Re: [USRP-users] RFNoC flowgraph runs right the second time

2018-07-30 Thread Jon Pendlum via USRP-users
Hey Jason, Have you tried using a smaller SPP such as 256? Jonathon On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 2:39 AM, Jason Matusiak via USRP-users wrote: > So, somehow I got things working for the first run in a certain situation. > I attached 2 pictures to show my flowgraphs. Again, my LBT block is >

Re: [USRP-users] about rfnoc nocshell

2018-07-30 Thread Jon Pendlum via USRP-users
Hi, 1) You cannot reduce noc_shell resource usage much. You can try putting all your custom logic in just one RFNoC block, that way you do not incur the overhead of multiple noc_shell instances. 2) Do you mean "Can I access PS DDR memory directly from the FPGA fabric?" If so, yes you can via the

Re: [USRP-users] noc_block_null_source_sink module

2018-07-30 Thread Jon Pendlum via USRP-users
Hey Jason, The block is functionally complete, in fact I think it was the first block ever made. There is a UHD C++ example, rfnoc_nullsource_ce_rx.cpp, that uses it. A block controller and GRC xml for GNU Radio needs to be created though. Jonathon On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 4:38 AM, Jason

Re: [USRP-users] Possible to enable via RFNoC block via RFNoC

2018-07-30 Thread Jon Pendlum via USRP-users
Hey Jason, You can send a command packet to another block via noc_shell's cmd_out port. Command packets basically encapsulate a settings bus write. In the payload of the command packet, the upper 32 bits are the settings register address and the lower 32 bits are the data. Also, the block will

Re: [USRP-users] Time alignment failure for four channels coherent receiver in X310

2018-07-30 Thread Jack Yang via USRP-users
Thank you so much!! Julian! Starting the RX streamer a little bit in the future works!! Now I can align 4 channels as coherent receiver with 50M sps without problem. Also thanks for Marcus's help All Best, Jack On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 12:49 PM, Julian Arnold wrote: > Hey, > > have you tried

Re: [USRP-users] Possible to enable via RFNoC block via RFNoC

2018-07-30 Thread Brian Padalino via USRP-users
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 3:14 PM Jason Matusiak via USRP-users < usrp-users@lists.ettus.com> wrote: > I am curious if it is possible to enable an RFNoC block from another RFNoC > block? An example would be, turning on the siggen when another RFNoC block > decides that it should run. > Not sure I

[USRP-users] Possible to enable via RFNoC block via RFNoC

2018-07-30 Thread Jason Matusiak via USRP-users
I am curious if it is possible to enable an RFNoC block from another RFNoC block? An example would be, turning on the siggen when another RFNoC block decides that it should run. I don't believe that I've seen this done anywhere, so I have a suspicion that there isn't a good way to get

Re: [USRP-users] Using Two DDC Chain in N210

2018-07-30 Thread Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
On 07/30/2018 12:30 PM, Amirhosein naseri via USRP-users wrote: Hi everybody I want to use Two DDC chain in usrp N210 to get streams for example around freq0 and freq1 with sample rate 400e3 for each channel. first i use uhd.tune_request_t function as argument fot set_center_freq function as

[USRP-users] Using Two DDC Chain in N210

2018-07-30 Thread Amirhosein naseri via USRP-users
Hi everybody I want to use Two DDC chain in usrp N210 to get streams for example around freq0 and freq1 with sample rate 400e3 for each channel.first i use uhd.tune_request_t function as argument fot set_center_freq function as below : usrp1.set_center_freq ( uhd.tune_request_t (freq1,0) ,

Re: [USRP-users] USRP X310 Remote Configuration

2018-07-30 Thread Jason Matusiak via USRP-users
I've actually done this with success, unfortunately, I am not allowed to share it :(. It wasn't too hard, I used a core in the block to hold the data, and then I just repeated it when I sent it out over and over. The catch was that there was a little bit of an issue within rfnoc at the time

Re: [USRP-users] Latency between multiple daughter boards on one USRP X310

2018-07-30 Thread Derek Kozel via USRP-users
Hello Fabian and Young, The suggestion about timed commands is on point, I think that is what is missing. Using unknown PPS will not hurt as there are two radio blocks with timekeepers and using the unknown PPS setting, or external or gpsdo if installed, will ensure that they are aligned. > 3)

[USRP-users] 回复:Re: overflowed when running two B210 simultaneously inone pc

2018-07-30 Thread 李春明 via USRP-users
Hi, thanks for you attention, i used two multi usrp object for each one. and usb 3 used. --原始邮件-- 发件人:"Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users "; 发送时间:2018年7月30日(星期一) 晚上11:36 收件人:"usrp-users" ; 主题:Re: [USRP-users] overflowed when running two B210 simultaneously inone pc

Re: [USRP-users] overflowed when running two B210 simultaneously in one pc

2018-07-30 Thread Marcus D. Leech via USRP-users
On 07/30/2018 09:32 AM, lichunming via USRP-users wrote: Dear All, I've got the following problem: I used two B210 boardssimultaneously in one program on one desktop pc with i7-7700K cpu, the two B210 was set different centre frequency. I started board A firstly, and it worked with no

Re: [USRP-users] USRP X310 Remote Configuration

2018-07-30 Thread Rob Kossler via USRP-users
Perhaps look at the RFNoC siggen block. You will need to add some component such as a block memory or fifo to store the samples on the fpga and then you will need a way to populate the memory and then play it out when desired. Rob On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 3:49 AM Farnaz Chamanzadeh wrote: >

[USRP-users] overflowed when running two B210 simultaneously in one pc

2018-07-30 Thread lichunming via USRP-users
Dear All, I've got the following problem: I used two B210 boardssimultaneously in one program on one desktop pc with i7-7700K cpu, the two B210 was set different centre frequency. I started board A firstly, and it worked with no problem. Then I started board B and there was "overflowed"

Re: [USRP-users] USRP X310 Remote Configuration

2018-07-30 Thread Farnaz Chamanzadeh via USRP-users
Dear Rob, Thanks for your helpful response. The reason that we need to use a switch is due to hour host hardware limits, which only have one 10GBE. About the second remark in your email, do you have an example or a reference where a similar case was implemented which we can use as a guideline for

Re: [USRP-users] Latency between multiple daughter boards on one USRP X310

2018-07-30 Thread Fabian Schwartau via USRP-users
Hi Young, I am not an expert, but I have three suggestions: 1) Using 'Unknown PSS' or any other sync method should not have no affect, as this is for syncing two or more USRPs. You have only one FPGA and that is in sync with itself ;) 2) Did you tried using timed commands? (see function

[USRP-users] Latency between multiple daughter boards on one USRP X310

2018-07-30 Thread YoungC_Park via USRP-users
Hi all, I hope someone could help me on my situation. I could not find similar cases on the usrp archive. I have one USRP X310 that has UBX-160(slot A) , LFTX board(slot B) and GPS module installed. - my UHD is 3.11.0 - Using uhd API based on tx_samples from_file.cpp, I can generate dual