[vchkpw] incorrect work of vdelivermail

2002-11-12 Thread JUST a Tester
some days ago i add virtual domain in catch-all-mode, and found the following problems: PROBLEM #1. dot-qmail-default with contents like | /var/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail '' [EMAIL PROTECTED] produce unnecessarily Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of just Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [vchkpw] incorrect work of vdelivermail

2002-11-12 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hi JUST, On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 23:11:07 +1000 JUST a Tester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: PROBLEM #1. Normal. With e-mail-address as destination another _delivery_ is done, therefore a new 'Delivered-To:' is inserted. With directory a simple 'store' is done, therefore no new 'Delivered-To:' is added.

Re: [vchkpw] incorrect work of vdelivermail

2002-11-12 Thread Vladimir Kabanov
ok, in other words you may write: i'm wrong everywhere -- thanks for this, but i recommend you to think again about that questions, maybe opinion will change PROBLEM #1. Normal. With e-mail-address as destination another _delivery_ is done, therefore a new 'Delivered-To:' is inserted.

Re: [vchkpw] incorrect work of vdelivermail

2002-11-12 Thread Anders Brander
Hi, I think Peter answers were good for #2-4, but I would like to comment on #1. On Tuesday 12 November 2002 14:11, JUST a Tester wrote: PROBLEM #1. dot-qmail-default with contents like | /var/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail '' [EMAIL PROTECTED] produce unnecessarily Delivered-To: [EMAIL

Re: [vchkpw] incorrect work of vdelivermail

2002-11-12 Thread Vladimir Kabanov
don't you forget: we are speaking about catch-all-mode domain? - Original Message - From: Anders Brander [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 12:11 AM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] incorrect work of vdelivermail Hi, I think Peter answers were good for #2

Re: [vchkpw] incorrect work of vdelivermail

2002-11-12 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hi Vladimir, On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 23:59:54 +1000 Vladimir Kabanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ok, in other words you may write: i'm wrong everywhere -- thanks for this, No. #2 I couldn't (and can't) say anything about. So not everywhere. but i recommend you to think again about that

Re: [vchkpw] incorrect work of vdelivermail

2002-11-12 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hi Vladimir, On Wed, 13 Nov 2002 00:15:15 +1000 Vladimir Kabanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: don't you forget: we are speaking about catch-all-mode domain? Go, figure out what 'catch-all-mode' means _in hard facts_. 'Catch all' could be achieved by simply putting

Re: [vchkpw] incorrect work of vdelivermail

2002-11-12 Thread Vladimir Kabanov
: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 12:34 AM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] incorrect work of vdelivermail Hi Vladimir, On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 23:59:54 +1000 Vladimir Kabanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ok, in other words you may write: i'm wrong everywhere -- thanks for this, No. #2 I couldn't (and can't

Re: [vchkpw] incorrect work of vdelivermail

2002-11-12 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hi Vladimir, On Wed, 13 Nov 2002 00:49:44 +1000 Vladimir Kabanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ok, thanks for comments! when i start to type that list of problems, i already been prepared to do work myself, as it will be no interest for everyone, including problem with unupdated quotas... That's

Re: [vchkpw] incorrect work of vdelivermail

2002-11-12 Thread Vladimir Kabanov
that another and long story about my contribution experience for better vpopmail. - Original Message - From: Peter Palmreuther [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 12:56 AM Subject: Re: [vchkpw] incorrect work of vdelivermail Hi Vladimir, On Wed