what is the salt that you use?
because we use the session specific key, but that can also already be used
like that in 1.4 is it maybe a different default so that you now use a
session key as salt?
does the database have enough room voor the encrypted? is it not truncated?
Op 11 nov. 2012 17:04 sc
Permspace is tricky
Do we have a nice management console on that server?
Because it looks like to little class/perm space mem us configured or we
leak classes when un deploying
On May 8, 2012 11:59 AM, "Martin Grigorov" wrote:
> I can see it now ...
> Maybe it is because I uploaded the examples
No this is bad, i agree with Igor, the latest page should be refreshed, not
reset!
By the way, the hybrid in 1.4 what we are using does look at the mount if
the page doesn't exists any more. And we depend on that, am i reading it
right that we lost that in 1.5?
On Mar 22, 2012 11:12 PM, "Pointbrea
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Johan Compagner wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 15:21, Martin Grigorov wrote:
>>> yes. each new page gets its id during construction from the session counter.
>>> if Page#isVersioned() returns 'false' then it will not cr
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 15:21, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> yes. each new page gets its id during construction from the session counter.
> if Page#isVersioned() returns 'false' then it will not create new
> versions of that page
i see that giving a custom IPageManager is also already ok, that has a
me
But that kills the complete back button support right?
Do pages increment their version then?
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 13:47, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Chris Colman
> wrote:
>> Our domain model has about 335 persistent classes so that won't be an
>> overnight task
yes that is the trick, all the urls that are generated before that
can't be used anymore because encrypted urls are session based.
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 09:46, Horacio Natyural
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i've noticed that it seems to happen after login. I've used the
> Session.replaceSession command on l
Isn't this just an encrypted url request to an session that is already
expired?
On Jul 7, 2011 4:06 PM, "Horacio Natyural"
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> anyone ever encountered this kind of error?
> i'm getting another page whenever I get this error. It's very
> intermettent and I'm not sure what's causing it.
power failure at the ISP, not everything came up, should be fine now
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 02:37, Steve Swinsburg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The wicketstuff site is down
>
> http://wicketstuff.org/wicket/
> Safari can’t open the page “http://wicketstuff.org/wicket/” because Safari
> can’t connect to
but if you have it down to 200K then 50 users it is nothing... thats
10MB on memory
If if both where 2X so 400K and 100 users thats still only 40MB in
memory Thats for a server nothing..
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 02:10, Per wrote:
>
>
> So I still haven't solved my memory issues, despite
works fine for me to
2011/1/10 Igor Vaynberg :
> really strange because it doesnt happen to me:
>
> http://pastebin.com/fe1pjZjy
>
> -igor
>
>
>
> 2011/1/9 Marcin Zajączkowski :
>> On 2011-01-09 22:00, Marcin Zajączkowski wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> Following some problems with page rendering in m
hat require proper
> hierarchy. like a form trying to find form submitting component, etc
>
> -igor
>
> On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Johan Compagner wrote:
>> ok a sample that it also works in with the right parent:
>>
>> public class HelloWorld extends W
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 19:37, Johan Compagner wrote:
> textfield.isEnabledInHierachy() will then ofcourse not get to the
> parent it is on.
> because its parent is the webpage not the body markupcontainer.
>
> So no this will not resolver from the child to the parent, only the
> pare
How will it work if I call get("body").setEnabled(false); and if label
> was a textfield? Would the textfield be still enabled?
>
> **
> Martin
>
> 2010/11/9 Johan Compagner :
>> no ofcourse not
>> The label will then be gone because the body is gone.
>>
does it?
>
> If you set get("body").setVisible(false) will the label remain visible?
>
> **
> Martin
>
> 2010/11/9 Johan Compagner :
>> Why are we discussing here already that works in wicket 1.4 if you
>> really need it?
>>
>>
>>
Why are we discussing here already that works in wicket 1.4 if you
really need it?
public class HelloWorld extends WebPage implements IComponentResolver {
public HelloWorld()
{
add(new WebMarkupContainer("body"));
add(new Label("label","my label"))
the user can continue with using site normally while waiting for
> upload to finish?
> It looks like performing upload in a separete pagemap could solve the
> problem. Is it possible to implement that?
