On Wed, November 24, 2004 10:20 pm, Tom Collins said:
> Go through /var/qmail/users/assign and update the user and group of
> every entry to match the new user/group for vpopmail. Run qmail-newu
> so it rebuilds the users/cdb file.
This looks fine. All uids and gids are 89, which is what I chang
On Nov 24, 2004, at 8:33 PM, Casey Allen Shobe wrote:
Could anyone advise me as to what might be going wrong here? Your
help is
greatly appreciated!
Go through /var/qmail/users/assign and update the user and group of
every entry to match the new user/group for vpopmail. Run qmail-newu
so it re
Hi guys,
I had qmail-smtp/smtpauth (standard Gentoo install) working fine with
vchkpw previously.
I then decided that I needed to change the user ID for vpopmail to get a
suexec script working as the vpopmail user...
So I stopped qmail, changed the UID and GID from 89 to 1004, and did: find
/ -u
Hi guys,
I had qmail-smtp/smtpauth (standard Gentoo install) working fine with
vchkpw previously.
I then decided that I needed to change the user ID for vpopmail to get a
suexec script working as the vpopmail user...
So I stopped qmail, changed the UID and GID from 89 to 1004, and did:
find / -u
Perhaps the code could be split up into chkuser, which does its purpose
in
validating local recipients, and another patch that attempts to perform
some
checks on the envelope sender.
I agree with that. chkuser is great, but in some particular cases the only
desirable feature is to validating
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
>>
>> One general question, before I publish 2.0.8:
>>
>> Does it make sense to have format checking enabled as default?
>
> I think it's beyond the scope of the functionality of the chkuser
> patch, to be honest.
>
> Perhaps the code could be split up into chkuser, which
hi all,
i'm trying sto setup vpopmail with oracle for authentication.
Domain and user creation is ok, but I'm getting a -1002 error in
vauth_getpw() (oracle.c)...
I'have not found documentation on ProC, so i don't know what kind of
error is...
Connectio to the db is ok, since creations work.. whi
On Wednesday 24 November 2004 04:17 am, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
> CORRECTION TO THE PREVIOUS MESSAGE.
>
>
> CHKUSER_ENABLE_NULL_SENDER is in 2.0.7.
>
> This version may be considered stable, despite of its "devel" attribute.
I tried to use it.. looks like I need to patch with 2.0.6 and then pa
On Tuesday 23 November 2004 08:18 pm, Tom Collins wrote:
> On Nov 23, 2004, at 11:01 AM, David Hubbard wrote:
> > Is there a way to override that
> > behavior so messages are not lost? Is this the
> > expected behavior even or is something else incorrect?
> > If I reverse the order in the .qmail f
CORRECTION TO THE PREVIOUS MESSAGE.
CHKUSER_ENABLE_NULL_SENDER is in 2.0.7.
This version may be considered stable, despite of its "devel" attribute.
On next days I'll publish a 2.0.8 "release", and update online
documentation. 2.0.8 that will probably be the definitive stable chkuser,
with the mo
Jeremy,
you should add also CHKUSER_ENABLE_NULL_SENDER.
When CHKUSER_SENDER_FORMAT or CHKUSER_SENDER_MX are defined,
CHKUSER_ENABLE_NULL_SENDER will exclude NULL SENDERS from those checkings.
This is the new default in the last distributions, after
CHKUSER_ENABLE_NULL_SENDER has been added:
11 matches
Mail list logo