Re: [vchkpw] vchkpw and courier 2.2.2 (probably a bug)

2004-01-13 Thread Michael Bowe
> Original Message - > From: "Andrea Riela" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Well, Michael, now it partially works. > > I send my test to you: > > observe# openssl s_client -connect 127.0.0.1:995 > CONNECTED(0004) > depth=0 /C=US/ST=NY/L=New York/O=Courier Mail > Server/OU=Automatically-genera

[vchkpw] Ucspi-ssl?

2004-01-13 Thread Andrea Riela
Hi folks, Have you ever been using ucspi-ssl to connect to pop3 service with ssl? I've tested that, and it works fine with vchkpw. The problem is the roaming: after the pop3 connection (with ssl), I look my /home/vpopmail/etc: the open-smtp is blank, and I've a lot .tmp files (one for one connecti

RE: [vchkpw] vchkpw and courier 2.2.2 (probably a bug)

2004-01-13 Thread Andrea Riela
> I should have a patch available soon Well, Michael, now it partially works. I send my test to you: observe# openssl s_client -connect 127.0.0.1:995 CONNECTED(0004) depth=0 /C=US/ST=NY/L=New York/O=Courier Mail Server/OU=Automatically-generated POP3 SSL key/CN=localhost/[EMAIL PROTECTED] -

Re: [vchkpw] spam assassin enable/disable per domain flag

2004-01-13 Thread Dave Weiner
On Tuesday 13 January 2004 02:47 pm, Ken Jones wrote: > Do you mean: > 1) site wide configuration: call spamc with no -u option > 2) domain: call spamc with -u domainname > 3) user: spamc -u [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I've got it running now with 1) and 3) but not sure if it can do 2). If you're using

Re: [vchkpw] spam assassin enable/disable per domain flag

2004-01-13 Thread Japheth Cleaver
I'm actually doing something like this already. We've patched vdelivermail to leave files in the user's Maildir/tmp if an environment variable is set. That variable is the name of a program to run with a set of arguments detailing the user, domain, size, and filename that we've stored. Said pro

Re: [vchkpw] spam assassin enable/disable per domain flag

2004-01-13 Thread Anthony Baratta
At 11:47 AM 1/13/2004, Ken Jones wrote: Do you mean: 1) site wide configuration: call spamc with no -u option 2) domain: call spamc with -u domainname 3) user: spamc -u [EMAIL PROTECTED] I've got it running now with 1) and 3) but not sure if it can do 2). Yes. I would assume that this is all confi

Re: [vchkpw] spam assassin enable/disable per domain flag

2004-01-13 Thread Ken Jones
On Tuesday 13 January 2004 1:40 pm, Anthony Baratta wrote: > At 11:06 AM 1/13/2004, Ken Jones wrote: > >The idea would be to have a file checked by vdelivermail. > >If spam assassin is enabled, vdelivermail calls spamc > >before dropping the email into the users Maildir. > >Then the setup would be

Re: [vchkpw] spam assassin enable/disable per domain flag

2004-01-13 Thread Anthony Baratta
At 11:06 AM 1/13/2004, Ken Jones wrote: The idea would be to have a file checked by vdelivermail. If spam assassin is enabled, vdelivermail calls spamc before dropping the email into the users Maildir. Then the setup would be backwardly compatible with current sites. And they could enable/disable

RE: [vchkpw] OT: BincImap +vpopmail +squirrelmail

2004-01-13 Thread Shane Chrisp
To clear up how I got it to work for anyone who may search the archives or google for the problem... I setup Bincimap-1.2.3 with the following options: I configured with --prefix=/usr/local on redhat linux 7.3. /usr/local/etc/bincimap.conf has these changes. Security { jail path = "/usr/lo

[vchkpw] spam assassin enable/disable per domain flag

2004-01-13 Thread Ken Jones
I was wondering where the best place to put a domain wide enable/disable flag for spamassassin would be. What do you folks think? The idea would be to have a file checked by vdelivermail. If spam assassin is enabled, vdelivermail calls spamc before dropping the email into the users Maildir. Then

RE: [vchkpw] OT: BincImap +vpopmail +squirrelmail

2004-01-13 Thread Shane Chrisp
Nevermind, I finally figured it out. Shane >-Original Message- >From: Shane Chrisp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, 14 January 2004 1:36 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [vchkpw] OT: BincImap +vpopmail +squirrelmail > >Hi All, > > Is there anyone else on the list using squ