>
> 2010/9/25 Johan Compagner
>>
>> Any other page can't be true,
Any other page can't be true, access to that page is not possible, but other
pages in other pagemaps should be accessable just fine
that time out can be configured see irequestcyclesetttings
- Original message -
> I have an upload form where users can upload very large files. Upload can
an image button can be stateless:
protected boolean getStatelessHint()
{
return getImageResource() == null &&
localizedImageResource.isStateless();
}
but that must be true.
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 13:19, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I had a stateless login form tha
If NamedParameter is something like;
/show?id=10&test=11
IndexedParameter is not something like:
/show/id/10/test/11
thats still named, just differently outputed, but
show/10/11
indexed then the name is presumed (its 1 ,2 ,3 ,...)
johan
2010/8/12 Major Péter :
> Hi,
>
> I've just tried t
, 2010 at 13:56, Thomas Singer wrote:
> When exactly the serialization happens? When viewing a page?
>
> Tom
>
>
> On 11.08.2010 13:25, Johan Compagner wrote:
>> the only way to do this is as i described look where the exception
>> really comes from
>> and go to
can generate this exception in my development
> environment. It is nasty to test on the production system.
>
> Tom
>
>
> On 11.08.2010 10:53, Johan Compagner wrote:
>> why not?
>> if you know which page it was and which component/model that holds
>> that none seri
ely, this does not answer my question.
>
> Tom
>
>
> On 11.08.2010 09:57, Johan Compagner wrote:
>> then you just have to check where those classes are used and where
>> they could be stored in a wicket component/model
>> and make sure you detach that object .
>&g
; correctly.
>
> Tom
>
>
> On 11.08.2010 09:27, Johan Compagner wrote:
>> doesnt the message of that exception tell you which object class is the
>> problem?
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 09:24, Thomas Singer wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
doesnt the message of that exception tell you which object class is the problem?
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 09:24, Thomas Singer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In our server logs we have a couple of WicketNotSerializableException
> logged, but we don't know when they occur. How we can create them locally in
> ou
I am against that patch.
You keep pagemaps in memory in the applicaiton context!
Those are session stuff stored in the HttpSession. You shouldnt keep
reference to those stuff.
This can break all kind of things (for example clustering)
If you want something like that, then it is fine if we need to
ation error" screen when they do that.
>
> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Johan Compagner wrote:
>
>> yes that is most likely the case.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 16:17, James Carman
>> wrote:
>> > I have a theory about what is
yes that is most likely the case.
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 16:17, James Carman wrote:
> I have a theory about what is causing this issue. Just wanted to run it by
> you guys. In my log files, I first see this:
>
> org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.request.InvalidUrlException:
> org.apache.wicket.
e checking there. Because that
would make IVisitor completely "generic"
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 15:27, Joseph Pachod wrote:
> Johan Compagner wrote:
>>
>> you can use:
>>
>> public final Object visitChildren(final
>> Class clazz,
>>
you can use:
public final Object visitChildren(final Class
clazz,
final IVisitor visitor)
then you have to cast yes, but you can cast safely.
johan
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:09, Joseph Pachod wrote:
> hello
>
> I wanted to do an Component.IVisitor for all children
94
> *** probably it has been unloaded recently
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 8:40 AM, James Carman
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Johan Compagner
>> wrote:
>>> the only thing i dont get is that for you the forSerialization flag
>>> s
dex = 542,
> hashcode = 2110119369
> *** Profiler engine warning: target VM cannot load class to instrument
> sun.reflect.GeneratedConstructorAccessor1
> *** probably it has been unloaded recently
>
> Sounds like we're on the right track, perhaps?
>
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at
as far as i see now if i look that the stacktrace:
java.io.ObjectStreamClass.(ObjectStreamClass.java:413)
java.io.ObjectStreamClass.lookup(ObjectStreamClass.java:310
so ObjectSTreamClass.lookup call there the constructor of ObjectStreamClass
lookup does check for caches but those are soft
impossible
there is so such thing as ParameterizedType for the example you give..
if you do:
TextField field = new TextField();
then at runtime that information isnt there anymore. Its gone. welcome
to type erasure..
I think stuff like that is only there if you do:
class MyTextField extends T
i think the problem with those memory analyzers that they give you the heap
Not the non heap, which is currently the problem..
