Can something be set up to publish either the snapshot or rc1 javadocs to a
public URL.
Does the wicket version need to be final to be published to
http://wicket.apache.org/docs/
I currently use -DdownloadSources - but its just not so great for navigating
- especially if you want to cut/paste
I'm looking for suggestions on various ways of handling form layout -
specifically auto generating labels for form components, and the associated
markup surrounding the form fields.
I've currently got a system in place that allows you to add the fields very
simply, and then uses a technique
My initial thinking is I'm thinking I'll have to roll my own form elements.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Labelling-standard-layout-for-form-components.-tp20653187p20654098.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I would have some idea ... I'm using that plugin.. maven plugins have
issues.. :) i think it stems from the lack of standard approach of writing
the plugins, and even then - if you check the maven generated sites, so many
pages can be unintentionally left blank!! The documentation on them is
I'm not sure how to get the textfield editor working on the property name
of the user object - I am aware the CPM is trying to look at the id editor
which is wrong :).
--
View this message in context:
I'm going to be sourcing the labelText from a properties file relatve to the
class of the modelObject (in this case it will be the User - eg,
user.properties).
If I use the binding, then I need to have scope to the CPM in java world...
within the LabelledTextField - which is a shame, because it
Bupbow. - that Yields an exception because the FormComponentPanels model
object is of type String - not user.
editor = new TextFieldT(editor, new PropertyModelT(this,
String.format(model.object.%s, id)));
org.apache.wicket.WicketRuntimeException: No get method defined for class:
class
FYI, you are awesome.
Always obvious what the problem is after its fixed hey ;)
igor.vaynberg wrote:
then justmodel.object will do :)
-igor
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Using-CompoundPropertyModel-with-FormComponentPanel-tp20697019p20710669.html
Sent from
Interestingly we used a similar approach with using classes as pseudo enums.
Not being able to extend enums is a bit suckfull.
igor.vaynberg wrote:
the problem is that the enum would have to live *inside* the
wicketstuffauth code. so wicketstuffauth would be the library that
would need to
[X] YES - I would like consistent naming!
Contrib is a bit lame... could be gift or present.. but again - they are all
lame.
wicket stuff seems good. Makes sense too.
I was thinking of making a post about all these vote threads :) I'm
personally not a fan, but i think a vote page on the wiki
, 2008 at 6:52 AM, Ned Collyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[X] YES - I would like consistent naming!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Consistent-naming-for-Wicket-Stuff-projects-tp20726075p20785481.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Should you be using a RadioChoice instead?
novotny wrote:
Hi,
I have a ListView containing several RadioButtons.setRequired(true) (a Q
A list) that are all required to be answered. However, if someone doesn't
click on all of the radio buttons, I see three Please answer the
question
jwcarman wrote:
I like shadow much better.
He was an awesome hedgehog hey ;)
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/LoadableDetachableModel-in-Listview-tp20894115p20926225.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Well... as far as validators are concerned - there is some murky water.
Depending on your design, the services/domain layer should include object
validation - this allows you to expose services. The trick is getting these
validators to be shared by the view layer AND the service layer.
I'm not
From a quick glance (and im not at all familiar with PageableListView - but
am alright with their parent - ListView)
Has it anything to do with not calling setReuseItems(true) on the list view
itself? - Ie, its destroying the links, then recreating them each request?
Rgds
Ned
Michael Oswell
I think it would be useful if the message resolution inside a
wicket:enclosure used the child (or implicit child) as the component that
is sent thru the localiser.
This is the scenario
OverviewPanel extends Panel
wicket:panel
wicket:enclosure child=productsListView
table
I can appreciate what it currently does - I just think it could be a little
more convenient.
It would still provide the default behavior, but allow keys to be translated
with the child scope primarily - in the same way it allows visibility to be
driven with the child scope.
Thanks for your
FYI, I cannot see the liquid stuff with the latest firefox on osx leopard -
its borked.
Also looks like crap in safari :)
Soo bring on the nifty - but I wouldn't waste your time on liquid canvas
because I do not believe the browser support (currently) warrants your
effort.
