> >> > factory for one
> >> >
> >> > so, any ideas about the conversation scope?
> >> > what do u think about the pageMap ? will it work? is it reliable?
> >> > can the core team provide some hooks to implement something like
> >> > IPageMapFactory?
> >> >
> >> > thanks
> >> > Joe
> >> >
> >>
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>

Re: AjaxEventBehavior onclick for WebMarkupContainer Precondition Check

[Martin Funk]

Am 17.06.2009 um 20:15 schrieb walnutmon:



For the record, the call to super.onComponentTag(tag) fixed the issue.

Awesome catch Martin!

Thank you,

your welcome. (and not to forget, I had my fun too)

mf





Martin Funk-3 wrote:


hm... lets see,

the JavaScript in the Browser complains since: function() {return
Wicket.$('superDiv2') != null;}.bind(this))
returns false. (its the precondition)
It returns false since there is no dom element with the id  
'superDiv2'

in the page.
I assume its the id of the  elements, but the id is not  
rendered.

Which is strange since   add(superDiv.setOutputMarkupId(true)); got
called.
Next shoot would be the overridden onComponentTag() method.
I'd say a call to super.onComponentTag() is needed.

Maybe that should be described more explicit in the JavaDoc.

mf

Am 17.06.2009 um 19:25 schrieb walnutmon:



Close but no donut, copper.  That occurred to me, but it was too
late.  The
source doesn't seem to give much away, I do see the JavaScript on
the Div
though.




  
  
  


]]>*/


  
  
  top: 
  left: 
  length: 
  width: 

  color: 
  
  
  
  


Thanks again
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/AjaxEventBehavior-onclick-for-WebMarkupContainer-Precondition-Check-tp24074285p24078270.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org





--
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/AjaxEventBehavior-onclick-for-WebMarkupContainer-Precondition-Check-tp24074285p24079175.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Usage DiskPageStore causes Session Swapping

[Martijn Dashorst]

I think we squashed a lingering thread local in 1.3.6 during request
detaching, which could cause this to happen.

Martijn

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Matej Knopp wrote:
> Latest  release in 1.3 branch is 1.3.6.
>
> -Matej
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:48 PM,
> rajendar.medishetty wrote:
>>
>>
>> Initially we were using Wicket 1.3.3 and sometime back I upgraded to Wicket
>> 1.3.5. I'm able to produce the scenario with both wicket versions.
>>
>>
>>
>> Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
>>>
>>> What wicket version are you using? DiskPageStore has separate folder
>>> for each session so I don't really see why this would happen.
>>>
>>> -Matej
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:28 PM, rajendar
>>> medishetty wrote:
 Hi,

 In one of our application, we are facing session swapping problem when we
 use DiskPageStore and this problem doesn't occur if we use
 HttpSessionStore.

 Let me explain you in more detail.

 This is policy Enrollment Application, we use Spring, Hibernate and
 Wicket
 Frameworks.
 We are using JDK serialization and the std
 SecondLevelCache/*DiskPageStore*
 *session* store.

 *Scenario:*
 Application works fine, when we are using only one in one Browser window.
  It seems that when two users are using the system, second user is able
 to
 see the first users data when he clicks back button.

 *Analysis*:
 Session id is different for both users, but while reading the page from
 the
 disk it somehow reads the wrong page.

 If I change the PageStore to HttpSessionStore, the same scenario works
 fine.


 Any inputs on this issue will be helpful.

 --
 Thanks,
 Rajendar

>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context: 
>> http://www.nabble.com/Usage-DiskPageStore-causes-Session-Swapping-tp24079378p24079732.html
>> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>



-- 
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Conversation scope in wicket

[Igor Vaynberg]

if the scope of your conversation is a browser window then its the best choice.

-igor

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Joe Fawzy wrote:
> Hi dearthanks for the reply and for the code snippet
> But, do u think that using pageMap is reliable or what
> i mean , is using pageMap is a good solution or just a hack, work around
> thanks
> Joe
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
>
>> class mysession extends websesison {
>>  private map> coversations;
>>
>>  public map getconversation(ipagemap pmap) {
>>        return conversations.get(pmap.getid());
>>  }
>> }
>>
>> -igor
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Joe Fawzy wrote:
>> > Hi alli need to implement something like a conversation scope in wicket
>> > i know that wicket is stateful by default and i can pass object o from
>> page
>> > A -> page B
>> > But if Object o in page A which -> page B -> page C -> page D -> page E
>> > and i need Object o in page E ,that will be very tedious to pass o all
>> > throught the way from A > ..E
>> > also if i need to pass a large number of objects between a set of pages
>> > ,this will be a nightmare
>> >
>> > so How can i implement a Conversation object ala Session and store these
>> > objects there
>> >
>> > i thought of using the IPageMap as a key in this situation as it
>> represent
>> > an open browser window or tab ie. conversation, but in a previous mail ,i
>> > 've been tald that it cannot be extended easily, and i cannot provide my
>> own
>> > factory for one
>> >
>> > so, any ideas about the conversation scope?
>> > what do u think about the pageMap ? will it work? is it reliable?
>> > can the core team provide some hooks to implement something like
>> > IPageMapFactory?
>> >
>> > thanks
>> > Joe
>> >
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Usage DiskPageStore causes Session Swapping

