I understand the problem.
Goodbye.
Tonix
At 29/04/2004 29/04/2004 -0400, you wrote:
tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
Jeremy,
why does the actual suck?
It's the first time I hear that.
Tonino
At 29/04/2004 29/04/2004 -0500, you wrote:
On Thursday 29 April 2004 09:49 am, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
On Sun, 2004-04-04 at 14:48, Oden Eriksson wrote:
I would recommend a more generic patch instead of this one, I personally like
this one very much:
http://www.netdevice.com/qmail
This patch appears to support cdb only... what about those of us using
mysql? Do you know of a patch for this?
You may do it enabling chkuser always, deleting the lines of code checking
for that string.
We could also look for a different string or for a different file (i.e.
like .qmailenablebounce), if you tell me your need and we may change what
we want.
Tonino
P.S. I'm studying for version 2.0 of
On Thu, 2004-04-29 at 15:40, Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold wrote:
On Sun, 2004-04-04 at 14:48, Oden Eriksson wrote:
I would recommend a more generic patch instead of this one, I personally like
this one very much:
http://www.netdevice.com/qmail
This patch appears to support cdb only...
On Thu, 2004-04-29 at 10:49, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
You may do it enabling chkuser always, deleting the lines of code checking
for that string.
You mean disable this code in qmail-smtpd.c ? :
if ( strstr(read_buf, bounce-no-mailbox) == NULL ) {
On Thu, 2004-04-29 at 09:55, David wrote:
I agree, chkuser patch works with mysql, or cdb, depending how vpopmail
was compiled. The patch calls vauth_getpw vpopmail function, and
depending how vpopmail was compiled that function looks inside cdb or
mysql.
Is there a huge difference between
On Thu, 2004-04-29 at 17:49, Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold wrote:
On Thu, 2004-04-29 at 09:55, David wrote:
I agree, chkuser patch works with mysql, or cdb, depending how vpopmail
was compiled. The patch calls vauth_getpw vpopmail function, and
depending how vpopmail was compiled that function
At 29/04/2004 29/04/2004 -0400, you wrote:
On Thu, 2004-04-29 at 10:49, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
You may do it enabling chkuser always, deleting the lines of code checking
for that string.
You mean disable this code in qmail-smtpd.c ? :
if ( strstr(read_buf,
On Thu, 2004-04-29 at 11:59, David wrote:
No idea, never used goodrcptto patch.
Eh, well.. thanks anyways :)
I don't know much about maildrop but I found time ago this mega script,
http://mymail.alien77.com/maildropMEGAEXAMPLE
I'm pretty sure it will help many people.
The guy who wrote
On Thursday 29 April 2004 09:49 am, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
P.S. I'm studying for version 2.0 of chkuser, this could be another issue.
please make it not suck (like the current one does), that's all I ask.
-Jeremy
--
Jeremy Kitchen ++ Systems Administrator ++ Inter7 Internet Technologies,
Jeremy,
why does the actual suck?
It's the first time I hear that.
Tonino
At 29/04/2004 29/04/2004 -0500, you wrote:
On Thursday 29 April 2004 09:49 am, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
P.S. I'm studying for version 2.0 of chkuser, this could be another issue.
please make it not suck (like the
tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
Jeremy,
why does the actual suck?
It's the first time I hear that.
Tonino
At 29/04/2004 29/04/2004 -0500, you wrote:
On Thursday 29 April 2004 09:49 am, tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
P.S. I'm studying for version 2.0 of chkuser, this could be another
issue.
please
Thought I'd share this tip with the crowd...
The chkuser patch, which ensures an address is valid in the given domain
before accepting a message, would be defeated if you simply replace your
vdelivermail line with a Maildrop delivery line in .qmail-default.
After taking a peek at how the chkuser
söndagen den 4 april 2004 20.45 skrev Ron Guerin:
Thought I'd share this tip with the crowd...
The chkuser patch, which ensures an address is valid in the given domain
before accepting a message, would be defeated if you simply replace your
vdelivermail line with a Maildrop delivery line in
14 matches
Mail list logo