I think it would
Ok - so I investigated a bit more - turns out I had a greasemonkey script
messing with it. DOH.
It looks beautiful :) - all works now. (and turns out safari is ok - i was
under the impression example 7 was misbehaving).
Sorry for the confusion.
--
View this message in context:
It is slightly ironic. Java, when we change default behaviour - we annotate
methods with @Override.
Its not a dissimilar solution. I can appreciate both decisions.
Same same but different.
What's the norm coding wise - what's more convenient? - I think when the
answer is depends - you can go
So, every once in a while - I get some buzz.
Wicket is really .. well thought out.. great puzzle. Understanding it is an
absolute blast.
It's a great meld with Java. One of the missing ingredients.
Today is full of wicket awesome.
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
Hi Guys,
I have a data construct which is as follows:
Template
MapString, ListConstraint fieldConstraints;
The map is fieldname against a list of constraints.
Eg, I might have firstName as the field, and the following constraints
length between 2 and 16 characters
mandatory
alphas
Got it licked - stuffed up the editors. Specifically I neglected
convertInput because I happen to be an idiot.
Thanks JT - I have the keyset stuff down already ;)
I was just wondering why my constraints were instantiated, but when they
were submitted their inner detail was nulled out. Makes
No - i officially don't know what's wrong :)
This is my snippet
-
ListString list = new
ArrayListString(model.getObject().getConstraints().keySet());
// display any existing constraints
form.add(new ListViewString(fields, list) {
protected void
Bleh - its one of those days.
Changed the base of the form fields from FormComponentPanel back to Panel -
and bobs ur uncle.
Sorry for the list noise (recovering from holidays still).
Ned Collyer wrote:
No - i officially don't know what's wrong :)
This is my snippet
Hi,
I have the following - which was working on 1.4-rc1
FormTester formTester = wicketTester.newFormTester(panel:form);
formTester.getForm().error(test error);
formTester.submit();
With 1.4-rc1 this code would not execute the forms onSubmit() method,
because an error
Perhaps this is the problem?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2019
I'll change my test to have an invalid field.
Ned Collyer wrote:
Hi,
I have the following - which was working on 1.4-rc1
FormTester formTester = wicketTester.newFormTester(panel:form
After update to rc2 - I am getting an NPE on a CheckBoxMultipleChoice when
submitting a form.
The NPE is thrown from the same area that the following Jira addresses.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1270
This patch does not appear in 1.4-rc2.
The stack I'm getting is
Caused by:
Hi,
I have browsed/read the previous threads regarding this topic and read the
wiki on styling and localisation - but its inconclusive as to how this
should be tackled.
I have my app running on multiple domains.
Each domain - when you hit it, sets a style into the session - so they
appear to
Yep :).
I at least 1 thought on this matter.
Currently, I have a webapp module - which will have my components in it,
and my components variants.
I have pushed all i18n into properties files - which is working thus far.
I allow the clients to customise their HTML from another folder - ie,
IMO, the brackets approach works because it clearly separates each of the
sections.
It is a bit ugly, but its still simple.
Can't please everyone all of the time, but we can try to give the clients
the right stuff, and the devs the power to build it :).
yeah, not to mention it might get quiet
What I'm trying to do at the moment (and the purpose of starting this thread)
is creating custom form fields, that have different types of HTML depending
on the variant.
So I could do
new LabelledTextField(banana) {
public String getVariation() {
return complex;
}
}
new
A possible added bonus to this that it *might* be possible to catch a session
expired, and re-login to the bookmarkable page.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-PROPOSAL--Use-path-in-URL-when-target-is-instance-of-BookmarkablePageRequestTarget-tp18188845p18228914.html
Sent
Witold Czaplewski wrote:
i'm trying to use a custom ResourceStreamLocator to place the markup
files in another directory. It is based on this wiki entry:
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/control-where-html-files-are-loaded-from.html#ControlwhereHTMLfilesareloadedfrom-InWicket1.3
The
I've written some code that allow spring to validate objects for me using the
org.springframework.validation.Validator interface.
