[vchkpw] Anti-Spam Challenge Systems

2006-12-15 Thread Joshua Megerman
This is an open letter to everyone on the vchkpw list, though I freely admit that it's primarily targetted at a single individual: If you send a message to the list asking for someone to send you something, and you have an anti-spam challenge filter on your incoming mail, don't expect to ever get

[vchkpw] Re: vpopmail sans qmail.

2006-12-15 Thread Robin Bowes
Darrel O'Pry wrote: > I'm currently considering replacing qmail in my mail systems. > > I was wondering if anyone had tried vpopmail with postfix or exim and > what their experiences were. > > I'd like to make the mail server change without changing my user > management tool set. I've got too muc

Re: [vchkpw] 5.4.17 patches

2006-12-15 Thread Remo Mattei
Hi Joshua I would like to know if I could use the plugin for squirrelmail. Thanks, Remo Joshua Megerman wrote: > Well I use the SQL backend for almost everything, including simple > delivery aliases, but I also use .qmail files for a variety of reasons: > > 1) While I want the ability to store a

Re: [vchkpw] 5.4.17 patches

2006-12-15 Thread Joshua Megerman
> On 2006-12-15, at 1144, Rick Widmer wrote: >> John Simpson wrote: >>> On 2006-12-13, at 0211, Rick Widmer wrote: Extra credit if the addresses are sorted like the /var/qmail/ congrol files so domains sort together. >>> >>> not unless every single line in the .qmail file is an addr

Re: [vchkpw] 5.4.17 patches

2006-12-15 Thread John Simpson
On 2006-12-15, at 1144, Rick Widmer wrote: John Simpson wrote: On 2006-12-13, at 0211, Rick Widmer wrote: Extra credit if the addresses are sorted like the /var/qmail/ congrol files so domains sort together. not unless every single line in the .qmail file is an address. The way I see it

[vchkpw] vpopmail sans qmail.

2006-12-15 Thread Darrel O'Pry
I'm currently considering replacing qmail in my mail systems. I was wondering if anyone had tried vpopmail with postfix or exim and what their experiences were. I'd like to make the mail server change without changing my user management tool set. I've got too much tied to vpopmail. .darrel.

Re: [vchkpw] .vpopmail-* instead of .qmail-*

2006-12-15 Thread Jeremy Kister
On 12/15/2006 1:05 PM, John Simpson wrote: i think the ones created within a mailbox's directory should be called ".vpopmail-*", while the ones in the domain's directory (which ARE processed by qmail-local) should be left the way they are. I couldn't agree more. in general i think the idea of

Re: [vchkpw] .vpopmail-* instead of .qmail-*

2006-12-15 Thread John Simpson
On 2006-12-13, at 0036, Rick Widmer wrote: One of the biggest complaints against vpopmail heard on the qmail mailing list is the fact that it uses files kind of like .qmail files, that are not interpreted by qmail-local, yet it names them .qmail*. actually, if the file is located in the

Re: [vchkpw] 5.4.17 patches

2006-12-15 Thread Rick Widmer
John Simpson wrote: On 2006-12-13, at 0211, Rick Widmer wrote: Extra credit if the addresses are sorted like the /var/qmail/ congrol files so domains sort together. not unless every single line in the .qmail file is an address. The way I see it without a sequence field and order by clau

Re: [vchkpw] 5.4.17 patches

2006-12-15 Thread John Simpson
On 2006-12-13, at 0211, Rick Widmer wrote: For the SQL back end we should add a sequence field with a default value of 0. When retrieving the valias lines they should be ORDER BY Sequence, Address. exactly. Extra credit if the addresses are sorted like the /var/qmail/ congrol files so d