On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 9:20 AM, Sandro Bonazzola
> 2018-01-12 17:39 GMT+01:00 Luca 'remix_tj' Lorenzetto <
>> i just completed the upgrade of my engine appliance from 4.1.8 to 18.104.22.168.
> This is interesting, since
can you attach vdsm logs during the time period where migration
failed ? It would help us to see why the migration failed.
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 5:24 AM, Bill James wrote:
> I have one node in our cluster that has problems when migrating
The oVirt Project is pleased to announce the availability of the oVirt
4.1.9 RC2 release, as of January 17th, 2017
This update is the ninth in a series of stabilization updates to the 4.1
This release is available now for:
* Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.4 or later
* CentOS Linux (or
Please clarify ‘Perhaps you can use webadmin and limit user’s permissions the
way you need’. Clean oVirt 4.2 installation have only admin user. Or I am
wrong? What type of user is webadmin you are talking about?
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 4:48 PM, Simone Tiraboschi wrote:
> Ciao Luca,
> do you remember if in the past you edited it somehow?
never had. It has been deployed when was 4.1.2 (IIRC) and upgraded
accordingly to 4.1.9 and then to latest version.
Any further suggestions on how to fix the issue and make HA setup working?
Can the complete removal of second host (with complete removal ovirt
configuration files and packages) from cluster and adding it again solve
the issue? Or it might completly ruin the cluster?
On Wed, January 17, 2018 11:13 am, Pavel Novotny wrote:
> On 16.1.2018 21:05, Derek Atkins wrote:
>> I upgraded from 4.0.6 to 4.1.8. I had created a VM in 4.0.6 but had
>> never started it nor had I ever run it before I upgraded. I then
>> upgraded to 4.1.8 (which went very
Here are my steps to upgrade oVirt 4.1.8 (Active Directory connected) to 4.2
1. oVirt 4.1.8 (This version is reached by several upgrades starting from oVirt
- engine - dedicated machine
- Data center A/2 clusters - Cluster 1/2 virtualization hosts - cluster
2018-01-17 0:02 GMT+01:00 ~Stack~ :
> FYI, your Ubuntu options are antiquated.
> 12.10, 13.04, 13.10 are all unsupported.
> 12.04 is only in extended security maintenance.
> I believe the options should be 12.04, 14.04, 16.04, and 17.10 (latest
I tested uploading an ISO to Gluster on my setup and it worked fine.
The size is OK:
# ls -lsh
1.6G -rw-rw. 1 vdsm kvm
What the official upgrade procedure now? Has anything changed?
What's the upgrade path from 4.0.4 to current stable?
Engine-upgrade-check returns no upgrades needed, and that's probably
correct, as it looks like the repos are from 4.0
On 01/26/2017 08:26 AM, Simone
Installed and seems to be working nicely.
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 8:36 AM, Yedidyah Bar David wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 11:33 PM, Alex K wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > Is the ISO at
is there a way to force select master storage domain? I have three data
domains, we had some storage problems and now none of the domains is
master. I cannot activate any because I should first activate the master
one. Any help appreciated.
yesterday I upgraded to 4.2 from 4.1.8.
Now I notice I cannot assign host dev pass though any more; in the GUI
the 'Pinnded to host' list is empty.
The hostdev from before the upgrades are still present. I tried to
remove them and got an NPE (see below).
Has anyone an idea?
Our oVirt environment was originally setup by someone else. The hosted
engine VM has a custom name, but it seems to me like some of the
hosted-engine tools such as hosted-engine --console for example expect the
domain to be "HostedEngine'. I tried renaming it in the admin interface
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 9:28 AM, Fred Rolland wrote:
> I tested uploading an ISO to Gluster on my setup and it worked fine.
> Are you seeing any other issues with your Gluster setup?
> Creating regular disks, copy/move disks to this SD?
On 01/12/2018 05:53 PM, Michal Skrivanek wrote:
On 12 Jan 2018, at 12:27, Giorgio Biacchi > wrote:
It's the same for me also.
Ovirt is connected to FreeIPA this time, so it seems not to be bound to a
specific AAA engine extension.
Yeah, I noticied the same thing and almost didn't select anyone of these
which are already pretty old.
On 17/01/2018 05:03, Barak Korren wrote:
On 17 January 2018 at 01:02, ~Stack~ wrote:
FYI, your Ubuntu options are antiquated.
12.10, 13.04, 13.10 are all
One brick was at a point down for replacement.
It has been replaced and all vols are up
Status of volume: data
Gluster process TCP Port RDMA Port Online Pid
Mail list logo