I've also got some code that maps the ValidationErrors back to wicket
fields.
The spring validators take an entire object rather than field by field. My
question
Thanks Lars,
That's the same *conclusion* I had come to :)
I'll have to override process I think (provided thats what's setting the
form elements back to the backing model).
The validators and the domain objects live in a module that has no wicket
dependencies, and I am not in a position to be
Yep, cool. Thanks Igor.
Will see how I go :)
igor.vaynberg wrote:
you will have to at least use wicket's type conversion validators
unless your beans only have string properties.
-igor
--
View this message in context:
So this is how i solved it - basically preserving wickets functionality as
much as I could, and only changing it in the event i have a spring
validator.
on my AbstractForm i did the following:
public void setSpringValidator(Validator validator) {
this.validator = validator;
}
Hi,
What's the best way of doing simple reordering of components?
For example:
I have a form which is
-
firstname
surname
--
and I want to change it to the following based on some condition (ie, a
checkbox being selected)
-
surname,
firstname
-
Obviously
er... form.hasError()? form.onError()?
What do you mean by page? - are there lots of forms on the page all with
errors?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/How-to-identify-if-any-of-a-page%27s-components-failed-validation-after-a-submit-tp18599562p18605378.html
Sent from
I've just converted over a project to 1.4-m3 from m1. I skipped m2
because of the drastic changes between 1, 2 and 3.
I must say, I think generics at a component level - when I initially started
using it felt like unneeded overhead - but it became more and more useful.
now that I've
Thinking about this - generifying panel would probably fix it - or i can just
make my own base panel with generics.
Ned Collyer wrote:
I've just converted over a project to 1.4-m3 from m1. I skipped m2
because of the drastic changes between 1, 2 and 3.
I must say, I think generics
Hi,
I'm currently using wicket 1.4-m1
I need to be able to partially override a properties file.
Eg,
Classpath:
Application.properties
key1=123
key2=456
Filesystem:
Application.properties
key2=444
key3=555
This should result in a resource which is like this
Application.properties
Not as simple as I'd hoped...
Looks like I need to copy/paste all of PropertiesFactory and reimplement
IPropertiesFactory with my mods.
Oh well :|
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Internationalisation-with-custom-folder-tp18705254p18705484.html
Sent from the Wicket -
I found it strange that my custom resource stream locator was forcibly
nullified when running tests.
Is this a bug? or by design.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Why-does-Settings.setResourceFinder-null-out-resourceStreamLocator--tp18748752p18748752.html
Sent from the
A tshirt with
Use IComponentBorder
would be rad.
Nino.Martinez wrote:
We talked about this a loong time ago. But theres a service
CafePress.com (could have been there then aswell )which fairly easy lets
you produce wicket merchandise.. So do the community want mugs caps and
I have a form that has its elements treated with various things (required
text, labels etc) - these get added by a FormComponent.AbstractVisitor in
the onBeforeRender of the form.
In the form I have a AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior which adds another
panel into the form when certain
fields in their own form and nest that with
its own visitor - just feels a bit nasty.
Timo Rantalaiho wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2008, Ned Collyer wrote:
In the form I have a AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior which adds another
panel into the form when certain conditions are met. This new panel has
Does anyone have any more opinions on this?
Can you share your wisdom Igor? :)
What I have at hte moment is
public class DefaultFormVisitor extends FormComponent.AbstractVisitor
implements Component.IVisitor, Serializable {
}
and I manually add this visitor in the onbeforerender of the ajax
Firstly - sorry for my initial post - i didnt see the inline bit in the
subject - so I wasn't very helpful.
You could also use a MixedParamUrlCodingStrategy and mount the page as
http://[host-name]/wap/[id]/[filename]
- then you can put in a check that the filename matches the ID (ie, its a
I have adapted forms with flair, however I've found that the onbeforerender
of the form is not executed when its contents are updated with ajax.
It will depend on your impl i guess.