If really constantly classes are leaked without that you constantly
redeploy web applications (because that would be a leak somewhere in
wicket or the app itself)
but the
what kind of classes are serialized constantly?
are those proxies or other generated onces?
Somehow it has something to do with getting the default constructor of
the first none serializable class
And i think your first class in the hierarchy that is found that
doenst implement Serializable doesnt
can we now deprecate protected boolean callOnBeforeRenderIfNotVisible() ??
because you could do it now in onConfigure right?
I hate multiply things do do the same thing :(
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 07:05, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> protected boolean callOnBeforeRenderIfNotVisible()
welcome!
hope you happily merge even more stuff ;)
johan
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 13:21, Martin Grigorov
wrote:
> Thanks a lot for the voted trust in me, team!
>
> As a big open source believer it is an honour for me to be a part of
> the team that made such a great framework!
>
> Looking forwa
works fine for me (except that Confluence is taken down i think on purpose)
2010/7/20 Vytautas Čivilis :
> Hi.
>
> As you might already noticed, http://wicketstuff.org is down.
>
> Anyone have any ideas?
>
> V
>
-
To unsubscribe
Is that tomcat 7??
But t seems that we dont clean up our page saving thread.
That sounds like a leak to me. Application.shutdown or something should clean
up that
- Original message -
> Anybody seen this before?
>
>
> SEVERE: Error filterStart
> Jun 24, 2010 3:24:06 PM org.apache.cata
Gmail is by the way not ajax but a flash application.
There is an opensource flash app i think on sourceforge that does pretty much
the same as gmail.
- Original message -
>
> I want to have gmail like file upload in my application , I want to
> have ajax multi file upload , ple
eginRequest of RequestCycle. This is what normally leads to this problem
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 9:57 PM, Ayodeji Aladejebi >wrote:
>
> > version 1.4.6 on windows vista running on tomcat 6.0.26
> >
> >
> > On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Johan Compagne
hmm
looking at the stack of the of that thread that has the lock on the page map
then it seems to me that that shouldnt happen, because that thread is doing
nothing anymore if the stack dump of that thread is really the right one.
Because that just seems to be in a waiting state in a tomcat pool
g some specific requests do not serialize the
> page, because these requests don't change the page and they are called
> continuously by design.
>
> I can extend WebRequestCycleProcessor and override resolve() method, but I
> cannot avoid searching page by calling Session.getPag
so for that ajax request you do want to create a new page every time the
ajax request hits?
2010/4/19 Martin Schayna
> I have pretty stateful page with plenty of AJAX components. Most of these
> components have behaviors, which renders JavaScript code for calling AJAX
> requests to Java code. B
its a browser from August 27, 2001 ... thats 9 years ago..
So who is using opera 6 ? Or Netscape 7? Or Safari 1.0 ?
Just dont support it anymore, drop it then the usage will also drop
Its a chicken and egg problem! if we keep supporting it it will drag on!
Force them to upgrade
In our product, Se
And i to the N900..
I want freedom, dont want to be controlled by fruit
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 17:12, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> but i just switched to htc hero :|
>
> -igor
>
> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 7:10 AM, James Carman
> wrote:
> > There's an app for that:
> >
> > http://www.gadgettastic.com/20
yes we didnt do that by default because it is quite annoying behavior
Back button should be quick and shouldnt load it from the server again at
least not by default.
You can configure it for you application the way you like. But for many
others back should really be browser cache back.
On Wed, A
Do you add the state ddc to the ajax target when you get a ajax country event?
- Original message -
>
> Sven,
>
> Thanks for your input. It seems that you do not understand the problem I have
> (Wicket problem??? or my page problem???). I know how Ajax works by adding
> components to Ajax r
y this in
> > production tomorrow.
> >
> > We upgraded to to 1.4.7 but still see that the pagemap is locked when the
> > stack overflows. Do you know if the fix to WICKET-2075 is in 1.4.7?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Nigel
> >
> >
> > Johan Compag
i fixed 2075 so that it should always unlock the pages.
Problem is that you still could get weird errors because that page is not in
a valid state in the session.
