and is VERY sensitive.
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Petersson [mailto:andr...@petersson.at]
Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2009 5:00 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Intellij9 integration
i think getting official support for wicket in idea is too late. the
roadmap
, 2009 10:08 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Intellij9 integration
Never felt like I need additional support for wicket. After all it's 95% in
type-safe java code. Keeping wicket:id's in sync is no rocket science once
you get the idea :-)
Am 15.11.2009 um 00:38 schrieb Nick Heudecker
because wicket isn't a stretch
for java.
-Original Message-
From: Peter Ertl [mailto:pe...@gmx.org]
Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2009 10:08 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Intellij9 integration
Never felt like I need additional support for wicket. After all it's 95% in
type
i think getting official support for wicket in idea is too late. the
roadmap was published about 6 months ago, for example at
http://blogs.jetbrains.com/idea/2009/05/maia-eap-is-finally-here/
and there is already a beta version available at
http://www.jetbrains.com/idea/nextversion/index.html
Petersson [mailto:andr...@petersson.at]
Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2009 5:00 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Intellij9 integration
i think getting official support for wicket in idea is too late. the
roadmap was published about 6 months ago, for example at
http
work - that'd
be
cool too :) Current one barely shows up and is VERY sensitive.
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Petersson [mailto:andr...@petersson.at]
Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2009 5:00 PM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Intellij9 integration
i think getting official
