Re: Where to download Javadoc for Wicket 8.x?

[Andrea Del Bene]

...or just use javadoc.io :-). Select the desired version and click
"download". For example:

https://www.javadoc.io/doc/org.apache.wicket/wicket-core/8.7.0/index.html

The only drawback is that you have to download JavaDoc per single module
(wicket-core, wicket-util, etc..)

On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 12:49 PM SB  wrote:

> Okay, I figured it out:
>
> 1. Download the Apache Wicket source code from
> https://wicket.apache.org/start/wicket-8.x.html
> 2. Unzip the downloaded file.
> 3. To generate Javadocs, run `mvn javadoc:aggregate` at the root of the
> source code.
> 4. The generated Javadocs can then be found in the `./target/site/apidocs/`
> directory.
>
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 8:01 AM SB  wrote:
>
> > I usually work offline, and I need to refer to the Javadocs. Is there a
> > place where I can download Wicket's Javadocs for offline use?
> >
>


-- 
Andrea Del Bene.
Apache Wicket committer.

Re: Where to download Javadoc for Wicket 8.x?

[SB]

Okay, I figured it out:

1. Download the Apache Wicket source code from
https://wicket.apache.org/start/wicket-8.x.html
2. Unzip the downloaded file.
3. To generate Javadocs, run `mvn javadoc:aggregate` at the root of the
source code.
4. The generated Javadocs can then be found in the `./target/site/apidocs/`
directory.

On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 8:01 AM SB  wrote:

> I usually work offline, and I need to refer to the Javadocs. Is there a
> place where I can download Wicket's Javadocs for offline use?
>

Re: Where to download Javadoc for Wicket 8.x?

[Martin Terra]

ma 2. maalisk. 2020 klo 13.43 SB (progscriptcl...@gmail.com) kirjoitti:

> > ... plug in the libraries with maven together with the source option ...
>
> Sorry, I don't understand. Could you explain what you mean by this?
>

Depending on which IDE you use, try something like:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/310720/get-source-jar-files-attached-to-eclipse-for-maven-managed-dependencies

**
Martin


>
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 11:35 AM Martin Terra <
> martin.te...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote:
>
> > I would recommend to plug in the libraries with maven together with the
> > source option, this way you have both the wicket source code and the
> > javadoc.
> >
> > **
> > Martin
> >
> > ma 2. maalisk. 2020 klo 2.01 SB (progscriptcl...@gmail.com) kirjoitti:
> >
> > > I usually work offline, and I need to refer to the Javadocs. Is there a
> > > place where I can download Wicket's Javadocs for offline use?
> > >
> >
>

Re: Where to download Javadoc for Wicket 8.x?

[SB]

> ... plug in the libraries with maven together with the source option ...

Sorry, I don't understand. Could you explain what you mean by this?


On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 11:35 AM Martin Terra <
martin.te...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote:

> I would recommend to plug in the libraries with maven together with the
> source option, this way you have both the wicket source code and the
> javadoc.
>
> **
> Martin
>
> ma 2. maalisk. 2020 klo 2.01 SB (progscriptcl...@gmail.com) kirjoitti:
>
> > I usually work offline, and I need to refer to the Javadocs. Is there a
> > place where I can download Wicket's Javadocs for offline use?
> >
>

Re: Where to download Javadoc for Wicket 8.x?

[Martin Terra]

I would recommend to plug in the libraries with maven together with the
source option, this way you have both the wicket source code and the
javadoc.

**
Martin

ma 2. maalisk. 2020 klo 2.01 SB (progscriptcl...@gmail.com) kirjoitti:

> I usually work offline, and I need to refer to the Javadocs. Is there a
> place where I can download Wicket's Javadocs for offline use?
>

Where to download Javadoc for Wicket 8.x?

[SB]

I usually work offline, and I need to refer to the Javadocs. Is there a
place where I can download Wicket's Javadocs for offline use?

Re: 404 : https://wicket.apache.org/learn/#javadoc JavaDoc 9.x

[Francois Meillet]

Thanks Martin

François



> Le 8 oct. 2019 à 05:10, Martin Grigorov  a écrit :
> 
> Fixed!
> 
> On Mon, Oct 7, 2019, 12:11 Martin Grigorov  wrote:
> 
>> Hi Francois,
>> 
>> This is a known issue.
>> 
>> https://markmail.org/message/6owzkxowbsf33jcy
>> https://markmail.org/message/ac65iqbmwjdlugz3
>> 
>> I will try to find a working solution for it this week.
>> 
>> Martin
>> 
>> 
>> On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 11:17 AM Francois Meillet <
>> francois.meil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> There is a 404 for
>>> https://ci.apache.org/projects/wicket/apidocs/9.x/index.html <
>>> https://ci.apache.org/projects/wicket/apidocs/9.x/index.html>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> François
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: 404 : https://wicket.apache.org/learn/#javadoc JavaDoc 9.x

[Martin Grigorov]

Fixed!

On Mon, Oct 7, 2019, 12:11 Martin Grigorov  wrote:

> Hi Francois,
>
> This is a known issue.
>
> https://markmail.org/message/6owzkxowbsf33jcy
> https://markmail.org/message/ac65iqbmwjdlugz3
>
> I will try to find a working solution for it this week.
>
> Martin
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 11:17 AM Francois Meillet <
> francois.meil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> There is a 404 for
>> https://ci.apache.org/projects/wicket/apidocs/9.x/index.html <
>> https://ci.apache.org/projects/wicket/apidocs/9.x/index.html>
>>
>>
>> François
>>
>>
>>
>>

Re: 404 : https://wicket.apache.org/learn/#javadoc JavaDoc 9.x

[Martin Grigorov]

Hi Francois,

This is a known issue.

https://markmail.org/message/6owzkxowbsf33jcy
https://markmail.org/message/ac65iqbmwjdlugz3

I will try to find a working solution for it this week.

Martin


On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 11:17 AM Francois Meillet 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> There is a 404 for
> https://ci.apache.org/projects/wicket/apidocs/9.x/index.html <
> https://ci.apache.org/projects/wicket/apidocs/9.x/index.html>
>
>
> François
>
>
>
>

404 : https://wicket.apache.org/learn/#javadoc JavaDoc 9.x

[Francois Meillet]

Hi,

There is a 404 for https://ci.apache.org/projects/wicket/apidocs/9.x/index.html 



François

Re: Build problems for Wicket 7.15.0 and Java 8 regarding Javadoc.

[Maxim Solodovnik]

Hello,

please use `buildbot` profile

On Mon, 16 Sep 2019 at 20:16, Thorsten Schöning 
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to build Wicket 7.15.0 from source using Java 8:
>
> > openjdk version "1.8.0_222"
> > OpenJDK Runtime Environment (AdoptOpenJDK)(build 1.8.0_222-b10)
> > OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (AdoptOpenJDK)(build 25.222-b10, mixed mode)
>
> This fails in Wicket Util already with lots of Javadoc-related errors.
> I know that the reason this happens is because of enabled linting for
> Javadoc in Java 8 by default, but earlier versions of Wicket 7
> implemented a workaround. That workaround has been removed without any
> further notice on why and what the alternative is:
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/ee1b8b37dbe5b34c63a33d65f84b26cbd38080d4
>
> https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/d7416a325338a7d229c9e25f4d6852f0c83775eb
>
> So, how am I supposed to build Wicket 7 using Java 8 these days?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
>
> Thorsten Schöning
>
> --
> Thorsten Schöning   E-Mail: thorsten.schoen...@am-soft.de
> AM-SoFT IT-Systeme  http://www.AM-SoFT.de/
>
> Telefon...05151-  9468- 55
> Fax...05151-  9468- 88
> Mobil..0178-8 9468- 04
>
> AM-SoFT GmbH IT-Systeme, Brandenburger Str. 7c, 31789 Hameln
> AG Hannover HRB 207 694 - Geschäftsführer: Andreas Muchow
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
>
>

-- 
WBR
Maxim aka solomax

Build problems for Wicket 7.15.0 and Java 8 regarding Javadoc.

[Thorsten Schöning]

Hi all,

I'm trying to build Wicket 7.15.0 from source using Java 8:

> openjdk version "1.8.0_222"
> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (AdoptOpenJDK)(build 1.8.0_222-b10)
> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (AdoptOpenJDK)(build 25.222-b10, mixed mode)

This fails in Wicket Util already with lots of Javadoc-related errors.
I know that the reason this happens is because of enabled linting for
Javadoc in Java 8 by default, but earlier versions of Wicket 7
implemented a workaround. That workaround has been removed without any
further notice on why and what the alternative is:

https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/ee1b8b37dbe5b34c63a33d65f84b26cbd38080d4
https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/d7416a325338a7d229c9e25f4d6852f0c83775eb

So, how am I supposed to build Wicket 7 using Java 8 these days?

Thanks!

Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

Thorsten Schöning

-- 
Thorsten Schöning   E-Mail: thorsten.schoen...@am-soft.de
AM-SoFT IT-Systeme  http://www.AM-SoFT.de/

Telefon...05151-  9468- 55
Fax...05151-  9468- 88
Mobil..0178-8 9468- 04

AM-SoFT GmbH IT-Systeme, Brandenburger Str. 7c, 31789 Hameln
AG Hannover HRB 207 694 - Geschäftsführer: Andreas Muchow


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Wicketstuff JavaDoc

[Andrea Del Bene]

Hi everybody,

I've created a gh-pages branch to host javadoc for wicketstuff. It 
contains docs for 6.x and master branch. They are linked in the readme 
file of each respective branch.


http://wicketstuff.org/core/javadoc6/apidocs/index.html
http://wicketstuff.org/core/javadoc7/apidocs/index.html

Have fun!

@Martin. Can be CI configured to generate and automatically update the 
doc? Doing it manually it's not a big issue but if can make it automatic 
is of course better.




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Wicketstuff JavaDoc

[Tobias Soloschenko]

Great! Yep auto generated doc would be very useful! +1

kind regards

Tobias

 Am 28.02.2015 um 15:23 schrieb Andrea Del Bene an.delb...@gmail.com:
 
 Hi everybody,
 
 I've created a gh-pages branch to host javadoc for wicketstuff. It contains 
 docs for 6.x and master branch. They are linked in the readme file of each 
 respective branch.
 
 http://wicketstuff.org/core/javadoc6/apidocs/index.html
 http://wicketstuff.org/core/javadoc7/apidocs/index.html
 
 Have fun!
 
 @Martin. Can be CI configured to generate and automatically update the doc? 
 Doing it manually it's not a big issue but if can make it automatic is of 
 course better.
 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Publish Javadoc or big number of Static pages

[phl]

Hello, 

Thanks for the tips. It works if I replace Page by WebPage. 

Best regardds
PHL

--
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Publish-Javadoc-or-big-number-of-Static-pages-tp4663621p4663770.html
Sent from the Users forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

RE: Publish Javadoc or big number of Static pages

[andre seame]

Use the web server to show the static page is a very good idea. As all other 
pages are in generated by wicket, I was only thinking in term of wicket. 

Thanks for the idea.
PHL

 Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 15:11:17 -0500
 Subject: Re: Publish Javadoc or big number of Static pages
 From: p...@bors.ws
 To: users@wicket.apache.org
 
 I'm not following, you want to show 200 static HTML pages in your webapp?
 