[Matej Knopp]

Latest  release in 1.3 branch is 1.3.6.

-Matej

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:48 PM,
rajendar.medishetty wrote:
>
>
> Initially we were using Wicket 1.3.3 and sometime back I upgraded to Wicket
> 1.3.5. I'm able to produce the scenario with both wicket versions.
>
>
>
> Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
>>
>> What wicket version are you using? DiskPageStore has separate folder
>> for each session so I don't really see why this would happen.
>>
>> -Matej
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:28 PM, rajendar
>> medishetty wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> In one of our application, we are facing session swapping problem when we
>>> use DiskPageStore and this problem doesn't occur if we use
>>> HttpSessionStore.
>>>
>>> Let me explain you in more detail.
>>>
>>> This is policy Enrollment Application, we use Spring, Hibernate and
>>> Wicket
>>> Frameworks.
>>> We are using JDK serialization and the std
>>> SecondLevelCache/*DiskPageStore*
>>> *session* store.
>>>
>>> *Scenario:*
>>> Application works fine, when we are using only one in one Browser window.
>>>  It seems that when two users are using the system, second user is able
>>> to
>>> see the first users data when he clicks back button.
>>>
>>> *Analysis*:
>>> Session id is different for both users, but while reading the page from
>>> the
>>> disk it somehow reads the wrong page.
>>>
>>> If I change the PageStore to HttpSessionStore, the same scenario works
>>> fine.
>>>
>>>
>>> Any inputs on this issue will be helpful.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thanks,
>>> Rajendar
>>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://www.nabble.com/Usage-DiskPageStore-causes-Session-Swapping-tp24079378p24079732.html
> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Usage DiskPageStore causes Session Swapping

[rajendar.medishetty]

Initially we were using Wicket 1.3.3 and sometime back I upgraded to Wicket
1.3.5. I'm able to produce the scenario with both wicket versions.



Matej Knopp-2 wrote:
> 
> What wicket version are you using? DiskPageStore has separate folder
> for each session so I don't really see why this would happen.
> 
> -Matej
> 
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:28 PM, rajendar
> medishetty wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> In one of our application, we are facing session swapping problem when we
>> use DiskPageStore and this problem doesn't occur if we use
>> HttpSessionStore.
>>
>> Let me explain you in more detail.
>>
>> This is policy Enrollment Application, we use Spring, Hibernate and
>> Wicket
>> Frameworks.
>> We are using JDK serialization and the std
>> SecondLevelCache/*DiskPageStore*
>> *session* store.
>>
>> *Scenario:*
>> Application works fine, when we are using only one in one Browser window.
>>  It seems that when two users are using the system, second user is able
>> to
>> see the first users data when he clicks back button.
>>
>> *Analysis*:
>> Session id is different for both users, but while reading the page from
>> the
>> disk it somehow reads the wrong page.
>>
>> If I change the PageStore to HttpSessionStore, the same scenario works
>> fine.
>>
>>
>> Any inputs on this issue will be helpful.
>>
>> --
>> Thanks,
>> Rajendar
>>
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Usage-DiskPageStore-causes-Session-Swapping-tp24079378p24079732.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Conversation scope in wicket

[Joe Fawzy]

Hi dearthanks for the reply and for the code snippet
But, do u think that using pageMap is reliable or what
i mean , is using pageMap is a good solution or just a hack, work around
thanks
Joe

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:

> class mysession extends websesison {
>  private map> coversations;
>
>  public map getconversation(ipagemap pmap) {
>return conversations.get(pmap.getid());
>  }
> }
>
> -igor
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Joe Fawzy wrote:
> > Hi alli need to implement something like a conversation scope in wicket
> > i know that wicket is stateful by default and i can pass object o from
> page
> > A -> page B
> > But if Object o in page A which -> page B -> page C -> page D -> page E
> > and i need Object o in page E ,that will be very tedious to pass o all
> > throught the way from A > ..E
> > also if i need to pass a large number of objects between a set of pages
> > ,this will be a nightmare
> >
> > so How can i implement a Conversation object ala Session and store these
> > objects there
> >
> > i thought of using the IPageMap as a key in this situation as it
> represent
> > an open browser window or tab ie. conversation, but in a previous mail ,i
> > 've been tald that it cannot be extended easily, and i cannot provide my
> own
> > factory for one
> >
> > so, any ideas about the conversation scope?
> > what do u think about the pageMap ? will it work? is it reliable?
> > can the core team provide some hooks to implement something like
> > IPageMapFactory?
> >
> > thanks
> > Joe
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>

