Hi Igor, another problem relating to the borders:
The markup is the same now, but if the content is set to be hidden
(visible=false) on the first time I load the page, I get the same
error message (Expected close tag for "border"). So it now only works
if the contents are visible by default, but c
> it is there for situations where you do not want to render any tag
> into the output because it may cause invalid markup, etc.
I understood from the specs that it is always allowed (according to
the namespace) and in the above example it could be used to
ajax-refresh those two table rows.
**
Ma
> it will also break all existing implementations of the interface out there.
Well, the effort will nicely blend in with the chores of refactoring
to the changes in generics... :) Or should it be made an abstract
class?
Another possibility would be to just enable suitable hooks in the
rendering p
wicket:container tag is never rendered into the output, that is kind
of the entire point of wicket:container :)
eg:
1
2
it is there for situations where you do not want to render any tag
into the output because it may cause invalid markup, etc.
-igor
On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 10:35 PM, Martin
Hi!
I want to use my wicketContainer (wicket:container tag) for a
placeholder for a ajax replace.
I have the following settings:
// ...
getMarkupSettings().setStripWicketTags(true);
// ...
wicketContainer.setOutputMarkupPlaceholderTag(true).setRenderBodyOnly(false);
Nevertheles
thanks
-igor
On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 10:19 PM, Martin Makundi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> do you call contents.add(getbodycontainer()) so that is
>> properly inside the "contents" container?
>
> Thanx.. now it works. It didn't occur to me to look into the javadoc
> as I was following the exampl
it will also break all existing implementations of the interface out there.
-igor
On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 10:21 PM, Martin Makundi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It would be pretty easy to just add a getDispayStyle method into the
> IChoiceRenderer interface and refactor the various classes using it
It would be pretty easy to just add a getDispayStyle method into the
IChoiceRenderer interface and refactor the various classes using it to
support it accordingly. Don't you think?
**
Martin
2008/8/10 Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> so write a component that works the way you want.
>
> as co
> do you call contents.add(getbodycontainer()) so that is
> properly inside the "contents" container?
Thanx.. now it works. It didn't occur to me to look into the javadoc
as I was following the example in the wiki. BUT, I have now updated
the WiKi accordingly!
**
Martin
>
> On Sat, Aug 9, 2008
so write a component that works the way you want.
as core devs we have to maintain a hard balance between simplicity and
flexibility. the more pluggable/customizable you make something, the
more complicated it becomes.
we do not make core components ultra pluggable because they serve as a
basis a
> Take a look http://jweekend.com/dev/ArticlesPage/ here , at the "Wicket
> Select And SelectOption" presentation (roughly about half way through).
Yes, but with Select And SelectOption you loose the benefits of
dropdownchoice (automatic notnull and localization, for example).
**
Martin
>
> Reg
Take a look http://jweekend.com/dev/ArticlesPage/ here , at the "Wicket
Select And SelectOption" presentation (roughly about half way through).
Regards - Cemal
http://www.jWeekend.co.uk http://jWeekend.co.uk
fulltoos wrote:
>
> hi
> I want to have a dropdown choice in which some of the choic
Note that you can style tags in Firefox, but it probably
won't work in Internet Explorer, so it may not be worth even bothering
with this...
Alastair
2008/8/9 Martin Makundi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Using Select/SelectOption/SelectOptions I loose all the other
> encapsulated benfits of DropDownCho
On Fri, 08 Aug 2008, jchappelle wrote:
> Every time my pages load all the images load again. I'm not sure how to fix
> this. Is it a change in my filter mapping?
Does this happen on all browsers?
I think that IE 6 needs some more caching headers than the
others
http://aspnetresources.com/blog
it might be, i am not sure. try tomcat 5 without apache infront of it.
-igor
On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 1:19 PM, jchappelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am using Tomcat 5 running as a mod under the apache http server.
>
> Do you think it is a configuration in tomcat?
> --
> View this message in c
I am using Tomcat 5 running as a mod under the apache http server.
Do you think it is a configuration in tomcat?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Images-not-caching-in-browser-tp18901385p18908064.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
because in certain scenarios we use regular expressions to get at
certain things, and some of them are hardcoded to skip over [0-9]+
because we consider those reserved for direct children of repeaters...
-igor
On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 12:25 PM, John Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yeah I w
Yeah I will do that... but it seems to work OK anyway. So I am curious why
the id must be numeric?
igor.vaynberg wrote:
>
> why are you even getting the warning? add an intermediate item if you
> want to use the CPM
>
> repeatingview rv=new repeatingview();
> webmarkupcontainer item=new webma
why are you even getting the warning? add an intermediate item if you
want to use the CPM
repeatingview rv=new repeatingview();
webmarkupcontainer item=new webmarkupcontainer(rv.newchildid());
rv.add(item);
item.add(componentwithwhateveridyouwant)
-igor
On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 11:09 AM, John Pat
do you call contents.add(getbodycontainer()) so that is
properly inside the "contents" container?
-igor
On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 7:43 AM, Martin Makundi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tried also
>
>
>
>
>
> which gives the same error message.
>
> **
> Martin
>
> 2008/8/9 Igor Vaynberg <[E
Am I OK to continue ignoring the warning? Or will this bite me somewhere
else?
igor.vaynberg wrote:
>
> there are a couple of historical reasons that are hard for us to
> remove due to api compatibility requirements in 1.3 and 1.4.
>
> this is something we can address once work starts on 1.5
I tried also
which gives the same error message.
**
Martin
2008/8/9 Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> wicket:body should not have a wicket:id
>
> -igor
>
> On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 2:17 AM, Martin Makundi
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I am trying to follow the example at
wicket:body should not have a wicket:id
-igor
On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 2:17 AM, Martin Makundi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I am trying to follow the example at
> http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/consistent-page-layout-using-borders.html
>
> However, I keep getting the error
>
> Expected clos
Using Select/SelectOption/SelectOptions I loose all the other
encapsulated benfits of DropDownChoice or ListChoice.
Wouldn't it be a good idea to have IChoiceRenderer or a similar
interface with a method getDispayStyle for each option?
**
Martin
2008/4/29 Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> see
On 06.08.2008, at 14:26, Kaspar Fischer wrote:
On 06.08.2008, at 13:15, James Carman wrote:
Why not make a new panel component that has a ListView and a label at
the bottom?
I ended up doing exactly this ...
I need this component in many places, every time with different
markup for
betwee
I want to code a custom form component that allows users to edit the
set of tags of
some object. When constructed, the component receives a model for the
current set
of tags. The user can then edit this set using AJAX Add button and
Remove links:
Current tags: Foo (x), Bar (x)
Add tag:
Hi!
I am trying to follow the example at
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/consistent-page-layout-using-borders.html
However, I keep getting the error
Expected close tag for
where the test-container is the border block.
I cannot seem to find any hierarchy errors from the markup and I do
not unde
Igor Vaynberg schrieb:
done for now
thx again.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
there are a couple of historical reasons that are hard for us to
remove due to api compatibility requirements in 1.3 and 1.4.
this is something we can address once work starts on 1.5
-igor
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 7:20 PM, John Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Why are only digits allowed?
if the image is in your context dir then it will be streamed by the
servlet container. wicket filter will let the url handling fall
through to the container...
so it is the servlet container that is not setting caching headers?
what container are you using?
-igor
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 6:41 PM,
30 matches
Mail list logo