 Your webapp must be running on top of a web server, why not just let the
 web server server the static content?
 What's the dynamic part of those 200 static HTML pages?
 Do you need to authenticate the user first or something before they can
 view the static content?
 
 
 On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 12:23 PM, andre seame andre1...@hotmail.fr wrote:
 
 
 
  Hello,
 
 
 
  I
  have a wicket site to manage different points on the project. I receive 200
  HTML pages for the developer teams. These pages are javadoc pages.
 
  I
  add some dynamic pages built over the static pages with wicket. And I will
  to
  publish all pages with wicket.
 
  As
  I have static HTML pages and as want to use them immediately, I must use
  the
  Frame HTML mechanism.
 
  So
  I will have a page with a left part: the menu or the list of pages, and on
  the
  right part (in another frame) the associated page.
 
  So
  I am using the
  http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/frames/ examples. This
  works, but I have 2 problems:
 
  -
  I have to created 200 page.java/page.class, one per static pages!
 
  -
  I have to modify the code (creating a new page.java/page.class) if there
  is a
  new static page.
 
 
 
  So
  what is the easiest way to manage this problem?
 
 
 
  May
  be an idea is to say to wicket:  just for
  this time, the associated html page to genericsaticpage.class is
  staticpage1.html. Of course for another link, the associated html page to
  genericsaticpage.class will be staticpage2.html.
 
 
 
  I
  can also image to have staticpage.html : ...bodydiv
  wicket:id=The body will be read from the static
  page/body. In this case, I will lost the css or the javascript
  code that may be included in the original static page.
 
 
 
  Thanks
  for any pointers or suggestion.
 
 
  

Publish Javadoc or big number of Static pages

[andre seame]

Hello,

 

I
have a wicket site to manage different points on the project. I receive 200
HTML pages for the developer teams. These pages are javadoc pages.

I
add some dynamic pages built over the static pages with wicket. And I will to
publish all pages with wicket. 

As
I have static HTML pages and as want to use them immediately, I must use the
Frame HTML mechanism. 

So
I will have a page with a left part: the menu or the list of pages, and on the
right part (in another frame) the associated page. 

So
I am using the 
http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/frames/ examples. This
works, but I have 2 problems: 

-
I have to created 200 page.java/page.class, one per static pages! 

-
I have to modify the code (creating a new page.java/page.class) if there is a
new static page.

 

So
what is the easiest way to manage this problem? 

 

May
be an idea is to say to wicket:  just for
this time, the associated html page to genericsaticpage.class is
staticpage1.html. Of course for another link, the associated html page to
genericsaticpage.class will be staticpage2.html.

 

I
can also image to have staticpage.html : ...bodydiv
wicket:id=The body will be read from the static
page/body. In this case, I will lost the css or the javascript
code that may be included in the original static page.

 

Thanks
for any pointers or suggestion. 

  

Re: Publish Javadoc or big number of Static pages

[Paul Bors]

I'm not following, you want to show 200 static HTML pages in your webapp?

Your webapp must be running on top of a web server, why not just let the
web server server the static content?
What's the dynamic part of those 200 static HTML pages?
Do you need to authenticate the user first or something before they can
view the static content?


On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 12:23 PM, andre seame andre1...@hotmail.fr wrote:



 Hello,



 I
 have a wicket site to manage different points on the project. I receive 200
 HTML pages for the developer teams. These pages are javadoc pages.

 I
 add some dynamic pages built over the static pages with wicket. And I will
 to
 publish all pages with wicket.

 As
 I have static HTML pages and as want to use them immediately, I must use
 the
 Frame HTML mechanism.

 So
 I will have a page with a left part: the menu or the list of pages, and on
 the
 right part (in another frame) the associated page.

 So
 I am using the
 http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/frames/ examples. This
 works, but I have 2 problems:

 -
 I have to created 200 page.java/page.class, one per static pages!

 -
 I have to modify the code (creating a new page.java/page.class) if there
 is a
 new static page.



 So
 what is the easiest way to manage this problem?



 May
 be an idea is to say to wicket:  just for
 this time, the associated html page to genericsaticpage.class is
 staticpage1.html. Of course for another link, the associated html page to
 genericsaticpage.class will be staticpage2.html.



 I
 can also image to have staticpage.html : ...bodydiv
 wicket:id=The body will be read from the static
 page/body. In this case, I will lost the css or the javascript
 code that may be included in the original static page.



 Thanks
 for any pointers or suggestion.

Re: Publish Javadoc or big number of Static pages

[Steve]

public class StaticPage extends Page implements
IMarkupResourceStreamProvider, IMarkupCacheKeyProvider {

private String staticPageFilename;

public StaticPage(String staticPageFilename) {
super();
this.staticPageFilename = staticPageFilename;
}

@Override
public String getCacheKey(MarkupContainer container, Class?
containerClass) {
return staticPageFilename;
}

@Override
public IResourceStream getMarkupResourceStream(MarkupContainer
container, Class? containerClass) {
   
String html = getFileAsString(staticPageFilename);
//modify html if necessary
return new StringResourceStream(html);
}

}
On 11/01/14 06:11, Paul Bors wrote:
 I'm not following, you want to show 200 static HTML pages in your webapp?

 Your webapp must be running on top of a web server, why not just let the
 web server server the static content?
 What's the dynamic part of those 200 static HTML pages?
 Do you need to authenticate the user first or something before they can
 view the static content?


 On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 12:23 PM, andre seame andre1...@hotmail.fr wrote:


 Hello,



 I
 have a wicket site to manage different points on the project. I receive 200
 HTML pages for the developer teams. These pages are javadoc pages.

 I
 add some dynamic pages built over the static pages with wicket. And I will
 to
 publish all pages with wicket.

 As
 I have static HTML pages and as want to use them immediately, I must use
 the
 Frame HTML mechanism.

 So
 I will have a page with a left part: the menu or the list of pages, and on
 the
 right part (in another frame) the associated page.

 So
 I am using the
 http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/frames/ examples. This
 works, but I have 2 problems:

 -
 I have to created 200 page.java/page.class, one per static pages!

 -
 I have to modify the code (creating a new page.java/page.class) if there
 is a
 new static page.



 So
 what is the easiest way to manage this problem?



 May
 be an idea is to say to wicket:  just for
 this time, the associated html page to genericsaticpage.class is
 staticpage1.html. Of course for another link, the associated html page to
 genericsaticpage.class will be staticpage2.html.



 I
 can also image to have staticpage.html : ...bodydiv
 wicket:id=The body will be read from the static
 page/body. In this case, I will lost the css or the javascript
 code that may be included in the original static page.



 Thanks
 for any pointers or suggestion.




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Publish Javadoc or big number of Static pages

[Steve]

Actually here's a slightly better example using PageParameters instead. 
This will allow you to mount it using:
WebApplication.get().mountPage(/static, StaticPage.class);

Also demonstrates that you can inject your own wicket tags into the
markup before returning it leaving the original markup file untouched.


public class StaticPage extends WebPage implements
IMarkupResourceStreamProvider, IMarkupCacheKeyProvider {

private String staticPageFilename;

public StaticPage(PageParameters params) {
super();
   
this.staticPageFilename =
params.get(staticPageFilename).toString();
   
add(new Label(label, This is a static page generated from: 
+ staticPageFilename));
}

@Override
public String getCacheKey(MarkupContainer container, Class?
containerClass) {
return staticPageFilename;
}

@Override
public IResourceStream getMarkupResourceStream(MarkupContainer
container, Class? containerClass) {
   
String html = getFileAsString(staticPageFilename);
//modify html if necessary
html = html.replace(body, body\n h1
wicket:id=\label\/h1);
   
return new StringResourceStream(html);
}

}
On 11/01/14 06:11, Paul Bors wrote:
 I'm not following, you want to show 200 static HTML pages in your webapp?

 Your webapp must be running on top of a web server, why not just let the
 web server server the static content?
 What's the dynamic part of those 200 static HTML pages?
 Do you need to authenticate the user first or something before they can
 view the static content?


 On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 12:23 PM, andre seame andre1...@hotmail.fr wrote:


 Hello,



 I
 have a wicket site to manage different points on the project. I receive 200
 HTML pages for the developer teams. These pages are javadoc pages.

 I
 add some dynamic pages built over the static pages with wicket. And I will
 to
 publish all pages with wicket.

 As
 I have static HTML pages and as want to use them immediately, I must use
 the
 Frame HTML mechanism.

 So
 I will have a page with a left part: the menu or the list of pages, and on
 the
 right part (in another frame) the associated page.

 So
 I am using the
 http://www.wicket-library.com/wicket-examples/frames/ examples. This
 works, but I have 2 problems:

 -
 I have to created 200 page.java/page.class, one per static pages!

 -
 I have to modify the code (creating a new page.java/page.class) if there
 is a
 new static page.



 So
 what is the easiest way to manage this problem?



 May
 be an idea is to say to wicket:  just for
 this time, the associated html page to genericsaticpage.class is
 staticpage1.html. Of course for another link, the associated html page to
 genericsaticpage.class will be staticpage2.html.



 I
 can also image to have staticpage.html : ...bodydiv
 wicket:id=The body will be read from the static
 page/body. In this case, I will lost the css or the javascript
 code that may be included in the original static page.



 Thanks
 for any pointers or suggestion.




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Wrong JavaDoc for FeedbackMessages#hasMessage(int)

[Martin Grigorov]

I've backported ExactLevelFeedbackMessageFilter from master branch.

It has been introduced for:
WICKET-4585 WicketTester.assertErrorMessages passes even if the message
isn't visible on the page
WICKET-5128 Allow for Testing Component relative Feedback-Messages in
Wicket-Tester

No need of new ticket.


On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Paul Bors p...@bors.ws wrote:

 Yes, we are using the .FeedbackMessages#hasMessage(IFeedbackMessageFilter)
 as we had no other choice.

 I'll file a ticket with a pull request now that I got used to GitHub :)

 ~ Thank you,
Paul Bors


 On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org
 wrote:

  Hi,
 
  You are right.
  But I think we can only improve the javadoc.
  You will have to
  use
 
 org.apache.wicket.feedback.FeedbackMessages#hasMessage(org.apache.wicket.feedback.IFeedbackMessageFilter)
  with a filter that makes exact match.
  I have the feeling that we added such filter but I can only
  see org.apache.wicket.feedback.ErrorLevelFeedbackMessageFilter that has
 the
  same behavior as #hasMessage(int).
 
  Please file a ticket and we will add it.
 
 
  On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Paul Bors p...@bors.ws wrote:
 
   Currently (as of 6.10.0) the JavaDoc on
   the FeedbackMessages#hasMessage(int) states that it returns true if and
   only if a message with the specified level was registered.
  
   However it relies on FeedbackMessage#isLevel(int) which in turn return
  true
   if whether the message level is greater than or equal to the given
 level.
  
   Isn't that contradicting? I registered an Error message for my form
 field
   and I have a new behavior checking for Warnings that performs its
 duties
   because an Error message is at a lever greater than the Warning level.
  
