Re: [ovirt-users] Performance Issue

On 18/04/18 14:54, Gianluca Cecchi wrote: > On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 2:25 PM, Tony Brian Albers > wrote: > > You need a lot faster disks to keep up with all that random I/O. > > "Storage IO is average on 75 M/s Read Disk and 25 Write Disk. ( SSD >  >     Raid )" >

Re: [ovirt-users] Performance Issue

On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 2:25 PM, Tony Brian Albers wrote: > You need a lot faster disks to keep up with all that random I/O. > > "Storage IO is average on 75 M/s Read Disk and 25 Write Disk. ( SSD > > Raid )" > > Ehm, are you running VM's on a DD box? Why on earth would you do that? > > /to

Re: [ovirt-users] Performance Issue

indows VM´s > > *From:*users-boun...@ovirt.org *On Behalf Of > *Thomas Fecke > *Sent:* Dienstag, 17. April 2018 16:18 > *To:* Roy Golan > *Cc:* users@ovirt.org > *Subject:* Re: [ovirt-users] Performance Issue > > Guest: Win 10 and 2016 > > Disk: VirtISCSI – Thin provisio

Re: [ovirt-users] Performance Issue

: Roy Golan Cc: users@ovirt.org Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Performance Issue Guest: Win 10 and 2016 Disk: VirtISCSI – Thin provision Domain: Single Data Domain – NFS 4 From: Roy Golan Sent: Dienstag, 17. April 2018 12:58 To: Thomas Fecke Cc: users@ovirt.org Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Performance

Re: [ovirt-users] Performance Issue

Guest: Win 10 and 2016 Disk: VirtISCSI – Thin provision Domain: Single Data Domain – NFS 4 From: Roy Golan Sent: Dienstag, 17. April 2018 12:58 To: Thomas Fecke Cc: users@ovirt.org Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Performance Issue On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 at 12:58 Thomas Fecke mailto:thomas.fe

Re: [ovirt-users] Performance Issue

*From:* Roy Golan > *Sent:* Dienstag, 17. April 2018 11:52 > *To:* Thomas Fecke > *Cc:* users@ovirt.org > *Subject:* Re: [ovirt-users] Performance Issue > > > > > > On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 at 12:45 Thomas Fecke wrote: > > Okay, > > > > it seems to be that

Re: [ovirt-users] Performance Issue

about 25Mbit/s external ( 400.000 k Internet ) I realy cant find that bottle neck From: Roy Golan Sent: Dienstag, 17. April 2018 11:52 To: Thomas Fecke Cc: users@ovirt.org Subject: Re: [ovirt-users] Performance Issue On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 at 12:45 Thomas Fecke mailto:thomas.fe...@eset.de>>

Re: [ovirt-users] Performance Issue

On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 at 12:45 Thomas Fecke wrote: > Okay, > > > > it seems to be that the Storage IO is the Problem – every Write and Read > Process takes a lot of time > > > > Sometimes the copy Job stops with 0/Byte and the traffic goes up and down > like a mountain. > > > > > > But the Storage

Re: [ovirt-users] Performance Issue

Okay, it seems to be that the Storage IO is the Problem - every Write and Read Process takes a lot of time Sometimes the copy Job stops with 0/Byte and the traffic goes up and down like a mountain. But the Storage Read and Write M/s looking fine... I don't get it Any toughts? From: users-b

Re: [ovirt-users] Performance issue for GlusterFS as the block storage for VMs

yment. Regards Donny D cloudspin.me From: Yue, Cong [mailto:cong_...@alliedtelesis.com] Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 12:30 PM To: Donny Davis; users@ovirt.org Subject: RE: [ovirt-users] Performance issue for GlusterFS as the block storage for VMs It is just the default configur

Re: [ovirt-users] Performance issue for GlusterFS as the block storage for VMs

: Donny Davis [mailto:do...@cloudspin.me] Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2015 11:24 AM To: Yue, Cong; users@ovirt.org Subject: RE: [ovirt-users] Performance issue for GlusterFS as the block storage for VMs I see. So have you done any tuning for IO performance or are the configs straight out of the box

Re: [ovirt-users] Performance issue for GlusterFS as the block storage for VMs

, 2015 11:40 AM To: Donny Davis; users@ovirt.org Subject: RE: [ovirt-users] Performance issue for GlusterFS as the block storage for VMs I am using iometer (http://www.iometer.org/) to test the IOPS from one of the vm. As for IOPS is more trying to test the performance of block, rather than real

Re: [ovirt-users] Performance issue for GlusterFS as the block storage for VMs

-users] Performance issue for GlusterFS as the block storage for VMs Do you have any metrics to give an idea of the difference. I am using NFS right now, and I am migrating to Gluster. I have the gluster system up, and I see that it seems to provision disks faster than my NFS. I haven't use

Re: [ovirt-users] Performance issue for GlusterFS as the block storage for VMs

Do you have any metrics to give an idea of the difference. I am using NFS right now, and I am migrating to Gluster. I have the gluster system up, and I see that it seems to provision disks faster than my NFS. I haven't used any real measurement tools to get actual metrics, this is all perceived.