Re: Usage DiskPageStore causes Session Swapping

[Matej Knopp]

What wicket version are you using? DiskPageStore has separate folder
for each session so I don't really see why this would happen.

-Matej

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:28 PM, rajendar
medishetty wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In one of our application, we are facing session swapping problem when we
> use DiskPageStore and this problem doesn't occur if we use HttpSessionStore.
>
> Let me explain you in more detail.
>
> This is policy Enrollment Application, we use Spring, Hibernate and Wicket
> Frameworks.
> We are using JDK serialization and the std SecondLevelCache/*DiskPageStore*
> *session* store.
>
> *Scenario:*
> Application works fine, when we are using only one in one Browser window.
>  It seems that when two users are using the system, second user is able to
> see the first users data when he clicks back button.
>
> *Analysis*:
> Session id is different for both users, but while reading the page from the
> disk it somehow reads the wrong page.
>
> If I change the PageStore to HttpSessionStore, the same scenario works fine.
>
>
> Any inputs on this issue will be helpful.
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Rajendar
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Usage DiskPageStore causes Session Swapping

[rajendar medishetty]

Hi,

In one of our application, we are facing session swapping problem when we
use DiskPageStore and this problem doesn't occur if we use HttpSessionStore.

Let me explain you in more detail.

This is policy Enrollment Application, we use Spring, Hibernate and Wicket
Frameworks.
We are using JDK serialization and the std SecondLevelCache/*DiskPageStore*
*session* store.

*Scenario:*
Application works fine, when we are using only one in one Browser window.
 It seems that when two users are using the system, second user is able to
see the first users data when he clicks back button.

*Analysis*:
Session id is different for both users, but while reading the page from the
disk it somehow reads the wrong page.

If I change the PageStore to HttpSessionStore, the same scenario works fine.


Any inputs on this issue will be helpful.

-- 
Thanks,
Rajendar

Re: Wicket-like JavaScript Components

[Paolo Di Tommaso]

Say your boss to engage more java developers ;)

-- p

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Dane Laverty  wrote:

> I'm currently the only Java programmer on staff, and I'm already
> maintaining
> two Wicket applications, so my boss is concerned that if I start a third
> project in Java that no one else will be able to maintain it. It's a
> reasonable concern, but kind of too bad nonetheless. I'm using JQuery as my
> main JS resource for the application. All of the business logic is managed
> through Ajax calls.
>
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Jeremy Thomerson <
> jer...@wickettraining.com> wrote:
>
> > Yeah - but I would guess that it wouldn't fit "where I'm limited to
> > using only JavaScript"
> >
> > Out of curiosity - what do you mean "where I'm limited to using only
> > JavaScript"?  I mean, can you use HTML?  What does this "app" do -
> > obviously not much if it's "only JS".  What does it tie in with to do
> > business logic, etc?  Were these requirements written by a PHB?
> >
> > --
> > Jeremy Thomerson
> > http://www.wickettraining.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Nicolas
> > Melendez wrote:
> > > GWT is a good framework.You can code in java and then it is translated
> to
> > > javascript.
> > > NM
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 4:05 PM, nino martinez wael <
> > > nino.martinez.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> You can also have a look at wicketstuff and see what integrations
> > >> already exists :)
> > >>
> > >> 2009/6/15 Dane Laverty :
> > >> > I'm working on a small project where I'm limited to using only
> > >> JavaScript. I
> > >> > love the Wicket programming model, especially reusable components.
> Is
> > >> anyone
> > >> > aware of a JavaScript framework or JavaScript techniques that would
> > allow
> > >> me
> > >> > to approximate Wicket components?
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> -
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> >
> >
>

Re: AjaxEventBehavior onclick for WebMarkupContainer Precondition Check

[walnutmon]

For the record, the call to super.onComponentTag(tag) fixed the issue.

Awesome catch Martin!