   ~ Thank you,
  Paul Bors
  
 

Re: Wrong JavaDoc for FeedbackMessages#hasMessage(int)

[Paul Bors]

We should still edit the JavaDoc for FeedbackMessages#hasMessage(int) and
instruct to use ExactLevelFeedbackMessageFilter.
Otherwise might get confused if the don't review the implementation.

~ Thank you,
   Paul Bors


On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 4:11 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.orgwrote:

 I've backported ExactLevelFeedbackMessageFilter from master branch.

 It has been introduced for:
 WICKET-4585 WicketTester.assertErrorMessages passes even if the message
 isn't visible on the page
 WICKET-5128 Allow for Testing Component relative Feedback-Messages in
 Wicket-Tester

 No need of new ticket.


 On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Paul Bors p...@bors.ws wrote:

  Yes, we are using the
 .FeedbackMessages#hasMessage(IFeedbackMessageFilter)
  as we had no other choice.
 
  I'll file a ticket with a pull request now that I got used to GitHub :)
 
  ~ Thank you,
 Paul Bors
 
 
  On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org
  wrote:
 
   Hi,
  
   You are right.
   But I think we can only improve the javadoc.
   You will have to
   use
  
 
 org.apache.wicket.feedback.FeedbackMessages#hasMessage(org.apache.wicket.feedback.IFeedbackMessageFilter)
   with a filter that makes exact match.
   I have the feeling that we added such filter but I can only
   see org.apache.wicket.feedback.ErrorLevelFeedbackMessageFilter that has
  the
   same behavior as #hasMessage(int).
  
   Please file a ticket and we will add it.
  
  
   On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Paul Bors p...@bors.ws wrote:
  
Currently (as of 6.10.0) the JavaDoc on
the FeedbackMessages#hasMessage(int) states that it returns true if
 and
only if a message with the specified level was registered.
   
However it relies on FeedbackMessage#isLevel(int) which in turn
 return
   true
if whether the message level is greater than or equal to the given
  level.
   
Isn't that contradicting? I registered an Error message for my form
  field
and I have a new behavior checking for Warnings that performs its
  duties
because an Error message is at a lever greater than the Warning
 level.
   
~ Thank you,
   Paul Bors
   
  
 

Wrong JavaDoc for FeedbackMessages#hasMessage(int)

[Paul Bors]

Currently (as of 6.10.0) the JavaDoc on
the FeedbackMessages#hasMessage(int) states that it returns true if and
only if a message with the specified level was registered.

However it relies on FeedbackMessage#isLevel(int) which in turn return true
if whether the message level is greater than or equal to the given level.

Isn't that contradicting? I registered an Error message for my form field
and I have a new behavior checking for Warnings that performs its duties
because an Error message is at a lever greater than the Warning level.

~ Thank you,
   Paul Bors

Re: Wrong JavaDoc for FeedbackMessages#hasMessage(int)

[Martin Grigorov]

Hi,

You are right.
But I think we can only improve the javadoc.
You will have to
use 
org.apache.wicket.feedback.FeedbackMessages#hasMessage(org.apache.wicket.feedback.IFeedbackMessageFilter)
with a filter that makes exact match.
I have the feeling that we added such filter but I can only
see org.apache.wicket.feedback.ErrorLevelFeedbackMessageFilter that has the
same behavior as #hasMessage(int).

Please file a ticket and we will add it.


On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Paul Bors p...@bors.ws wrote:

 Currently (as of 6.10.0) the JavaDoc on
 the FeedbackMessages#hasMessage(int) states that it returns true if and
 only if a message with the specified level was registered.

 However it relies on FeedbackMessage#isLevel(int) which in turn return true
 if whether the message level is greater than or equal to the given level.

 Isn't that contradicting? I registered an Error message for my form field
 and I have a new behavior checking for Warnings that performs its duties
 because an Error message is at a lever greater than the Warning level.

 ~ Thank you,
Paul Bors

Re: Wrong JavaDoc for FeedbackMessages#hasMessage(int)

[Paul Bors]

Yes, we are using the .FeedbackMessages#hasMessage(IFeedbackMessageFilter)
as we had no other choice.

I'll file a ticket with a pull request now that I got used to GitHub :)

~ Thank you,
   Paul Bors


On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.orgwrote:

 Hi,

 You are right.
 But I think we can only improve the javadoc.
 You will have to
 use
 org.apache.wicket.feedback.FeedbackMessages#hasMessage(org.apache.wicket.feedback.IFeedbackMessageFilter)
 with a filter that makes exact match.
 I have the feeling that we added such filter but I can only
 see org.apache.wicket.feedback.ErrorLevelFeedbackMessageFilter that has the
 same behavior as #hasMessage(int).

 Please file a ticket and we will add it.


 On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Paul Bors p...@bors.ws wrote:

  Currently (as of 6.10.0) the JavaDoc on
  the FeedbackMessages#hasMessage(int) states that it returns true if and
  only if a message with the specified level was registered.
 
  However it relies on FeedbackMessage#isLevel(int) which in turn return
 true
  if whether the message level is greater than or equal to the given level.
 
  Isn't that contradicting? I registered an Error message for my form field
  and I have a new behavior checking for Warnings that performs its duties
  because an Error message is at a lever greater than the Warning level.
 
  ~ Thank you,
 Paul Bors
 

Incorrect javadoc for IPageRequestHandler.isPageInstanceCreated()?

[Jonas]

Hello,

quick question about the javadoc of
org.apache.wicket.core.request.handler.IPageRequestHandler.isPageInstanceCreated()

it states '@return true iff page instance is not yet created', but looking
at
the implementations (e.g. in RenderPageRequestHandler), the opposite seems
to be correct, i.e. '@return false iff page instance is not yet created'.

Am I missing something, or is the javadoc actually incorrect?

cheers,
Jonas

ps: wicket version is 6.6.0

Re: Incorrect javadoc for IPageRequestHandler.isPageInstanceCreated()?

[Martin Grigorov]

Hi,

This has been fixed recently with 12d3bd33e5f6da403d66d43abf6cf9d6c09152ce
Now it says:

/**
 * Checks if the page instance is already created or if it will be created
when
 * {@link #getPage()} is called
 *
 * @return {@code true} iff page instance is already created
 */
boolean isPageInstanceCreated();



On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Jonas barney...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hello,

 quick question about the javadoc of

 org.apache.wicket.core.request.handler.IPageRequestHandler.isPageInstanceCreated()

 it states '@return true iff page instance is not yet created', but looking
 at
 the implementations (e.g. in RenderPageRequestHandler), the opposite seems
 to be correct, i.e. '@return false iff page instance is not yet created'.

 Am I missing something, or is the javadoc actually incorrect?

 cheers,
 Jonas

 ps: wicket version is 6.6.0




-- 
Martin Grigorov
jWeekend
Training, Consulting, Development
http://jWeekend.com http://jweekend.com/

Re: OnChangeAjaxBehavior javadoc note

[Joachim Schrod]

When I started to use Wicket, I stumbled over that feature as well
- and reading Javadoc I often skip the Field Summary until I need
the specific fields. OTOH, I learned quickly that
OnChangeAjaxBehavior() is often not the behavior I want and won't
forget it... :-)

Best,
Joachim

Sven Meier wrote:
 What about OnChangeAjaxBehavior#EVENT_NAME's javadoc? Isn't that
 sufficient?
 
 Sven
 
 On 01/21/2013 08:53 PM, Ondrej Zizka wrote:
 Hi all,

 guessing from a name, I would expect these two to do the same:

 link.add( new OnChangeAjaxBehavior() {
 @Override protected void onUpdate( AjaxRequestTarget
 target ) {
 ReleaseTraitRowPanel.this.onUpdate( target );
 }
 });

 link.add( new AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior(onchange){
 @Override protected void onUpdate( AjaxRequestTarget
 target ) {
 ReleaseTraitRowPanel.this.onUpdate( target );
 }
 } );

 However, the first one reacts (and sends AJAX request) on each
 keypress.
 Could this info be added to the javadoc of OnChangeAjaxBehavior?

 Thanks,
 Ondra

 -

 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org
 
 



Joachim

-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Joachim Schrod, Roedermark, Germany
Email: jsch...@acm.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

OnChangeAjaxBehavior javadoc note

[Ondrej Zizka]

Hi all,

guessing from a name, I would expect these two to do the same:

link.add( new OnChangeAjaxBehavior() {
@Override protected void onUpdate( AjaxRequestTarget target ) {
ReleaseTraitRowPanel.this.onUpdate( target );
}
});

link.add( new AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior(onchange){
@Override protected void onUpdate( AjaxRequestTarget target ) {
ReleaseTraitRowPanel.this.onUpdate( target );
}
} );

However, the first one reacts (and sends AJAX request) on each keypress.
Could this info be added to the javadoc of OnChangeAjaxBehavior?

Thanks,
Ondra

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: OnChangeAjaxBehavior javadoc note

[Sven Meier]

What about OnChangeAjaxBehavior#EVENT_NAME's javadoc? Isn't that sufficient?

Sven

On 01/21/2013 08:53 PM, Ondrej Zizka wrote:

Hi all,

guessing from a name, I would expect these two to do the same:

link.add( new OnChangeAjaxBehavior() {
@Override protected void onUpdate( AjaxRequestTarget 
target ) {

ReleaseTraitRowPanel.this.onUpdate( target );
}
});

link.add( new AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior(onchange){
@Override protected void onUpdate( AjaxRequestTarget 
target ) {

ReleaseTraitRowPanel.this.onUpdate( target );
}
} );

However, the first one reacts (and sends AJAX request) on each keypress.
Could this info be added to the javadoc of OnChangeAjaxBehavior?

Thanks,
Ondra

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

JavaDoc for Wicket 6

[Andrea Del Bene]

I've seen that version 6.0.0 has adopted also a new structure for its 
distribution archives. So far I didn't find where the JavaDoc for this 
version can be downloaded . Are they available only online?


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

RE: JavaDoc for Wicket 6

[Paul Bors]

It's linked off Wicket's home page at http://wicket.apache.org/ under the
Releases section in parenthesis (docs):
http://ci.apache.org/projects/wicket/apidocs/6.0.x/

~ Thank you,
  Paul Bors

-Original Message-
From: Andrea Del Bene [mailto:an.delb...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 1:18 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: JavaDoc for Wicket 6

I've seen that version 6.0.0 has adopted also a new structure for its
distribution archives. So far I didn't find where the JavaDoc for this
version can be downloaded . Are they available only online?

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

RE: JavaDoc for Wicket 6

[Paul Bors]

Sorry I think I might have read your question wrong, if you're looking for
the JavaDoc artifact you can grab it via maven by using the javadoc
classifier or you can search the Maven central repository and download it
via your web browser from:
http://search.maven.org/#artifactdetails%7Corg.apache.wicket%7Cwicket-core%7
C6.0.0%7Cjar

~ Thank you,
  Paul Bors

-Original Message-
From: Paul Bors [mailto:p...@bors.ws] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 2:00 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: RE: JavaDoc for Wicket 6

It's linked off Wicket's home page at http://wicket.apache.org/ under the
Releases section in parenthesis (docs):
http://ci.apache.org/projects/wicket/apidocs/6.0.x/

~ Thank you,
  Paul Bors

-Original Message-
From: Andrea Del Bene [mailto:an.delb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 1:18 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: JavaDoc for Wicket 6

I've seen that version 6.0.0 has adopted also a new structure for its
distribution archives. So far I didn't find where the JavaDoc for this
version can be downloaded . Are they available only online?

