The 'net' tflag exists to allow SA to know what tests to disable when it
is told to run only local tests. That is usually done when messages are
being checked well after their arrival, because network-dependent tests
are generally dynamic. There are also places where policy or network
Thanks!
>The 'net' tflag exists to allow SA to know what tests to disable when it
>is told to run only local tests. That is usually done when messages are
>being checked well after their arrival, because network-dependent tests
>are generally dynamic. There are also places where policy or
On Sun, 23 Oct 2016, Bill Cole wrote:
On 23 Oct 2016, at 1:01, Pedro David Marco wrote:
This takes me to and old question: How does SA know which are network
rules and which are not?
tflags
because it does itright even if "tflag net" is not set for the rule...
The 'net' tflag exists
On 23 Oct 2016, at 1:01, Pedro David Marco wrote:
I have tested it in a new Debian box and as expected PYZOR_CHECK
worked. So it is obvious that i have something odd in my Debibox.
Thanks to all who helped me gently!!
This takes me to and old question: How does SA know which are network
I have tested it in a new Debian box and as expected PYZOR_CHECK worked. So it
is obvious that i have something odd in my Debibox.
Thanks to all who helped me gently!!
This takes me to and old question: How does SA know which are network rules and
which are not? because it does itright even if
On 19 Oct 2016, at 23:23, Pedro David Marco wrote:
Hmmm... Relevant context of those lines is lost with grep, but they
confirm something odd is going on.
Bill, your remark is welcome, what lines/info should i pay attention
to or event post here?
The full output of the Dumper. As John said,
On Wed, 19 Oct 2016, Bill Cole wrote:
This is a print Dumper of permsgstatus with a grep -i PYZOR:
[snip]
Hmmm... Relevant context of those lines is lost with grep, but they confirm
something odd is going on.
Perhaps dump the entire thing to a text file and post it (gzipped if
large) to
>Hmmm... Relevant context of those lines is lost with grep, but they
>confirm something odd is going on.
Bill, your remark is welcome, what lines/info should i pay attention to or
event post here?
Pedro
od_ma...@yahoo.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2016 5:03 AM
Subject: Re: PYZOR_CHECK always have zero score, why?
On 19 Oct 2016, at 22:41, Pedro David Marco wrote:
> Thanks Bill...
I wish it had been more helpful.
> tested...
>> 1. Add to local.cf, along with the other PYZO
On 19 Oct 2016, at 22:41, Pedro David Marco wrote:
Thanks Bill...
I wish it had been more helpful.
tested...
1. Add to local.cf, along with the other PYZOR_CHECK_2 lines you
had:>> tflags PYZOR_CHECK_2 net>>Does that change whether the
rule is hit?>>>2. Change the PYZOR_CHECK score
Thanks Bill...
tested...
>1. Add to local.cf, along with the other PYZOR_CHECK_2 lines you had:>>
>tflags PYZOR_CHECK_2 net>>Does that change whether the rule is hit?>>>2.
>Change the PYZOR_CHECK score line in 50_scores.cf to:>> score PYZOR_CHECK
>0.001 1.985 0.001 1.392>>Does that quiet
On 19 Oct 2016, at 12:16, Pedro David Marco wrote:
IIRC I've seen this warning on meta rule dependencies with a non-zero
scores. Unless you have a better reason to think Pyzor isn't working,
I>'d just ignore it.
Well... you are right, in fact i have no problem in ignoring it, but i
do not
>IIRC I've seen this warning on meta rule dependencies with a non-zero
>scores. Unless you have a better reason to think Pyzor isn't working,
I>'d just ignore it.
Well... you are right, in fact i have no problem in ignoring it, but i do not
like tohave unresolved issues in something that is
???
score PYZOR_CHECK 2
and sets score 0?
you haven't answered my question, see below.
From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk>
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 9:42 AM
Subject: Re: PYZOR_CHECK always have zero score, why?
On 19
On Wed, 19 Oct 2016 03:22:13 + (UTC)
Pedro David Marco wrote:
> Hi!
>
> It seems PYZOR_CHECK rule is not being used in my SA Just
> installed SA and Pyzor in a Debian and executed "pyzor discover."In
> Debian pyzor is enabled by default so nothing to add in
> local.cf. Command "pyzor
ets score 0?
i am stuck...
-Pedro
From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk>
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 9:42 AM
Subject: Re: PYZOR_CHECK always have zero score, why?
On 19.10.16 04:28, Pedro David Marco wrote:
>i already d
On 19.10.16 04:28, Pedro David Marco wrote:
i already did but still no clues...
Files in my Debian SA package (3.4.1) containing the string PYZOR_CHECK:
# for i in `dpkg -L spamassassin`; do grep -l PYZOR_CHECK $i 2>/dev/null ;
ssassin_org/regression_tests.cf"
for included file
only 50_scores.cf contains string PYZOR_CHECK
--Pedro
From: John Hardin <jhar...@impsec.org>
To: SA Mailing List <users@spamassassin.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 6:41 AM
Subject: Re: PYZOR_CHECK a
On Wed, 19 Oct 2016, Pedro David Marco wrote:
Files in my Debian SA package (3.4.1) containing the string PYZOR_CHECK:
Run debug mode and look for the list of config files it's actually
reading. What comes after the default 50_scores.cf?
i have even looked for the string PYZOR_CHECK
-20150...@billmail.scconsult.com>
To: SA Mailing List <users@spamassassin.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 6:04 AM
Subject: Re: PYZOR_CHECK always have zero score, why?
On 18 Oct 2016, at 23:22, Pedro David Marco wrote:
> So Pyzor seems to be OK!... the problem is somehow related to
On 18 Oct 2016, at 23:22, Pedro David Marco wrote:
So Pyzor seems to be OK!... the problem is somehow related to
PYZOR_CHECK rule but why???
Some config file is being loaded that sets the score of PYZOR_CHECK to
0. It is NOT 0 in the current default ruleset:
50_scores.cf:score PYZOR_CHECK
21 matches
Mail list logo