[vchkpw] OT: BincImap +vpopmail +squirrelmail

2004-01-13 Thread Shane Chrisp
Hi All, Is there anyone else on the list using squirrelmail with Binc and vpopmail? Ive got Binc working nicely with vpopmail, but I cannot get vpopmail to play nicely. I was just wondering what settings you have for your IMAP server and in your folders section. Email me directly if you want to k

Re: [vchkpw] Working SMTP-AUTH-CRAM-MD5 after applied vchkpw.c.diff

2004-01-13 Thread Tom Collins
On Jan 13, 2004, at 10:13 AM, David Hubbard wrote: From: Tom Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Jan 13, 2004, at 9:00 AM, Dean Henrichsmeyer wrote: I applied this vchkpw.c.diff patch from http://www.fehcom.de/qmail/smtpauth.html and CRAM-MD5 authentication seems to be working (of course I also ap

RE: [vchkpw] Working SMTP-AUTH-CRAM-MD5 after applied vchkpw.c.diff

2004-01-13 Thread David Hubbard
From: Tom Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Jan 13, 2004, at 9:00 AM, Dean Henrichsmeyer wrote: > >> I applied this vchkpw.c.diff patch from > >> http://www.fehcom.de/qmail/smtpauth.html and CRAM-MD5 > >> authentication seems to be working (of course I also > >> applied the smtp-auth patc

Re: [vchkpw] Working SMTP-AUTH-CRAM-MD5 after applied vchkpw.c.diff

2004-01-13 Thread Tom Collins
On Jan 13, 2004, at 9:00 AM, Dean Henrichsmeyer wrote: I applied this vchkpw.c.diff patch from http://www.fehcom.de/qmail/smtpauth.html and CRAM-MD5 authentication seems to be working (of course I also applied the smtp-auth patch to qmail). Can we get this worked into 5.4.0? :) It's already in CVS

Re: [vchkpw] More on clearopensmtp [FIXED]

2004-01-13 Thread Tom Collins
On Jan 11, 2004, at 10:31 AM, Alejandro Aguilar Sierra wrote: In a recent post, Tom Collins wrote that the bug causing IPs with the ":::" prefix in open-smtp had been fixed in 5.4-rc1. However, I got the same problem with 5.4.-rc1 and courier-imap-2.2.1. I fixed it after this hack to vpopmail.c

Re: [vchkpw] Working SMTP-AUTH-CRAM-MD5 after applied vchkpw.c.diff

2004-01-13 Thread Dean Henrichsmeyer
On Jan 12, 2004, at 4:39 PM, Alejandro Aguilar Sierra wrote: Hello: I applied this vchkpw.c.diff patch from http://www.fehcom.de/qmail/smtpauth.html and CRAM-MD5 authentication seems to be working (of course I also applied the smtp-auth patch to qmail). Can we get this worked into 5.4.0? :) Tha

Re: [vchkpw] vchkpw and courier 2.2.1 (long)

2004-01-13 Thread Tom Collins
On Jan 13, 2004, at 2:16 AM, Andrea Riela wrote: After the "make install-strip" (vpopmail/cdb) I've: -L/home/vpopmail/lib -lvpopmail If I add '-crypt' after, and compile courier-imap, I've an error and I couldn't install it. Without '-lcrypt', the installation is completed. Well, what could I do?

RE: [vchkpw] vchkpw and courier 2.2.2 (probably a bug)

2004-01-13 Thread Andrea Riela
Andrea Riela wrote: > 18592 authvchkpw CALL fcntl(0x3,0x3,0) > 18592 authvchkpw RET fcntl -1 errno 9 Bad file descriptor Well, I've seen that MrSam has released another 2.2.2 version (20040112). In the changelog there isn't our bug, but MrSam says that "This build fixes all reported bugs". I

RE: [vchkpw] vchkpw and courier 2.2.1 (long)

2004-01-13 Thread Andrea Riela
Michael Bowe wrote: > You shouldnt need to manually edit this file... It should be > auto-populated when you run "make install-strip" After the "make install-strip" (vpopmail/cdb) I've: -L/home/vpopmail/lib -lvpopmail If I add '-crypt' after, and compile courier-imap, I've an error and I couldn'