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Update JavaDoc for AbstractChoice#setType(java.lang.Class)

[Sven Meier]

A pull request on github would be fine.

You can edit the wiki page by yourself.

Thanks
Sven

Paul Bors pb...@knoa.com schrieb:

How should we as Wicket users request updates to JavaDocs as we come across 
them?

AbstractChoice.setType throws an UnsupportedOperationException but that's not 
reflected in its JavaDoc at:
http://ci.apache.org/projects/wicket/apidocs/1.5.x/org/apache/wicket/markup/html/form/AbstractChoice.html#setType(java.lang.Class)

This is not mentioned in the migration guide. Perhaps a note should be added 
next to the one about AbstractSingleSelectChoice:
https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/migration-to-wicket-15.html#MigrationtoWicket1.5-%2528RC6%2529AbstractSingleSelectChoiceusesemptyStringasvaluefordefaultchoice

~ Thank you,
Paul Bors

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Update JavaDoc for AbstractChoice#setType(java.lang.Class)

[Paul Bors]

How should we as Wicket users request updates to JavaDocs as we come across 
them?

AbstractChoice.setType throws an UnsupportedOperationException but that's not 
reflected in its JavaDoc at:
http://ci.apache.org/projects/wicket/apidocs/1.5.x/org/apache/wicket/markup/html/form/AbstractChoice.html#setType(java.lang.Class)

This is not mentioned in the migration guide. Perhaps a note should be added 
next to the one about AbstractSingleSelectChoice:
https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/migration-to-wicket-15.html#MigrationtoWicket1.5-%2528RC6%2529AbstractSingleSelectChoiceusesemptyStringasvaluefordefaultchoice

~ Thank you,
Paul Bors

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

discrepancy between JavaDoc and code in MarkupContainer#visitChildren()

[Bert]

Hi list,

the JavaDoc for  MarkupContainer#visitChildren() states that
  @param clazz The class of child to visit, or null to visit all children

The parameter clazz is used to create a new ClassVisitFilter which in
its visitObject() does not check for clazz == null, leading to a NPE.

regards
Bert

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: discrepancy between JavaDoc and code in MarkupContainer#visitChildren()

[Martin Grigorov]

File a ticket please.

On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Bert taser...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi list,

 the JavaDoc for  MarkupContainer#visitChildren() states that
  @param clazz The class of child to visit, or null to visit all children

 The parameter clazz is used to create a new ClassVisitFilter which in
 its visitObject() does not check for clazz == null, leading to a NPE.

 regards
 Bert

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org




-- 
Martin Grigorov
jWeekend
Training, Consulting, Development
http://jWeekend.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: discrepancy between JavaDoc and code in MarkupContainer#visitChildren()

[Bert]

Hi Martin,

done. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4519

Bert

On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 13:18, Martin Grigorov mgrigo...@apache.org wrote:
 File a ticket please.

 On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Bert taser...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi list,

 the JavaDoc for  MarkupContainer#visitChildren() states that
  @param clazz The class of child to visit, or null to visit all children

 The parameter clazz is used to create a new ClassVisitFilter which in
 its visitObject() does not check for clazz == null, leading to a NPE.

 regards
 Bert

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org




 --
 Martin Grigorov
 jWeekend
 Training, Consulting, Development
 http://jWeekend.com

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Error on GuiceWebApplicationFactory javadoc

[Cristiano Gavião]

Hi,

I'm testing the wicket guice integration. At the 
GuiceWebApplicationFactory class javadoc I could read this example of 
how to setup web.xml:



filter
filter-nameMyApplication/filter-name
filter-classorg.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter/filter-class
init-param
param-name*applicationClassName*/param-name
param-valueorg.apache.wicket.guice.GuiceWebApplicationFactory/param-value
/init-param
init-param
param-namemodule/param-name
param-valuecom.company.MyGuiceModule,com.company.MyOtherGuiceModule/param-value
/init-param
init-param
param-namewicket-guice.stage/param-name
param-valueDEVELOPMENT/param-value
/init-param
/filter


But when I tried to execute it with jetty:run it throws an error:

Application class org.apache.wicket.guice.GuiceWebApplicationFactory 
must be a subclass of WebApplication


After debug the org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter I've 
discovered that the right word is: *applicationFactoryClassName *instead 
applicationClassName.



cheers

Cristiano

Re: Error on GuiceWebApplicationFactory javadoc

[Martin Grigorov]

Fixed. Thanks!
Someone forgot to fix it in 1.5

On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Cristiano Gavião cvgav...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hi,

 I'm testing the wicket guice integration. At the GuiceWebApplicationFactory
 class javadoc I could read this example of how to setup web.xml:

  filter
 filter-nameMyApplication/filter-name
 filter-classorg.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter/filter-class
 init-param
 param-name*applicationClassName*/param-name

 param-valueorg.apache.wicket.guice.GuiceWebApplicationFactory/param-value
 /init-param
 init-param
 param-namemodule/param-name

 param-valuecom.company.MyGuiceModule,com.company.MyOtherGuiceModule/param-value
 /init-param
 init-param
 param-namewicket-guice.stage/param-name
 param-valueDEVELOPMENT/param-value
 /init-param
 /filter


 But when I tried to execute it with jetty:run it throws an error:

  Application class org.apache.wicket.guice.GuiceWebApplicationFactory must
 be a subclass of WebApplication


 After debug the org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketFilter I've
 discovered that the right word is: *applicationFactoryClassName *instead
 applicationClassName.


 cheers

 Cristiano




-- 
Martin Grigorov
jWeekend
Training, Consulting, Development
http://jWeekend.com http://jweekend.com/

Re: 1.5.x javadoc

[Christian Grobmeier]

I uploaded a 1.5 javadoc for my own use here:
http://projects.grobmeier.de/javadoc/wicket-core/1.5-snapshot/
Its from a 2 day old trunk version - guess this will not change much
until 1.5 is released


On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Zhubin Salehi zhubin.sal...@route1.com wrote:
 No 1.5.x!

 -Original Message-
 From: Steve Swinsburg [mailto:steve.swinsb...@gmail.com]
 Sent: January 28, 2011 12:04 AM
 To: users@wicket.apache.org
 Subject: Re: 1.5.x javadoc

 Wicket By Example has a section for the Javadocs, but it needs a refresh.
 http://wicketbyexample.com/api/

 cheers,
 Steve

 On 28/01/2011, at 10:36 AM, Todd Wolff wrote:

 Hi,



 Is there a URL where I can pull up javadoc for latest 1.5 RC without
 having to checkout source and generate myself?  Thanks.



 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org





-- 
http://www.grobmeier.de

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: 1.5.x javadoc

[Michael O'Cleirigh]

The easiest is to just download it through maven (or in eclipse.org/m2e 
just check download sources and javadocs) but you can also get the 
javadoc.jar from the maven repository directly.


i.e. wget 
http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/wicket/wicket-core/1.5-RC1/wicket-core-1.5-RC1-javadoc.jar


Or you could get the latest 1.5-SNAPSHOT javadoc jar like this:

wget 
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/wicket/wicket-core/1.5-SNAPSHOT/wicket-core-1.5-20110129.002838-144-javadoc.jar


Consult with the 
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/wicket/wicket-core/1.5-SNAPSHOT/maven-metadata.xml 
to see which file is the most recent.  (there is probably an automated 
way to do this).


Regards,

Mike



I uploaded a 1.5 javadoc for my own use here:
http://projects.grobmeier.de/javadoc/wicket-core/1.5-snapshot/
Its from a 2 day old trunk version - guess this will not change much
until 1.5 is released


On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Zhubin Salehizhubin.sal...@route1.com  wrote:

No 1.5.x!

-Original Message-
From: Steve Swinsburg [mailto:steve.swinsb...@gmail.com]
Sent: January 28, 2011 12:04 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: 1.5.x javadoc

Wicket By Example has a section for the Javadocs, but it needs a refresh.
http://wicketbyexample.com/api/

cheers,
Steve

On 28/01/2011, at 10:36 AM, Todd Wolff wrote:


Hi,



Is there a URL where I can pull up javadoc for latest 1.5 RC without
having to checkout source and generate myself?  Thanks.



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org








-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

RE: 1.5.x javadoc

[Zhubin Salehi]

No 1.5.x!

-Original Message-
From: Steve Swinsburg [mailto:steve.swinsb...@gmail.com] 
Sent: January 28, 2011 12:04 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: 1.5.x javadoc

Wicket By Example has a section for the Javadocs, but it needs a refresh.
http://wicketbyexample.com/api/

cheers,
Steve

On 28/01/2011, at 10:36 AM, Todd Wolff wrote:

 Hi,
 
 
 
 Is there a URL where I can pull up javadoc for latest 1.5 RC without
 having to checkout source and generate myself?  Thanks.
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

1.5.x javadoc

[Todd Wolff]

Hi,

 

Is there a URL where I can pull up javadoc for latest 1.5 RC without
having to checkout source and generate myself?  Thanks.

Re: 1.5.x javadoc

[Steve Swinsburg]

Wicket By Example has a section for the Javadocs, but it needs a refresh.
http://wicketbyexample.com/api/

cheers,
Steve

On 28/01/2011, at 10:36 AM, Todd Wolff wrote:

 Hi,
 
 
 
 Is there a URL where I can pull up javadoc for latest 1.5 RC without
 having to checkout source and generate myself?  Thanks.
 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

1.5-RC1 maven source, javadoc, and tests

[Steve Lowery]

Looks like the source, javadoc and test artifacts for 1.5-RC1 published to
the maven repo are empty.  Can this be fixed please?

Thanks,
Steve

Re: 1.5-RC1 maven source, javadoc, and tests

[Igor Vaynberg]

see this thread: [discuss] How to resolve wicket aggregate classes /
sources jar issues

-igor

On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 6:54 AM, Steve Lowery
slow...@gatessolutions.com wrote:
 Looks like the source, javadoc and test artifacts for 1.5-RC1 published to
 the maven repo are empty.  Can this be fixed please?

 Thanks,
 Steve


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

javadoc suggestion: @Since Wicket 1.4

[Ayodeji Aladejebi]

javadoc suggestion: @since Wicket 1.5
Just to help identify which components are not available in a version


-- 
Aladejebi Ayodeji A.,

Call to action: find and fix errata in 1.4 JavaDoc

[Martijn Dashorst]

Many of our JavaDoc examples are still Wicket 1.3 based. For example,
just yesterday I found the JavaDoc for Link to contain an unnecessary
cast. Before we finalize 1.4, we should try to fix all javadoc
examples (mostly in components) to ensure they are up to par with 1.4.

As the core team we can only do so much in so little time.  With the
help of our community we will be able to clean up our documentation in
no time...

I hereby send out a call for action to the grander community: please
read the javadocs of 1.4 and see if you can find an old example that
doesn't fit with 1.4 syntax and semantics. Send in a patch with the
improved javadoc!

