Unless it is his own code in which case he has the perogative to change the
licenses as he sees fit. This is the case here I believe. My only point
was that to hold back the source in protest of attempts to block the flow of
the source seems to be a bit circular to me and playing into the hands of
the "bad guys".
Now it seems that the code was held due to Ken getting his feelings hurt.
David
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael T. Babcock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "DG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "vchkpw / vpopmail mailing list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2000 9:14 AM
Subject: Re: Removal of the Source Code ?
> DG wrote:
>
> > If the source is provided then how is the dissemination of the code
being
> > restricted? It seems to me that if you don't provide the code then you
are
> > the ones restricting the free code.
>
> That and breaking the law -- distributing binaries without access to
source
> code.
>
