Re: Removal of the Source Code ?

[Michael T. Babcock]

dG wrote:

> Unless it is his own code in which case he has the perogative to change the
> licenses as he sees fit.  This is the case here I believe.  My only point
> was that to hold back the source in protest of attempts to block the flow of
> the source seems to be a bit circular to me and playing into the hands of
> the "bad guys".

That's exactly what I was seeing -- and was pointing out the stipulations of the
GPL since it seems that Ken inherited the project to some degree and is not the
author of all of the code distributed (and therefore doesn't have any special
rights over the source code package).