I've created issue 2338 to track these errata. Please work with us!

http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2338

You can view the JavaDoc online here: http://wicket.apache.org/docs/1.4/

Martijn

--
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Call to action: find and fix errata in 1.4 JavaDoc

[Vasu Srinivasan]

I'm willing to help in my spare time. I have been using wicket only for the
last two months, and I have been very impressed. How do I go about fixing it
and not overlapping on others work at the same time ? Any specific areas to
look at as a priority ?


On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 6:45 AM, Martijn Dashorst 
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:

 Many of our JavaDoc examples are still Wicket 1.3 based. For example,
 just yesterday I found the JavaDoc for Link to contain an unnecessary
 cast. Before we finalize 1.4, we should try to fix all javadoc
 examples (mostly in components) to ensure they are up to par with 1.4.

 As the core team we can only do so much in so little time.  With the
 help of our community we will be able to clean up our documentation in
 no time...

 I hereby send out a call for action to the grander community: please
 read the javadocs of 1.4 and see if you can find an old example that
 doesn't fit with 1.4 syntax and semantics. Send in a patch with the
 improved javadoc!

 I've created issue 2338 to track these errata. Please work with us!

 http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2338

 You can view the JavaDoc online here: http://wicket.apache.org/docs/1.4/

 Martijn

 --
 Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
 Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released
 Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org




-- 
Regards,
Vasu Srinivasan

Re: Call to action: find and fix errata in 1.4 JavaDoc

[Jeremy Thomerson]

Just add comments (and / or patches) to that JIRA issue.
All of the most common components would be the biggest area where
there are likely changes.

--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com




On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Vasu Srinivasanvasy...@gmail.com wrote:
 I'm willing to help in my spare time. I have been using wicket only for the
 last two months, and I have been very impressed. How do I go about fixing it
 and not overlapping on others work at the same time ? Any specific areas to
 look at as a priority ?


 On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 6:45 AM, Martijn Dashorst 
 martijn.dasho...@gmail.com wrote:

 Many of our JavaDoc examples are still Wicket 1.3 based. For example,
 just yesterday I found the JavaDoc for Link to contain an unnecessary
 cast. Before we finalize 1.4, we should try to fix all javadoc
 examples (mostly in components) to ensure they are up to par with 1.4.

 As the core team we can only do so much in so little time.  With the
 help of our community we will be able to clean up our documentation in
 no time...

 I hereby send out a call for action to the grander community: please
 read the javadocs of 1.4 and see if you can find an old example that
 doesn't fit with 1.4 syntax and semantics. Send in a patch with the
 improved javadoc!

 I've created issue 2338 to track these errata. Please work with us!

 http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-2338

 You can view the JavaDoc online here: http://wicket.apache.org/docs/1.4/

 Martijn

 --
 Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
 Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released
 Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org




 --
 Regards,
 Vasu Srinivasan


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: DownloadLink (Javadoc)

[David Brown]

Hello Steve, thanks, this worked. I imported the entire wicket 1.3.6 into 
Eclipse and a whole bunch of other things started working a whole lot better in 
the WIA Eclipse project. Since you got unlucky and I have you on the hook is 
there anyway of getting the mvn jetty:run to import into Eclipse such that I 
don't have to switch to a terminal or command window to redeploy to see the 
results of my changes. Maybe, somebody out there has a suggestion? Thanks and 
please advise, David.



There are 10 kinds of people in this world: those who understand binary and 
those who don’t (Valid only for 2's complement).

- Original Message -
From: Steve Swinsburg s.swinsb...@lancaster.ac.uk
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 5:10:57 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: Re: DownloadLink (Javadoc)

Hi David,

You can get the Javadoc either by building it yourself from source via  
'mvn javadoc:javadoc' or by issuing 'mvn eclipse:eclipse - 
DdownloadJavadocs=true' which will get the Javadoc and adjust your  
Eclipse classpath to link it up.


cheers,
Steve


On 25/05/2009, at 10:54 PM, David Brown wrote:

 Hello, it just so happens I have been looking for Wicket Javadoc.  
 the Wicket jar I have contains no javadoc. Please reply with the  
 source of the Wicket javadoc you are referencing. Please advise,  
 David.

 There are 10 kinds of people in this world: those who understand  
 binary and those who don’t (Valid only for 2's complement).

 - Original Message -
 From: Douglas Ferguson doug...@douglasferguson.us
 To: users@wicket.apache.org
 Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 12:11:06 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
 Subject: DownloadLink

 I was just reading the javadoc for DownloadLink and it says that it
 locks the PageMap, does this mean that the page becomes unresponsive
 during the download?

 It mentions using a shared resource as an alternative. Is there
 example of this online somewhere?

 Douglas

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: DownloadLink (Javadoc)

[Martijn Dashorst]

Read the free downloadable bonus chapter 15 to WIA, downloadable from
http://wicketinaction.com/downloads

This explains all this stuff, including setting up your Eclipse
workspace from maven, and running the embedded Jetty server.

Martijn

On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 4:52 PM, David Brown
dbr...@sexingtechnologies.com wrote:
 Hello Steve, thanks, this worked. I imported the entire wicket 1.3.6 into 
 Eclipse and a whole bunch of other things started working a whole lot better 
 in the WIA Eclipse project. Since you got unlucky and I have you on the hook 
 is there anyway of getting the mvn jetty:run to import into Eclipse such that 
 I don't have to switch to a terminal or command window to redeploy to see the 
 results of my changes. Maybe, somebody out there has a suggestion? Thanks and 
 please advise, David.



 There are 10 kinds of people in this world: those who understand binary and 
 those who don’t (Valid only for 2's complement).

 - Original Message -
 From: Steve Swinsburg s.swinsb...@lancaster.ac.uk
 To: users@wicket.apache.org
 Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 5:10:57 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
 Subject: Re: DownloadLink (Javadoc)

 Hi David,

 You can get the Javadoc either by building it yourself from source via
 'mvn javadoc:javadoc' or by issuing 'mvn eclipse:eclipse -
 DdownloadJavadocs=true' which will get the Javadoc and adjust your
 Eclipse classpath to link it up.


 cheers,
 Steve


 On 25/05/2009, at 10:54 PM, David Brown wrote:

 Hello, it just so happens I have been looking for Wicket Javadoc.
 the Wicket jar I have contains no javadoc. Please reply with the
 source of the Wicket javadoc you are referencing. Please advise,
 David.

 There are 10 kinds of people in this world: those who understand
 binary and those who don’t (Valid only for 2's complement).

 - Original Message -
 From: Douglas Ferguson doug...@douglasferguson.us
 To: users@wicket.apache.org
 Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 12:11:06 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
 Subject: DownloadLink

 I was just reading the javadoc for DownloadLink and it says that it
 locks the PageMap, does this mean that the page becomes unresponsive
 during the download?

 It mentions using a shared resource as an alternative. Is there
 example of this online somewhere?

 Douglas

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org





-- 
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: DownloadLink (Javadoc)

[Steve Swinsburg]

Hi David,

You can get the Javadoc either by building it yourself from source via  
'mvn javadoc:javadoc' or by issuing 'mvn eclipse:eclipse - 
DdownloadJavadocs=true' which will get the Javadoc and adjust your  
Eclipse classpath to link it up.



cheers,
Steve


On 25/05/2009, at 10:54 PM, David Brown wrote:

Hello, it just so happens I have been looking for Wicket Javadoc.  
the Wicket jar I have contains no javadoc. Please reply with the  
source of the Wicket javadoc you are referencing. Please advise,  
David.


There are 10 kinds of people in this world: those who understand  
binary and those who don’t (Valid only for 2's complement).


- Original Message -
From: Douglas Ferguson doug...@douglasferguson.us
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 12:11:06 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: DownloadLink

I was just reading the javadoc for DownloadLink and it says that it
locks the PageMap, does this mean that the page becomes unresponsive
during the download?

It mentions using a shared resource as an alternative. Is there
example of this online somewhere?

Douglas

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org





smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

MapModel javadoc spelling

[Francis De Brabandere]

Can somebody fix the javadoc for MapModel?

Based on codeModel/code but for mapss of serializable objects.

should be maps instead of mapss

-- 
http://www.somatik.be
Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: MapModel javadoc spelling

[Igor Vaynberg]

fixed

-igor

On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 1:25 AM, Francis De Brabandere
franci...@gmail.com wrote:
 Can somebody fix the javadoc for MapModel?

 Based on codeModel/code but for mapss of serializable objects.

 should be maps instead of mapss

 --
 http://www.somatik.be
 Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: where to find javadoc for wikcet 1.4

[Timo Rantalaiho]

On Tue, 13 Jan 2009, Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
 Do you use Maven?  If so, do mvn eclipse:eclipse -DdownloadJavadocs=true

Better yet,

-DdownloadSources=true

or the equivalent in pom.xml.

With open source, you shold always get the source (that also 
provides the javadocs in the IDE). It doesn't make sense to 
just read the javadocs and guess when you can navigate to 
the actual source code whenever necessary.

Best wishes,
Timo


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

where to find javadoc for wikcet 1.4

[rjilani]

Can some one point me where to find the javadoc for wicket 1.4, it is very
confusing/frustrating working with release 1.4 and keep looking for the
Javadoc at wicket side that belongs to version 1.3.2.

Thanks,
Rashid.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/where-to-find-javadoc-for-wikcet-1.4-tp21446463p21446463.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: where to find javadoc for wikcet 1.4

[Jeremy Thomerson]

Do you use Maven?  If so, do mvn eclipse:eclipse -DdownloadJavadocs=true

If not, you can still benefit from Maven:
http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/wicket/wicket/


-- 
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com

On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 5:02 PM, rjilani jil...@lifebiosystems.com wrote:


 Can some one point me where to find the javadoc for wicket 1.4, it is very
 confusing/frustrating working with release 1.4 and keep looking for the
 Javadoc at wicket side that belongs to version 1.3.2.

 Thanks,
 Rashid.
 --
 View this message in context:
 http://www.nabble.com/where-to-find-javadoc-for-wikcet-1.4-tp21446463p21446463.html
 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Re: Wicket JavaDoc - plz publish

[Ayodeji Aladejebi]

If you have netbeans plugin for maven, you can generate the latest Javadoc
yourself from netbeans. Just right-click in netbeans and select generate
Javadoc and dats all

On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 7:40 AM, Martijn Dashorst 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Like I said in my blog post I won't be publishing anything until maven
 site plugin works without problems. You don't have any idea how much
 time I've already sunk into that fcker.

 Martijn

 On 11/24/08, Ned Collyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Can something be set up to publish either the snapshot or rc1 javadocs to
 a
  public URL.
 
  Does the wicket version need to be final to be published to
  http://wicket.apache.org/docs/
 
  I currently use -DdownloadSources - but its just not so great for
 navigating
  - especially if you want to cut/paste URL's to other devs.
  --
  View this message in context:
 
 http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-JavaDoc---plz-publish-tp20652802p20652802.html
  Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
 
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 


 --
 Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
 Apache Wicket 1.3.4 is released
 Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-- 
Aladejebi Ayodeji A.,
DabarObjects Solutions
Phone: +234 9 481 7 156
Mobile: +234 803 589 1780
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: www.dabarobjects.com
Blog: blog.dabarobjects.com

Participate, Collaborate, Innovate
Join Community:
http://www.cowblock.net/

Get A Free Blog:
http://blogs.cowblock.net/

Re: Wicket JavaDoc - plz publish

[Ned Collyer]

I would have some idea ... I'm using that plugin.. maven plugins have
issues.. :) i think it stems from the lack of standard approach of writing
the plugins, and even then - if you check the maven generated sites, so many
pages can be unintentionally left blank!!  The documentation on them is
generally poor too.