Kai Mütz wrote:
Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael wrote:
Look at Ivisitor and add one to the form, that
I have a form with a CompoundPropertyModel. One of the fields inside this
model is a FileUpload.
Why do I need to pass a dummy model, (or the current model) through to the
FileUploadField - is this an oversight?
I cannot find details surrounding the private hasExplicitModel boolean in
the
inputstream into the cpm, thats how cpms work...
if you set hasexcplicitmodel(false) then the model will not be
updated, instead you will have to call getfileupload() yourself.
what exactly are you trying to do?
-igor
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 11:22 PM, Ned Collyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote
You should be able to do
Form form = new Form(form, new CompoundPropertyModel(MyPojo));
page.add(form);
form.add(new MyFormComponent(myProperty));
See
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/working-with-wicket-models.html#WorkingwithWicketmodels-CompoundPropertyModels
dukehoops wrote:
The
Perhaps I don't understand your use case.
I'm using CPM all over the shop, and letting auto CPM propagation take care
of itself.
If the property is obtained from some other way, then obviously you would
need to supply it to the form field - in the same way there are multi
constructors for most
Its a requirement for me that my domain entities have DateTime.
I'd like to use wicket-datetime (as described here)
http://www.nabble.com/my-domain-model-and-Joda-Time-td15660961.html#a15660961
I can see its internals are all DateTimey which is AWESOME!!
What is the easiest / quickest way of
I was hoping to wait for the next milestone to see what the fallout of all
the generics mods are.
The change between m1, m2, and m3 were significant.
Is it staying as it is in m3? (Ive checked the generics page on the wiki).
Rgds
Ned
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
First, please upgrade to
Yeah i saw that (the patch file and zips). Interesting stuff.
I ended up getting the source from svn, and just replacing Date with
DateTime. The datatype features a lot more than I'd expected.
I'm normally the type of person who likes rollin their own components, but I
just don't have the
The system I'm building at the moment has almost everything pushed down into
components. Most of the functionality is achieved by a single base page
which takes a component in its constructor.
For Bookmarkable pages, I extend this base page, and pass a component to the
super.
How do _you_
Use firebug.
Beyonder Unknown wrote:
Hi Guys,
I was wondering if there's a way that wicket can generate the html in with
indentation? Right now, when we view-source our wicket page in the
browser, it generates the html without tabs. All lines are left-aligned.
Thanks in advance.
?
Are you not using markup inheritance?
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Ned Collyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The system I'm building at the moment has almost everything pushed down
into
components. Most of the functionality is achieved by a single base page
which takes a component in its
I use those annotations - they are awesome :)
If you could annotate a panel to be bookmarkable.. that'd be interesting.
So the panel COULD be embeded into other components, or used standalone as a
page.
Currently I achieve this by creating a new page class which instantiates and
passes the
Their constructor :)
Nav Che wrote:
Ned,
But then how do u pass parameters across the panels???
//nav
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Pages-or-components...-how-do-u-decide--tp20016807p20100652.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at
Yep, wrong place to paste for CSS probs
That being said, given your CSS rule:
div#footer ul#navlist, #noprint
{
display: none;
}
its expecting navlist to be in the footer, but is not.
its expecting noprint to be an id, but it is not (its a class).
Feel free to ask wicket questions :)
Sorry
As you probably are aware - this is just outputting XML using XStream.
This is a one way data feed.
I'm using XStream - but chose a different tech for our REST components
because wicket is not RESTy.
I'd be interested if you can make this 2 way web service, and support POST,
GET, PUT and
if you have em's wrapped around the link, its probably disabled.
Eg, from
if(poll.getStatus().equals(VidgetStatus.ACTIVE))
deleteLink.setEnabled(false);
Rgds
Ned
itayh wrote:
Hi Charlie,
You are correct, I removed some not relevant data.
Here
I'm in the process of updating to 1.4m3.
The following is resulting in the same cache key for each item. (which did
not happen in 1.4m1)
ListView createLinks = new ListViewLink(createLinks, links) {
protected void populateItem(ListItemLink item) {
Link link =
actually.. found out what it was (and the example i gave was incorrect -
oops).
the new Localizer#getCacheKey(String, Component) assumes that for a given
key in the markup, there will only ever be a single translation.