Martin Funk-3 wrote:
> 
> hm... lets see,
> 
> the JavaScript in the Browser complains since: function() {return  
> Wicket.$('superDiv2') != null;}.bind(this))
> returns false. (its the precondition)
> It returns false since there is no dom element with the id 'superDiv2'  
> in the page.
> I assume its the id of the  elements, but the id is not rendered.
> Which is strange since   add(superDiv.setOutputMarkupId(true)); got  
> called.
> Next shoot would be the overridden onComponentTag() method.
> I'd say a call to super.onComponentTag() is needed.
> 
> Maybe that should be described more explicit in the JavaDoc.
> 
> mf
> 
> Am 17.06.2009 um 19:25 schrieb walnutmon:
> 
>>
>> Close but no donut, copper.  That occurred to me, but it was too  
>> late.  The
>> source doesn't seem to give much away, I do see the JavaScript on  
>> the Div
>> though.
>>
>>
>> 
>> 
>>
>>
>>> src="resources/org.apache.wicket.markup.html.WicketEventReference/ 
>> wicket-event.js">
>> > src="resources/org.apache.wicket.ajax.WicketAjaxReference/wicket- 
>> ajax.js">
>> > src="resources/org.apache.wicket.ajax.AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior/ 
>> wicket-ajax-debug.js">
>> > id="wicket-ajax-debug-enable">]]>*/
>>
>> 
>>
>>> action="?wicket:interface=:0:form::IFormSubmitListener::">> style="display:none">> id="form1_hf_0"
>> />
>>top: > name="top"/>
>>left: > name="left"/>
>>length: > name="height"/>
>>width: > name="width"/>
>>
>>color: > name="color"/>
>>
>>
>>> div>
>>
>> 
>>
>> Thanks again
>> -- 
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/AjaxEventBehavior-onclick-for-WebMarkupContainer-Precondition-Check-tp24074285p24078270.html
>> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>>
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/AjaxEventBehavior-onclick-for-WebMarkupContainer-Precondition-Check-tp24074285p24079175.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Conversation scope in wicket

[Igor Vaynberg]

class mysession extends websesison {
  private map> coversations;

  public map getconversation(ipagemap pmap) {
return conversations.get(pmap.getid());
  }
}

-igor

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Joe Fawzy wrote:
> Hi alli need to implement something like a conversation scope in wicket
> i know that wicket is stateful by default and i can pass object o from page
> A -> page B
> But if Object o in page A which -> page B -> page C -> page D -> page E
> and i need Object o in page E ,that will be very tedious to pass o all
> throught the way from A > ..E
> also if i need to pass a large number of objects between a set of pages
> ,this will be a nightmare
>
> so How can i implement a Conversation object ala Session and store these
> objects there
>
> i thought of using the IPageMap as a key in this situation as it represent
> an open browser window or tab ie. conversation, but in a previous mail ,i
> 've been tald that it cannot be extended easily, and i cannot provide my own
> factory for one
>
> so, any ideas about the conversation scope?
> what do u think about the pageMap ? will it work? is it reliable?
> can the core team provide some hooks to implement something like
> IPageMapFactory?
>
> thanks
> Joe
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: AjaxEventBehavior onclick for WebMarkupContainer Precondition Check

[Martin Funk]

hm... lets see,

the JavaScript in the Browser complains since: function() {return  
Wicket.$('superDiv2') != null;}.bind(this))

returns false. (its the precondition)
It returns false since there is no dom element with the id 'superDiv2'  
in the page.

I assume its the id of the  elements, but the id is not rendered.
Which is strange since   add(superDiv.setOutputMarkupId(true)); got  
called.

Next shoot would be the overridden onComponentTag() method.
I'd say a call to super.onComponentTag() is needed.

Maybe that should be described more explicit in the JavaDoc.

mf

Am 17.06.2009 um 19:25 schrieb walnutmon:



Close but no donut, copper.  That occurred to me, but it was too  
late.  The
source doesn't seem to give much away, I do see the JavaScript on  
the Div

though.




   
   
   src="resources/org.apache.wicket.markup.html.WicketEventReference/ 
wicket-event.js">

src="resources/org.apache.wicket.ajax.WicketAjaxReference/wicket- 
ajax.js">

src="resources/org.apache.wicket.ajax.AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior/ 
wicket-ajax-debug.js">

]]>*/


   
   style="display:none">id="form1_hf_0"

/>
   top: 
   left: 
   length: 
   width: 

   color: 
   
   
   
400;height: 100;width: 100;background-color: blue;" onmousedown="var
wcall=wicketAjaxGet('?wicket:interface=: 
0:superDiv::IBehaviorListener:0:',null,null,
function() {return Wicket.$('superDiv2') != null;}.bind(this));">div>

   


Thanks again
--
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/AjaxEventBehavior-onclick-for-WebMarkupContainer-Precondition-Check-tp24074285p24078270.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org