"Michael T. Babcock" wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > My only response to that is to laugh. Breaking the law? It would change
> > the licensing from GNU, but an author as the choice to distribute their
> > code or not.
> >
> > Please read up before posting such uninformed statements. Ken is very
> > generous to provide the tools and source code that him and Inter7 provide
> > to the public for free, he should be recognized for his voluntary efforts.
> > He is not required to distribute anything.
>
> I am quite happy that Ken has decided to GPL his code, but he cannot remove the
> license from his software. He is free to distribute future versions under other
> licenses, but may not remove the license stipulations from older versions.
Yes, the license is not removed. Nor could it be removed.
Just the source download was removed tonight.
We (or me) have no plans to distribute any other licence.
However, we are looking into a news story, that describes
what people go through using open source code.
If anyone has any thing to contribute, thier
experiences or whatever...
I think it would be really interesting for me
and others to hear.
Ken Jones
