James,
On 11/18/2020 5:06 PM, James H. H. Lampert wrote:
Ladies and Gentlemen:
The same customer installation that required 104 (but with the 103
catalina.sh, to avoid Bug 64501) back in June is now demanding an update
to 106 because of the CVE-2020-13935 vulnerability.
Two questions:
1.
Ladies and Gentlemen:
The same customer installation that required 104 (but with the 103
catalina.sh, to avoid Bug 64501) back in June is now demanding an update
to 106 because of the CVE-2020-13935 vulnerability.
Two questions:
1. Is the problem from June fixed in 106?
2. Does 106 take
On Mon, Jun 22, 2020, 11:56 James H. H. Lampert
wrote:
> On 6/20/20 8:41 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> > 7.0.105 hasn't been released yet. You can use catalina.sh from 7.0
> > 103 or the latest version from source control.
>
> Where would I find "the latest version from source control"?
>
On 6/20/20 8:41 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
7.0.105 hasn't been released yet. You can use catalina.sh from 7.0
103 or the latest version from source control.
Where would I find "the latest version from source control"?
--
JHHL
-
On June 19, 2020 10:49:54 PM UTC, "James H. H. Lampert"
wrote:
>On 6/19/20 3:20 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64501
>
>Hmm. I'm now looking through the entire catalina.sh script in both
>versions. (First, I looked through the startup.sh script; that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
James,
On 6/19/20 18:49, James H. H. Lampert wrote:
> On 6/19/20 3:20 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64501
>
> Hmm. I'm now looking through the entire catalina.sh script in both
> versions. (First, I looked
On 6/19/20 3:20 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64501
Hmm. I'm now looking through the entire catalina.sh script in both
versions. (First, I looked through the startup.sh script; that appears
to be identical in both versions.)
First thing I noticed was
On 19/06/2020 21:14, James H. H. Lampert wrote:
> Ladies and Gentlemen:
>
> In preparation for updating a customer box, I installed Tomcat 7.0.104
> on our own AS/400 (64-bit Java 6 JVM).
>
> 7.0.93 works just fine on our box, but 7.0.104 seems to crash on
> takeoff, producing no log files, just
On 6/19/20 2:27 PM, calder wrote:
a) it's worth asking the obvious ... are the file permissions correct for
the new TCp installation, i.e , such as read/write in "logs" subdir and
execute permissions for the TC scripts?
Unless something weird is going on with the apache-tomcat-7.0.104.zip
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020, 15:33 James H. H. Lampert
wrote:
> On 6/19/20 1:26 PM, calder wrote:
> > a) are both Tomcat instances installed on that same server?
>
> Yes
>
> > b) if yes, is the 7.0.93 instance running when you launch the 7.0.104
> > instance?
>
> No.
>
> We've done this procedure
On 6/19/20 1:24 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
My guess is that the system-property-setting part of catalina.sh (or
some other script) is getting fouled-up. What script(s) are you
running to start Tomcat?
Remember, we're talking about IBM Midrange systems, not *nix. So bash is
entirely
On 6/19/20 1:24 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
My guess is that the system-property-setting part of catalina.sh (or
some other script) is getting fouled-up. What script(s) are you
running to start Tomcat?
Remember, we're talking about IBM Midrange systems, not *nix. So bash is
entirely
On 6/19/20 1:26 PM, calder wrote:
a) are both Tomcat instances installed on that same server?
Yes
b) if yes, is the 7.0.93 instance running when you launch the 7.0.104
instance?
No.
We've done this procedure before: installing a new version, doing the
setup in the new version, then
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020, 15:15 James H. H. Lampert
wrote:
> Ladies and Gentlemen:
>
> In preparation for updating a customer box, I installed Tomcat 7.0.104
> on our own AS/400 (64-bit Java 6 JVM).
>
> 7.0.93 works just fine on our box, but 7.0.104 seems to crash on
> takeoff, producing no log
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
James,
On 6/19/20 16:14, James H. H. Lampert wrote:
> Ladies and Gentlemen:
>
> In preparation for updating a customer box, I installed Tomcat
> 7.0.104 on our own AS/400 (64-bit Java 6 JVM).
>
> 7.0.93 works just fine on our box, but 7.0.104 seems
15 matches
Mail list logo
