My only response to that is to laugh. Breaking the law? It would change
the licensing from GNU, but an author as the choice to distribute their
code or not.
Please read up before posting such uninformed statements. Ken is very
generous to provide the tools and source code that him and Inter7 provide
to the public for free, he should be recognized for his voluntary efforts.
He is not required to distribute anything.
-Scott
Michael T. Babcock writes:
> DG wrote:
>
> > If the source is provided then how is the dissemination of the code being
> > restricted? It seems to me that if you don't provide the code then you are
> > the ones restricting the free code.
>
> That and breaking the law -- distributing binaries without access to source
> code.
>
