On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Tom Collins wrote:
> Tom Collins
> - Fix vsetuserquota() to write properly formatted quota to
>maildirsize file.
Hi Tom,
Can you elaborate on what that fix does and what problems it addressed?
Thanks,
Charles
> From: Ken Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On Friday 12 March 2004 5:54 am, CoyoteTM wrote:
> > What is enable-make-seekable and disable-make-seekable ?
> >
> > What is the difference? Which is prefered ?
>
> It makes the file descriptor that qmail-local hands to
> vdelivermail seekable. By de
On Fri, 2004-03-12 at 14:53, X-Istence wrote:
> >>The BSD code had a hard set limit, with the --enable-spam-threshold=15,
> >>which means that anything over 15 would get DELETED, and not just
> >>tagged, which is what SA does normally.
> > does normally? SA is only used for tagging mail. You
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
On Fri, 2004-03-12 at 14:35, X-Istence wrote:
Ken Jones wrote:
On Friday 12 March 2004 6:35 am, Cristiano Deana wrote:
Il giorno Friday 12 March 2004 12:53, X-Istence mi scriveva:
Now spam threshold is hardcoded with --enable-spam-threshold=15
shouldn't be better to put
On Fri, 2004-03-12 at 14:35, X-Istence wrote:
> Ken Jones wrote:
> > On Friday 12 March 2004 6:35 am, Cristiano Deana wrote:
> >
> >>Il giorno Friday 12 March 2004 12:53, X-Istence mi scriveva:
> >>
> Now spam threshold is hardcoded with --enable-spam-threshold=15
> shouldn't be better to
Ken Jones wrote:
On Friday 12 March 2004 6:35 am, Cristiano Deana wrote:
Il giorno Friday 12 March 2004 12:53, X-Istence mi scriveva:
Now spam threshold is hardcoded with --enable-spam-threshold=15
shouldn't be better to put it in vlimits.default?
I think this should be made an option, if it is n
On Fri, 2004-03-12 at 13:01, Shouguan Lin wrote:
> Is it possible not to hard code the header?
> CRM114 just like SA can add a header like "X-CRM114-Status: SPAM" for
> identified spam emails. If the header is not hard coded, then vpopmail can
> work with both SA and CRM114 or other spam filters.
Is it possible not to hard code the header?
CRM114 just like SA can add a header like "X-CRM114-Status: SPAM" for
identified spam emails. If the header is not hard coded, then vpopmail can
work with both SA and CRM114 or other spam filters.
Thanks,
Shouguan Lin
- Original Message -
Fr
On Thursday 11 March 2004 6:31 pm, Nick Harring wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 16:48, Chris Ess wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Ken Jones wrote:
> > > On Thursday 11 March 2004 4:22 pm, Tom Collins wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > > I'm not sure that there's a need to disable the shared library opti
On Friday 12 March 2004 5:54 am, CoyoteTM wrote:
> What is enable-make-seekable and disable-make-seekable ?
>
> What is the difference? Which is prefered ?
It makes the file descriptor that qmail-local hands to
vdelivermail seekable. By default it's not seekable.
Making it seekable means vdeliverm
On Friday 12 March 2004 6:35 am, Cristiano Deana wrote:
> Il giorno Friday 12 March 2004 12:53, X-Istence mi scriveva:
> > > Now spam threshold is hardcoded with --enable-spam-threshold=15
> > > shouldn't be better to put it in vlimits.default?
> >
> > I think this should be made an option, if it i
I just want to apologize for not digging enough before mailing the list.
By searching around I got things to work perfectly by patching qmail.
SMTP AUTH seems to work fine with vchkpw now.
\Stefan
> -Ursprungligt meddelande-
> Från: Stefan Gudmundsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Skickat
Hi list,
once again I'm searching for a fully functional solution for my quota
problem with maildrop.
My setup looks like this: User has a .qmail file, containing
|preline /usr/bin/maildrop maildropfile
I tried some solutions I found on the list, but each has its
disadvantages:
1.) deliverquota:
Il giorno Friday 12 March 2004 12:53, X-Istence mi scriveva:
> > Now spam threshold is hardcoded with --enable-spam-threshold=15
> > shouldn't be better to put it in vlimits.default?
> I think this should be made an option, if it is not set, look for
> vlimits.default, if it is set, then use it h
What is enable-make-seekable and disable-make-seekable ?
What is the difference? Which is prefered ?
thanks
CoyoteTM
Cristiano Deana wrote:
Now spam threshold is hardcoded with --enable-spam-threshold=15
shouldn't be better to put it in vlimits.default?
I think this should be made an option, if it is not set, look for
vlimits.default, if it is set, then use it hard coded, i prefer that as
i dont want vdeliverm
Now spam threshold is hardcoded with --enable-spam-threshold=15
shouldn't be better to put it in vlimits.default?
--
Cristiano Deana - FreeCRIS
"Ho iniziato a usare FreeBSD perche' m$ usava me. ed e' spiacevole"
pgp public key: http://freecris.bmm.it/cris.asc
in irc su: irc.azzurra.org #freebsd-
17 matches
Mail list logo