I have my own resource resolver, which allows for resolution of the keys
Can someone please post or link to an example of how the filters are meant to
work with the data table. Specifically TextFilter or
TextFilteredPropertyColumn.
I've done some poking around, but its escaping me.
I've added the elements to my page - but I'm having little luck.
The javadoc is
Thanks very much.
Wicket just gets better and better hey ;)
Kai Mütz wrote:
Ned Collyer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone please post or link to an example of how the filters are
meant to work with the data table. Specifically TextFilter or
TextFilteredPropertyColumn
Hi,
I have a FormComponentPanel which contains several select boxes.
selectTitle/select
selectModel/select
selectTransmission/select
I'd like to be able to be able to do the following - but not sure how
to achieve it.
MyAwesomeComponent extends FormComponentPanel
new
I am currently running wicket 1.4-rc2
I have nested forms setup in the wizard. One of my steps is as follows.
code
public class MyStep1 extends WizardStep {
public MyStep1(final CompoundPropertyModelCampaign campaignModel) {
super(Step 1, Wow bananas);
add(new Form(form) {
...@gmail.com wrote:
Is the form nested in the other form in html. I remember vaguely
something about it needs to be nested, wicket then rewrites it or
something like that.. How does the resulting html look like?
2009/7/6 Ned Collyer ned.coll...@gmail.com:
I am currently running wicket 1.4-rc2
I have
I'm building a wizard. It has 3 steps. Persistence occurs for all my
models after the completion of the 3rd step.
Each step has a number of forms. Each form is brought in dynamically
from 3rd party jars.
This works great so far. The exception to the rule is FileUploads -
as these are only
something similar, but my part are working.. It's pretty
hard digesting without code.. :(
2009/7/7 Ned Collyer ned.coll...@gmail.com:
The nesting is -
The outer form is inside the wizard, then I have an inner form inside
one of the steps.
Sorry, I cant show you the output of the html - I scrapped
Basically I want to do the following in my base abstract Page (or Panel - it
makes little difference).
Eg.
wicket:link
a href=MyHome.htmlHome br /
a href=MyPage.html?id=1Page 1 br /
a href=MyPage.html?id=2Page 2
/wicket:link
Now this is fine - it generates the links on the page (and
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
And according to me you are the first person in a while to encounter such
a
thing...
Nah, some of us just do workarounds, or begrudgingly add the urgly method
call ;).
I must admit having something so simple like adding components to a list,
and them not working
Hi,
I may be overlooking something, however I am having a bit of trouble linking
to the last current version of a page unless I use the method outlined by
igor, which isn't practical for what I am trying to achieve (see his method
below from
Hi Johan,
Thank you for the reply.
This suggestion will work, but it seems like something that the framework
should do automatically. The whole maintaining state thing is meant to
maintain state between requests without the extra dev overhead of manually
plugging stuff into, and pulling out of
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
If you're still unconvinced, take a look at
org.apache.wicket.examples.staticpages in wicket-examples; it might do
what you want.
Eelco
This sounds like very similar question to
I have the circumstance where I have a sidebar panel on the left hand side
of my site that I want to reflect the current state of the system -
regardless of the state of the components in the middle.
It will do a data lookup based on an id given to the component in its
constructor, and should
igor.vaynberg wrote:
you can try using a repeater like a listview, and also make sure you
are using detachable models. perhaps if you gave more description of
what the component looks like/what it does and a screenshot that could
help us help you more.
-igor
Hi Igor, thanks for the
Thank you :)
I'll give it a try. - pretty busy on other things, but will try it out asap!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Reloading-component-on-each-request.-tp15017178p15033866.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ListView is appropriate, just make sure you set the setReuseItems to true.
Other repeaters may well work too, but ListView is the most obvious choice,
so might as well use it. (I'm a wicket noobie, and had the same problem a
few days back)
Edvin Syse wrote:
Hi Ned,
Thanks a lot, that
With wicket security (either wasp/swarm, or wicket-auth-roles) can things
like Roles and Permissions be created through a web interface?
