>From my experience, WicketForge already displays a warning if the components
can't be located in the HTML or Java code.  Toggling between Java and HTML
also works fine for me.  You can either submit a bug report or a patch.

Also, feel free to submit a patch with templates you'd like to see added to
WF.  I'm getting ready to release 0.5.7 this week.

On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Alex Rass <a...@itbsllc.com> wrote:

> Would be good if it told you about "unmentioned" wicket:ids from the html
> so
> you didn't have to wait till you run.
> Or if you are declaring a component that it can't find in html.
>
> Jumping back and forth between code and html d/n seem to work for me.
>
> Entirely too much typing for my taste! Idea is REALLY good at minimizing on
> that.
>
> Bunch of templates can be written for Wicket programmers to simplify
> typical
> stuff.
>
> But yes, a lot of things in IJ work already because wicket isn't a stretch
> for java.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Ertl [mailto:pe...@gmx.org]
> Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2009 10:08 AM
> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Intellij9 integration
>
> Never felt like I need additional support for wicket. After all it's 95% in
> type-safe java code. Keeping wicket:id's in sync is no rocket science once
> you get the idea :-)
>
> Am 15.11.2009 um 00:38 schrieb Nick Heudecker:
>
> > What do you mean that the current one shows up?  I haven't updated
> > WicketForge to work with IDEA 9 because I'm not on IDEA 9.
> >
> > Feel free to submit patches.  Right now WicketForge does everything I
> need
> > it to do, so unless I start using Wicket more often or it doesn't meet my
> > needs, I'm not really inclined to spend my limited free time on it.
> >
> > On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Alex Rass <a...@itbsllc.com> wrote:
> >
> >> You have a point, but I've been using Idea for... 6+ years now.
> >> These guys are very sales oriented.
> >> They added GWT support as a point release, like it was a no big deal.
> >> When they see there's a demand - they move on it.
> >> And if they can add a new popular framework for the launch - they just
> may,
> >> to make it sell better. They are in a war with Eclipse and "we got that
> and
> >> it's better" has been their selling angle.
> >>
> >> But if someone wants to make the wicketidea plugin actually work -
> that'd
> >> be
> >> cool too :)  Current one barely shows up and is VERY sensitive.
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Andreas Petersson [mailto:andr...@petersson.at]
> >> Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2009 5:00 PM
> >> To: users@wicket.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: Intellij9 integration
> >>
> >> i think getting official support for wicket in idea is too late. the
> >> roadmap was published about 6 months ago, for example at
> >> http://blogs.jetbrains.com/idea/2009/05/maia-eap-is-finally-here/
> >> and there is already a beta version available at
> >> http://www.jetbrains.com/idea/nextversion/index.html
> >>
> >> but maybe it is the right time to give wicketforge some polish. my
> >> suggestions for enhancements, since it should be possible to better
> >> develop plugins since it is open source now.
> >> *) validation of propertymodels/CPM like idea does for expression
> >> Language for jsp. ability to ctrl-click to the corresponding getter and
> >> "find usages" of those getters
> >> *) support for "find usages" for wicket:ids
> >> *) central facet for wicket, to control its settings.
> >> *) ability to turn off the "non-serializable field in serializable
> >> class" warning in components for fields that are injected.
> >>
> >> br
> >> andreas
> >>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to