Would be good if it told you about "unmentioned" wicket:ids from the html so
you didn't have to wait till you run.
Or if you are declaring a component that it can't find in html.

Jumping back and forth between code and html d/n seem to work for me.

Entirely too much typing for my taste! Idea is REALLY good at minimizing on
that.

Bunch of templates can be written for Wicket programmers to simplify typical
stuff.

But yes, a lot of things in IJ work already because wicket isn't a stretch
for java.


-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Ertl [mailto:pe...@gmx.org] 
Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2009 10:08 AM
To: users@wicket.apache.org
Subject: Re: Intellij9 integration

Never felt like I need additional support for wicket. After all it's 95% in
type-safe java code. Keeping wicket:id's in sync is no rocket science once
you get the idea :-)

Am 15.11.2009 um 00:38 schrieb Nick Heudecker:

> What do you mean that the current one shows up?  I haven't updated
> WicketForge to work with IDEA 9 because I'm not on IDEA 9.
> 
> Feel free to submit patches.  Right now WicketForge does everything I need
> it to do, so unless I start using Wicket more often or it doesn't meet my
> needs, I'm not really inclined to spend my limited free time on it.
> 
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Alex Rass <a...@itbsllc.com> wrote:
> 
>> You have a point, but I've been using Idea for... 6+ years now.
>> These guys are very sales oriented.
>> They added GWT support as a point release, like it was a no big deal.
>> When they see there's a demand - they move on it.
>> And if they can add a new popular framework for the launch - they just
may,
>> to make it sell better. They are in a war with Eclipse and "we got that
and
>> it's better" has been their selling angle.
>> 
>> But if someone wants to make the wicketidea plugin actually work - that'd
>> be
>> cool too :)  Current one barely shows up and is VERY sensitive.
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Andreas Petersson [mailto:andr...@petersson.at]
>> Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2009 5:00 PM
>> To: users@wicket.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Intellij9 integration
>> 
>> i think getting official support for wicket in idea is too late. the
>> roadmap was published about 6 months ago, for example at
>> http://blogs.jetbrains.com/idea/2009/05/maia-eap-is-finally-here/
>> and there is already a beta version available at
>> http://www.jetbrains.com/idea/nextversion/index.html
>> 
>> but maybe it is the right time to give wicketforge some polish. my
>> suggestions for enhancements, since it should be possible to better
>> develop plugins since it is open source now.
>> *) validation of propertymodels/CPM like idea does for expression
>> Language for jsp. ability to ctrl-click to the corresponding getter and
>> "find usages" of those getters
>> *) support for "find usages" for wicket:ids
>> *) central facet for wicket, to control its settings.
>> *) ability to turn off the "non-serializable field in serializable
>> class" warning in components for fields that are injected.
>> 
>> br
>> andreas
>> 
>> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org

Reply via email to