Hmm i should start reading ur blog hey :)


Martijn Dashorst wrote:
 
 Like I said in my blog post I won't be publishing anything until maven
 site plugin works without problems. You don't have any idea how much
 time I've already sunk into that fcker.
 
 Martijn
 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-JavaDoc---plz-publish-tp20652802p20657152.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Wicket JavaDoc - plz publish

[Susan Liebeskind]

Ayodeji Aladejebi wrote:

If you have netbeans plugin for maven, you can generate the latest Javadoc
yourself from netbeans. Just right-click in netbeans and select generate
Javadoc and dats all

  
If you use Eclipse, there is a similar facility, assuming you use 
Sonatype's M2Eclipse plugin, available here - http://m2eclipse.sonatype.org/


In the comments posted on Martijn's blog entry on this subject, Tim 
O'Brien of Sonatype posted a video link in which he walks you through 
generating the Wicket Javadoc, using the m2Eclipse plugin.   Here's the 
link to that video, which assumes you have the m2eclipse plugin 
installed in advance


http://blogs.sonatype.com/people/book/2008/10/23/browsing-javadoc-for-dependencies-in-eclipse-m2eclipse/

Maybe these interim techniques for generating Wicket Javadoc in two 
oft-used IDEs, are items that could at least temporarily be added to the 
migration to 1.4 wiki page?  If you decide to include javadocs in the 
future distros, you can always remove the information in later revisions.


Susan

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Wicket JavaDoc - plz publish

[Ned Collyer]

Can something be set up to publish either the snapshot or rc1 javadocs to a
public URL.

Does the wicket version need to be final to be published to
http://wicket.apache.org/docs/

I currently use -DdownloadSources - but its just not so great for navigating
- especially if you want to cut/paste URL's to other devs.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-JavaDoc---plz-publish-tp20652802p20652802.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Wicket JavaDoc - plz publish

[Martijn Dashorst]

Like I said in my blog post I won't be publishing anything until maven
site plugin works without problems. You don't have any idea how much
time I've already sunk into that fcker.

Martijn

On 11/24/08, Ned Collyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Can something be set up to publish either the snapshot or rc1 javadocs to a
 public URL.

 Does the wicket version need to be final to be published to
 http://wicket.apache.org/docs/

 I currently use -DdownloadSources - but its just not so great for navigating
 - especially if you want to cut/paste URL's to other devs.
 --
 View this message in context:
 http://www.nabble.com/Wicket-JavaDoc---plz-publish-tp20652802p20652802.html
 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-- 
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
Apache Wicket 1.3.4 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Javadoc for wicket 1.3.5 - how to include it in eclipse

[pieter claassen]

What is the most effective way to get the documentation available offline
for wicket 1.3.5 in Eclipse. I notice that mvn eclipse:eclipse
-Ddownloadsources=true does not give javadocs.

Regards,
Pieter

Re: Javadoc for wicket 1.3.5 - how to include it in eclipse

[Xhelas]

You have run run mvn javadoc:javadoc at the root of the source directory.
This will generated all the javadoc. Then you have to associate each jar
with its corresponding javadoc root directory. 

Regards,

Alexandre


Pieter Claassen wrote:
 
 What is the most effective way to get the documentation available offline
 for wicket 1.3.5 in Eclipse. I notice that mvn eclipse:eclipse
 -Ddownloadsources=true does not give javadocs.
 
 Regards,
 Pieter
 
 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Javadoc-for-wicket-1.3.5---how-to-include-it-in-eclipse-tp20261585p20261864.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Javadoc for wicket 1.3.5 - how to include it in eclipse

[Martin Grigorov]

It has to be -DdownloadSources=true (with capital 'S'). Or eevn better
put this in the pom.xml itself.

If it still doesn't work by some reason then you could download it from
Maven repos and tell Eclipse about it.

There is no need to checkout the code just to generate the javadoc. 

Fri, 2008-10-31 at 09:14 +0100, pieter claassen wrote:
 What is the most effective way to get the documentation available offline
 for wicket 1.3.5 in Eclipse. I notice that mvn eclipse:eclipse
 -Ddownloadsources=true does not give javadocs.
 
 Regards,
 Pieter


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Javadoc for wicket 1.3.5 - how to include it in eclipse

[Martijn Dashorst]

this is not for including javadoc, this is for generating it. Pieter
wants to use the javadoc/source bundles we provide in the maven
repository.

mvn eclipse:eclipse -DdownloadSources=true

should work (note the capital S)

Martijn

On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 9:41 AM, Xhelas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 You have run run mvn javadoc:javadoc at the root of the source directory.
 This will generated all the javadoc. Then you have to associate each jar
 with its corresponding javadoc root directory.

 Regards,

 Alexandre


 Pieter Claassen wrote:

 What is the most effective way to get the documentation available offline
 for wicket 1.3.5 in Eclipse. I notice that mvn eclipse:eclipse
 -Ddownloadsources=true does not give javadocs.

 Regards,
 Pieter



 --
 View this message in context: 
 http://www.nabble.com/Javadoc-for-wicket-1.3.5---how-to-include-it-in-eclipse-tp20261585p20261864.html
 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





-- 
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
Apache Wicket 1.3.4 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Javadoc for wicket 1.3.5 - how to include it in eclipse

[Ricky]

umm ... there is a -DdownloadJavaDocs=true ... u can use that too.

On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 4:58 AM, Martijn Dashorst 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 this is not for including javadoc, this is for generating it. Pieter
 wants to use the javadoc/source bundles we provide in the maven
 repository.

 mvn eclipse:eclipse -DdownloadSources=true

 should work (note the capital S)

 Martijn

 On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 9:41 AM, Xhelas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  You have run run mvn javadoc:javadoc at the root of the source
 directory.
  This will generated all the javadoc. Then you have to associate each jar
  with its corresponding javadoc root directory.
 
  Regards,
 
  Alexandre
 
 
  Pieter Claassen wrote:
 
  What is the most effective way to get the documentation available
 offline
  for wicket 1.3.5 in Eclipse. I notice that mvn eclipse:eclipse
  -Ddownloadsources=true does not give javadocs.
 
  Regards,
  Pieter
 
 
 
  --
  View this message in context:
 http://www.nabble.com/Javadoc-for-wicket-1.3.5---how-to-include-it-in-eclipse-tp20261585p20261864.html
  Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
 
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 



 --
 Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
 Apache Wicket 1.3.4 is released
 Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-- 

Regards
Vyas, Anirudh
||  ॐ  ||

Re: wicket-extensions javadoc

[Matthijs Wensveen]

I understand that the 1.2 docs must be on sf.net hardware, and that they 
are still available there. I just want the most recent version of the 
wicket-extensions javadoc to be available too, somewhere, anywhere. Doug 
did just that, so a big thanks there!


Matthijs


Martijn Dashorst wrote:

wicketframework.org is not the main site. http://wicket.apache.org is

As you can see, http://wicketframework.org redirects to http://wicket.apache.org

The 1.2 docs are still available for reference, and *must* be hosted
on the sf.net hardware (they are not released under supervision of
Apache).

Martijn

On 5/7/08, Doug Donohoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  

 Matthijs,

 I had to host javadoc for my own wicketstuff-annotations project, so I
 decided to put the Wicket docs there (since the main site isn't up-to-date).
 I added wicket-extensions to the site:

 http://www.ddpoker.com/javadoc/

 -Doug



 Matthijs Wensveen-2 wrote:
 
  Hi,
  I'm not sure this is the right place, but anyway. The online javadoc of
  wicket-extensions at
  http://wicketframework.org/wicket-extensions/apidocs/index.html is of
  version 1.2-SNAPSHOT, but the latest release is 1.3.3. The javadoc that
  maven pulls in is more current. Could the online javadocs be updated
  please?
 
  Thanks,
  Matthijs
 
  --
  Matthijs Wensveen
  Func. Internet Integration
  W http://www.func.nl
  T +31 20 423
  F +31 20 4223500
 
 
  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 


--
 View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/wicket-extensions-javadoc-tp17099232p17108936.html
 Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






  



--
Matthijs Wensveen
Func. Internet Integration
W http://www.func.nl
T +31 20 423
F +31 20 4223500 



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: wicket-extensions javadoc

[Martijn Dashorst]

http://wicket.apache.org/docs/wicket-1.3.2/wicket-extensions/apidocs/index.html

On 5/9/08, Matthijs Wensveen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I understand that the 1.2 docs must be on sf.net hardware, and that they are
 still available there. I just want the most recent version of the
 wicket-extensions javadoc to be available too, somewhere, anywhere. Doug did
 just that, so a big thanks there!

  Matthijs



  Martijn Dashorst wrote:

  wicketframework.org is not the main site. http://wicket.apache.org is
 
  As you can see, http://wicketframework.org redirects to
 http://wicket.apache.org
 
  The 1.2 docs are still available for reference, and *must* be hosted
  on the sf.net hardware (they are not released under supervision of
  Apache).
 
  Martijn
 
  On 5/7/08, Doug Donohoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
Matthijs,
  
I had to host javadoc for my own wicketstuff-annotations project, so I
decided to put the Wicket docs there (since the main site isn't
 up-to-date).
I added wicket-extensions to the site:
  
http://www.ddpoker.com/javadoc/
  
-Doug
  
  
  
Matthijs Wensveen-2 wrote:

 Hi,
 I'm not sure this is the right place, but anyway. The online javadoc
 of
 wicket-extensions at

 http://wicketframework.org/wicket-extensions/apidocs/index.html
 is of
 version 1.2-SNAPSHOT, but the latest release is 1.3.3. The javadoc
 that
 maven pulls in is more current. Could the online javadocs be updated
 please?

 Thanks,
 Matthijs

 --
 Matthijs Wensveen
 Func. Internet Integration
 W http://www.func.nl
 T +31 20 423
 F +31 20 4223500



 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



  
  
   --
View this message in context:
 http://www.nabble.com/wicket-extensions-javadoc-tp17099232p17108936.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
  
  
  
  
 -
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 


  --
  Matthijs Wensveen
  Func. Internet Integration
  W http://www.func.nl
  T +31 20 423
  F +31 20 4223500

 -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-- 
Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
Apache Wicket 1.3.3 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.3

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: wicket-extensions javadoc

[James Carman]

Yes, but that URL isn't obvious.  Is there a link on the main site
anywhere to that Javadoc?  I couldn't find it.  I always have to
hand-type it (or bookmark it of course :)

On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 7:03 AM, Martijn Dashorst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 http://wicket.apache.org/docs/wicket-1.3.2/wicket-extensions/apidocs/index.html

 On 5/9/08, Matthijs Wensveen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I understand that the 1.2 docs must be on sf.net hardware, and that they are
 still available there. I just want the most recent version of the
 wicket-extensions javadoc to be available too, somewhere, anywhere. Doug did
 just that, so a big thanks there!