Eg,
I need a system whereby I can add new roles (or principals) through the web
interface, and define their permission to a ACLs which are determined by
which
Thank you for the detail of your answer.
I'll have a look into it asap - other work matters are pressing :(
Mr Mean wrote:
There is no example application (that i know of) showing what you want.
Let me recap what i think you want:
You have an application (probably with a basic set of
You may be interested in something like the bean editor webcast linked from
here
http://herebebeasties.com/2007-08-17/wicket-bean-editor/
With a bit of customisation you should be able to bend it to suit your needs
for any of your pojos.
Rgds
Ned
Constantin Y wrote:
First of all I want to
Hi,
I've searched this forum for answers and come up short :| even tho the
question has been posed before.
I'm running DEVELOPMENT mode on 1.3.1 through the Start class provided in
the maven archetype.
I run this through intellij 7, but changes to my pages (eg, HomePage.html)
are not coming
It's ... quite obvious now that I think about it some more.
Your prompt replies are always appreciated.
The bit that threw me was bb.setWar(src/main/webapp);
I just glossed over it assuming it was pointing all resources at my src/main
by magic :)
Now the hard part... bending idea to my whim.
Ned Collyer wrote:
Now the hard part... bending idea to my whim. (unless u know off the top
of ur head how to automate this copy).
ripped from http://www.jroller.com/dashorst/entry/intellij_idea_experiences
- specifically a comment by Ali
in IDEA you can simulate save+compile of eclipse
I was hoping to compress my stylesheet and have it available at
/style/mystyle.css
I'm having a great deal of difficulty getting this working. - i can
successfully get it on resource/mypackage.MyClass/whatver, but this is not
appropriate.
I've searched this forum and google, and i guess what
Hi,
In one of my pages, i need to invoke a method from my web application.
My application class is as follows
public class MyApp extends WebApplication {
private Thing thing;
public void init() {
// Attach the component injector - ie, enable spring for this
application.
4 minutes? You're getting slower!
That kind of worked. I'm not fond of having to reinitialise all the things I
set inside init, so i've moved this method out to a protected void
initSpring().
Thanks for your help.
Rgds
Ned
igor.vaynberg wrote:
try the Spring page on the wiki, it shows
Hi,
If i have a dashboard (kinda like how Jira has its dashboards), if i want to
persist the arrangement of panels, and the type .. what are my options?
At the moment I'm thinking of using a list of widgets which will consist of
the fully qualified dashboard widget class name, and a list of
Stefan Fußenegger wrote:
Hi Tom,
I'd suggest not to use Spring to manage panels. You should rather create a
new panel for every page and request. You should use Spring to manage your
services and inject those into your panels.
Best regards, Stefan
Hi Stephan :) (I work with Tom)
Kent Tong wrote:
I don't know why you feel this hacky. It looks clean and easy to me:
It works, and the implementation is nice and easy BUT...
Spring is meant to be the factory :). Isn't that a big part of why we use
spring?
--
View this message in context:
This is close to the solution we are currently using ;)
Thanks for the info on the Classes object.
Rgds
Ned
Kent Tong wrote:
public class TestPage extends WebPage {
@SpringBean(name = panelFactory)
private PanelFactory panelFactory;
public TestPage() {
I'm wondering if this thing has been abandoned.
It looked very promising, and I love the trimmed down syntax of the builder.
as shown here:
http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/WicketBuilder
--
View this message in context:
Oh boy are you in for a treat.
http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/localization-and-skinning-of-applications.html
Different css ... or markup.. or language... possibly determined by user
preference... or whatever you like.
Bobby Quninne wrote:
There is a requirement that the website can be
Just on Set's. if its unordered - then you can have a potential problem for
your users.
In the domain model it might make perfect sense that something is a Set -
but just be wary that a user generally expects order, not randomness.
wiki wrote:
Hi I have a set of questionaires
I know how
1 - 100 of 176 matches
Mail list logo
