Ben Beuchler wrote:
Is anyone still maintaining the PAM patch? We are considering some
changes to our user management and authenticating against PAM would sure
be helpful...
It's not being maintained in the traditional sense (ie, I'm not
releasing a pam patch for each vpopmail release).
Dear Ken
I went along to check the vpopmail website (as I seem to have missed the
4.6.1 annouce) and saw this:
We have removed the vpopmail source code. We
appologize for this unfortunuate incident. Unfortuntately,
there are abusive people on the internet who hope to
restrict the free
Hello:
I met a problem when I installed qmail 1.03 on FreeBSD 4.2release.
I input ' csh -cf '/var/qmail/rc ', qmail runs well.
I add 'smtp stream tcp nowait qmaild /var/qmail/bin/tcp-env tcp-env
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd' to inetd.conf.
It only open smtp port.
How can I let
If the source is provided then how is the dissemination of the code being
restricted? It seems to me that if you don't provide the code then you are
the ones restricting the free code.
Nice way to kill your user base.
From: Greg Cope [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 10:46:27 +
It looks like it's not the only thing to go, vqsignup and
qmailadmin are missing too!! Please tell us what's going on!
David
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Greg Cope wrote:
Dear Ken
I went along to check the vpopmail website (as I seem to have missed the
4.6.1 annouce) and saw this:
We have
Greg Cope wrote:
Dear Ken
I went along to check the vpopmail website (as I seem to have missed the
4.6.1 annouce) and saw this:
We have removed the vpopmail source code. We
appologize for this unfortunuate incident. Unfortuntately,
there are abusive people on the internet who hope to
smtpstream tcp nowait qmaild /var/qmail/bin/tcp-env -r
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
worked for me in inetd.conf !
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, oneflower wrote:
Hello:
I met a problem when I installed qmail 1.03 on FreeBSD 4.2release.
I input ' csh -cf '/var/qmail/rc ', qmail
My only response to that is to laugh. Breaking the law? It would change
the licensing from GNU, but an author as the choice to distribute their
code or not.
Please read up before posting such uninformed statements. Ken is very
generous to provide the tools and source code that him and Inter7
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My only response to that is to laugh. Breaking the law? It would change
the licensing from GNU, but an author as the choice to distribute their
code or not.
Please read up before posting such uninformed statements. Ken is very
generous to provide the tools and
Ken, your software kicks ass! I use vpopmail all over the place without
problems. Qmailadmin works great too, it could use a little tweaking still
:-) but don't let them get to you, they have the problem.
Dave
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Ken Jones wrote:
I'm sorry.
The source code will be put
Heres one way...
1. tar or rsync ~vpopmail onto new machine
2. dump the database using mysqldump ( mysqldump --add-drop-table -u root -p
vpopmail vpopmail_dump.sql )
3. load the dump into the new machines mysql instance ( mysql -u vpopmail -p
vpopmail vpopmail_dump.sql )
Heres what I have
* Ken Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Greg Cope wrote:
I went along to check the vpopmail website (as I seem to have missed
the 4.6.1 annouce) and saw this:
| We have removed the vpopmail source code.
[...]
Can you shed some light ?
[...]
Unfortunatly, i was conversing with people on
Unless it is his own code in which case he has the perogative to change the
licenses as he sees fit. This is the case here I believe. My only point
was that to hold back the source in protest of attempts to block the flow of
the source seems to be a bit circular to me and playing into the hands
dG wrote:
Unless it is his own code in which case he has the perogative to change the
licenses as he sees fit. This is the case here I believe. My only point
was that to hold back the source in protest of attempts to block the flow of
the source seems to be a bit circular to me and playing
OK, he might have gone a little far removing the source, but when shit
happens it's good to get positiv feedback.
I do definitely agree. We have built a really nice web/mail system based on
vpopmail which is usefull for thousands of people. We do support you, Ken
:)))
thanx for all, daniel
I agree with the Vpopmail/Qmailadmin system. It is very excellent system
and it got better. The only thing I think would be lacking is a little help
menu added to the Qmailadmin system so that we can be less burdened by the
users using them when the help system is available there.
"Michael T. Babcock" wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My only response to that is to laugh. Breaking the law? It would change
the licensing from GNU, but an author as the choice to distribute their
code or not.
Please read up before posting such uninformed statements. Ken is very
Ken (et al),
First, and foremost, why do you care what the script kiddies on #openbsd say
about your code? Seriously. Most of the people that loiter around on irc
channels are either extremely competent people who have gravy jobs and can
sit around and talk about all the cool stuff they've done.
