Re: chrome + wicket ajax + back button = problem?

2010-10-11 Thread Ryan Crumley
I have (I am using MixedParamHybridUrlCodingStrategy) however in this case the browser is not contacting the server on back button click so the UrlCodingStrategy does not come into play. Ryan On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:13 PM, wrote: > I've had similar issues, have you tried HybridUrlCodingStrate

Re: chrome + wicket ajax + back button = problem?

2010-10-03 Thread Ryan Crumley
8353 > E-mail: cika...@gmail.com > > > > On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Ryan Crumley wrote: > > What is interesting is this is not a wicket specific issue however it is > > more serious when using wicket than other frameworks due to the expired > > links ca

Re: chrome + wicket ajax + back button = problem?

2010-10-03 Thread Ryan Crumley
What is interesting is this is not a wicket specific issue however it is more serious when using wicket than other frameworks due to the expired links causing errors when they reappear. I created a very simple version of the problem. Chrome and IE8 exhibits the problem but Firefox and Safari do no

chrome + wicket ajax + back button = problem?

2010-09-21 Thread Ryan Crumley
All, I ran into strange behavior involving wicket ajax updates + chrome + back button. I am pretty sure the issue is not caused by wicket but I am hoping the problem might sound familiar to someone and they can point me in the right direction. The scenario goes like this: - An ajax request is mad

Re: wicketstuff-merged-resources 3.1 parent class scanning?

2010-06-24 Thread Ryan Crumley
there and should be able to react pretty quickly). > > Regarding your issue, wouldn't it be enough it @*Contribution would be > @Inherited and superclasses of matching classes would be checked as well for > potentially overridden annotations? Could you provide a test case for your >

Re: wicketstuff-merged-resources 3.1 parent class scanning?

2010-05-21 Thread Ryan Crumley
rcrumley On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Jeremy Thomerson wrote: > What's your sf.net ID?   I can add you as committer and you can just commit > the patches. > > -- > Jeremy Thomerson > http://www.wickettraining.com > > > > On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 9:35 AM

Re: wicketstuff-merged-resources 3.1 parent class scanning?

2010-05-21 Thread Ryan Crumley
ng.com > > > > On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 9:43 PM, Ryan Crumley wrote: >> >> All, >> >> [If there is a wicketstuff specific mailing list please let me know >> and I will be happy to post there (wicketstuff.org is down so its >> difficult to find i

wicketstuff-merged-resources 3.1 parent class scanning?

2010-05-17 Thread Ryan Crumley
All, [If there is a wicketstuff specific mailing list please let me know and I will be happy to post there (wicketstuff.org is down so its difficult to find information).] I am using wicketstuff-merged-resources (3.1-SNAPSHOT) with wicketstuff-annotation (1.1) and I have found a potential issue w

Re: Static link for stateful page (Wicket 1.3)

2009-12-02 Thread Ryan Crumley
nabble.com). Any hints on how to go about this are appreciated. Ryan On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Ryan Crumley wrote: > Hi all, > > I have an unusual requirement for a stateful page that can be accessed > via a static url. To state it another way I would like the same url to &g

Static link for stateful page (Wicket 1.3)

2009-11-30 Thread Ryan Crumley
Hi all, I have an unusual requirement for a stateful page that can be accessed via a static url. To state it another way I would like the same url to always shows the latest state of a page for that session. For example: Operations: 1. Initial Render. url = http://ABC/XYZ 2. User changes the page

Re: Turning off ModificationWatcher

2009-04-08 Thread Ryan Crumley
Matt, Add this to your WebApplication.init() method: getResourceSettings().setResourcePollFrequency(null); Ryan On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Matthew Welch wrote: > I'm experimenting with Wicket inside Google's new Java support for its App > Engine. My simple apps run fine if the configurati