So if back buttons/page versions are used it could be that that doesnt work
So what should be fixed is the original problem
On Wed,
look at your html code
because somehow you get those kind of urls
org.apache.wicket.ajax.WicketAjax%3C/div%3E%3Cdiv%20class=
back to wicket and that seems very weird.
it seems that that is a piece of html with those div and class stuff.
It could also be that this is done by some header contributio
an int (primitive) is always required.
We have to set it to something. cant be null
if you want to be able to not require it (so null) make it an Integer not
int
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 16:48, Thierry Leveque wrote:
> Here's what I have in my code:
>
> TextField lAdaptingHitCountThreshold = new
no just the opposite
bookmarkable url will create a new page (which can be state full or
stateless)
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 14:09, Loritsch, Berin C.
wrote:
> It's bookmarked pages that avoid new page creation isn't it?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Matej Knopp [mailto:matej.kn...@gmail.
what is the definition of an overloaded pagestore?
if the page store can be overloaded (so more then it should load) then it is
a bug of wicket.
But even if you get a dos attack then max 10MB per user will be allocated
yes, but thats not overloading in my point of view.
you could always decrease it
if you constantly target exactly that url
then that will be a new page everytime because thats just a bookmarkable
url.
not an instance url.
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 12:52, manuelbarzi wrote:
> the url is this: http://localhost:9090/test/
>
So you just want to throw all the components of a page or panel (the one
with markup) in 1 big place.
then all those have to be uniquely named ofcourse. Throughout the complete
page.
Repeaters will then be a bit special i guess. Because they are generation
ListItem components for you
that then als
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 07:32, Sudhir N wrote:
> One more thing I am still looking for is, integrating GWT. I did that
> before with other framework.
>
>
>
>
i asked this question more
How do you see this integration? What should be integrated. What should
wicket do? What should GWT do?
public class HomePage extends WebPage {
private Long value = 0L;
public HomePage(final PageParameters parameters) {
Model m = new Model() {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
// It doesn't matters if I take
in trunk of 1.4 this should also be fixed.
so if you can use a snapshot of it that should work also
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 18:07, Kurt Heston wrote:
> Johan & Marat, thank you!
>
> Downgrading to 1.4.3 cured it. If I see the problem again, I'll check
> the forums and Jira for "content-length" i
can you try 1.4.3?
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:07, Kurt Heston wrote:
> Tonight, I moved from v1.3.5 to v1.4.4. I'm up and running after
> changing all of my getModel statements, but an old performance problem
> has shown up again.
>
> Back when I moved to 1.3.x, pages started loading really slo
g to come up with this, yes it
> does,
> > it
> > works fine in the apache wicket offcial page, but when I do the example
> > and
> > compile it, it only works in Mozilla! maybe I do not have the last Wicket
> > release, what do you think¿?
> >
> > Th
hen I do the example and
> compile it, it only works in Mozilla! maybe I do not have the last Wicket
> release, what do you think¿?
>
> Thanks for the reply Johan
>
>
> Johan Compagner wrote:
> >
> > Modal windows are working find for me on IE8
> >
&g
isnt your page not just a brand new shiny new instance?
place a breakpoint in your constructor
On 14/12/2009, Warren Bell wrote:
> Does Any body have any ideas, I am stuck and can't figure this out.
>
> I have a page with about 10 text fields. The model for the page is a
> ValueMap. All of the va
http://wicketinaction.com/2009/11/removing-fragile-string-expressions-from-wicket-code/
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 16:52, Juan Carlos Garcia M. wrote:
>
> Johan, Can you elaborate more on that please? What is this new solution?
>
>
>
> Johan Compagner wrote:
> >
> &
>
> Anyways, if it works for you, use it.
>
> my 2cents
>
> **
> Martin
>
> 2009/12/15 Johan Compagner :
> > why not
> > it kills a lot of code.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 17:45, Martin Makundi <
> > martin.maku...@koodar
Modal windows are working find for me on IE8
http://wicketstuff.org/wicket14/ajax/modal-window
are you saying that above example doesnt work?
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 01:41, victorTrapiello wrote:
>
> Hello guyss, I find it anoying as well I´m developing a web app and now I
> realize that the
why not
it kills a lot of code.
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 17:45, Martin Makundi <
martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote:
> I wouldn't use CPM for anything serious anyways...
