On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Paolo wrote:
> Great!! You was very fast to reply! And I solved my problem with:
>
> System.out.println ("Tipo pagamento:"+bean.getMyInt());
>
> Thank you very much!!!
>
No problem. That's what Wicket is all about, models. Your RadioGroup
"edits" the model you g
Wicketopia is a Rapid Application Development (RAD) library for
Wicket. The documentation is available at:
http://wicketopia.sourceforge.net
The official release will be available in the main maven repository
shortly, but you can download it via SVN (and run the example
application) by doing:
s
Alle giovedì 07 aprile 2011, James Carman ha scritto:
> What is the value of "myInt"? That should tell you which one was selected.
>
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:15 PM, Paolo wrote:
> > I implemented this example in my application
> >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/using-radiogroups.html
> >
What is the value of "myInt"? That should tell you which one was selected.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:15 PM, Paolo wrote:
> I implemented this example in my application
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/using-radiogroups.html
>
> But, how I can know what radio button of radiogroup the user sele
I implemented this example in my application
https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/using-radiogroups.html
But, how I can know what radio button of radiogroup the user selected?
This is a part of the html code:
This is a part of the java code
I both agree and disagree with the aforementioned comments.
I don't think anyone would disagree that writing javascript from wicket or
using a decorator to write javascript is wrong. In fact quite often I may
not know the id of an object until run-time and I may want the javascript to
run on a spe
Most of the things you want to do with jQuery, you don't need a library for.
I totally agree with Maarten
Bruno Borges
www.brunoborges.com.br
+55 21 76727099
"The glory of great men should always be
measured by the means they have used to
acquire it."
- Francois de La Rochefoucauld
On Wed,
yes the idea is not to have the huber jar, it's all about this, is the main
feature :)
some guys in the felix maling list suggested me that's actually possible and
supported, it's called WAB, that's a war without /lib (a partially reverse
recursive achronim for A Better War)
http://old.nabble.com
On 06/04/2011 16:53, James Carman wrote:
As the voting stands right now, it looks like option 2 is the winner
(I counted Matthew as +1 for option 1 even though he didn't really
cast a vote, but his response indicated support for option 1):
I was convinced by Igor's comments to change my mind if t
+1 for 2nd option
-Original Message-
From: Igor Vaynberg
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 11:46:40
To:
Reply-To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Behavior of CheckBox With Respect to setRequired(true)
+1 for option 2
-igor
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 10:34 AM, James Carman
wrote:
> This
As the voting stands right now, it looks like option 2 is the winner
(I counted Matthew as +1 for option 1 even though he didn't really
cast a vote, but his response indicated support for option 1):
Option 1: 4 +1s
Option 2: 6 +1s
This isn't an "official" vote, per se, but it is an informative po
I'm not an OSGi user but here is what I'll do.
1) create a new Maven project with packaging type 'pom'
2) combine all wicket jars in one (uber-jar)
there are several approaches here:
1) maven-shade-plugin
2) the way we did it in RC1 with maven-dependency-plugin: see
http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/
mmm, can't really understand.
Anyway, I wanted to add that the point here is to deploy a jar on karaf, not
a war.
To be honest, the real advantage is to deploy a small jar on karaf that is
far better than a heavy war on a jee container.
My idea is to have karaf with all the wicket, spring and othe
(03:10:56 PM) pedrosans_: Hi, my reply in the users mailing list got
rejected again :S
(03:11:47 PM) pedrosans_: can someone reply Alexander for me?
(03:12:00 PM) pedrosans_: thread: Pre-Select CheckBox in
CheckBoxMultipleChoice?
(03:12:12 PM) pedrosans_: my reply: It is important to notify model c
See RC1 o.a.w:wicket:pom.xml
You'll need to create your own project that will combine the all needed
.jars as we did in RC1.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Daniele Dellafiore
wrote:
> I'd really like to start my wicket app in a osgi (karaf) container.
> My app uses also wicket-spring. What is th
I'd really like to start my wicket app in a osgi (karaf) container.
My app uses also wicket-spring. What is the best way to do that now, with
wichet 1.5 rc3?
Thanls.
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Michael O'Cleirigh <
michael.ocleir...@rivulet.ca> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The way releases have been
Hello Michael,
Thank you for your fast response.
I still didn't manage to solve the problem.
I attached the code to see exactly the design and to explain better:
I have this ListView attached to a scroll (getBatchNumbers() is a model that
will return number of batches = total number of docs/50)
Thank you for explanation.
On 04/06/2011 02:01 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
WicketFilter needs to know the filter path it listens at.
By default it extracts this information from web.xml but since you don't use
web.xml you need to let Wicket know explicitly.
The sequence is:
1) WicketFilter.FILTE
WicketFilter needs to know the filter path it listens at.
By default it extracts this information from web.xml but since you don't use
web.xml you need to let Wicket know explicitly.
The sequence is:
1) WicketFilter.FILTER_MAPPING_PARAM
2) @ServletFilter's initParams (when Servlet 3.0 API is used
Hi,
thank you, it helped. If that does not bother you, could you please
elaborate a little bit?
Reqards,
Marek
On 04/05/2011 08:37 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
you should set
init-param org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter.FILTER_MAPPING_PARAM
with value == the one you would put in we
hi again,
so I really dont understand how to set hings up but I tried this yesterday
around midnight :] so please forgive me ...
let me explain again
I have simple webpage *DashboardPage* (1)
then I created a panel with a form *UserFormPanel*(2)
Unless WiQuery has matured a *lot* lately and the code has been cleaned up
significantly, I can't recommend it, personally.
Writing what should be JavaScript in your wicket Java code is quite
out-of-place, and generally all you need to do is place your code where it
belongs, in a .js or your ma
Hi,
We are thinking of using wiquery for a project. We are interested in
the experiences of people using it. Does wiquery work in the major
browsers (IE7, IE8, IE9, FF3 and Chrome)? Are there any complications
when different versions of jquery are used on other places in the
HTML? What is
23 matches
Mail list logo