Ken, as I've said in a few messages to both you directly and to this list, I
REALLY DO APPRECIATE YOUR EFFORTS/PROGRAMS!! Please don't let the
comments of some childish wanna-be script kiddies bother you. They are
trolls. You have a great group of followers here on this re-mailer that do
I'd really really love to see the POP3 'Index' feature
make it's way into the forwarding accounts list. I
have hundreds of forwards on one domain but only about
10 pop3's, so the index is in the wrong place for me. :-)
Dave
Matt,
THAT is exactly what i have been looking for. I have come across several
but nothing that compares.
I will be using it tonight.
David
Vpopmail users have a vested interest in the code. Some of us appreciate
that it's open source. I've gone through quite a bit of effort to help
We just recently became aware of a post to the vpopmail
mailing list which described us as removing our software
from the internet due to a conflict with other persons.
We're not sure yet where this message originated from,
but we're looking into it. The software was down due
to a disk change,
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [001207 13:22]:
We just recently became aware of a post to the vpopmail
mailing list which described us as removing our software
from the internet due to a conflict with other persons.
We're not sure yet where this message originated from,
but we're
Peter Green wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [001207 13:22]:
We just recently became aware of a post to the vpopmail
mailing list which described us as removing our software
from the internet due to a conflict with other persons.
We're not sure yet where this message
iam asking that
make sure path is correct
if its installed RPM
it will be in ../lib directory
- Original Message -
From: Dan Phoenix [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: oneflower [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: vinient [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000
give me some more information
find the files where the mysql client files are installed
areu installed RPM or TAR
- Original Message -
From: oneflower [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vinient [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 10:27 AM
I applied the fix mentioned below but with no success. I downloaded
the updated version of vpopmail, recompiled and installed it. I
then recompiled vqsignup and copied the vqsignup.cgi file to
/cgi-bin/ directory and tested. Still got a blank page. All the
other error pages show up except
Unfortunatly, i was conversing with people on #efnet on the
openbsd channel, and they insulted me deeply. I can not
begin to describe how deeply I was offeneded. It was not
one thing or another thing, just the small attitudes of
a small group of people.
I guess i should be paying
There's no fix required. In signup.conf, you must provide a full
path to the directory containing the success.html, as well
as any other template files specified.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Martin Fienkeng wrote:
I applied the fix mentioned below but with no success. I downloaded
the updated
I've talked with Ken and we're investigating the source
of that message. Parts of the website were down while
we switched a disk, and power cycled. Our pre-configured
404 message is to redirect to our main site, so any attempts
to download missing files, or go to missing portions of the
site
Please excuse this message if it has been asked before but as I just got
onto the list I don't know the answer. I wish to preform authentication
against the virtual user database in PHP but it only supports cdb v0.55 and
not cdb0.75. Every time I try to access the database, I get massive errors.
Hmm. Yes, that's how it should look. Sounds like
there may be another problem somewhere. Check
the permissions and make sure the CGI is SUID vpopmail,
and that the vpopmail user has read access to the
templates.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Martin Fienkeng wrote:
I did that. The the line with
Is anyone still maintaining the PAM patch? We are considering some
changes to our user management and authenticating against PAM would sure
be helpful...
It's not being maintained in the traditional sense (ie, I'm not
releasing a pam patch for each vpopmail release). The patch should
Michael Bell wrote:
Please excuse this message if it has been asked before but as I just got
onto the list I don't know the answer. I wish to preform authentication
against the virtual user database in PHP but it only supports cdb v0.55 and
not cdb0.75. Every time I try to access the
Thanks man,
Thanks for what you said below. I think I need a 2 day vactation ;]
I shouldn't let folks like that get to me.
clear skies.. blue lakes.. my girlfriend ;]
wow, i actually feel alot better.
Thanks
Ken
Chris Bunnell wrote:
Ken, as I've said in a few messages to both you
Hey,
Having a problem getting vpopmail to autheticate for "default domain"
users - sending just a username (without the %domain) doesn't seem to
work. Sending the full user%domain does, btw.
I have configured with the --enable-default-domain option and also
tried linking the users dir to the
What version of vpopmail are you running, and did you do
--enable-default-domain=phoenixdsl.com?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brendan Wood wrote:
Hey,
Having a problem getting vpopmail to autheticate for "default domain"
users - sending just a username (without the %domain) doesn't seem to
work.
hi can some tell me how to join #qmail
38 matches
Mail list logo