>
> my 2cents
>
> **
> Martin
>
> 2009/12/14 Xavier López :
> > Hi,
> >
> > In my application I have a number of fields
ike to have a "close" button that do the same as the cross
> image, but I'm not able to find which javascript code is executed on this
> cross image.
> Regards
> Bernard
>
>
> Johan Compagner wrote:
> >
> > it could be that if you do that then in normal
did wicket 2.0 had a tardis??
i am checking svn right now for those lost diamonds!
On 11/12/2009, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> maybe wicket 2.0 will come with a TardisPageStore :)
>
> -igor
>
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Neil Curzon wrote:
>> You are right, I was not testing correctly. The pages
Yeah it seems strange, some project seems not to have the issue:
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>>
> http://www.wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/org/wicketstuff/iolite/wicketstuff-iolite/0.3-SNAPSHOT/
> >>>> >
> >>>> > While a core
somehow the disks where full again
i deleted as much logging as i can and some old stuff
so we should be able to go on
Biggest problem is as always but nobody seems to be able to fix that shitty
maven:
http://www.wicketstuff.org/maven/repository/org/apache/wicket/wicket/1.5-SNAPSHOT/
It still ge
it could be that if you do that then in normal use
the serverside doesnt know that the modal window isnt shown anymore.
So i guess you should also try to let the server know.
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 10:16, Bernard Lupin wrote:
>
> Hi again,
> After a lot of various tries, I finally found a soluti
ways* recalculates lastModified.
>
> And lastModified() calls urlConnection.getInputstream().close();
>
>
> Best Regards,
>Ilja Pavkovic
>
> Am Donnerstag, 3. Dezember 2009 11:40:04 schrieb Johan Compagner:
> > ahh
> > i did knew that there was already code fo
he.org/msg43879.html
>
> Maarten
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Johan Compagner >wrote:
>
> > We try to do our best, but the problem is that this is a leak internal to
> > java itself (classloader and urlconnection)
> >
> > http://tomcat.apache.org
We try to do our best, but the problem is that this is a leak internal to
java itself (classloader and urlconnection)
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/config/context.html
play with antiJarLocking and antiResouceLocking attributes.
johan
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 09:41, Pascal Grange <
pasc
load that data in separate threads, dont touch any wicket components
in those threads
make a component like ajaxlazyload that polls for that data if still
not there use a timer of a few seconds to test it again
On 28/11/2009, Kaspar Fischer wrote:
> Because the requests will be sequential (a prob
yes that component isnt nicely written, the tabs field should be a model
(make a jira entry for this)
but from the outside you can use:
public final List getTabs()
{
return tabs;
}
to add or remove tabs.
That is the same list as you give the constructor
So you could use tha
http://help.eclipse.org/help32/index.jsp?topic=/org.eclipse.platform.doc.isv/reference/api/org/eclipse/ltk/core/refactoring/participants/package-summary.html
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 13:52, James Carman wrote:
> Refactoring could definitely be supported in IDEA. With the Hibernate
> support, when
the pro's of this compared to the SafeProperty is that the safe property
needs to generate proxies at runtime so you need CGLIB and you could have
issues with final classes
this is more a develop environment solution which is because of that a bit
nicer.
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 10:53, Maarten Bos
193.46.80.204
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 10:46, Ilja Pavkovic wrote:
> Dear Martijn,
>
> > THE server had been moves to another ip. I havent had time to update dns
> perhaps you can tell us the ip so I am able to use the maven repository
> while
> the dns update is not yet synchronized with the rest
'll check the projects which are not in wicketstuff-core.
> >
> > El mar, 27-10-2009 a las 10:41 +0100, Johan Compagner escribió:
> > > i already did that
> > > its up again but it was AGAIN disk full problems
> > > and that is because of that STUPID mave
i already did that
its up again but it was AGAIN disk full problems
and that is because of that STUPID maven that generates unique snapshots
Who is the maven expert here that will FIX that problems on all our pom
files?
i have been deleting stuff now for at least 1 hour!
johan
On Tue, Oct 27, 2
looks to me like a screwed up tomcat install somehow.
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 10:10, Fernando Wermus wrote:
> Does anyone face this exception under Tomcat?