  Matthijs



  Martijn Dashorst wrote:

  wicketframework.org is not the main site. http://wicket.apache.org is
 
  As you can see, http://wicketframework.org redirects to
 http://wicket.apache.org
 
  The 1.2 docs are still available for reference, and *must* be hosted
  on the sf.net hardware (they are not released under supervision of
  Apache).
 
  Martijn
 
  On 5/7/08, Doug Donohoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
Matthijs,
  
I had to host javadoc for my own wicketstuff-annotations project, so I
decided to put the Wicket docs there (since the main site isn't
 up-to-date).
I added wicket-extensions to the site:
  
http://www.ddpoker.com/javadoc/
  
-Doug
  
  
  
Matthijs Wensveen-2 wrote:

 Hi,
 I'm not sure this is the right place, but anyway. The online javadoc
 of
 wicket-extensions at

 http://wicketframework.org/wicket-extensions/apidocs/index.html
 is of
 version 1.2-SNAPSHOT, but the latest release is 1.3.3. The javadoc
 that
 maven pulls in is more current. Could the online javadocs be updated
 please?

 Thanks,
 Matthijs

 --
 Matthijs Wensveen
 Func. Internet Integration
 W http://www.func.nl
 T +31 20 423
 F +31 20 4223500



 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



  
  
   --
View this message in context:
 http://www.nabble.com/wicket-extensions-javadoc-tp17099232p17108936.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
  
  
  
  
 -
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 


  --
  Matthijs Wensveen
  Func. Internet Integration
  W http://www.func.nl
  T +31 20 423
  F +31 20 4223500

 -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




 --
 Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
 Apache Wicket 1.3.3 is released
 Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.3

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: wicket-extensions javadoc

[Maurice Marrink]

It is under the section labeled Documentation called JavaDocs ;)

Incidentally should it not point to 1.3.3 now? or has nothing changed
in the javadoc since then.

Maurice

On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 1:05 PM, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Yes, but that URL isn't obvious.  Is there a link on the main site
 anywhere to that Javadoc?  I couldn't find it.  I always have to
 hand-type it (or bookmark it of course :)

 On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 7:03 AM, Martijn Dashorst
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 http://wicket.apache.org/docs/wicket-1.3.2/wicket-extensions/apidocs/index.html

 On 5/9/08, Matthijs Wensveen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I understand that the 1.2 docs must be on sf.net hardware, and that they are
 still available there. I just want the most recent version of the
 wicket-extensions javadoc to be available too, somewhere, anywhere. Doug did
 just that, so a big thanks there!

  Matthijs



  Martijn Dashorst wrote:

  wicketframework.org is not the main site. http://wicket.apache.org is
 
  As you can see, http://wicketframework.org redirects to
 http://wicket.apache.org
 
  The 1.2 docs are still available for reference, and *must* be hosted
  on the sf.net hardware (they are not released under supervision of
  Apache).
 
  Martijn
 
  On 5/7/08, Doug Donohoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
Matthijs,
  
I had to host javadoc for my own wicketstuff-annotations project, so I
decided to put the Wicket docs there (since the main site isn't
 up-to-date).
I added wicket-extensions to the site:
  
http://www.ddpoker.com/javadoc/
  
-Doug
  
  
  
Matthijs Wensveen-2 wrote:

 Hi,
 I'm not sure this is the right place, but anyway. The online javadoc
 of
 wicket-extensions at

 http://wicketframework.org/wicket-extensions/apidocs/index.html
 is of
 version 1.2-SNAPSHOT, but the latest release is 1.3.3. The javadoc
 that
 maven pulls in is more current. Could the online javadocs be updated
 please?

 Thanks,
 Matthijs

 --
 Matthijs Wensveen
 Func. Internet Integration
 W http://www.func.nl
 T +31 20 423
 F +31 20 4223500



 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



  
  
   --
View this message in context:
 http://www.nabble.com/wicket-extensions-javadoc-tp17099232p17108936.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
  
  
  
  
 -
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
 


  --
  Matthijs Wensveen
  Func. Internet Integration
  W http://www.func.nl
  T +31 20 423
  F +31 20 4223500

 -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




 --
 Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
 Apache Wicket 1.3.3 is released
 Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.3

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: wicket-extensions javadoc

[James Carman]

On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 7:54 AM, Maurice Marrink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 It is under the section labeled Documentation called JavaDocs ;)


Those Javadocs don't contain the wicket-extensions classes.  That's
only the Javadoc for the core Wicket stuff.

 Incidentally should it not point to 1.3.3 now? or has nothing changed
 in the javadoc since then.

+1.  And what about 1.4-m1?  Can we get a link to that Javadoc from
the main site?  Since there are two active branches of development,
it would be nice to have links to both sets of documentation.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: wicket-extensions javadoc

[Maurice Marrink]

On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 2:17 PM, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 7:54 AM, Maurice Marrink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 It is under the section labeled Documentation called JavaDocs ;)


 Those Javadocs don't contain the wicket-extensions classes.  That's
 only the Javadoc for the core Wicket stuff.

You are correct, Martijn also pointed this out to me :)


 Incidentally should it not point to 1.3.3 now? or has nothing changed
 in the javadoc since then.

 +1.  And what about 1.4-m1?  Can we get a link to that Javadoc from
 the main site?  Since there are two active branches of development,
 it would be nice to have links to both sets of documentation.

I agree, i mentioned this to Martijn but he did not seem overly enthusiastic :P
There are some problems with letting maven generate the site for us
that prevent us from doing everything we would like to do.

Maurice

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

wicket-extensions javadoc

[Matthijs Wensveen]

Hi,
I'm not sure this is the right place, but anyway. The online javadoc of 
wicket-extensions at 
http://wicketframework.org/wicket-extensions/apidocs/index.html is of 
version 1.2-SNAPSHOT, but the latest release is 1.3.3. The javadoc that 
maven pulls in is more current. Could the online javadocs be updated please?


Thanks,
Matthijs

--
Matthijs Wensveen
Func. Internet Integration
W http://www.func.nl
T +31 20 423
F +31 20 4223500 



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: wicket-extensions javadoc

[Doug Donohoe]

Matthijs,

I had to host javadoc for my own wicketstuff-annotations project, so I
decided to put the Wicket docs there (since the main site isn't up-to-date). 
I added wicket-extensions to the site:

http://www.ddpoker.com/javadoc/

-Doug


Matthijs Wensveen-2 wrote:
 
 Hi,
 I'm not sure this is the right place, but anyway. The online javadoc of 
 wicket-extensions at 
 http://wicketframework.org/wicket-extensions/apidocs/index.html is of 
 version 1.2-SNAPSHOT, but the latest release is 1.3.3. The javadoc that 
 maven pulls in is more current. Could the online javadocs be updated
 please?
 
 Thanks,
 Matthijs
 
 -- 
 Matthijs Wensveen
 Func. Internet Integration
 W http://www.func.nl
 T +31 20 423
 F +31 20 4223500 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/wicket-extensions-javadoc-tp17099232p17108936.html
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: wicket-extensions javadoc

[Martijn Dashorst]

wicketframework.org is not the main site. http://wicket.apache.org is

As you can see, http://wicketframework.org redirects to http://wicket.apache.org

The 1.2 docs are still available for reference, and *must* be hosted
on the sf.net hardware (they are not released under supervision of
Apache).

Martijn

On 5/7/08, Doug Donohoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Matthijs,

  I had to host javadoc for my own wicketstuff-annotations project, so I
  decided to put the Wicket docs there (since the main site isn't up-to-date).
  I added wicket-extensions to the site:

  http://www.ddpoker.com/javadoc/

  -Doug



  Matthijs Wensveen-2 wrote:
  
   Hi,
   I'm not sure this is the right place, but anyway. The online javadoc of
   wicket-extensions at
   http://wicketframework.org/wicket-extensions/apidocs/index.html is of
   version 1.2-SNAPSHOT, but the latest release is 1.3.3. The javadoc that
   maven pulls in is more current. Could the online javadocs be updated
   please?
  
   Thanks,
   Matthijs
  
   --
   Matthijs Wensveen
   Func. Internet Integration
   W http://www.func.nl
   T +31 20 423
   F +31 20 4223500
  
  
   -
   To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  
  


 --
  View this message in context: 
 http://www.nabble.com/wicket-extensions-javadoc-tp17099232p17108936.html
  Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-- 
Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
Apache Wicket 1.3.3 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.3

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Building javadoc for Wicket 1.4 from svn download

[Stefan Lindner]

The current Wicket 1.4 trunk does not create javadocs anymore (as
described on this list and on the build webpage). How can I create the
javadoc files with maven? I don't know maven mechanisms for this task.

When I build the project with maven javadoc:javadoc, the javadocs are
generated in the target directorys but not packed to jar files. How can
I let maven create the javadoc jar files?

Stefan

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Building javadoc for Wicket 1.4 from svn download

[Martijn Dashorst]

iirc:

mvn -Prelease install

Martijn

On 4/24/08, Stefan Lindner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 The current Wicket 1.4 trunk does not create javadocs anymore (as
  described on this list and on the build webpage). How can I create the
  javadoc files with maven? I don't know maven mechanisms for this task.

  When I build the project with maven javadoc:javadoc, the javadocs are
  generated in the target directorys but not packed to jar files. How can
  I let maven create the javadoc jar files?

  Stefan

  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-- 
Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
Apache Wicket 1.3.2 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.2

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Building javadoc for Wicket 1.4 from svn download

[Igor Vaynberg]

shouldnt mvn javadoc:javadoc or mvn javadoc:jar work?

-igor


On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 5:58 AM, Stefan Lindner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Thank you!

  -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
  Von: Martijn Dashorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Gesendet: Donnerstag, 24. April 2008 14:28
  An: users@wicket.apache.org
  Betreff: Re: Building javadoc for Wicket 1.4 from svn download



  iirc:

  mvn -Prelease install

  Martijn

  On 4/24/08, Stefan Lindner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   The current Wicket 1.4 trunk does not create javadocs anymore (as
   described on this list and on the build webpage). How can I create the
   javadoc files with maven? I don't know maven mechanisms for this task.
  
When I build the project with maven javadoc:javadoc, the javadocs are
   generated in the target directorys but not packed to jar files. How
   can  I let maven create the javadoc jar files?
  
Stefan
  
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  


  --
  Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst Apache Wicket 1.3.2 is 
 released Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.2

  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Javadoc problem ?

[Eyal Golan]

ok,
I encountered this problem while looking for AbstractColumn and IColumn.
I guess there are more?

On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 5:46 PM, Martijn Dashorst 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 It would help if you would specify which classes you miss.

 Martijn

 On 3/20/08, Eyal Golan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Has anyone noticed that there are many missing classes in
   http://wicket.apache.org/docs/wicket-1.3.2/wicket/apidocs/index.html
 
   Or am I missing something?
 
  --
   Eyal Golan
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
   Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/
 


 --
 Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
 Apache Wicket 1.3.2 is released
 Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.2

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-- 
Eyal Golan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/

Re: Javadoc problem ?