> The servelet-api.jar is in usr/share/tomcat5.5/lib/commons
>
> javax.servlet.ServletException: Filter execution threw an exception
>
> *roo
his picture of Johan with his phone - it will
> clear things up:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/myz5dq
>
> --
> Jeremy Thomerson
> http://www.wickettraining.com
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Matej Knopp
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 5:32 PM,
Its almost getting replaced!
http://maemo.nokia.com/n900/
pure power! Full control! Multi tasking!
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 17:48, Matej Knopp wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Johan Compagner
> wrote:
> > no i did build something special in wicket so that it will n
no i did build something special in wicket so that it will never work on
those iphones.
Stop buying those fully controlled by apple phones.. Think for your self !
Freedom Freedom!
johan
:)
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 13:00, Edmund Urbani wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was wondering whether there is some sp
i dont see how that can happen if i look at your code.
is RequestMessageForm .this != this.getForm() ??
do you nest forms?
johan
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 11:38, Charles Moulliard wrote:
> I have created a form class which is used by a class extending
> webpage. When I call the following metho
we tried that already but dismissed it
wicket has no support for this and for these kind of things to work
everything must be come a post
you cant use any normal links.
also you are trading in memory for cpu speed and bandwidth which is in my
eyes more expensive then memory or hd space
Page expir
And that back and forward buttons in the browser dont really work well in
the HttpSessionStore
But i cant believe that the overhead he is reporting is really the
overhead..
It could be an Antivirus checker or other stuff like that.
Besides that if that would be a problem just get an SSD and place
Which version of wicket do you use?
Why do you need absoluut urls?
On 11/09/2009, Dima Rzhevskiy wrote:
> Sorry, yes, urlFor return correct result.
> toAbsolutePath(final String relativePagePath) do not return result what I
> expected.
> javadoc copy/pasted from toAbsolutePath(final String requ
i dont see why wicket would do that.
are you really posting it or is it a get?
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 17:10, Gatos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a very long text that was truncated after submitting the form.
> How is it possible to enlarge allowed posted data?
>
>
> Thank you
>
Everybody should stop using any other encoding then UTF-8
Common people we should start this change from happening now :)
Drop all charsets and all over the world. ban them everywhere, it should be
illegal to use them, if you do still use them you should be thrown in to
prison for at least 5 years
one question.
why do you want that?
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 06:01, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With forms on Wicket pages, it appears that on submit which is HTTP
> POST, Wicket redirects to the same page (the page from where the data
> was sent) ad this is how we show feedback on the form page.
>
> How is
Which values are you missing or are invalid? The outer form?
On 23/08/2009, Marcin Palka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just noticed that the multipart forms over ajax feature does not
> really work in case of having nested forms. Is this a known
> limitation? Is there any workaround?
>
> My case looks like
I guess this is because of the new feature that multi part forms work
now in ajax by submitting a iframe
I guess this behavior now doesnt do a normal submit and you miss some data?
On 22/08/2009, Major Péter wrote:
> After solving the Ajax problem, it looks like, this is still don't want
> to wo
Pleae try to find out why it broke in 1.4.1 and make a case for this in jira
On 23/08/2009, Major Péter wrote:
> Marcin,
>
> That's it, thanks!!
> I would never had thought about downgrading to 1.4.0.
> After changing one character in pom.xml, it works...
>
> Thanks again.
>
> Regards,
> Peter
>
wicket can also do that for you
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 06:45, Anton Veretennikov <
anton.veretenni...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As I remember, GWT appends some garbage to JS filenames as they change
> to prevent this.
>
> -- Tony
>
> On 8/5/09, John Armstrong wrote:
> > Install the web developers tool
There are other options like:
class MyLocalizer extends Localizer
{
getCacheKey() { if (xxx == yyy) return null} // dont return a cache
key for certain things
}
or
class MyLocalizer extends Localizer
{
public String getString(final String key, final Component component,
final IMo
EHAM) wrote:
> > Hello johan,
> >
> > Because I want to use the information hold in the RequestLogger as an
> > object in a model. Something like this:
> >
> > New Model(getRequestLogger());
> >
> > Thx
> > Jing
> >
> > -Original Mes
1 - 100 of 1508 matches
Mail list logo