[Eyal Golan]

hmmm,
Well, found them.
Thanks

2008/3/20 Sergej Logis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 I assume missing classes are all from wicket-extensions package.
 There is (somewhat hidden) link to the missing part:
 http://wicket.apache.org/docs/wicket-1.3.2/wicket-extensions/index.html

 ---
 Sincerely,
 Sergej Logiš
 Software developer
 Exigen Services
 ICQ: 12510115



 Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 2008.03.20 17:46
 Please respond to
 users@wicket.apache.org


 To
 users@wicket.apache.org
 cc

 Subject
 Re: Javadoc problem ?






 It would help if you would specify which classes you miss.

 Martijn

 On 3/20/08, Eyal Golan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Has anyone noticed that there are many missing classes in
   http://wicket.apache.org/docs/wicket-1.3.2/wicket/apidocs/index.html
 
   Or am I missing something?
 
  --
   Eyal Golan
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
   Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/
 


 --
 Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
 Apache Wicket 1.3.2 is released
 Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.2

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





-- 
Eyal Golan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/

Javadoc problem ?

[Eyal Golan]

Has anyone noticed that there are many missing classes in
http://wicket.apache.org/docs/wicket-1.3.2/wicket/apidocs/index.html

Or am I missing something?
-- 
Eyal Golan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/

Re: Javadoc problem ?

[Martijn Dashorst]

It would help if you would specify which classes you miss.

Martijn

On 3/20/08, Eyal Golan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Has anyone noticed that there are many missing classes in
  http://wicket.apache.org/docs/wicket-1.3.2/wicket/apidocs/index.html

  Or am I missing something?

 --
  Eyal Golan
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/



-- 
Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
Apache Wicket 1.3.2 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.2

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Javadoc problem ?

[Gerolf Seitz]

these are just the javadocs for the wicket core project.
you can find the classes for wicket-extensions here, in case you missed one
of
the classes in there:
http://wicket.apache.org/docs/wicket-1.3.2/wicket-extensions/apidocs/index.html

more projects (datetime, spring, ...) will follow soon.

  Gerolf

On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 4:35 PM, Eyal Golan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Has anyone noticed that there are many missing classes in
 http://wicket.apache.org/docs/wicket-1.3.2/wicket/apidocs/index.html

 Or am I missing something?
 --
 Eyal Golan
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/

Re: Javadoc problem ?

[Sergej Logis]

I assume missing classes are all from wicket-extensions package. 
There is (somewhat hidden) link to the missing part:
http://wicket.apache.org/docs/wicket-1.3.2/wicket-extensions/index.html

---
Sincerely,
Sergej Logiš
Software developer
Exigen Services
ICQ: 12510115



Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
2008.03.20 17:46
Please respond to
users@wicket.apache.org


To
users@wicket.apache.org
cc

Subject
Re: Javadoc problem ?






It would help if you would specify which classes you miss.

Martijn

On 3/20/08, Eyal Golan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Has anyone noticed that there are many missing classes in
  http://wicket.apache.org/docs/wicket-1.3.2/wicket/apidocs/index.html

  Or am I missing something?

 --
  Eyal Golan
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  Visit: http://jvdrums.sourceforge.net/



-- 
Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
Apache Wicket 1.3.2 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.2

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Wicket JavaDoc + Maven

[Igor Vaynberg]

mvn eclipse:eclipse -DdownloadSources=true

-igor


On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 1:42 PM, SEIDLER DANIEL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello,

  is it possible to add the wicket javadoc as an artifact in pom.xml.
  So maven can download and integrate javadoc Jar in eclipse by itself?

  thanks in advance

  daniel







-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Wicket JavaDoc + Maven

[SEIDLER DANIEL]

Thx Guys, that worked !








Am 04.03.2008 um 22:55 schrieb Igor Vaynberg:


mvn eclipse:eclipse -DdownloadSources=true

Outdated Javadoc referenced on wicket.apache.org

[Jay Hogan]

Any chance someone can updated the javadoc referenced on the Wicket
homepage? It is currently showing a 1.3.0 snapshot.


Cheers,
Jay

Re: Outdated Javadoc referenced on wicket.apache.org

[Igor Vaynberg]

please add a jira issue

-igor


On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 2:53 AM, Jay Hogan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Any chance someone can updated the javadoc referenced on the Wicket
  homepage? It is currently showing a 1.3.0 snapshot.


  Cheers,
  Jay


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Outdated Javadoc referenced on wicket.apache.org

[Kevin Murphy]

Igor Vaynberg wrote:

please add a jira issue

  
It's already in there (WICKET-1333 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1333).  It has been an 
unassigned issue in Jira from Feb 10, 2008.


-Kevin Murphy


-igor


On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 2:53 AM, Jay Hogan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  

Any chance someone can updated the javadoc referenced on the Wicket
 homepage? It is currently showing a 1.3.0 snapshot.


 Cheers,
 Jay






-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Outdated Javadoc referenced on wicket.apache.org

[Igor Vaynberg]

and now its assigned...most of the core team is away on holiday...

-igor


On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Kevin Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Igor Vaynberg wrote:
   please add a jira issue
  
  
  It's already in there (WICKET-1333
  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1333).  It has been an
  unassigned issue in Jira from Feb 10, 2008.

  -Kevin Murphy



   -igor
  
  
   On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 2:53 AM, Jay Hogan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   Any chance someone can updated the javadoc referenced on the Wicket
homepage? It is currently showing a 1.3.0 snapshot.
  
  
Cheers,
Jay
  
  



  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Outdated Javadoc referenced on wicket.apache.org

[Kevin Murphy]

Igor Vaynberg wrote:

and now its assigned...most of the core team is away on holiday...

  
On the same theme of Wicket web presence needs some work, I just 
created jira ticket 1375: wicket.sourceforge.net/wicket-quickstart is 
totally obsolete and too easily found in search engines.


The whole http://wicket.sourceforge.net/wicket-quickstart/ tree makes 
Wicket look like a dead or dying project. If it hasn't been updated 
since 2006, I assume it should just be replaced with redirects to the 
current Quick Start page on the main Wicket site 
(http://wicket.apache.org/quickstart.html) 


-Kevin




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Outdated Javadoc referenced on wicket.apache.org

[Gerolf Seitz]

can we remove the old website?
or do we still need it for the 1.2.x releases?

  Gerolf

On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 2:47 AM, Kevin Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Igor Vaynberg wrote:
  and now its assigned...most of the core team is away on holiday...
 
 
 On the same theme of Wicket web presence needs some work, I just
 created jira ticket 1375: wicket.sourceforge.net/wicket-quickstart is
 totally obsolete and too easily found in search engines.

 The whole http://wicket.sourceforge.net/wicket-quickstart/ tree makes
 Wicket look like a dead or dying project. If it hasn't been updated
 since 2006, I assume it should just be replaced with redirects to the
 current Quick Start page on the main Wicket site
 (http://wicket.apache.org/quickstart.html) 

 -Kevin




 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Outdated Javadoc referenced on wicket.apache.org

[Ryan Sonnek]

+1 for complete removal... sf.net will always serve up the binaries,
but no need leaving the rest of the entrails lying around.

On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Gerolf Seitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 can we remove the old website?
  or do we still need it for the 1.2.x releases?

   Gerolf

  On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 2:47 AM, Kevin Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  wrote:



   Igor Vaynberg wrote:
and now its assigned...most of the core team is away on holiday...
   
   
   On the same theme of Wicket web presence needs some work, I just
   created jira ticket 1375: wicket.sourceforge.net/wicket-quickstart is
   totally obsolete and too easily found in search engines.
  
   The whole http://wicket.sourceforge.net/wicket-quickstart/ tree makes
   Wicket look like a dead or dying project. If it hasn't been updated
   since 2006, I assume it should just be replaced with redirects to the
   current Quick Start page on the main Wicket site
   (http://wicket.apache.org/quickstart.html) 
  
   -Kevin
  
  
  
  
   -
   To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Outdated Javadoc referenced on wicket.apache.org

[Martijn Dashorst]

These sites are there for archive reasons. -1000 for removing them

Martijn

On 2/27/08, Ryan Sonnek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 +1 for complete removal... sf.net will always serve up the binaries,
  but no need leaving the rest of the entrails lying around.


  On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Gerolf Seitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   can we remove the old website?
or do we still need it for the 1.2.x releases?
  
 Gerolf
  
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 2:47 AM, Kevin Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
  
  
  
 Igor Vaynberg wrote:
  and now its assigned...most of the core team is away on holiday...
 
 
 On the same theme of Wicket web presence needs some work, I just
 created jira ticket 1375: wicket.sourceforge.net/wicket-quickstart is
 totally obsolete and too easily found in search engines.

 The whole http://wicket.sourceforge.net/wicket-quickstart/ tree makes
 Wicket look like a dead or dying project. If it hasn't been updated
 since 2006, I assume it should just be replaced with redirects to the
 current Quick Start page on the main Wicket site
 (http://wicket.apache.org/quickstart.html) 

 -Kevin




 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


  

  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-- 
Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
Apache Wicket 1.3.1 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.1

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Outdated Javadoc referenced on wicket.apache.org

[Igor Vaynberg]

can we at least have a fat banner across the top that points to
apache.wicket.org saying the project has moved?

-igor


On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 7:43 PM, Martijn Dashorst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 These sites are there for archive reasons. -1000 for removing them

  Martijn



  On 2/27/08, Ryan Sonnek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   +1 for complete removal... sf.net will always serve up the binaries,
but no need leaving the rest of the entrails lying around.
  
  
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Gerolf Seitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 can we remove the old website?
  or do we still need it for the 1.2.x releases?

   Gerolf

  On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 2:47 AM, Kevin Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  wrote:



   Igor Vaynberg wrote:
and now its assigned...most of the core team is away on holiday...
   
   
   On the same theme of Wicket web presence needs some work, I just
   created jira ticket 1375: wicket.sourceforge.net/wicket-quickstart 
 is
   totally obsolete and too easily found in search engines.
  
   The whole http://wicket.sourceforge.net/wicket-quickstart/ tree 
 makes
   Wicket look like a dead or dying project. If it hasn't been updated
   since 2006, I assume it should just be replaced with redirects to the
   current Quick Start page on the main Wicket site
   (http://wicket.apache.org/quickstart.html) 
  
   -Kevin
  
  
  
  
   -
   To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  

  
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  


  --
  Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
  Apache Wicket 1.3.1 is released
  Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.1



  -
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: DateTextField, i18n, javadoc and DatePicker

[Alan Romaniuc]

This problem will be solved using DateTextField from  
org.apache.wicket.datetime.markup.html.form  instead of 
org.apache.wicket.extensions.markup.html.form


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Javadoc?

[Ayodeji Aladejebi]

i was even referring to getting the javadocs for offline use by downloading
it.

On 1/12/08, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 We also have them on wicketstuff.org/wicket13doc i believe
 Dont know if that is the latest version and i cant check it at this time

 On 1/11/08, Ayodeji Aladejebi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  The javadoc does not come with the wicket 1.3 bundle.
 
  Where can the javadoc for all the wicket1.3 builds be found?
 

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-- 
Aladejebi Ayodeji A.,
DabarObjects Solutions
Phone: +234 9 481 7 156
Mobile: +234 803 589 1780
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: www.dabarobjects.com
Blog: blog.dabarobjects.com

Participate, Collaborate, Innovate
Join Community:
http://www.cowblock.net/

Get A Free Blog:
http://blogs.cowblock.net/